1
|
Wend CM, Fransman RB, Haut ER. Prehospital Trauma Care. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:267-277. [PMID: 38453301 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Prehospital trauma evaluation begins with the primary assessment of airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure. This is closely followed by vital signs and a secondary assessment. Key prehospital interventions include management and resuscitation according to the aforementioned principles with a focus on major hemorrhage control, airway compromise, and invasive management of tension pneumothorax. Determining the appropriate time and method for transportation (eg, ground ambulance, helicopter, police, private vehicle) to the hospital or when to terminate resuscitation are also important decisions to be made by emergency medical services clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Wend
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street Suite 6-100, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ryan B Fransman
- Department of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, SE, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Elliott R Haut
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street Suite 6-100, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sheikh Zayed 6107C, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levy MJ, Wend CM, Flemming WP, Lazieh A, Rosenblum AJ, Pineda CM, Wolfberg DM, Jenkins JL, Goolsby CA, Margolis AM. Bleeding Control Protections Within US Good Samaritan Laws. Prehosp Disaster Med 2024; 39:156-162. [PMID: 38572644 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x24000268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the United States, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs). Designed to encourage bystanders to aid at the scene of an emergency, GSLs generally limit the risk of civil tort liability if the care is rendered in good faith. Nation-wide, a leading cause of preventable death is uncontrolled external hemorrhage. Public bleeding control initiatives aim to train the public to recognize life-threatening external bleeding, perform life-sustaining interventions (including direct pressure, tourniquet application, and wound packing), and to promote access to bleeding control equipment to ensure a rapid response from bystanders. METHODS This study sought to identify the GSLs in each state and the District of Columbia to identify what type of responder is covered by the law (eg, all laypersons, only trained individuals, or only licensed health care providers) and if bleeding control is explicitly included or excluded in their Good Samaritan coverage. RESULTS Good Samaritan Laws providing civil liability qualified immunity were identified in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. One state, Oklahoma, specifically includes bleeding control in its GSLs. Six states - Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, and Missouri - have laws that define those covered under Good Samaritan immunity, generally limiting protection to individuals trained in a standard first aid or resuscitation course or health care clinicians. No state explicitly excludes bleeding control from their GSLs, and one state expressly includes it. CONCLUSION Nation-wide across the United States, most states have broad bystander coverage within GSLs for emergency medical conditions of all types, including bleeding emergencies, and no state explicitly excludes bleeding control interventions. Some states restrict coverage to those health care personnel or bystanders who have completed a specific training program. Opportunity exists for additional research into those states whose GSLs may not be inclusive of bleeding control interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Levy
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MarylandUSA
| | | | | | - Antoin Lazieh
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New JerseyUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Asa M Margolis
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tovar MA, Zwemer CH, Wend CM, Meltzer AC, Sarani B, Phillips JP. Disasters on campus: A cross-sectional survey of college EMS systems' preparedness to respond to mass casualty incidents. Am J Disaster Med 2022; 14:271-295. [PMID: 35325463 DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2021.0411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the training and readiness levels of Collegiate Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers to respond to mass casualty incidents (MCIs). METHODS An anonymous cross-sectional survey of Collegiate EMS providers was performed. PARTICIPANTS Participants were US-based EMS providers affiliated with the National Collegiate Emergency Medical Services Foundation. OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measures were levels of EMS experience and MCI training, subjective readiness levels for responding to various MCI scenarios, and analyzing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on MCI response capabilities. RESULTS Respondents had a median age of 21 years (interquartile range IQR 20, 22), with 86 percent (n = 96/112) being trained to the Emergency Medical Technician-Basic level. Providers reported participating in an average of 1.6 MCI trainings over the last four years (IQR, 1.0, 2.2). Subjective MCI response readiness levels were highest with active assailant attacks followed by large event evacuations, natural disasters, hazardous material (HAZMAT) incidents, targeted automobile ramming attacks, explosions, and finally bioweapons release. Disparate to this, only 18 percent of participants reported training in the fundamentals of tactical and disaster medicine. With respect to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on MCI readiness, 27 percent of respondents reported being less prepared, and there was a statistically significant decrease in subjective readiness to respond to HAZMAT incidents. CONCLUSION Given low rates of MCI training but high rates of self-assessed MCI preparedness, respondents may overestimate their readiness to adequately respond to the complexity of a real-world MCI. More objective assessment measures are needed to evaluate provider preparedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Tovar
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Catherine H Zwemer
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Christopher M Wend
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Andrew C Meltzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Babak Sarani
- Chief of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Center for Trauma and Critical Care, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - James P Phillips
- Chief of Disaster and Operational Medicine Section, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rosenblum AJ, Wend CM, Margolis AM. Haddon matrix analysis of medical preparedness for mass gathering music festivals. Am J Disaster Med 2021; 16:225-232. [PMID: 34904707 DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2021.0405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Beginning in the 1960s as a tool to disaggregate complicated auto injuries, the Haddon matrix has evolved into a modern method of analyzing complex public health challenges. Throughout the United States and internationally, music festivals have become a rapidly growing and increasingly complex area of mass gathering medicine. Given the austere environment and inherent challenges of providing medical care during a music festival, we utilized a modified Haddon matrix. The objective is to assess the relevant human, physical, and sociocultural factors that impact these festivals throughout the pre-event, event, and post-event time periods. This will ensure an all-hazards preparedness approach to the historically high incidence of traumatic injuries and polysubstance abuse, coupled with modern challenges such as infectious diseases and acts of intentional violence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Rosenblum
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-0511
| | - Christopher M Wend
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Asa M Margolis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wend CM, Goolsby C, Schuler K, Fischer ST, Levy MJ. Tourniquet Use in Animal Attacks: An Analysis of News Media Reports. Cureus 2021; 13:e13926. [PMID: 33880274 PMCID: PMC8051424 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Animal attacks pose a significant public health problem in the United States. Non-venomous animals are the leading cause of mortality in these attacks, and extremity injuries leading to hemorrhage are a common pattern. The Stop the Bleed campaign advocates for public training in bleeding control tactics and public access to bleeding control kits. Controlling life-threatening bleeding, as promoted by the Stop the Bleed campaign, may be a method to reduce preventable death in these attacks. Methodology We searched the Nexus Uni database, which compiles international news media articles, to collect newspaper articles in the United States between 2010 and 2019 that referenced animal attacks on humans in which a tourniquet was applied. We screened articles to assess for inclusion criteria and isolated a single report for each attack. Results A total of 50 individual attacks met the inclusion criteria and were included for data collection. Overall, 92% (n = 46) of the victims survived the attacks, and the average victim age was 33. California was the most common location of the attacks (n = 12, 24%), sharks caused the most attacks (n = 26, 52%), and victims most often sustained isolated extremity injuries (n = 24, 48% for arm and n = 24, 48% for leg). Laypeople applied the most tourniquets (n = 29, 58%), and appliers most frequently used improvised tourniquets (n = 30, 60%). Conclusions While mortality in this series was low, there are hundreds of fatalities from non-venomous animal attacks each year. Equipping and training the at-risk public to stop bleeding may save additional lives. Future Stop the Bleed efforts should improve access to public hemorrhage control equipment and expand educational outreach to people engaged in high-risk activities with animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Wend
- Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA
| | - Craig Goolsby
- Department of Military & Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.,National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA
| | - Keke Schuler
- Department of Military & Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.,National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, USA
| | - Steven T Fischer
- Emergency Medical Services, Dix Hills Volunteer Fire Department, Dix Hills, USA
| | - Matthew J Levy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.,National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|