1
|
Steinbach CL, Töpper C, Adam T, Kees MG. Spectrum adequacy of antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis: a retrospective analysis in intermediate and intensive care unit patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2015; 14:48. [PMID: 26541549 PMCID: PMC4635547 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-015-0110-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Secondary peritonitis requires surgical source control and adequate antimicrobial treatment. Antimicrobial regimens are usually selected according to local susceptibility data of individual pathogens against single agents, but this neglects both the polymicrobial nature of the infection and the use of combination therapy. We analysed the probability of common regimens to cover all relevant pathogens isolated in one patient (“spectrum adequacy rate”, SAR) in a real-life data set. Methods
Data from 242 patients with secondary peritonitis (88 community acquired, 154 postoperative cases) treated in our IMCU/ICU were obtained retrospectively. The relative frequency of pathogens, resistance rates and the SAR were analysed using the free software R. Results Enterococci were isolated in 47.1 % of all patients, followed by Escherichia coli (42.6 %), other enterobacteriaceae (33.1 %), anaerobes (29.8 %) and Candida spp. (28.9 %). Resistance patterns were consistent with general surveillance data from our hospital. The susceptibility rates and SAR were lower in postoperative than in community acquired cases. The following regimens yielded a SAR > 95 % when enterobacteriaceae only were considered: piperacillin/tazobactam + gentamicin, cefotaxim (only for community acquired cases), cefotaxim + gentamicin, meropenem, tigecycline + gentamicin or tigecycline + ciprofloxaxin. When enterococci were also considered, all betalactam based regimens required combination with vancomycin or linezolid for a SAR > 95 %, whereas TGC based regimens were not compromised. As for Candida spp., the SAR of fluconazole was 81.9–87.5 %. Conclusions This study demonstrates a rational approach to assess the adequacy of antimicrobial regimens in secondary peritonitis, which may help to adjust local guidelines or to select candidate regimens for clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathérine L Steinbach
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christoph Töpper
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Thomas Adam
- Labor Berlin GmbH, Department of Microbiology, Clinical Consulting, Sylter Str. 2, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Martin G Kees
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schleibinger M, Steinbach CL, Töpper C, Kratzer A, Liebchen U, Kees F, Salzberger B, Kees MG. Protein binding characteristics and pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in intensive care unit patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80:525-33. [PMID: 25808018 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2015] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound ceftriaxone in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and its protein binding characteristics. METHODS Twenty patients (m/f 15/5, age 25-86 years, body weight 60-121 kg, APACHE II 7-40, estimated glomerular filtration rate 19-157 ml min(-1) , albumin 11.7-30.1 g l(-1) , total bilirubin <0.1-36.1 mg dl(-1) ) treated with intravenous ceftriaxone were recruited from two ICUs. Timed plasma samples were obtained using an opportunistic study protocol. Ceftriaxone concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography; unbound concentrations were determined after ultrafiltration using a new method which maintains physiological pH and temperature. The pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartment model, the protein-binding characteristics by Michaelis-Menten kinetics. RESULTS For total drug, the volume of distribution was 20.2 l (median; interquartile range 15.6-24.5 l), the half-life 14.5 h (10.0-25.5 h) and the clearance 0.96 l h(-1) (0.55-1.28 l h(-1) ). The clearance of unbound drug was 1.91 l h(-1) (1.46-6.20 l h(-1) ) and linearly correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (slope 0.85, y-intercept 0.24 l h(-1) , r(2) = 0.70). The unbound fraction was higher in ICU patients (33.0%; 20.2-44.5%) than reported in healthy volunteers, particularly when renal impairment or severe hyperbilirubinaemia was present. In all patients, unbound concentrations during treatment with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily remained above the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint (≤1 mg l(-1) ) throughout the whole dosing interval. CONCLUSIONS Protein binding of ceftriaxone is reduced and variable in ICU patients due to hypoalbuminaemia, but also to altered binding characteristics. Despite these changes, the pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftriaxone is governed by renal function. For patients with normal or reduced renal function, standard doses are sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schleibinger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Cathérine L Steinbach
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Töpper
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Kratzer
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Liebchen
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Frieder Kees
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Salzberger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin G Kees
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|