Preferences of physicians for treatment-related toxicity vs. recurrence in melanoma (GERMELATOX-A): the doctors' perspective

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD1-antibodies (ICI) ± CTLA4-antibodies (cICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT), has shown a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for high-risk melanoma patients. However, due to specific side effects, the choice of treatment is often influenced by the risk of toxicity. Therefore, the role of physicians in treatment decisions of patients is crucial. This study investigated for the first time in a multicenter setting the attitudes and preferences of dermatooncologists in Germany and Switzerland regarding adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI and TT.

METHODS

In the GERMELATOX-A study, 108 physicians (median age: 32 yrs, 67.6% female) from 11 skin cancer centers were surveyed to rate typical side effect scenarios of (c)ICI and TT treatments and then compared to patients' ratings evaluated in a previous analysis from the same centers. The scenarios described mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and included melanoma relapse leading to death. The physicians were asked about the level of side effects they would tolerate in exchange for a reduction in melanoma relapse and an increase in survival at 5 years.

RESULTS

The preferences of physicians and patients revealed significant differences regarding adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT (p < 0.05). Compared to patients, physicians tend to value a melanoma relapse less severe, according to a visual analog scale. They were also less threatened by all scenarios of side effects during adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI or TT, compared to patients. Physicians required lower risk reductions for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for both ICI and TT and their drug-related side effects to accept these treatments. In case of severe side effects, physicians required similar 5-year DFS rates for ICI and TT (60-65%), while patients needed a 15% improvement of 5-year DFS for ICI compared to TT (80%/65%). For survival, physicians expected an OS improvement of + 10% for all three treatment modalities, whereas patients required a higher increase: + 18-22% for ICI and + 15% for TT.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the importance of understanding the patient's perspective and a potential difference to the doctor's view when making decisions about adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT, especially as these treatments are increasingly being implemented in earlier stages.

Preferences of German and Swiss melanoma patients for toxicities versus melanoma recurrence during adjuvant treatment (GERMELATOX-A-trial)

PURPOSE

Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1-antibodies (ICI) ± CTLA4-antibodies (cICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT) in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrate a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS). Due to specific side effects, the choice of treatment is very often driven by the risk for toxicity. This study addressed for the first time in a multicenter setting the attitudes and preferences of melanoma patients for adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI and TT.

METHODS

In this study ("GERMELATOX-A"), 136 low-risk melanoma patients from 11 skin cancer centers were asked to rate side effect scenarios typical for each (c)ICI and TT with mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and melanoma recurrence leading to cancer death. We asked patients about the reduction in melanoma relapse and the survival increase at 5 years they would require to tolerate defined side-effects.

RESULTS

By VAS, patients on average valued melanoma relapse worse than all scenarios of side-effects during treatment with (c)ICI or TT. In case of severe side effects, patients required a 15% higher rate of DFS at 5 years for (c)ICI (80%) compared to TT (65%). For survival, patients required an increase of 5-10% for melanoma survival during (c)ICI (85%/80%) compared to TT (75%).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a pronounced variation of patient preferences for toxicity and outcomes and a clear preference for TT. As adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT will be increasingly implemented in earlier stages, precise knowledge of the patient perspective can be helpful for decision making.

The GERMELATOX-A (Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group): Study attitude of German melanoma patients towards toxicity during adjuvant treatment

e21597

Background: Trials of adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1-antibodies (ICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT) in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrate a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) with a very similar relative risk reduction. Both treatment modalities are characterized by specific side effects. Therefore the decision for or against a treatment modality is very often driven by the risk for toxicity. This study addressed for the first time the attitudes and preferences of German and Swiss patients and physicians for adjuvant treatment with ICI and TT. Methods: In this multicenter study („GERMELATOX-A“) patients with low-risk melanoma (pT1a, AJCC stage I, familiar with cancer diagnosis but no adjuvant treatment planned), and dermatooncologists from 11 German and 1 Swiss skin cancer centers were asked to fill out a questionnaire. Here, side effect scenarios typical for each ICI and TT with mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and also melanoma recurrence leading to cancer death were described. We asked patients and physicians about the reduction in melanoma relapse (relapse-free survival, RFS) and the survival increase (overall survival, OS) at 5 yrs they would expect to tolerate defined side-effects. Results: Data were obtained from 136/107 patients/physicians, respectively (median age: 59 yrs/32 yrs, 56.2%/67.6% female).Overall, by visual analog scale, patients valued a melanoma relapse worse than all scenarios of side-effects during adjuvant treatment with ICI or TT. In general patients required higher risk reductions for DFS and OS for both ICI and TT and their drug related side effects compared to physicians to accept this treatment. In case of severe side effects, patients needed a 20% higher reduction of relapse rate at 5 yrs for ICI compared to TT (71.4%/50.0%). Physicians required identical relapse reduction rates for ICI and TT in case of severe side effects (42.9%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated a pronounced variation of German and Swiss patient preferences on adjuvant treatment related to drug class specific side effects and outcomes and a clear difference between patients' and physicians' attitudes. This difference might influence decision making for adjuvant treatment options and should therefore also be investigated in further trials for current adjuvant treatment modalities. As adjuvant melanoma treatment with ICI and TT will possibly be implemented in earlier stages soon, precise knowledge of the patient perspective can be helpful for the process of decision making.