Guidelines for the public health management of typhoid and paratyphoid in England: practice guidelines from the National Typhoid and Paratyphoid Reference Group

OBJECTIVES

The Typhoid and Paratyphoid Reference Group (TPRG) was convened by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) to revise guidelines for public health management of enteric fever. This paper presents the new guidelines for England and their rationale.

METHODS

Methods include literature reviews including grey literature such as audit data and case studies; analysis of enhanced surveillance data from England, Wales and Northern Ireland; review of clearance and screening schedules in use in other non-endemic areas; and expert consensus.

RESULTS

The evidence and principles underpinning the new guidance are summarised. Significant changes from previous guidance include: • Algorithms to guide risk assessment and management, based on risk group and travel history; • Outline of investigation of non-travel cases; • Simplified microbiological clearance schedules for cases and contacts; • Targeted co-traveller screening and a "warn and inform" approach for contacts; • Management of convalescent and chronic carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines were launched in February 2012. Feedback has been positive: the guidelines are reported to be clear, systematic, practical and risk-based. An evaluation of the guidelines is outlined and will add to the evidence base. There is potential for simplification and consistency between international guidelines.

Present Practice and Treatment Strategies in Endourological Stone Management

OBJECTIVES

The European Society of Urological Technology (ESUT) conducted a survey in order to assess and record the current trends between urologists with regard to the application of endourological stone management to identify trends and differences in treatment strategies among urologists.

METHODS

A total of 695 certified urologists and urological residents answered the ESUT Endourological Stone Management Questionnaire. There were 136 (28.7%) chief urologists, 240 (50.6%) staff urologists and 98 (20.7%) residents. The respondents were classified according to both the geographical origin (in four groups: Northern Europe (NE), Southern Europe (SE), Eastern Europe (EE) and Outside Europe (OE)), and department size (number of urological beds per department: small < or = 25, medium 26-50 beds, large > 50 beds) in order to identify any differences in the replies.

RESULTS

On average, 40.1 newly diagnosed patients and 73.6 revisits with urolithiasis are seen a month per department. According to the replies, there are no significant differences in total numbers of treatments in ESWL and/or endourological stone managements amongst the geographically based groups. Monthly, on average 68.5 ESWL treatments and 23.0 URS are performed per department. A significant majority of surveyed urologists performs URS with a rigid or semi-rigid instrument (79%) instead of a flexible instrument (21%, p = 0.003). URS is more frequently performed outside Europe (p = 0.02) with a more frequent use of dormia catheters (p < 0.001). On average, 20.9 double g-stents are placed monthly in each department, most commonly before or after endourological procedures (p < 0.001). Percutaneous procedures are performed by 69.6% of the respondents with a mean of 16.8 PNL procedures a month. PNL for stone management is mainly performed in Eastern Europe and non-European countries (p = 0.017). Nephrostomy tubes are used by 77.7% of the responding urologists. Monthly, 13.1 nephrostomy tubes are placed, mostly during PNL or after endourological procedures (40.7%).

CONCLUSION

The data obtained from the 695 urologists and residents provides information on the performed procedures and the use of material. In general, respondents from different geographical locations perform similar procedures and use identical material; however URS and PNL are performed more frequently outside of Europe, whereas laser lithotripsy is frequently used in Northern European counties.

Contemporary management of renal calculus disease

The management of renal calculus disease has changed. Non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques of stone disintegration and removal have replaced open stone surgery in managing this condition. In this article we discuss the investigation and management of patients with renal stone disease as currently performed in specialist stone centres.