The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on oncology workload: The experience of an Italian Reference Cancer Center

e13520

Background: Since its outbreak in January 2020, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic dramatically affected health systems worldwide and a prompt realignment of clinical activities had to be thought. International Oncology guidelines recommended that routine oncology care continued to be delivered, ensuring triage procedures to prevent COVID-19 diffusion alongside treatments prioritization. Aim of this study was to assess the variation of activity volumes due to COVID-19 pandemic in the Oncology Department of the Academic Reference Cancer Center of Udine, Italy. Methods: We extracted activity volumes from the electronic “Data Warehouse” accountability system and compared activity in 2020 with historical activity in 2019. We then narrowed the analysis to the peak of COVID-19 pandemic, comparing data of a four-months period (February-May 2020 vs 2019). In accordance with the Italian Association of Medical Oncology guidelines, the activities analyzed included: new patients referrals, first consultations, new therapy assignments, treatment prescriptions and therapy administrations, disease re-assessments, follow-up visits, tele-examinations, unplanned visits and ward discharges. Results: Overall, throughout COVID-19 pandemic a negligible reduction in the number of first consultations (-5%) and new patients referrals to our Oncology Department (-10%) was detected. Of note, a significant reduction in the number of unplanned oncologic visits was observed (-23%). The replacement of follow up visits with telephonic interviews with the interpretation of laboratory and radiologic examinations (tele-examinations) led to a substantial reduction in follow-up visits throughout 2020 (-25%). Conversely, treatment-related activities, including new therapy assignments (+1%), treatment prescriptions and therapy administrations (+2% and +3%, respectively), confirmed the increasing trend of the previous year. Interestingly, similar trends were observed in the four-months peak period with a substantially higher decrease in follow-up visits in 2020 vs 2019 (-51%), whereas treatment-related activities remained stable. Conclusions: In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, our Oncology Department maintained stable performances on critical oncology activities. Strict triage procedures, serial swabs for patients and healthcare professionals and strategic follow-up visits remodulation were crucial. Notwithstanding the significant decrease in cancer treatments observed in several published reports, our experience demonstrates that the reorganization of oncology departments during a global pandemic is feasible and it should be pursued to preserve patients’ safety without compromising the continuum of care.