1
|
Lewiecki EM, Czerwinski E, Recknor C, Strzelecka A, Valenzuela G, Lawrence M, Silverman S, Cardona J, Nattrass SM, Binkley N, Annett M, Pearman L, Mitlak B. Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Abaloparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized Study. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38:1404-1414. [PMID: 37417725 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Anabolic therapies, recommended for patients at very high fracture risk, are administered subcutaneously (SC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the abaloparatide microstructured transdermal system (abaloparatide-sMTS) as an alternative to the SC formulation. This phase 3, noninferiority study (NCT04064411) randomly assigned postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N = 511) 1:1 to open-label abaloparatide administered daily via abaloparatide-sMTS or SC injection for 12 months. The primary comparison between treatment groups was the percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months, with a noninferiority margin of 2.0%. Secondary endpoints included percentage change in total hip and femoral neck BMD, bone turnover markers, dermatologic safety, and new clinical fracture incidence. At 12 months, percentage increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.14% (SE: 0.46%) for abaloparatide-sMTS and 10.86% (SE: 0.48%) for abaloparatide-SC (treatment difference: -3.72% [95% confidence interval: -5.01%, -2.43%]). Percentage change in total hip BMD was 1.97% for abaloparatide-sMTS and 3.70% for abaloparatide-SC. Median changes from baseline at 12 months in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP) were 52.6% for abaloparatide-sMTS and 74.5% for abaloparatide-SC. Administration site reactions were the most frequently reported adverse events (abaloparatide-sMTS, 94.4%; abaloparatide-SC, 70.5%). Incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups. Mild or moderate skin reactions occurred with abaloparatide-sMTS with no identifiable risk factors for sensitization reactions. Few new clinical fractures occurred in either group. Noninferiority of abaloparatide-sMTS to abaloparatide-SC for percentage change in spine BMD at 12 months was not demonstrated; however, clinically meaningful increases from baseline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD were observed in both treatment groups. © 2023 Radius Health, Inc and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jose Cardona
- Indago Research & Health Center, Inc., Hialeah, FL, USA
| | | | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czerwinski E, Cardona J, Plebanski R, Recknor C, Vokes T, Saag KG, Binkley N, Lewiecki EM, Adachi J, Knychas D, Kendler D, Orwoll E, Chen Y, Pearman L, Li YH, Mitlak B. The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2435-2442. [PMID: 36190391 PMCID: PMC10091818 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Abaloparatide significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and decreased risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical fractures compared with placebo. The Abaloparatide for the Treatment of Men with Osteoporosis (ATOM; NCT03512262) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide compared with placebo in men. Eligible men aged 40 to 85 years with osteoporosis were randomized 2:1 to daily subcutaneous injections of abaloparatide 80 μg or placebo for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD. Key secondary endpoints included BMD change from baseline at the total hip and femoral neck. A total of 228 men were randomized (abaloparatide, n = 149; placebo, n = 79). Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups (mean age, 68.3 years; mean lumbar spine BMD T-score, -2.1). At 12 months, BMD gains were greater with abaloparatide compared with placebo at the lumbar spine (least squares mean percentage change [standard error]: 8.48 [0.54] versus 1.17 [0.72]), total hip (2.14 [0.27] versus 0.01 [0.35]), and femoral neck (2.98 [0.34] versus 0.15 [0.45]) (all p < 0.0001). The most common (≥5%) treatment-emergent adverse events were injection site reaction, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, bronchitis, hypertension, and headache. During 12 months of abaloparatide treatment, men with osteoporosis exhibited rapid and significant improvements in BMD with a safety profile consistent with previous studies. These results suggest abaloparatide can be considered as an effective anabolic treatment option for men with osteoporosis. © 2022 Radius Health Inc and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose Cardona
- Indago Research & Health Center, Hialeah, FL, USA
| | | | - Chris Recknor
- Center for Advanced Research & Education, Gainesville, GA, USA
| | | | - Kenneth G Saag
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, WI, USA
| | - E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | | | - David Kendler
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric Orwoll
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poole KE, Treece GM, Pearson RA, Gee AH, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Goemaere S, Grauer A, Hanley DA, Mautalen C, Recknor C, Yang YC, Rojeski M, Libanati C, Whitmarsh T. Romosozumab Enhances Vertebral Bone Structure in Women With Low Bone Density. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:256-264. [PMID: 34738660 PMCID: PMC9299688 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Romosozumab monoclonal antibody treatment works by binding sclerostin and causing rapid stimulation of bone formation while decreasing bone resorption. The location and local magnitude of vertebral bone accrual by romosozumab and how it compares to teriparatide remains to be investigated. Here we analyzed the data from a study collecting lumbar computed tomography (CT) spine scans at enrollment and 12 months post-treatment with romosozumab (210 mg sc monthly, n = 17), open-label daily teriparatide (20 μg sc, n = 19), or placebo (sc monthly, n = 20). For each of the 56 women, cortical thickness (Ct.Th), endocortical thickness (Ec.Th), cortical bone mineral density (Ct.bone mineral density (BMD)), cancellous BMD (Cn.BMD), and cortical mass surface density (CMSD) were measured across the first lumbar vertebral surface. In addition, color maps of the changes in the lumbar vertebrae structure were statistically analyzed and then visualized on the bone surface. At 12 months, romosozumab improved all parameters significantly over placebo and resulted in a mean vertebral Ct.Th increase of 10.3% versus 4.3% for teriparatide, an Ec.Th increase of 137.6% versus 47.5% for teriparatide, a Ct.BMD increase of 2.1% versus a -0.1% decrease for teriparatide, and a CMSD increase of 12.4% versus 3.8% for teriparatide. For all these measurements, the differences between romosozumab and teriparatide were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the romosozumab-associated Cn.BMD gains of 22.2% versus 18.1% for teriparatide, but both were significantly greater compared with the change in the placebo group (-4.6%, p < 0.05). Cortical maps showed the topographical locations of the increase in bone in fracture-prone areas of the vertebral shell, walls, and endplates. This study confirms widespread vertebral bone accrual with romosozumab or teriparatide treatment and provides new insights into how the rapid prevention of vertebral fractures is achieved in women with osteoporosis using these anabolic agents. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Es Poole
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Graham M Treece
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rose A Pearson
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew H Gee
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Jacques P Brown
- CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dempster DW, Zhou H, Rao SD, Recknor C, Miller PD, Leder BZ, Annett M, Ominsky MS, Mitlak BH. Early Effects of Abaloparatide on Bone Formation and Resorption Indices in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36:644-653. [PMID: 33434314 PMCID: PMC8248188 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Anabolic osteoporosis drugs improve bone mineral density by increasing bone formation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early effects of abaloparatide on indices of bone formation and to assess the effect of abaloparatide on modeling-based formation (MBF), remodeling-based formation (RBF), and overflow MBF (oMBF) in transiliac bone biopsies. In this open-label, single-arm study, 23 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were treated with 80 μg abaloparatide daily. Subjects received double fluorochrome labels before treatment and before biopsy collection at 3 months. Change in dynamic histomorphometry indices in four bone envelopes were assessed. Median mineralizing surface per unit of bone surface (MS/BS) increased to 24.7%, 48.7%, 21.4%, and 16.3% of total surface after 3 months of abaloparatide treatment, representing 5.5-, 5.2-, 2.8-, and 12.9-fold changes, on cancellous, endocortical, intracortical, and periosteal surfaces (p < .001 versus baseline for all). Mineral apposition rate (MAR) was significantly increased only on intracortical surfaces. Bone formation rate (BFR/BS) was significantly increased on all four bone envelopes. Significant increases versus baseline were observed in MBF on cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal surfaces, for oMBF on cancellous and endocortical surfaces, and for RBF on cancellous, endocortical, and intracortical surfaces. Overall, modeling-based formation (MBF + oMBF) accounted for 37% and 23% of the increase in bone-forming surface on the endocortical and cancellous surfaces, respectively. Changes from baseline in serum biomarkers of bone turnover at either month 1 or month 3 were generally good surrogates for changes in histomorphometric endpoints. In conclusion, treatment with abaloparatide for 3 months stimulated bone formation on cancellous, endocortical, intracortical, and periosteal envelopes in transiliac bone biopsies obtained from postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. These increases reflected stimulation of both remodeling- and modeling-based bone formation, further elucidating the mechanisms by which abaloparatide improves bone mass and lowers fracture risk. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hua Zhou
- Regional Bone CenterHelen Hayes HospitalWest HaverstrawNYUSA
| | - Sudhaker D Rao
- Bone & Mineral Research LaboratoryHenry Ford Health SystemDetroitMIUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rooks D, Swan T, Goswami B, Filosa LA, Bunte O, Panchaud N, Coleman LA, Miller RR, Garcia Garayoa E, Praestgaard J, Perry RG, Recknor C, Fogarty CM, Arai H, Chen LK, Hashimoto J, Chung YS, Vissing J, Laurent D, Petricoul O, Hemsley S, Lach-Trifilieff E, Papanicolaou DA, Roubenoff R. Bimagrumab vs Optimized Standard of Care for Treatment of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2020836. [PMID: 33074327 PMCID: PMC7573681 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The potential benefit of novel skeletal muscle anabolic agents to improve physical function in people with sarcopenia and other muscle wasting diseases is unknown. OBJECTIVE To confirm the safety and efficacy of bimagrumab plus the new standard of care on skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical function compared with standard of care alone in community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 38 sites in 13 countries among community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years and older meeting gait speed and skeletal muscle criteria for sarcopenia. The study was conducted from December 2014 to June 2018, and analyses were conducted from August to November 2018. INTERVENTIONS Bimagrumab 700 mg or placebo monthly for 6 months with adequate diet and home-based exercise. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk distance, usual gait speed, handgrip strength, lean body mass, fat body mass, and standard safety parameters. RESULTS A total of 180 participants were recruited, with 113 randomized to bimagrumab and 67 randomized to placebo. Among these, 159 participants (88.3%; mean [SD] age, 79.1 [5.3] years; 109 [60.6%] women) completed the study. The mean SPPB score increased by a mean of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.77) with bimagrumab vs 1.03 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.52) with placebo (P = .13); 6-minute walk distance increased by a mean of 24.60 (95% CI, 7.65 to 41.56) m with bimagrumab vs 14.30 (95% CI, -4.64 to 33.23) m with placebo (P = .16); and gait speed increased by a mean of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.18) m/s with bimagrumab vs 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.16) m/s with placebo (P = .16). Bimagrumab was safe and well-tolerated and increased lean body mass by 7% (95% CI, 6% to 8%) vs 1% (95% CI, 0% to 2%) with placebo, resulting in difference of 6% (95% CI, 4% to 7%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found no significant difference between participants treated with bimagrumab vs placebo among older adults with sarcopenia who had 6 months of adequate nutrition and light exercise, with physical function improving in both groups. Bimagrumab treatment was safe, well-tolerated, increased lean body mass, and decreased fat body mass. The effects of sarcopenia, an increasing cause of disability in older adults, can be reduced with proper diet and exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333331; EudraCT number: 2014-003482-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rooks
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Therese Swan
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Budhaditya Goswami
- Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
- Now with MorphoSys, Planegg, Germany
| | - Lee Anne Filosa
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Ola Bunte
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Panchaud
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Laura A. Coleman
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Ram R. Miller
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa Garcia Garayoa
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Chris Recknor
- Center for Advanced Research and Education, Gainesville, Georgia
| | | | - Hidenori Arai
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Liang-Kung Chen
- Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jun Hashimoto
- National Hospital Organization, Osaka Minami Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - John Vissing
- Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Didier Laurent
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Petricoul
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Hemsley
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Estelle Lach-Trifilieff
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ronenn Roubenoff
- Translational Medicine and Musculoskeletal Diseases Research, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown JP, Chines A, Chapurlat R, Foldes J, Nogues X, Civitelli R, De Villiers T, Massari F, Zerbini C, Yang W, Recknor C, Libanati C. Romosozumab improves lumbar spine BMD and bone strength greater than alendronate as assessed by quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis in the ARCH trial. Bone Rep 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
7
|
Berry SD, Dufour AB, Travison TG, Zhu H, Yehoshua A, Barron R, Recknor C, Samelson EJ. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD): a longitudinal study of osteoporosis patients in the real-world setting. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:124. [PMID: 30421141 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0528-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In clinical practice, the frequency of patients achieving improved T-scores and the expected change in bone mineral density (BMD) according to osteoporosis drugs is unknown. We found that osteoporosis medications infrequently achieve improved femoral neck T-scores over 1.2 years. BMD increases were more often seen with IV bisphosphonates and denosumab. PURPOSE To determine the frequency of osteoporosis patients achieving improvement in T-scores and quantify the change in bone mineral density (BMD) over time according to osteoporosis medication use. METHODS The study included all patients receiving clinical care at United Osteoporosis Centers, Gainesville, GA, 1995-2015, who had at least two measures of femoral neck BMD (N = 1232). We evaluated successive pairs of BMD tests to describe the distribution of transitions between T-score categories. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate %BMD change between successive pairs of BMD tests according to osteoporosis medication, adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, baseline BMD, previous fracture, and follow-up time. RESULTS Mean (±SD) age was 68 (±10) years, and 90% of patients were women. Mean baseline T-score was - 2.04 (± 0.85). In total, 1232 patients had 4918 pairs of successive BMD tests, with a mean 1.2 years (± 0.9) between assessments. Frequency of transition to an improved T-score category was 41% when prior T-score ≤ - 3.5, and 15% when prior T-score - 1.99 to - 1.50. Most individuals (69%) remained in the same T-score category. BMD increased 0.54% (95% CI 0.23-0.85%) with IV bisphosphonates and 1.23% (95% CI 0.56-1.90%) with denosumab, whereas no significant change was seen with oral bisphosphonates, teriparatide, or raloxifene. CONCLUSIONS Osteoporosis patients are unlikely to improve femoral neck T-scores over 1.2 years. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal time to repeat BMD testing while receiving osteoporosis treatment and to determine whether fracture risk is reduced in patients who achieve target T-scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Berry
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Center Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - A B Dufour
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Center Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T G Travison
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Center Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - H Zhu
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Center Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA
| | | | | | - C Recknor
- United Osteoporosis Centers, Gainesville, GA, USA
| | - E J Samelson
- Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, 1200 Center Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Silverman SL, Siris E, Belazi D, Recknor C, Papaioannou A, Brown JP, Gold DT, Lewiecki EM, Quinn G, Balasubramanian A, Yue S, Stolshek B, Kendler DL. Persistence at 24 months with denosumab among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a prospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:85. [PMID: 30088189 PMCID: PMC6096691 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0491-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Persistence with prescribed medications for chronic diseases is important; however, persistence with osteoporosis treatments is historically poor. In this prospective cohort study of postmenopausal women treated for osteoporosis in real-world clinical practice settings in the USA and Canada, 24-month persistence with denosumab was 58%. PURPOSE Patients who persist with their prescribed osteoporosis treatment have increased bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced risk of fracture. Twelve-month persistence with denosumab in routine clinical practice is as high as 95%, but there are limited data on longer-term persistence with denosumab in this setting. METHODS This single-arm, prospective, cohort study evaluated 24-month persistence with denosumab administered every 6 months in postmenopausal women receiving treatment for osteoporosis in real-world clinical practice in the USA and Canada. Endpoints and analyses included the percentage of patients who persist with denosumab at 24 months (greater than or equal to four injections with a gap between injections of no more than 6 months plus 8 weeks), the total number of injections received by each patient, changes in BMD in persistent patients, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fractures. RESULTS Among 935 enrolled patients, 24-month persistence was 58% (50% in US patients and 75% in Canadian patients). A majority of patients received at least four injections over the observation period (62% of US patients and 81% of Canadian patients). Among patients who were persistent at 24 months and who had a baseline, 12-month, and 24-month DXA scan, mean BMD increased from baseline to 24 months by 7.8% at the lumbar spine and 2.1% at the femoral neck. SAEs and fractures were reported for 122 (13.0%) patients and 54 (5.8%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Persistence with denosumab for 24 months yields improvement in BMD among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated in routine clinical practice in the USA and Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart L. Silverman
- OMC Clinical Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA, 8641 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 301, Beverly Hills, CA 90211 USA
| | - E. Siris
- Columbia University Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, HP9-964, New York, NY USA
| | - D. Belazi
- AlchemiPharma, 1582 High Grove LN, Malvern, PA USA
| | - C. Recknor
- United Osteoporosis Centers, 2350 Limestone Parkway, Gainesville, GA USA
| | - A. Papaioannou
- Juravinski Research Center, McMaster University, Room 151, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J. P. Brown
- CHU de Québec (CHUL) Research Center, Laval University, Room TR-83, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC Canada
| | - D. T. Gold
- Duke University Medical Center, Box 3003, Durham, NC USA
| | - E. M. Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research and Osteoporosis Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 300 Oak St. NE, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - G. Quinn
- Outlier Statistics Ltd, 25 Blacksmith Close, St Michaels Mead, Bishop’s Stortford, UK
| | | | - S. Yue
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA USA
| | - B. Stolshek
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA USA
| | - D. L. Kendler
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Prohealth, 150-943 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adachi JD, Bone HG, Daizadeh NS, Dakin P, Papapoulos S, Hadji P, Recknor C, Bolognese MA, Wang A, Lin CJF, Wagman RB, Ferrari S. Influence of subject discontinuation on long-term nonvertebral fracture rate in the denosumab FREEDOM Extension study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:174. [PMID: 28449657 PMCID: PMC5408481 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Denosumab treatment for up to 8 years in the FREEDOM study and Extension was associated with low fracture incidence. It was not clear whether subjects who discontinued during the study conduct had a higher risk of fracture than those who remained enrolled, thereby underestimating the true fracture risk for the entire trial cohort. Thus, we explored the influence of early withdrawals on nonvertebral fracture incidence during the Extension study. Methods To understand the potential effect of depletion of susceptible subjects on fracture incidence, we first evaluated subject characteristics in patients who were enrolled in the Extension vs those who were not. We subsequently employed a Kaplan-Meier multiple imputation (KMMI) approach to consider subjects who discontinued as if they remained enrolled with a 0%, 20%, 50%, and 100% increase in fracture risk compared with participants remaining on study. Results Extension enrollees were generally similar to nonparticipants in median age (71.9 and 73.1 years, respectively), mean total hip bone mineral density T-score (–1.9 and –2.0, respectively), and probability of fracture risk by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) at FREEDOM baseline (16.9% and 17.7% for major osteoporotic fracture and 6.7% and 7.4% for hip fracture, respectively). When we assumed a doubled fracture risk (100% increase) after discontinuation in KMMI analyses, nonvertebral fracture rate estimates were only marginally higher than the observed rates for both the crossover group (10.32% vs 9.16%, respectively) and the long-term group (7.63% vs 6.63%, respectively). Conclusion The observation of continued denosumab efficacy over 8 years of treatment was robust and does not seem to be explained by depletion of susceptible subjects. Trial registration ClincalTrials.gov registration number NCT00523341; registered August 30, 2007 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1520-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Adachi
- McMaster University, 501-25 Charlton Ave E., Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y2, Canada.
| | - Henry G Bone
- Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, 22201 Moross Rd, Detroit, MI, 48236, USA
| | | | - Paula Dakin
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Ctr Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - Socrates Papapoulos
- Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Chris Recknor
- United Osteoporosis Centers, 2350 Limestone Pkwy, Gainesville, GA, 30501, USA
| | - Michael A Bolognese
- Bethesda Health Research Center, 10215 Fernwood Rd Ste 40, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
| | - Andrea Wang
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Ctr Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - Celia J F Lin
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Ctr Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - Rachel B Wagman
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Ctr Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - Serge Ferrari
- Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Genant HK, Engelke K, Bolognese MA, Mautalen C, Brown JP, Recknor C, Goemaere S, Fuerst T, Yang YC, Grauer A, Libanati C. Effects of Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide on Bone Density and Mass at the Spine and Hip in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32:181-187. [PMID: 27487526 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, has a dual effect on bone by increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption, and thus has favorable effects in both aspects of bone volume regulation. In a phase 2 study, romosozumab increased areal BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip as measured by DXA compared with placebo, alendronate, and teriparatide in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. In additional analyses from this international, randomized study, we now describe the effect of romosozumab on lumbar spine and hip volumetric BMD (vBMD) and BMC at month 12 as assessed by QCT in the subset of participants receiving placebo, s.c. teriparatide (20 µg once daily), and s.c. romosozumab (210 mg once monthly). QCT measurements were performed at the lumbar spine (mean of L1 and L2 entire vertebral bodies, excluding posterior processes) and hip. One year of treatment with romosozumab significantly increased integral vBMD and BMC at the lumbar spine and total hip from baseline, and compared with placebo and teriparatide (all p < 0.05). Trabecular vertebral vBMD improved significantly and similarly from baseline (p < 0.05) with both romosozumab (18.3%) and teriparatide (20.1%), whereas cortical vertebral vBMD gains were larger with romosozumab compared with teriparatide (13.7% versus 5.7%, p < 0.0001). Trabecular hip vBMD gains were significantly larger with romosozumab than with teriparatide (10.8% versus 4.2%, p = 0.01), but were similar for cortical vBMD (1.1% versus -0.9%, p = 0.12). Cortical BMC gains were larger with romosozumab compared with teriparatide at both the spine (23.3% versus 10.9%, p < 0.0001) and hip (3.4% versus 0.0%, p = 0.03). These improvements are expected to result in strength gains and support the continued clinical investigation of romosozumab as a potential therapy to rapidly reduce fracture risk in ongoing phase 3 studies. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry K Genant
- University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.,BioClinica-Synarc, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Klaus Engelke
- BioClinica, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Jacques P Brown
- CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Stefan Goemaere
- Department of Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dent R, Joshi R, Stephen Djedjos C, Legg J, Elliott M, Geller M, Meyer D, Somaratne R, Recknor C, Weiss R. Evolocumab lowers LDL-C safely and effectively when self-administered in the at-home setting. Springerplus 2016; 5:300. [PMID: 27066336 PMCID: PMC4783317 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1892-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Evolocumab has been shown to consistently reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) across populations. The phase 3 studies included administration in the home-use and in-clinic settings but did not specifically evaluate the feasibility of home-use administration. Two clinical studies enrolled patients with hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia on statin therapy and with/without ezetimibe received evolocumab in the home-use setting. Patients were randomized to self-administer evolocumab using one of two injection devices biweekly over 6 weeks (autoinjector or prefilled syringe; n = 149; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01849497) or monthly over 12 weeks (autoinjector or automated minidoser; n = 164; NCT01879319). The first self-administration occurred in the in-clinic setting, and two more were performed in the at-home setting. Patients were successful in self-administering evolocumab in the home-use setting in approximately 95 % of attempts and experienced LDL-C reductions from baseline to week 6 or the mean of weeks 10 and 12 of approximately 65 %. Rates of successful self-administration and LDL-C reduction were similar across dosing schedules and study devices. Adverse events were similar between randomized groups and generally mild in severity. In two clinical studies, therefore, patients were able to successfully self-administer evolocumab in both the in-clinic and at-home settings regardless of which dosing schedule or device they used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Dent
- Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Dammstrasse 23, 6300 Zug, Switzerland
| | - Raju Joshi
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
| | | | - Jason Legg
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
| | - Mary Elliott
- Amgen Ltd., 240 Cambridge Science Park, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 0WD UK
| | - Michelle Geller
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
| | - Dawn Meyer
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
| | - Ransi Somaratne
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
| | - Chris Recknor
- Centers for Advanced Research and Education, 2350 Limestone Pkwy NE, Gainesville, GA 30501 USA
| | - Robert Weiss
- Maine Research Associates, 2 Great Falls Plaza, Auburn, ME 04210 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Silverman SL, Siris E, Kendler DL, Belazi D, Brown JP, Gold DT, Lewiecki EM, Papaioannou A, Simonelli C, Ferreira I, Balasubramanian A, Dakin P, Ho P, Siddhanti S, Stolshek B, Recknor C. Persistence at 12 months with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: interim results from a prospective observational study. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:361-72. [PMID: 25236877 PMCID: PMC4286624 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2871-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED To determine persistence with subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months in women being treated for osteoporosis, we conducted a single-arm prospective, observational study in the United States and Canada. Among 935 patients enrolled, 12-month persistence was 82%, with 66 patients (7%) reporting serious adverse events and 19 patients (2%) reporting fractures. INTRODUCTION Increased persistence with osteoporosis therapy is associated with reduced fracture risk. Denosumab reduced fracture risk in clinical trials; persistence in community settings is undetermined. This study evaluates persistence with denosumab in community practice in the United States (US) and Canada. METHODS In a 24-month multicenter, prospective, single-arm, observational study, women being treated for osteoporosis were enrolled ≤4 weeks after the first subcutaneous injection of denosumab. For this 12-month prespecified interim analysis, endpoints include persistence (one injection at study entry and another within 6 months + 8 weeks), attributes associated with persistence (univariate analysis), and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS Among 935 patients (mean age 71 years), mean baseline T-scores were -2.18 (femoral neck) and -2.00 (lumbar spine); 50% of patients had experienced osteoporotic fracture(s). At 12 months, 82 % of patients were persistent with denosumab. Baseline factors significantly (p < 0.05) associated with higher persistence included use of osteoporosis medications >5 years previously, lumbar spine T-score > -2.5, and treatment by female physicians (US). Lower persistence was associated (p < 0.05) with psychiatric diagnoses including depression, southern US residence, being divorced, separated, or widowed (US), and prior hip fracture (Canada). SAEs were reported in 66 patients (7%); no SAEs of osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture, fracture healing complications, hypocalcemia, eczema, or hypersensitivity were reported. Nineteen patients (2%) reported osteoporotic fractures. CONCLUSIONS The 12-month persistence observed in this single-arm open-label study of US and Canadian community practice extends the evidence regarding denosumab's potential role in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Silverman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and OMC Clinical Research Center, 8641 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 301, Los Angeles, CA, 90211, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Magaziner JS, Orwig DL, Lyles KW, Nordsletten L, Boonen S, Adachi JD, Recknor C, Colón-Emeric CS, Mesenbrink P, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Su G, Johnson R, Pieper CF. Subgroup variations in bone mineral density response to zoledronic acid after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29:2545-51. [PMID: 24839241 PMCID: PMC4307640 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Minimizing post-fracture bone loss is an important aspect of recovery from hip fracture, and determination of factors that affect bone mineral density (BMD) response to treatment after hip fracture may assist in the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. A post hoc analysis of the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial was done to determine the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) on total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in subgroups with low-trauma hip fracture. A total of 2127 patients were randomized (1:1) to yearly infusions of ZOL 5 mg (n = 1065) or placebo (n = 1062) within 90 days of operation for low-trauma hip fracture. The 1486 patients with a baseline and at least one post-baseline BMD assessment at TH or FN (ZOL = 745, placebo = 741) were included in the analyses. Percentage change from baseline in TH and FN BMD was assessed at months 12 and 24 and compared across subgroups of hip fracture patients. Percentage change from baseline in TH and FN BMD at months 12 and 24 was greater (p < 0.05) in ZOL-treated patients compared with placebo in most subgroups. Treatment-by-subgroup interactions (p < 0.05) indicated that a greater effect on BMD was observed for TH BMD at month 12 in females, in patients in the lower tertile body mass index at baseline (≤22.6 kg/m(2) ), and in patients with baseline FN BMD T-score of ≤ -2.5; for FN BMD in patients who received ZOL for >6 weeks post-surgery; and for TH and FN BMD in patients with a history of one or more prior fractures. All interactions were limited to the first 12 months after treatment with none observed for the 24-month comparisons. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00046254.)
Collapse
|
14
|
Brown JP, Roux C, Ho PR, Bolognese MA, Hall J, Bone HG, Bonnick S, van den Bergh JP, Ferreira I, Dakin P, Wagman RB, Recknor C. Denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density and reduces bone turnover compared with monthly oral ibandronate and risedronate in postmenopausal women who remained at higher risk for fracture despite previous suboptimal treatment with an oral bisphosphonate. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25:1953-61. [PMID: 24676847 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2692-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 03/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Managing osteoporotic patients suboptimally adherent to bisphosphonates (BPs) is difficult. Such patients who remained at higher risk for fracture (≥1 risk factor) were transitioned to denosumab or a monthly oral BP. Denosumab-treated subjects had significantly greater increases in bone mineral density and decreases in bone turnover in this 12-month study. INTRODUCTION A clinical need exists to manage patients who are suboptimally adherent to oral BPs and remain at higher risk for fracture. Here, we compare the effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover of transitioning such patients to denosumab or monthly oral BP (ibandronate or risedronate). METHODS In two previous multicenter, open-label studies, postmenopausal women ≥55 years previously treated with, though suboptimally adherent to, a daily or weekly BP were randomized to denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (N = 852) or oral BP 150 mg monthly (N = 851) for 12 months. In this combined post-hoc analysis, a subset of higher risk subjects was identified, and the percentage changes from baseline in BMD and serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX-1) were assessed. RESULTS In the overall population, denosumab was associated with greater gains in BMD at 12 months than monthly oral BP at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (p < 0.0001 for all). In higher risk subjects, denosumab led to greater gains in BMD than oral BPs at the total hip (2.2 vs 0.8 %), femoral neck (1.8 vs 0.3 %), and lumbar spine (3.7 vs 1.4 %) (p < 0.0001 for all). Denosumab also led to greater decreases in sCTX-1 in the overall population and higher risk subjects at months 1 and 6 (p < 0.0001 for both). Adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Transitioning to denosumab was well tolerated and more effective in increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover than cycling to a monthly oral BP treatment in subjects who remained at higher fracture risk despite suboptimal BP treatment.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Administration, Oral
- Aged
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers/blood
- Bone Density/drug effects
- Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects
- Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology
- Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
- Bone Remodeling/drug effects
- Collagen Type I/blood
- Denosumab
- Diphosphonates/adverse effects
- Diphosphonates/pharmacology
- Diphosphonates/therapeutic use
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Etidronic Acid/adverse effects
- Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives
- Etidronic Acid/pharmacology
- Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use
- Female
- Femur Neck/physiopathology
- Hip Joint/physiopathology
- Humans
- Ibandronic Acid
- Injections, Subcutaneous
- Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology
- Medication Adherence
- Middle Aged
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology
- Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology
- Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology
- Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
- Peptides/blood
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Risedronic Acid
- Risk Factors
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Brown
- CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University, Room S-763, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Genant H, Bolognese M, Mautalen C, Brown J, Recknor C, Goemaere S, Engelke K, Yang YC, Austin M, Grauer A, Libanati C. OP0291 Romosozumab Administration is Associated with Significant Improvements in Lumbar Spine and Hip Volumetric Bone Mineral Density and Content Compared with Teriparatide. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
16
|
Keaveny TM, McClung MR, Genant HK, Zanchetta JR, Kendler D, Brown JP, Goemaere S, Recknor C, Brandi ML, Eastell R, Kopperdahl DL, Engelke K, Fuerst T, Radcliffe HS, Libanati C. Femoral and vertebral strength improvements in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29:158-65. [PMID: 23794225 PMCID: PMC4238810 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Revised: 05/30/2013] [Accepted: 06/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
In the randomized, placebo-controlled FREEDOM study of women aged 60 to 90 years with postmenopausal osteoporosis, treatment with denosumab once every 6 months for 36 months significantly reduced hip and new vertebral fracture risk by 40% and 68%, respectively. To gain further insight into this efficacy, we performed a nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) of hip and spine quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans to estimate hip and spine strength in a subset of FREEDOM subjects (n = 48 placebo; n = 51 denosumab) at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. We found that, compared with baseline, the finite element estimates of hip strength increased from 12 months (5.3%; p < 0.0001) and through 36 months (8.6%; p < 0.0001) in the denosumab group. For the placebo group, hip strength did not change at 12 months and decreased at 36 months (-5.6%; p < 0.0001). Similar changes were observed at the spine: strength increased by 18.2% at 36 months for the denosumab group (p < 0.0001) and decreased by -4.2% for the placebo group (p = 0.002). At 36 months, hip and spine strength increased for the denosumab group compared with the placebo group by 14.3% (p < 0.0001) and 22.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Further analysis of the finite element models indicated that strength associated with the trabecular bone was lost at the hip and spine in the placebo group, whereas strength associated with both the trabecular and cortical bone improved in the denosumab group. In conclusion, treatment with denosumab increased hip and spine strength as estimated by FEA of QCT scans compared with both baseline and placebo owing to positive treatment effects in both the trabecular and cortical bone compartments. These findings provide insight into the mechanism by which denosumab reduces fracture risk for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony M Keaveny
- University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Törring O, Brown J, Jensen JE, Gilchrist N, Recknor C, Roux C, Austin M, Wang A, Grauer A, Ho PR, Wagman R. OP0037 Denosumab discontinuation and associated fracture incidence: Analysis from the freedom trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
18
|
McClung MR, Zanchetta JR, Høiseth A, Kendler DL, Yuen CK, Brown JP, Stonkus S, Goemaere S, Recknor C, Woodson GC, Bolognese MA, Franek E, Brandi ML, Wang A, Libanati C. Denosumab densitometric changes assessed by quantitative computed tomography at the spine and hip in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2013; 16:250-6. [PMID: 22572531 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2011] [Revised: 02/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
FREEDOM was a phase 3 trial in 7808 women aged 60-90yr with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Subjects received placebo or 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6mo for 3yr in addition to daily calcium and vitamin D. Denosumab significantly decreased bone turnover; increased dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) areal bone mineral density (aBMD); and significantly reduced new vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. In a subset of women (N=209), lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck volumetric BMD (vBMD) were assessed by quantitative computed tomography at baseline and months 12, 24, and 36. Significant improvement from placebo and baseline was observed in aBMD and vBMD in the denosumab-treated subjects at all sites and time points measured. The vBMD difference from placebo reached 21.8%, 7.8%, and 5.9%, respectively, for the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at 36mo (all p≤0.0001). Compared with placebo and baseline, significant increases were also observed in bone mineral content (BMC) at the total hip (p<0.0001) largely related to significant BMC improvement in the cortical compartment (p<0.0001). These results supplement the data from DXA on the positive effect of denosumab on BMD in both the cortical and trabecular compartments.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wark JD, Bensen W, Recknor C, Ryabitseva O, Chiodo J, Mesenbrink P, de Villiers TJ. Treatment with acetaminophen/paracetamol or ibuprofen alleviates post-dose symptoms related to intravenous infusion with zoledronic acid 5 mg. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:503-12. [PMID: 21331467 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1563-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2010] [Accepted: 01/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Patients treated with intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg for osteoporosis may experience post-dose influenza-like symptoms. Oral acetaminophen/paracetamol or ibuprofen administered 4 h post-infusion reduced the proportion of patients with increased oral temperature and worsening post-infusion symptom scores vs. placebo, thus providing an effective strategy for the treatment of such symptoms. INTRODUCTION Once-yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg is a safe and effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study assessed whether transient influenza-like post-dose symptoms associated with intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid can be reduced by post-dose administration of acetaminophen/paracetamol or ibuprofen. METHODS In an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel-group study, bisphosphonate-naïve postmenopausal women with osteopenia (n = 481) were randomized to receive zoledronic acid 5 mg + acetaminophen/paracetamol (n = 135), ibuprofen (n = 137) or placebo (n = 137), or placebo + placebo (n = 72). Acetaminophen/paracetamol and ibuprofen were administered every 6 h for 3 days beginning 4 h post-infusion. RESULTS The proportion of patients with increased oral temperature (≥1°C above 37.5°C) and with worsening post-infusion symptom scores over 3 days was significantly lower in patients receiving ibuprofen (36.8% and 48.5%) or acetaminophen/paracetamol (37.3% and 46.3%) vs. those receiving placebo (63.5% and 75.9%, respectively; all p < 0.0001) compared with background rates of 11.1% and 16.7%, respectively, in the absence of any active treatment. Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable for patients receiving acetaminophen/paracetamol or ibuprofen. CONCLUSION Oral acetaminophen/paracetamol or ibuprofen effectively managed the transient influenza-like symptoms associated with zoledronic acid 5 mg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Wark
- University of Melbourne Department of Medicine and Bone & Mineral Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3050 Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adachi JD, Lyles K, Boonen S, Colón-Emeric C, Hyldstrup L, Nordsletten L, Pieper C, Recknor C, Su G, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Magaziner J. Subtrochanteric fractures in bisphosphonate-naive patients: results from the HORIZON-recurrent fracture trial. Calcif Tissue Int 2011; 89:427-33. [PMID: 22038744 PMCID: PMC3215881 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-011-9543-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2011] [Accepted: 10/09/2011] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Our purpose was to characterize the risks of osteoporosis-related subtrochanteric fractures in bisphosphonate-naive individuals. Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the HORIZON-Recurrent Fracture Trial with a study-qualifying hip fracture were examined, comparing those who sustained incident subtrochanteric fractures with those sustaining other hip fractures. Subjects were bisphosphonate-naive or had a bisphosphonate washout period of 6-24 months and subsequently received an annual infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg or placebo after low-trauma hip-fracture repair. In total, 2,127 men and women were included. Of the qualifying hip fractures, 5.2% were subtrochanteric, 54.8% femoral neck, 33.0% intertrochanteric, and 7.1% other (generally complex fractures of mixed type). Significant baseline (pre-hip fracture) differences were seen between index hip-fracture types, with the percentage of patients with extreme mobility problems being twofold higher in patients with index subtrochanteric fracture (9.9%) compared to other patients. The distribution of hip-fracture types was similar between the treatment groups at baseline. No patients with index subtrochanteric fractures and six patients with other qualifying hip fractures reported prior bisphosphonate use. Only one further subtrochanteric fracture occurred in each treatment group over an average 2-year patient follow-up. Subtrochanteric fractures are not uncommon in bisphosphonate-naive patients. Extreme difficulties with mobility may be a unique risk factor predisposing to development of incident subtrochanteric fractures rather than other types of hip fracture. In patients with recent hip fracture who received zoledronic acid therapy, the incidence of new subtrochanteric fractures was too small to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Adachi JD, Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Boonen S, Pieper CF, Mautalen C, Hyldstrup L, Recknor C, Nordsletten L, Moore KA, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Su G, Eriksen EF, Magaziner JS. Zoledronic acid results in better health-related quality of life following hip fracture: the HORIZON-Recurrent Fracture Trial. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22:2539-49. [PMID: 21249332 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2010] [Accepted: 10/25/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This study evaluated the benefits of ZOL versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients from HORIZON-RFT. At month 24 and end of the study visit, ZOL significantly improved patients' overall health state compared to placebo as assessed by the EQ-5D VAS. INTRODUCTION To evaluate the benefits of zoledronic acid (ZOL) versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients from The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly Recurrent Fracture Trial (HORIZON-RFT). METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 2,127 patients were randomized to receive annual infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n = 1,065) or placebo (n = 1,062) within 90 days after surgical repair of low-trauma hip fracture. HRQoL was measured using EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and utility scores (EuroQol instrument) at months 6, 12, 24, 36, and end of the study visit. Analysis of covariance model included baseline EQ-5D value, region, and treatment as explanatory variables. RESULTS At baseline, patients (mean age 75 years; 24% men and 76% women) were well matched between treatment groups with mean EQ-5D VAS of 65.82 in ZOL and 65.70 in placebo group. At the end of the study, mean change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS was greater for ZOL vs. placebo in all patients (7.67 ± 0.56 vs. 5.42 ± 0.56), and in subgroups of patients experiencing clinical vertebral fractures (8.86 ± 4.91 vs. -1.69 ± 3.42), non-vertebral fractures (5.03 ± 2.48 vs. -1.07 ± 2.16), and clinical fractures (5.19 ± 2.25 vs. -0.72 ± 1.82) with treatment difference significantly in favor of ZOL. EQ-5D utility scores were comparable for ZOL and placebo groups, but more patients on placebo consistently had extreme difficulty in mobility (1.74% for ZOL vs. 2.13% for placebo; p = 0.6238), self-care (4.92% vs. 6.69%; p = 0.1013), and usual activities (10.28% vs. 12.91%; p = 0.0775). CONCLUSION ZOL significantly improves HRQoL in patients with low-trauma hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Adachi
- St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, 501-25 Charlton Ave E., Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y2, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Colón-Emeric C, Nordsletten L, Olson S, Major N, Boonen S, Haentjens P, Mesenbrink P, Magaziner J, Adachi J, Lyles KW, Hyldstrup L, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Recknor C. Association between timing of zoledronic acid infusion and hip fracture healing. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22:2329-36. [PMID: 21153021 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1473-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2010] [Accepted: 10/05/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patients in the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly (HORIZON) Recurrent Fracture Trial were assessed for evidence of delayed hip fracture healing. No association was observed between zoledronic acid (ZOL) and delayed healing. We conclude that ZOL has no clinically evident effect on fracture healing, even when the drug is infused in the immediate postoperative period. INTRODUCTION Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg (ZOL) given after a hip fracture reduces secondary fracture rates and mortality. It has been postulated that bisphosphonates may affect healing if given soon after a fracture. We sought to determine whether the timing of ZOL infusion affected the risk of delayed hip fracture healing. METHODS In the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial, patients were randomized within 90 days of a low-trauma hip fracture to receive either once-yearly ZOL (n = 1,065) or placebo (n = 1,062). Clinical symptoms of delayed hip fracture healing were sought at randomization, 6 months and 12 months after fracture; if present, a central adjudication committee blinded to treatment assignment reviewed radiographs and clinical records. Median follow-up was 1.9 years. RESULTS The overall incidence of delayed healing was 3.2% (ZOL) and 2.7% (placebo; odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.90; p = 0.61). Logistic regression models revealed no association between ZOL and delayed healing even after adjusting for other risk factors (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.74-1.99; p = 0.44). There was no interaction by timing of infusion, and nonunion rates were similar even when ZOL was given within 2 weeks of hip fracture repair. NSAID use was significantly associated with delayed fracture healing (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.49-4.39; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ZOL has no clinically evident effect on fracture healing, even when the drug is infused in the immediate postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Colón-Emeric
- Duke University Medical Center and the Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sambrook PN, Silverman SL, Cauley JA, Recknor C, Olson M, Su G, Boonen S, Black D, Adachi JD. Health-related quality of life and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the HORIZON-PFT. Bone 2011; 48:1298-304. [PMID: 21421092 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.03.719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2011] [Revised: 03/14/2011] [Accepted: 03/14/2011] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis-related fractures are associated with reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQL). We examined the benefits of zoledronic acid (ZOL) on HRQL in patients sustaining vertebral and clinical fractures from HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial using mini-Osteoporosis quality of life Questionnaire (OQLQ). In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 1434 patients from a cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 73years) were randomized to receive annual infusions of ZOL 5mg or placebo for 3years. Baseline HRQL scores were comparable between ZOL and placebo groups based on the presence or absence of fractures, with exception of prevalent vertebral fractures where patients (irrespective of the treatment group) had lower baseline HRQL scores than those without prevalent vertebral fractures. Greater number of prevalent vertebral fractures was associated with lower baseline HRQL (p<0.001). No significant difference between ZOL and placebo in the overall summary score was observed but a significant benefit was noted in certain domains with ZOL, especially in patients sustaining incident clinical fractures. Improvements in HRQL were marked at first assessment after a morphometric vertebral fracture with significant differences favouring ZOL in pain (p=0.0115), standing pain (p=0.0125)), physical (lifting, p=0.0333) and emotional function (fear of fractures, p=0.0243; fear of falls, p=0.0075) but not for activities of daily living or leisure domains. HRQL is reduced in patients with vertebral fractures. Treatment with ZOL over 3years was associated with improvements in specific domains of quality of life vs. placebo, particularly in patients sustaining incident fractures.
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Cosman F, Eriksen EF, Recknor C, Miller PD, Guañabens N, Kasperk C, Papanastasiou P, Readie A, Rao H, Gasser JA, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Boonen S. Effects of intravenous zoledronic acid plus subcutaneous teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26:503-11. [PMID: 20814967 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Clinical data suggest concomitant therapy with bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) may blunt the anabolic effect of PTH; rodent models suggest that infrequently administered bisphosphonates may interact differently. To evaluate the effects of combination therapy with an intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg and daily subcutaneous recombinant human (rh)PTH(1-34) (teriparatide) 20 µg versus either agent alone on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers, we conducted a 1-year multicenter, multinational, randomized, partial double-blinded, controlled trial. 412 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 65 ± 9 years) were randomized to a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg plus daily subcutaneous teriparatide 20 µg (n = 137), zoledronic acid alone (n = 137), or teriparatide alone (n = 138). The primary endpoint was percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) at 52 weeks versus baseline. Secondary endpoints included change in BMD at the spine at earlier time points and at the total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck at all time points. At week 52, lumbar spine BMD had increased 7.5%, 7.0%, and 4.4% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively (p < .001 for combination and teriparatide versus zoledronic acid). In the combination group, spine BMD increased more rapidly than with either agent alone (p < .001 versus both teriparatide and zoledronic acid at 13 and 26 weeks). Combination therapy increased total-hip BMD more than teriparatide alone at all times (all p < .01) and more than zoledronic acid at 13 weeks (p < .05), with final 52-week increments of 2.3%, 1.1%, and 2.2% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively. With combination therapy, bone formation (assessed by serum N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) increased from 0 to 4 weeks, declined minimally from 4 to 8 weeks, and then rose throughout the trial, with levels above baseline from 6 to 12 months. Bone resorption (assessed by serum β-C-telopeptide of type I collagen [β-CTX]) was markedly reduced with combination therapy from 0 to 8 weeks (a reduction of similar magnitude to that seen with zoledronic acid alone), followed by a gradual increase after week 8, with levels remaining above baseline for the latter half of the year. Levels for both markers were significantly lower with combination therapy versus teriparatide alone (p < .002). Limitations of the study included its short duration, lack of endpoints beyond DXA-based BMD (e.g., quantitative computed tomography and finite-element modeling for bone strength), lack of teriparatide placebo, and insufficient power for fracture outcomes. We conclude that while teriparatide increases spine BMD more than zoledronic acid and zoledronic acid increases hip BMD more than teriparatide, combination therapy provides the largest, most rapid increments when both spine and hip sites are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Cosman
- Clinical Research Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY 10993, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zanchetta J, Høiseth A, Kendler D, Yuen C, Brown J, Stonkus S, Goemaere S, Recknor C, Woodson G, Bolognese M, Franek E, Brandi M, Wang A, Libanati C, McClung M. Denosumab Increased BMD of the Lumbar Spine, Total Hip, Femoral Neck, and Trochanter as Measured by QCT in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
27
|
Devogelaer JP, Adler RA, Recknor C, See K, Warner MR, Wong M, Krohn K. Baseline glucocorticoid dose and bone mineral density response with teriparatide or alendronate therapy in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 2009; 37:141-8. [PMID: 19918047 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post-hoc analysis studied the effect of baseline glucocorticoid dose on the 18-month bone mineral density (BMD) response to teriparatide 20 microg/day or alendronate 10 mg/day in 387 patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) from a randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BMD were measured at baseline and 18 months. Mean baseline glucocorticoid dose was categorized as low (< or = 5 mg/day), medium (> 5 and < 15 mg/day), or high (> or = 15 mg/day). RESULTS Baseline LS, FN, and TH BMD were similar between groups, and between glucocorticoid dose categories within each group. LS BMD increases at the low, medium, and high glucocorticoid doses were 8.1%, 6.6%, and 4.6%, respectively, with teriparatide, and 3.6%, 2.8%, and 2.3% with alendronate. Analyzed as a continuous variable, higher glucocorticoid doses had a negative, but non-significant, effect on the percentage increase in LS BMD in both groups. Glucocorticoid dose did not significantly affect FN or TH BMD increases in either group. Across the 3 glucocorticoid dose categories, the overall LS BMD increases were different for both treatments combined (p = 0.033), but the relative differences between the treatment groups were not different (interaction, p = 0.52). CONCLUSION Teriparatide and alendronate increased LS and hip BMD across a range of baseline glucocorticoid doses. LS BMD increases with teriparatide were greater in the low-dose category than in the high-dose category. Overall LS BMD increases were significantly greater with teriparatide compared with alendronate, which may reflect the respective anabolic and antiresorptive mechanisms of action. Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT00051558.
Collapse
|
28
|
Eriksen EF, Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Pieper CF, Magaziner JS, Adachi JD, Hyldstrup L, Recknor C, Nordsletten L, Lavecchia C, Hu H, Boonen S, Mesenbrink P. Antifracture efficacy and reduction of mortality in relation to timing of the first dose of zoledronic acid after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24:1308-13. [PMID: 19257818 PMCID: PMC5770985 DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.090209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2008] [Revised: 12/19/2008] [Accepted: 02/11/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Annual infusions of zoledronic acid (5 mg) significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures in a study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and significantly reduced clinical fractures and all-cause mortality in another study of women and men who had recently undergone surgical repair of hip fracture. In this analysis, we examined whether timing of the first infusion of zoledronic acid study drug after hip fracture repair influenced the antifracture efficacy and mortality benefit observed in the study. A total of 2127 patients (1065 on active treatment and 1062 on placebo; mean age, 75 yr; 76% women and 24% men) were administered zoledronic acid or placebo within 90 days after surgical repair of an osteoporotic hip fracture and annually thereafter, with a median follow-up time of 1.9 yr. Median time to first dose after the incident hip fracture surgery was approximately 6 wk. Posthoc analyses were performed by dividing the study population into 2-wk intervals (calculated from time of first infusion in relation to surgical repair) to examine effects on BMD, fracture, and mortality. Analysis by 2-wk intervals showed a significant total hip BMD response and a consistent reduction of overall clinical fractures and mortality in patients receiving the first dose 2-wk or later after surgical repair. Clinical fracture subgroups (vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip) were also reduced, albeit with more variation and 95% CIs crossing 1 at most time points. We concluded that administration of zoledronic acid to patients suffering a low-trauma hip fracture 2 wk or later after surgical repair increases hip BMD, induces significant reductions in the risk of subsequent clinical vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures, and reduces mortality.
Collapse
|
29
|
Eisman JA, Civitelli R, Adami S, Czerwinski E, Recknor C, Prince R, Reginster JY, Zaidi M, Felsenberg D, Hughes C, Mairon N, Masanauskaite D, Reid DM, Delmas PD, Recker RR. Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study. J Rheumatol 2008; 35:488-497. [PMID: 18260172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An effective and well tolerated intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate could provide a new treatment method for patients with osteoporosis. The Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) study was designed to identify the optimal ibandronate IV injection schedule for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis by comparing the efficacy and tolerability of 2- and 3-monthly injections with the previously evaluated daily oral ibandronate regimen. We report the effects on lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) and bone resorption markers over 2 years. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority study recruited 1395 women (aged 55-80 yrs; > or = 5 yrs since menopause) with osteoporosis [mean lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD T-score < -2.5 and > or = -5.0]. Patients received IV ibandronate (2 mg every 2 mo or 3 mg every 3 mo) plus daily oral placebo, or 2.5 mg daily oral ibandronate plus 2- or 3-monthly IV placebo. Supplemental vitamin D (400 IU) and calcium (500 mg) were provided throughout the 2-year study. RESULTS At 2 years, the 2- and 3-monthly IV regimens achieved statistically noninferior and also superior increases in lumbar spine BMD compared with the daily regimen (6.4% and 6.3% vs 4.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). Greater increases were also obtained with IV ibandronate versus daily in proximal femur BMD. Serum concentrations of the biochemical marker of bone resorption C-telopeptide of the alpha-chain of type I collagen were reduced to a similar extent in all treatment arms (53.4%-59.9%). The tolerability profile of the IV regimens was similar to that observed with daily oral therapy. CONCLUSION Ibandronate IV injections are an effective and well tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and provide a useful alternative to oral dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Eisman
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Campus and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, Adachi JD, Pieper CF, Mautalen C, Hyldstrup L, Recknor C, Nordsletten L, Moore KA, Lavecchia C, Zhang J, Mesenbrink P, Hodgson PK, Abrams K, Orloff JJ, Horowitz Z, Eriksen EF, Boonen S. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1799-809. [PMID: 17878149 PMCID: PMC2324066 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa074941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1259] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality is increased after a hip fracture, and strategies that improve outcomes are needed. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 1065 patients were assigned to receive yearly intravenous zoledronic acid (at a dose of 5 mg), and 1062 patients were assigned to receive placebo. The infusions were first administered within 90 days after surgical repair of a hip fracture. All patients (mean age, 74.5 years) received supplemental vitamin D and calcium. The median follow-up was 1.9 years. The primary end point was a new clinical fracture. RESULTS The rates of any new clinical fracture were 8.6% in the zoledronic acid group and 13.9% in the placebo group, a 35% risk reduction with zoledronic acid (P=0.001); the respective rates of a new clinical vertebral fracture were 1.7% and 3.8% (P=0.02), and the respective rates of new nonvertebral fractures were 7.6% and 10.7% (P=0.03). In the safety analysis, 101 of 1054 patients in the zoledronic acid group (9.6%) and 141 of 1057 patients in the placebo group (13.3%) died, a reduction of 28% in deaths from any cause in the zoledronic acid group (P=0.01). The most frequent adverse events in patients receiving zoledronic acid were pyrexia, myalgia, and bone and musculoskeletal pain. No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported, and no adverse effects on the healing of fractures were noted. The rates of renal and cardiovascular adverse events, including atrial fibrillation and stroke, were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS An annual infusion of zoledronic acid within 90 days after repair of a low-trauma hip fracture was associated with a reduction in the rate of new clinical fractures and with improved survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00046254 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Collapse
|