1
|
Lindeman GJ, Nolan E, Vaillant F, Branstetter D, Pal B, Giner G, Whitehead L, Lok SW, Mann GB, kConFab C, Rohrbach K, Huang LY, Soriano R, Smyth GK, Dougall WC, Visvader JE. Abstract S2-04: RANK ligand as a target for breast cancer prevention in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-s2-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: BRCA1 mutation carriers commonly undergo prophylactic mastectomy to reduce their risk of breast cancer. The precise role of chemoprevention with tamoxifen, which reduces the incidence of ER-positive breast cancer in the general population, is uncertain for BRCA1 mutation carriers, where uptake has been modest. The identification of an effective and acceptable prevention therapy therefore remains a 'holy grail' for the field. Precancerous BRCA1mut/+ tissue harbors an aberrant population of luminal progenitor cells and deregulated progesterone signaling has been implicated in BRCA1-associated oncogenesis. Since Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) is a key paracrine effector of progesterone signaling, and RANKL and its receptor RANK contribute to mammary tumorigenesis, we investigated a role for this pathway in the preneoplastic phase of BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Methods: We explored a role for the RANK/RANKL pathway during the preneoplastic phase in freshly isolated (histologically normal) patient specimens from BRCA1 mutation carriers using several approaches. RANK and RANKL expression in breast cancer was evaluated in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) archival sections by IHC from the kConFab and the Amgen Tissue Banks. All samples were obtained with patient consent and relevant IRB approval. A role for RANKL inhibition in attenuating tumor onset was studied using the MMTV-cre/Brca1fl/fl/p53+/– mouse model that recapitulates human basal-like breast cancer.
Results: We identified two subsets of luminal progenitors (RANK+ and RANK–) in histologically normal tissue of BRCA1 mutation carriers and found that RANK+ cells are highly proliferative, exhibit grossly aberrant DNA repair and bear a molecular signature similar to that of basal-like breast cancer. Moreover, high levels of RANK expression prevailed in established BRCA1-associated tumors. These data suggest that RANK+ and not RANK– progenitors are a key target population in these women. Notably, inhibition of RANKL signaling by denosumab in 3D breast organoids derived from pre-neoplastic BRCA1mut/+ tissue attenuated progesterone-induced proliferation. Furthermore, inhibition of RANKL with either the RANKL inhibitor OPG-Fc or a RANKL monoclonal antibody in a Brca1-deficient mouse model significantly curtailed mammary tumorigenesis, when compared to controls (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Together these findings identify a targetable pathway in a putative cell of origin population in BRCA1 mutation carriers and implicate RANKL blockade as a promising breast cancer prevention strategy.
Citation Format: Lindeman GJ, Nolan E, Vaillant F, Branstetter D, Pal B, Giner G, Whitehead L, Lok SW, Mann GB, kConFab Consortium, Rohrbach K, Huang L-Y, Soriano R, Smyth GK, Dougall WC, Visvader JE. RANK ligand as a target for breast cancer prevention in BRCA1 mutation carriers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GJ Lindeman
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - E Nolan
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - F Vaillant
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - D Branstetter
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - B Pal
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - G Giner
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - L Whitehead
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - SW Lok
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - GB Mann
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Consortium kConFab
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - K Rohrbach
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - L-Y Huang
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - R Soriano
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - GK Smyth
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - WC Dougall
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - JE Visvader
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc, CA; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; kConFab, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE, Vaillant F, Mann GB, Soriano R, Branstetter D, Dougall WC. Abstract P5-03-02: Expression of RANK and RANK ligand (RANKL) in breast carcinoma and distinct breast epithelial cells from BRCA1 mutation carriers. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p5-03-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers likely arise from luminal progenitor (LP) cells, previously shown to exhibit aberrant growth properties. Oophorectomy, and possibly tamoxifen, reduce breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers, potentially via inhibition of paracrine mediated signaling to stem/progenitor cells. RANKL is a major paracrine effector of progesterone's mitogenic action in mammary epithelium via its receptor RANK, and has a role in ovarian hormone-dependent activation of stem cells. Here we assessed RANK and RANKL expression in breast tumors and normal breast epithelial subtypes from women with mutations of BRCA1 (mBRCA1) or BRCA2 (mBRCA2).
Methods: RANK and RANKL expression in breast cancer or normal breast tissue samples with mBRCA1, mBRCA2 or wildtype (WT) BRCA1/2 were analyzed in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections by IHC. kConFab and The Royal Melbourne Hospital Tissue Bank provided the samples used in this analysis; these samples were obtained with relevant IRB approval. RANK expression on normal breast epithelial cells was measured by flow cytometry. Antibodies against human RANK (N-1H8, N-2B10; Amgen) and RANKL (M366; Amgen) were used in both assays. Incidence of IHC staining was scored as a positive IHC signal of any intensity. The overall expression was generated using the H scoring method which is calculated as the staining intensity of the tumor (0-3) multiplied by the percentage of positively staining cells.
Results: Breast tumors from women with mBRCA1 had a higher incidence of RANK expression (68/162; 42%) compared with mBRCA2 (17/113; 15%) or WT (34/314; 11%) and higher overall H score (21.3) compared with mBRCA2 (8.0) or WT (3.4); RANKL expression did not vary greatly between groups: mBRCA1 (13/135; 10%), mBRCA2 (5/114; 4%), WT (23/212; 11%). In normal breast tissue, LP (Lin−EpCAM+CD49f+) and basal/stem cells (Lin−EpCAM−CD49fhi) expressed RANK on their surface. Similar expression patterns were seen in these epithelial subtypes from each BRCA1/2 genotype. Stromal cells (Lin−EpCAM−CD49f−) had minimal RANK expression.
Conclusions: RANK expression intensity and incidence scores are both enriched approximately 4-fold in breast tumors from BRCA1 carriers compared with other genotypes. Also, RANK is normally expressed in breast LP cells as well as the basal/stem cell containing population. Ongoing studies will assess functional regulation of LP or mammary stem cell activity by RANKL and determine if the RANKL/RANK signaling pathway affects the aberrant growth characteristics of these cells from BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-03-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GJ Lindeman
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - JE Visvader
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - F Vaillant
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - GB Mann
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - R Soriano
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - D Branstetter
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| | - WC Dougall
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA; Therapeutic Innovation Unit, Amgen Inc., Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pan Y, Xu R, Peach M, Huang C, Branstetter D, Durbin B, Herbst R, Eckhardt G, Mendelson D, Holland P. Application of pharmacodynamic assays in a phase Ia trial of Apo2L/TRAIL in patients with advanced tumors. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.3535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3535 Background: Recombinant human (rh) Apo2L/TRAIL is a dual pro-poptotic receptor agonist (PARA) that induces apoptosis by binding to pro-apoptotic receptors DR4 and DR5, which recruit a death inducing signaling complex upon ligand binding. This results in activation of the effector caspase 3/7, that subsequently cleaves intracellular substrates to execute cellular apoptosis. A Phase1a trial is underway to evaluate the safety and tolerability of rhApo2L/TRAIL in patients with advanced tumors. The aim of this study was to develop and validate high-throughput pharmacodynamic assays to monitor rhApo2L/TRAIL activity in easily accessible patient samples such as serum. Methods: To monitor rhApo2L/TRAIL activity in patients, we optimized assays to measure the release of the apoptotic markers caspase 3/7, cytokeratin 18 (CK18), and genomic DNA (gDNA) in serum. Serum caspase 3/7 levels were monitored using the Caspase Glo kit, which generates a luminescent signal upon cleavage of a caspase 3/7 substrate; cleavage of the caspase substrate CK18 was measured using an optimized form of the M30 ELISA assay; gDNA was measured using a β-actin-specific TaqMan real-time PCR assay. Mice bearing Colo205 xenografts were treated with rhApo2L/TRAIL and sera were collected and assayed for apoptotic markers. Upon validating these assays, we monitored the levels of apoptotic markers in cancer patients who received rhApo2L/TRAIL. Results: We detected transient increases in apoptotic markers in mouse sera 8–24 hr after treatment with rhApo2L/TRAIL. This increase was dose-dependent and correlated with active caspase 3 detected by IHC in Colo205 tumors. In the phase Ia study, increases in serum caspase 3/7 and gDNA levels were observed in >50% of colorectal, lung and sarcoma patients evaluated. Preliminary analyses show the percentage of increase correlates using both analytes and is dose-dependent. Conclusions: These findings support the use of serum-based pharmacodynamic assays as a means to monitor rhApo2L/TRAIL activity in patients with advanced tumors. A complete analysis of all patient serum samples from the ongoing phase Ia trial will be reported. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Pan
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - R. Xu
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - M. Peach
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C. Huang
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - D. Branstetter
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - B. Durbin
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - R. Herbst
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - G. Eckhardt
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - D. Mendelson
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - P. Holland
- Amgen, Seattle, WA; Genentech, San Francisco, CA; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Premiere Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|