Bioequivalence of Liquid and Reconstituted Lyophilized Etanercept Subcutaneous Injections

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of liquid and reconstituted lyophilized etanercept. This single-center, open-label study had a 2-period crossover design in which 36 healthy subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to etanercept (liquid/lyo or lyo/liquid). The treatments were separated by 28 days. Blood samples were obtained predose and at 10 predetermined time points postdose. Serum concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using a standard crossover analysis of variance model. Thirty-three subjects completed both treatment periods. Geometric mean values (adjusted) of area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the final quantifiable sample, area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, and maximum concentration obtained with the 50-mg/mL liquid etanercept injection were 93.0%, 90.7%, and 98.5% of the respective parameters for 2 injections of 25 mg/mL reconstituted formulation. All associated confidence intervals were within the predefined equivalence interval of 80% to 125%. No differences in safety profiles of the 2 formulations were apparent. Liquid etanercept was bioequivalent to the reconstituted lyophilized etanercept formulation.

Monoclonal antibodies to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) have no effect on in vitro B cell proliferation and act to inhibit in vitro T cell proliferation when presented in a cis, but not trans, format relative to the activating stimulus

B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) is an immunoglobulin superfamily member surface protein expressed on B and T cells. Its ligand, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), is believed to act as a monomeric agonist that signals via the CRD1 of HVEM to inhibit lymphocyte activation: HVEM is also the receptor for lymphotoxin-α and LIGHT, which both bind in the CRD2 and CRD3 domains of the HVEM molecule, and for CD160 which competes with BTLA. We have shown that recombinant HVEM and a panel of different monoclonal antibodies specifically bind murine BTLA on both B and T cells and that some antibodies inhibit anti-CD3ε-induced T cell proliferation in vitro, but only when constrained appropriately with a putatively cross-linking reagent. The antibodies had no significant effect on in vitro T cell proliferation in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay nor on in vitro DO11.10 antigen-induced T cell proliferation. None of these antibodies, nor HVEM-Fc, had any significant effect on in vitro B cell proliferation induced by anti-immunoglobulin M antibodies (±anti-CD40) or lipopolysaccharide. We further elucidated the requirements for inhibition of in vitro T cell proliferation using a beads-based system to demonstrate that the antibodies that inhibited T cell proliferation in vitro were required to be presented to the T cell in a cis, and not trans, format relative to the anti-CD3ε stimulus. We also found that antibodies that inhibited T cell proliferation in vitro had no significant effect on the antibody captured interleukin-2 associated with the in vivo activation of DO11.10 T cells transferred to syngeneic recipient BALB/c mice. These data suggest that there may be specific structural requirements for the BTLA molecule to exert its effect on lymphocyte activation and proliferation.