Management and treatment outcome of DRESS patients in Europe: An international multicentre retrospective study of 141 cases

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal drug hypersensitivity reaction.

OBJECTIVE

To explore treatment approaches across Europe and their impact on the disease course, as well as prognostic factors and culprit drugs.

METHODS

In this retrospective European multicentric study, we included patients with probable or certain DRESS (RegiSCAR score ≥ 4) between January 2016 and December 2020. Independent associations between clinical parameters and the risk of intensive care unit admission and mortality at three months were assessed using a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients from 8 tertiary centres were included. Morbilliform exanthem was the most frequent cutaneous manifestation (78.0%). The mean affected body surface area (BSA) was 67%, 42% of the patients presented with erythroderma, and 24.8% had mucosal involvement. Based on systemic involvement, 31.9% of the patients had a severe DRESS. Anticonvulsants (24.1%) and sulphonamides (22.0%) were the most frequent causative agents. In all, 73% of the patients were treated with systemic glucocorticoids, and 25.5% received topical corticosteroids as monotherapy. Few patients received antiviral drugs or anti-IL5. No patients received intravenous immunoglobulins. The overall mortality was 7.1%. Independent predictors of mortality were older age (≥57.0 years; fully adjusted OR, 9.80; 95% CI, 1.20-79.93; p = 0.033), kidney involvement (fully adjusted OR, 4.70; 95% CI, 1.00-24.12; p = 0.049), and admission in intensive care unit (fully adjusted OR, 8.12; 95% CI, 1.90-34.67; p = 0.005). Relapse of DRESS and delayed autoimmune sequelae occurred in 8.5% and 12.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the need for diagnostic and prognostic scores/markers as well as for prospective clinical trials of drugs with the potential to reduce mortality and complications of DRESS.

Compression Stocking With 100% Donning and Doffing Success: An Open Label Randomised Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test whether an investigational two layer stocking exerting 27-29 mmHg pressure at the medial supramalleolar level, but without compression in the foot and heel, is easier to put on and take off than a standard stocking of the same compression class (23-32 mmHg), and also to assess the prevention of diurnal oedema with both types of stocking.

METHODS

This was an open label randomised controlled trial, which included 47 patients. All participants were at least 65 years of age and suffered from chronic venous disease class C3 - C6 in one leg. The primary end point was donning success; secondary endpoints were doffing success, prevention of diurnal oedema over one day, and the comfort of wearing the stocking. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Both types of compression stocking were compared in each group for ease of donning and doffing in the manner of a crossover study. Subsequently, patients wore the stocking type assigned to their group for a whole day to evaluate comfort and the effect on diurnal leg volume.

RESULTS

All participants were able to don the investigational stocking unaided, compared with 75% for the standard stocking (p < .001). Unaided removal success was 100% with the investigational stocking vs. 66% for the standard stocking (p < .001). There was no significant difference in leg volume reduction between the study groups after a day of wear. The investigational stocking was also rated as being more comfortable than the standard stocking (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The investigational stocking, which has no compression in the foot or heel area, is significantly easier to don and doff, with no inferiority in oedema prevention, compared with a standard stocking of the same compression class.