Lifestyle Factors and Other Influences on Medical Students Choosing a Career in Emergency Medicine

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine which lifestyle factors influence medical students who choose a career in emergency medicine (EM).

METHODS

Final-year medical students from 10 medical schools were surveyed after the National Residency Match Program match but prior to graduation regarding preferred medical specialty and lifestyle preferences. Responses from students pursuing EM regarding importance of lifestyle factors were compared to students interested in other specialties.

RESULTS

A total of 453 of 1,575 invited medical students completed an electronic survey. EM was the third most preferred specialty. Students selecting EM were less likely to endorse "having control of work schedule" as being important (p < 0.005), but more likely to endorse "having time off work" as important (p < 0.05). When students were asked what specific factors were important in choosing a specialty, EM students differed from other students in the importance of flexible work schedule, time outside of work, and balance between work and personal life (p < 0.001). Fewer EM students endorsed that having a "low-stress work day" was an important consideration in their specialty choice (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study representing 10 medical schools, graduating medical students who prefer EM as opposed to other specialties exhibit differences in lifestyle factors deemed important when choosing a specialty as a physician. Further investigation regarding any potential link to these factors and career longevity is warranted.

Specialty and Lifestyle Preference Changes during Medical School

PURPOSE

Medical student specialty choices have significant downstream effects on the availability of physicians and, ultimately, the effectiveness of health systems. This study investigated how medical student specialty preferences change over time in relation to their demographics and lifestyle preferences.

METHOD

Students from ten medical schools were surveyed at matriculation (2012) and graduation (2016). The two surveys included questions about specialty and lifestyle preferences, demographics, educational background, and indebtedness. Student data from 2012 to 2016 were paired together and grouped into those whose specialty preferences remained constant or switched.

RESULTS

Response rates in 2012 and 2016 were 65% (997/1530) and 50% (788/1575), respectively. Fourth-year students ranked "enjoying the type of work I am doing" as less important to a good physician lifestyle than did first-year students (from 59.6 to 39.7%). The lifestyle factors "having control of work schedule" and "having enough time off work" were ranked as more important to fourth-year students than first-year students (from 15.6 to 18.2% and 14.8 to 31.9%, respectively). The paired dataset included 19% of eligible students (237/1226). Demographic and lifestyle factors were not significantly associated with specialty preference switching. Additionally, no significant association existed between changing lifestyle preferences and switching specialty preference (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

During the course of medical school, lifestyle preferences became more focused on day-to-day factors and less on deeper motivational factors. Neither demographics nor lifestyle preferences appear to relate to a student's decision to switch specialty preference during medical school. These findings represent an important step in uncovering causes of specialty preference trends.

Estimation of laceration length by emergency department personnel

Introduction

Documentation and billing for laceration repair involves a description of wound length. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that emergency department (ED) personnel can accurately estimate wound lengths without the aid of a measuring device.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective observational study performed in an academic ED. Seven wounds of varying lengths were simulated by creating lacerations on purchased pigs’ ears and feet. We asked healthcare providers, defined as nurses and physicians working in the ED, to estimate the length of each wound by visual inspection. Length estimates were given in centimeters (cm) and inches. Estimated lengths were considered correct if the estimate was within 0.5 cm or 0.2 inches of the actual length. We calculated the differences between estimated and actual laceration lengths for each laceration and compared the accuracy of physicians to nurses using an unpaired t-test.

Results

Thirty-two physicians (nine faculty and 23 residents) and 16 nurses participated. All subjects tended to overestimate in cm and inches. Physicians were able to estimate laceration length within 0.5 cm 36% of the time and within 0.2 inches 29% of the time. Physicians were more accurate at estimating wound lengths than nurses in both cm and inches. Both physicians and nurses were more accurate at estimating shorter lengths (<5.0 cm) than longer (>5.0 cm).

Conclusion

ED personnel are often unable to accurately estimate wound length in either cm or inches and tend to overestimate laceration lengths when based solely on visual inspection.

Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Local anesthesia used for incision and drainage of abscesses is known to be painful.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We studied the analgesia provided by a lidocaine/tetracaine patch compared to injectable lidocaine during incision and drainage (I&D) of skin abscesses.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial carried out in the Emergency Department (ED) of an adult tertiary referral center. Adult patients with a skin abscess in need of I&D were randomized to one of two groups. One group received a lidocaine/tetracaine patch and injectable normal saline for anesthesia. The second group received a placebo patch and injectable 1% lidocaine. A visual analog pain scale was used to record the patient's pain level prior to treatment, during the procedure, and after I&D.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients enrolled in the study, including 12 randomized to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch and 8 to the injectable lidocaine. Pain scores preprocedure were similar in the two groups. Pain scores during I&D and postprocedure were compared between groups using a paired t-test. Patients receiving injectable lidocaine experienced pain that was similar (50.1 ± 5.9 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 45.2-55.1) to those receiving the transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch (60.1 mm ± 11.0; 95% CI = 55.2-68.1), p = 0.04, with a power of 80% to detect a difference of 20 mm at p ≤ 0.05; although this was statistically significant, it was not clinically significant. There was also no statistical difference between the two groups in the postprocedure pain scores (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Local injection of lidocaine provided clinically similar analgesia compared to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch during I&D of skin abscesses in the ED. Pain at presentation and after the procedure was similar in both groups. Emergency physicians should continue to use a local injected anesthetic for I&D of skin abscesses until a less painful alternative is identified.

The perils of sneezing: Bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax

This is a brief case report of an adolescent male who developed bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax after sneezing.

Emergency medicine rural rotations: a program director's guide

The Institute of Medicine's 2006 report titled "Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point" called national attention to the lack of specialty-trained emergency care practitioners, particularly in rural America. One suggested strategy for narrowing the gap between the prevalence of residency-trained, board-certified emergency physicians practicing in rural and urban emergency departments is the development of rural clinical experiences for emergency medicine residents during the course of their training. This article addresses promotion of a rural emergency medicine rotation to hospital leadership and resident recruits, examines funding sources, discusses medical liability and disability insurance options, provides suggestions for meeting faculty and planned educational activity residency review committee requirements, and offers guidance about site selection to direct emergency medicine academic leaders considering or planning a new rural emergency medicine rotation.