1
|
van Gils AM, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Handgraaf D, Hendriksen HMA, van Strien A, Schoonenboom N, Schipper A, Kleijer M, Griffioen A, Muller M, Tolonen A, Lötjönen J, van der Flier WM, Visser LNC. Use of a digital tool to support the diagnostic process in memory clinics-a usability study. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16:75. [PMID: 38589933 PMCID: PMC11003066 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01433-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both memory clinic professionals and patients see value in digital tools, yet these hardly find their way to clinical practice. We explored the usability of a digital tool to support the diagnostic work-up in daily memory clinic practice. We evaluated four modules that integrate multi-modal patient data (1.cognitive test; cCOG, and 2. MRI quantification; cMRI) into useful diagnostic information for clinicians (3. cDSI) and understandable and personalized information for patients (4. patient report). METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods study in five Dutch memory clinics. Fourteen clinicians (11 geriatric specialists/residents, two neurologists, one nurse practitioner) were invited to integrate the tool into routine care with 43 new memory clinic patients. We evaluated usability and user experiences through quantitative data from questionnaires (patients, care partners, clinicians), enriched with thematically analyzed qualitative data from interviews (clinicians). RESULTS We observed wide variation in tool use among clinicians. Our core findings were that clinicians: 1) were mainly positive about the patient report, since it contributes to patient-centered and personalized communication. This was endorsed by patients and care partners, who indicated that the patient report was useful and understandable and helped them to better understand their diagnosis, 2) considered the tool acceptable in addition to their own clinical competence, 3) indicated that the usefulness of the tool depended on the patient population and purpose of the diagnostic process, 4) addressed facilitators (ease of use, practice makes perfect) and barriers (high workload, lack of experience, data unavailability). CONCLUSION This multicenter usability study revealed a willingness to adopt a digital tool to support the diagnostic process in memory clinics. Clinicians, patients, and care partners appreciated the personalized diagnostic report. More attention to education and training of clinicians is needed to utilize the full functionality of the tool and foster implementation in actual daily practice. These findings provide an important step towards a lasting adoption of digital tools in memory clinic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek M van Gils
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Memory Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dédé Handgraaf
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen M A Hendriksen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Strien
- Department of Geriatric medicine, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annemieke Schipper
- Department of Neurology, HagaZiekenhuis, location Zoetermeer, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska Kleijer
- Department of Neurology, HagaZiekenhuis, location Zoetermeer, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek Griffioen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majon Muller
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam/AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Gils AM, Rhodius‐Meester HFM, Leeuwis AE, Handgraaf D, Bakker C, Peetoom K, Bouwman FH, Pijnenburg YAL, Papma JM, Hoogendoorn T, Schoonenboom N, van Strien A, Verwey NA, Köhler S, de Vugt ME, van der Flier WM. Young-onset dementia in memory clinics in the Netherlands: Study design and description of PRECODE-GP. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2023; 15:e12471. [PMID: 37609004 PMCID: PMC10441283 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The disease trajectory and healthcare requirements of patients with young-onset dementia (YOD) differ from those of older patients. Accurate data about YOD is crucial to improve diagnosis and optimize care. PRECODE-GP aims to set up a prospective national database of patients with YOD to gain insight into the occurrence and characteristics of patients with YOD in memory clinics in the Netherlands. The national database includes data from dementia patients aged <70 years at diagnosis, collected by local memory clinics (MCs). Data included demographic information, clinical variables, and (etiological) diagnoses. Between July 2019 and December 2022, 781 patients with a mean age of 62±6y at diagnosis (range 37 to 69y) were included from 39 MCs. Most (n = 547,70%) were diagnosed with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Patients with Frontotemporal lobe dementia (FTD, n = 87, 11%) were youngest (61±6.0y). Over half (55%) of patients were experiencing symptoms for ≥2 years. We initiated a Dutch national YOD database to improve diagnosis and care for this underrepresented and vulnerable patient group. The database provides a basis for future in-depth studies on YOD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek M. van Gils
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F. M. Rhodius‐Meester
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Internal MedicineGeriatric Medicine SectionAmsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric MedicineThe Memory ClinicOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Anna E. Leeuwis
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dédé Handgraaf
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Christian Bakker
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Alzheimer CenterRadboud UMCNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Center for Specialized Geriatric CareGroenhuysenRoosendaalThe Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Peetoom
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Center LimburgSchool for Mental Health and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Femke H. Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Janne M. Papma
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MCErasmus MC University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Niki Schoonenboom
- Department of Clinical Geriatrics Spaarne GasthuisHaarlemThe Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Strien
- Department of Geriatric MedicineJeroen Bosch Hospital‘s‐HertogenboschThe Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas A. Verwey
- Department of NeurologyMedical Center LeeuwardenLeeuwardenThe Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Center LimburgSchool for Mental Health and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Marjolein E. de Vugt
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Center LimburgSchool for Mental Health and NeuroscienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamDepartment of NeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Gils AM, van de Beek M, van Unnik AAJM, Tolonen A, Handgraaf D, van Leeuwenstijn M, Lötjönen J, van der Flier WM, Lemstra A, Rhodius‐Meester HFM. Optimizing cCOG, a Web-based tool, to detect dementia with Lewy Bodies. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2022; 14:e12379. [PMID: 36569383 PMCID: PMC9773307 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Distinguishing dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging due to overlapping presentations. We adapted a Web-based test tool, cCOG, by adding a visuospatial task and a brief clinical survey and assessed its ability to differentiate between DLB and AD. Methods We included 110 patients (n = 30 DLB, n = 32 AD dementia, and n = 48 controls with subjective cognitive decline (SCD)). Full cCOG comprises six cognitive subtasks and a survey addressing self-reported DLB core and autonomic features. First, we compared cCOG cognitive tasks to traditional neuropsychological tasks for all diagnostic groups and clinical questions to validated assessments of clinical features in DLB only. Then, we studied the performance of cCOG cognitive tasks and clinical questions, separately and combined, in differentiating diagnostic groups. Results cCOG cognitive tasks and clinical survey had moderate to strong correlations to standard neuropsychological testing (.61≤ r s ≤ .77) and to validated assessments of clinical features (.41≤ r s ≤ .65), except for fluctuations and REM-sleep behavior disorder (RBD) (r s = .32 and r s = .10). Full cCOG, including both cognitive tasks and brief survey had a diagnostic accuracy (acc) of 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.89], with good discrimination of DLB versus AD (acc 0.87 [0.76-0.95]) and DLB versus controls (acc 0.94 [0.86-0.98]). Conclusion We illustrated that cCOG aids in distinguishing DLB and AD patients by using remote assessment of cognition and clinical features. Our findings pave the way to a funneled, harmonized diagnostic process among memory clinics and, eventually, a more timely and accurate diagnosis of DLB and AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek M. van Gils
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marleen van de Beek
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annemartijn A. J. M. van Unnik
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Dédé Handgraaf
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mardou van Leeuwenstijn
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Epidemiology and Data SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Afina Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F. M. Rhodius‐Meester
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamNeurologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC location VUmcAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam NeuroscienceNeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Internal MedicineGeriatric Medicine SectionVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Gils AM, van de Beek M, van Unnik A, Tolonen A, Handgraaf D, van Leeuwenstijn M, Lötjönen J, van der Flier WM, Lemstra AW, Meester HFR. Optimizing cCOG, a web‐based tool, to detect dementia with Lewy Bodies. Alzheimers Dement 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.062089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek M. van Gils
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Marleen van de Beek
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Annemartijn van Unnik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | | | - Dédé Handgraaf
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Mardou van Leeuwenstijn
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | | | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Afina W. Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F.M. Rhodius‐ Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|