Periostin, tenascin, osteopontin isoforms in long- and non-long survival patients with pancreatic cancer: a pilot study

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most frequent histological type of malignancy in the pancreas. Extracellular matrix (ECM), plays a critical role during the process of human carcinogenesis and the possible diversity in matricellular proteins composition of ECM may have a significant impact on the clinical course of PDAC. Aim of this paper was to evaluate the expression of three matricellular proteins, including Periostin (POSTN), Tenascin (TNS) and Osteopontin (OPN), in PDAC from long-survival (LS) and non-long survival (NLS) patients. A total of 30 PDAC were analyzed, 15 from patients that survived more than 60 months after surgery (LS) and 15 that died from the disease within 24 (NLS). RNA was extracted and OPN, TNS and POSTN mRNA levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR. LS and NLS samples showed the same type of POSTN and TN isoforms. On the contrary, OPN seems to be preferentially expressed in NLS PDAC. Moreover, OPNb and OPNc isoforms were expressed exclusively in NLS samples. In conclusion, Our data led to hypothesize a possible relationship between the expression of different isoforms of each of these proteins and the clinical outcome of patients with PDAC.

BRAF Exon 15 Mutations in Papillary Carcinoma and Adjacent Thyroid Parenchyma: A Search for the Early Molecular Events Associated with Tumor Development

BRAF exon 15 mutations are the most common molecular alterations found in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). To date, there is no information regarding BRAF alterations in the thyroid parenchyma surrounding the tumor. To explore the early events associated with the development of PTC, we used massively parallel sequencing to investigate BRAF exon 15 in 30 PTCs and in 100 samples from the thyroid parenchyma surrounding the tumor. BRAF p.V600E was identified in 19/30 PTCs (63.3%). BRAF p.V600E mutations were identified in the tissue adjacent the PTC only in samples containing psammoma bodies. The other samples were either BRAF wild type (WT) or carried BRAF non p.V600E mutations. Specifically, BRAF p.G593D, -p.A598T, -p.V600M, -p.R603Q, -p.S607F, and -p.S607P were identified in 4 of 36 (11.1%) samples with follicular cell atypia, in 2 of 16 (12.5%) with follicular cell hyperplasia, and in 1 of 33 (3.0%) histologically normal samples-only in tissue surrounding BRAF p.V600E mutated PTCs. These mutations are predicted to affect protein function in silico but, in vitro, have kinase activity and BRAF phosphorylation levels similar to BRAF WT. No BRAF exon 15 mutations were identified in samples adjacent to PTCs that were BRAF WT. A mutagenic process affecting BRAF exon 15 occurs in a subset of thyroid glands that develop BRAF p.V600E mutated PTCs.

IDH1 polymorphism G105G (rs11554137) as a prognostic factor in gliomas

e14734

Background: IDH mutational status is required for diagnosis according to the 2016 WHO criteria. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs11554137 ( IDH1105GGT) at codon 105 of IDH1 has been reported in patients with several tumor types, including glioma. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of IDH1105GGT Methods: We analyzed our institutional data warehouse for consecutive patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, histologically proven grade II or Grade III gliomas. IDH sequencing was performed using the 454 GS-Junior next generation sequencer (NGS) (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany). All analyses were performed on DNA from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens. Results: The analysis included 77 pts with grade II (n = 51, 66.2%) or grade III glioma (n = 26, 33.8%). Median follow up of this study was 91 months. Patients received biopsy/partial resection/complete resection in 7.8%, 70.1% and 22.1%, respectively. Postsurgical RT and/or chemotherapy was delivered in 64.9% of pts. IDH mutations affecting codons 132 (for IDH1) and 172 (for IDH2) were found in 71 pts (92.2%). IDH1105GGTwas found in 11 pts (14.3%), mainly harboring also IDH mutations (81.8%), and was more frequent in grade 3 (30.8%) than in grade 2 gliomas (5.9%, P = 0.006). Pts harboring both IDH mutations and IDH1105GGTshowed a significantly longer progression-free survival compared with pts with IDH mutation alone (78.7 months vs 49.9 months, p = 0.041). Conclusions: IDH1105GGT represents a promising novel biomarker in IDH mutated grade 2 and 3 gliomas and warrants further investigations.

Survival outcomes in glioma patients with noncanonical IDH mutations: Beyond diagnostic improvements

2028

Background: According to the 2016 WHO classification of Central Nervous System tumors, the assessment of exon 4 mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 genes is an essential step in the characterization of gliomas. The R132H mutation is the most frequent alteration in IDH1 gene, however other non-canonical IDH mutations have been identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of IDH non-canonical mutations. Methods: We analyzed our institutional data warehouse for all consecutive patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, histologically proven grade II – IV IDH mutant gliomas. IDH sequencing was performed using the 454 GS-Junior next generation sequencer (NGS) (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany). All analyses were performed on DNA from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens. Results: The analysis included 493 pts with IDH mutations. We found 279 (56.6%) grade 2, 173 grade 3 (35.1%) gliomas, and 41 (8.3%) IDH mutant glioblastoma. Canonical IDH1 R132H mutation was found in 428 pts (86.8%). The remaining pts showed IDH2 (3.9%) or IDH 1 non-canonical mutations (mainly R132C, R132G, R132S – 9.3%). Median follow-up time was 80.5 months. Pts with non-canonical mutations showed a younger median age (32 vs 39 years, p < 0.001). Other clinical characteristics and treatments were similar across IDH groups. Median survival was 145 months (95%CI: 137.7 - 152.9) and 198.6 (95%CI 155.2– 242.1) in patients with IDH R132H and non-canonical mutations, respectively (p = 0.013). In multivariate analysis grading (p < 0.001), extent of surgery (p < 0.001), 1p19q codeletion (p = 0.003) and presence of non-canonical mutations (p = 0.022) showed a significant role for improved survival. Conclusions: Detecting non-canonical IDH1 mutations is essential for diagnosis and for prognosis in patients with gliomas. Differential enzymatic activity of non-canonical IDH1 mutations, resulting in different levels 2-hydroxyglutaratecould be the reason of improved survival.