Vaccine effectiveness against severe laboratory-confirmed influenza in children: results of two consecutive seasons in Italy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalisations for influenza like illness (ILI) in children.

METHODS

We conducted a test negative case-control study during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 influenza seasons. Eleven paediatric hospital/wards in seven Italian regions participated in the study. Consecutive children visiting the ED with an ILI, as diagnosed by the doctor according to the European Centre for Disease Control case definition, were eligible for the study. Data were collected from trained pharmacists/physicians by interviewing parents during the ED visit (or hospital admission) of their children. An influenza microbiological test (RT-PCR) was carried out in all children.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred and four children, from 6 months to 16 years of age, were enrolled: 262 children tested positive for one of the influenza viruses (cases) and 442 tested negative (controls). Cases were older than controls (median age 46 vs. 29 months), though with a similar prevalence of chronic conditions. Only 25 children (4%) were vaccinated in the study period. The overall age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 38% (95% confidence interval -52% to 75%). A higher VE was estimated for hospitalised children (53%; 95% confidence interval -45% to 85%).

DISCUSSION

This study supports the effectiveness of the seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing visits to the EDs and hospitalisations for ILI in children, although the estimates were not statistically significant and with wide confidence intervals. Future systematic reviews of available data will provide more robust evidence for recommending influenza vaccination in children.

Human T-cell leukemia virus type II infection among high risk groups and its influence on HIV-1 disease progression

The prevalence and the risk factors of the human T-cell leukemia virus type I/II (HTLV-I/II) infection were evaluated among 552 individuals at high risk for HIV-1. HTLV infections showed a low (1.6%) prevalence, were restricted to intravenous drug addicts and were due to HTLV-II alone. Moreover, in order to weigh the influence of HTLV-II on the natural history of HIV-1 infection, the clinical outcome of HIV-1 disease was compared between subjects with and without HTLV-II coinfection. Our findings showed that HTLV-II does not adversely affect the outcome of HIV-1 infection. Infact, a slower disease progression has been recorded in some HTLV-II coinfected subjects.

Randomized trial of dapsone and aerosolized pentamidine for the prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmic encephalitis

PURPOSE

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and toxoplasmic encephalitis are the most frequent pulmonary and central nervous system opportunistic infections associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. We designed a prospective study to compare the effects of aerosolized pentamidine and dapsone in the prophylaxis of these infections in HIV-infected persons with CD4+ lymphocyte counts less than 250/mm3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy-eight patients seropositive for HIV who had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or advanced AIDS-related complex were randomly assigned to receive intermittent dapsone (100 mg twice weekly) or aerosolized pentamidine (100 mg every 2 weeks). The proportion of patients remaining free of PCP or toxoplasmosis was analyzed with the log-rank test as a function of time, as were the effects of zidovudine or prophylaxis on survival.

RESULTS

Dapsone and aerosolized pentamidine demonstrated similar efficacy in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of PCP, with 15 (18%) failures among patients receiving dapsone compared to 15 (14%) among those receiving aerosolized pentamidine (p = 0.4), after a mean length of follow-up of 42 and 44 weeks, respectively. Dapsone was more effective in the primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmic encephalitis, with six toxoplasmic encephalitis events occurring among those receiving aerosolized pentamidine, compared to none among those taking dapsone (p = 0.01). Primary prophylaxis for PCP was more effective than secondary prophylaxis with either therapy. Zidovudine therapy did not prevent PCP yet prolonged the PCP-free interval for those in whom either prophylactic therapy failed. Kaplan-Meier estimates did not show a difference in survival between the patients receiving either therapy, yet zidovudine use was associated with improved survival, independent of race and risk factor (Cox proportional hazards model, p = 0.001). The 1-month survival for patients developing PCP despite prophylaxis was better with those in whom dapsone failed than it was for those in whom aerosolized pentamidine failed (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Dapsone is as effective as aerosolized pentamidine in preventing PCP and has the advantage of a lower cost, easier administration, and possibly an additional preventive effect against toxoplasmosis. Zidovudine prolongs the PCP-free interval for patients receiving prophylaxis, regardless of which prophylactic agent is used.