POS1363 THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF BEHÇET’S SYNDROME OVERALL DAMAGE INDEX IN A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT

Background

Behçet’s syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) is a newly developed damage index specific to Behçet syndrome (BS).

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate validity, reliability and feasibility of the Turkish version of BODI and evaluate its performance for use in retrospective cohort studies for different phenotypes of BS.

Methods

The study included 295 patients with at least 3 visits at 6 months intervals out of 590 consecutive BS patients who were admitted between January 2015 and August 2017. Turkish version of the BODI form was developed by translating into Turkish and backwards by 2 people. BODI scores were calculated for each year during the follow-up period. The test-retest reliability of BODI was assessed by scoring the same 50 patients at 6-month intervals by the same observer (YYO). Two different observers (YYO- YO) assessed the same 50 patients for inter-observer agreement. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the inter and intra-observer agreement. We also evaluated the median time to fill out the form in patients with different types of involvements.

Results

Among the 295 (158 F/137 M) patients, mean age was 39 (9.9) and the mean disease duration was 8.8 (5.9) years. Clinical features of BS patients were summarized in the Table 1. BODI median score was 1 (IQR=0-1). We observed an increase in BODI score in 111 (38%) patients during follow-up. The main reasons for increasing BODI scores were eye, vascular and neurological involvement (Table 1). The mean ICC for inter-observer agreement was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96) and for intra-observer agreement was 1. The median (range) time to complete the form was 2 (1-8) minutes.

Table 1.

Clinical features and BODI scores of Behçet syndrome patients.

Oral ulceration99.7Genital ulceration81.3Erythema nodosum57.1Papulopustular lesions89.5Joint involvement25.2Ocular involvement47.3Vascular involvement21.4Neurologic involvement3.1Gastrointestinal involvement2.7N of patients with more than 3 BODI scores*(%)194 (66)Causes for increase in BODI score**(n=111) (%)Ocular involvement77 (69)Vascular involvement17 (15)Neurological involvement8 (7)Gastrointestinal involvement3 (3)Mucocutaneous inv.6 (5)Cardiovascular inv.1 (0.9)Diabetes mellitus4 (4)Avascular necrosis2 (2)Osteoporosis related fracture1 (0.9)

*All patients had at least 3 BODI scores,

**Some patients had more than 1 type of involvement

Conclusion

This study showed that the Turkish version of BODI was a reliable and feasible instrument that could capture the change over time in damage, and could be used in retrospective cohort studies. Ocular involvement was the most common cause of progressive damage in this cohort.

Disclosure of Interests

Yeliz Yagiz Ozogul: None declared, Yesim Ozguler Speakers bureau: Yesim Ozguler has received honorariums for presentations from UCB Pharma, Novartis, and Pfizer., Didar Ucar: None declared, Ugur Uygunoglu: None declared, Zekayi Kutlubay: None declared, Vedat Hamuryudan Speakers bureau: Vedat Hamuryudan has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma., Grant/research support from: Vedat Hamuryudan has received grant/research support from Celgene, Gulen Hatemi Speakers bureau: Gulen Hatemi has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma., Grant/research support from: Gulen Hatemi has received grant/research support from Celgene.

AB1308 MYCOPHENOLATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF EYE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH BEHÇET’S SYNDROME

Background

Experience with mycophenolate in uveitis associated with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) is limited.

Objectives

We aimed to report the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and mycophenolate sodium (MPA) in the treatment of BS uveitis.

Methods

All patients with panuveitis or posterior uveitis who used mycophenolate for eye involvement between 2016 and 2018 were included. Patient charts were reviewed and data on demographic features, previous immunosuppressives, concomitant therapies, ocular attacks and outcome, and adverse events were extracted. Follow up was ended on October 2021.

Results

We included 12 BS patients (M/W: 8/4, mean age: 35±7 years) treated with mycophenolate during a mean follow-up of 42±19 months (Table 1). All but 3 patients had bilateral eye involvement. IFX and INF-α had been discontinued due to adverse events in all patients, AZA in 10/12, and Cy-A in 7/10.

Table 1.

Demographic, treatment and outcome of the 12 patients

Age /genderPrevious therapiesRemission induction or Maintenance therapyConcomitant biologicTime to ocular attack (months)Treatment after ocular attackAt the end of the follow-upMMF duration (months)25/MAZA,Cy-ARemission inductionNone2ADA was addedADA and MPAa were switched to INF due to further ocular attacks3842/WAZA,Cy-A, INF, IFXRemission inductionIFXN/AN/AStill on IFX and MMF7237/MAZA,Cy-A, INF, IFX, ADARemission inductionADAN/AN/AStill on ADA and MMF2732/MAZARemission inductionNone12IFX was addedStill on IFX and MMF5233/WAZA, Cy-A, INF, ADA, IFXRemission inductionNoneN/AN/AMPAb was switched to certolizumab and MTX524/MAZARemission inductionIFXN/AN/AStill on MMF and IFX was stopped due to remission6337/MAZA, Cy-ARemission inductionNone6IFX was addedIFX and MMF were switched to INF due to further ocular attacks4136/WAZA,Cy-A, INFMaintenanceNone2ADA was addedStill on ADA and MMF5036/MAZA,Cy-A, INF, IFXMaintenanceIFXN/AN/AStill on IFX and MMF was stopped due to remission1749/WAZA,Cy-A, INFMaintenanceNoneN/AN/AStill on MMF3937/MAZA, INFMaintenanceNone31Cy-A was addedStill on MMF and Cy-A38 d31/MAZA, Cy-A, INFMaintenanceNone5IFX was addedOff treatment for 2 years38

a MMF was switched to MPA due to numbness in hands and feet, and MPA was stopped due to arthralgia.

b MMF was switched to MPA due to diarrhea

Seven patients were prescribed mycophenolate for remission induction. One of these patients had had his first uveitis attack while on AZA treatment due to gastrointestinal involvement. The remaining 6 patients were using other immunosuppressives and experienced relapses that led to mycophenolate use. MMF was added to a biologic agent in 2 patients (IFX and ADA) and was initiated in combination with IFX in 1 patient. These 3 patients did not experience further ocular attacks and IFX was stopped due to remission in 1 patient. In the fourth patient, MMF was switched to MPA due to numbness in hands and feet and MPA was stopped due to arthralgia. This patient did not experience ocular attacks during 5 months of MPA therapy. The remaining 3 patients had further uveitis attacks without decrease in visual acuity 2, 6, and 12 months after MMF initiation, and IFX was added in 2 patients, and ADA in 1 patient. Two of these patients were switched to INF-α due to uveitis relapses. MMF was switched to MPA for diarrhea in 1 patient.

Five patients had received MMF for maintenance. One of these was using IFX when MMF was started and these 2 agents were used together. This patient discontinued MMF due to remission 17 months after MMF initiation and is still on IFX monotherapy. The second patient is still on MMF for 39 months without further ocular attacks. ADA, IFX and Cy-A were added in the remaining 3 patients due to ocular attacks 2, 5 and 31 months after MMF initiation. One of these 3 patients stopped IFX and MMF due to remission and is off treatment for 2 years.

Conclusion

Mycophenolate may be an alternative treatment modality in addition to biologics for patients with eye involvement who are intolerant to conventional therapies. Further data is needed to show whether it would be effective when used alone.

Disclosure of Interests

Didar Ucar: None declared, Yilmaz Ozyazgan: None declared, Sinem Nihal Esatoglu Speakers bureau: Sinem Nihal Esatoglu has received honorariums for presentations from UCB Pharma, Roche, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp Dohme, Emir Cerme: None declared, Vedat Hamuryudan Speakers bureau: Vedat Hamuryudan has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Vedat Hamuryudan has received grant/research support from Celgene., Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Izzet Fresko: None declared, Sebahattin Yurdakul: None declared, Hasan Yazici: None declared, Gulen Hatemi Speakers bureau: Gulen Hatemi has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma., Grant/research support from: Gulen Hatemi has received grant/research support from Celgene.

POS0816 DRUG SURVIVAL OF INFLIXIMAB IN BEHÇET’S SYNDROME PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF INVOLVEMENT

Background

Infliximab (IFX) is an effective therapeutic option in the management of severe and refractory manifestations of Behçet’s syndrome (BS).

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate long term drug survival of IFX in a large cohort of BS patients.

Methods

We reviewed the charts of BS patients who received IFX between 2004 and June 2021 and noted demographic features, reasons for IFX use, IFX duration, and reasons for discontinuation.

Results

371 patients (290 men, mean age at IFX initiation: 35.5 ± 10 years) received IFX for uveitis (n=164), vascular involvement (n=114), central nervous system (CNS) involvement (n=55), arthritis (n=19), gastrointestinal (GI) involvement (n=15), mucocutaneous involvement (n=10), venous ulcers (n=13), and secondary amyloidosis (n=1). Twenty patients had more than one type of involvement requiring IFX.

During a median follow-up of 30 months (IQR: 13-52), 175 (47%) patients were still receiving IFX for a median period of 40 months (IQR: 22-66) while 196 (53%) patients had discontinued IFX after a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR: 8-34).

IFX retention rate was 50% for mucocutaneous involvement, 43% for uveitis, 49% for vascular involvement, 58% for CNS involvement, 37% for arthritis, 53% for GI involvement, and 31% for venous ulcer (Table 1).

Table 1.

Drug survival of infliximab and reasons for infliximab discontinuation

Mucocutaneous involvement (n=10)Uveitis (n=164)Vascular (n=114)CNS (n=55)Arthritis (n=19)GIS (n=15)Venous ulcer (n=13)Male (n, %)3 (30)127 (77)89 (78)49 (89)14 (74)9 (60)12 (92)Age at infliximab initiation (mean ± SD years)35.8 ± 9.334 ± 9.936 ± 9.136.2 ± 10.439.6 ± 10.743 ± 14.137.4 ± 8.2Number of patients who used concomitant immunosuppressives (n, %)5 (50)108 (66)86 (75)38 (69)5 (26)11 (73)7 (54)Duration of infliximab use (mean ± SD months)33 ± 3845 ± 3828 ± 2337 ± 2837 ± 3526 ± 2625 ± 25Number of patients who discontinued infliximab (n, %)5 (50)93 (57)58 (51)23 (42)12 (63)7 (47)9 (69)Due to remission-30212121Due to primary inefficacy157---5Due to secondary inefficacy212545--Due to adverse event1231211541Due to noncompliance11113--2Due to other reasons-1212311-

Reasons for discontinuation were adverse events in 56 (15%), remission in 54 (15%) patients, inefficacy in 45 (12%) (secondary inefficacy in 26 (7%), primary inefficacy in 19 (5%)), and lack of patient compliance in 18 (5%). Other reasons were preparation for surgical operation (n=4), pregnancy (n=4), lack of health insurance (n=4), preferring subcutaneous administration during the pandemic (n=3), due to prison sentence (n=3), willing to get pregnant (n=1), rejecting the treatment (n=1), and death (n=3).

Adverse events (n=56) leading to the cessation of IFX were infusion reactions (n=22), infections (n=7), tuberculosis (n=6), malignancy (n=6), palmoplantar psoriasis (n=5), hepatotoxicity (n=4), lichen planus (n=1), drug induced lupus (n=1), auricular chondritis (n=1), macrophage activation syndrome (n=1), splenic infarction (n=1) and a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (n=1).

At the end of the follow-up, 2 patients had died due to lung adenocarcinoma, 1 patient had died due to pneumosepsis, 1 due to severe parenchymal neurologic involvement and 1 with pulmonary artery involvement due to massive hemorrhage during IFX treatment. Additionally, 7 patients had died 9, 10 months, 3, 3, 4, 7 and 9 years after IFX discontinuation. The causes of death were severe nervous system involvement in 2 patients, right heart failure due to pulmonary hypertension, laryngeal adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, sepsis and gastrointestinal bleeding in 1 patient each.

Conclusion

IFX seems to be effective for the treatment of organ and life-threatening manifestations in the majority of the patients. However, drug retention rate was not optimal, mainly due to adverse events, inefficacy and patient non-compliance.

Disclosure of Interests

Sinem Nihal Esatoglu Speakers bureau: Sinem Nihal Esatoglu has received honorariums for presentations from UCB Pharma, Roche, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp Dohme, Beyza Tukek: None declared, Sitki Safa Taflan: None declared, Yilmaz Ozyazgan: None declared, Didar Ucar: None declared, Vedat Hamuryudan Speakers bureau: Vedat Hamuryudan has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Vedat Hamuryudan has received grant/research support from Celgene., Yesim Ozguler Speakers bureau: Yesim Ozguler has received honorariums for presentations from UCB Pharma, Novartis, and Pfizer., Emire Seyahi Speakers bureau: Emire Seyahi has received honorariums for presentations from Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Gliead, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Ugur Uygunoglu Speakers bureau: Ugur Uygunoglu has received speaker fees from F Hoffmann La-Roche, F Hoffmann La-Roche, Bayer, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma of Turkey, Consultant of: Ugur Uygunoglu has received advisory board honorariums from F Hoffmann La-Roche, F Hoffmann La-Roche, Bayer, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma of Turkey, Aksel Siva Speakers bureau: Aksel Siva received honorariums from Teva for speaking engagements., Consultant of: Aksel Siva received honorariums from Bayer-Schering AG, Biogen/Gen Ilac of Turkey, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Roche for consulting, fees from Novartis as a consultant and advisory committee member,., Grant/research support from: Aksel Siva received travel and registration reimbursements from Genzyme., Zekayi Kutlubay: None declared, Izzet Fresko: None declared, Sebahattin Yurdakul: None declared, Hasan Yazici: None declared, Gulen Hatemi Speakers bureau: Gulen Hatemi has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and UCB Pharma., Grant/research support from: Gulen Hatemi has received grant/research support from Celgene.

POS1255 SAFETY OF THE PFIZER/BIONTECH AND SINOVAC/CORONAVAC VACCINES AMONG PATIENTS WITH BEHCET’S SYNDROME AND FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER

Background

Since first emerged in December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a death toll surpassing 5.5 million worldwide and had severe consequences on the global economy, environment, public health and social life [1, 2]. Multiple potential vaccines against COVID-19 have been developed swiftly and as shown in several phase 3 clinical trials, they demonstrated considerable efficacy without an unusual safety signal in healthy individuals.

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to evaluate vaccine reactivity and disease flare following vaccination with either Sinovac/CoronaVac or Pfizer/BioNTech among BS and FMF patients compared with patients with various diagnosis of RD and healthy controls.

Methods

Only those patients and healthy controls who rece,ved at least one single shot of either CoronoVac or BioNTech against COVID-19 were included in the study. We tried to contact all of these patients and controls consecutively by telephone and attempted to make interviews with the eligible ones.

Results

We studied the efficacy, side effects and disease flares after COVID-19 vaccination in 256 patients with Behcet’s syndrome (BS), 247 with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), 601 with rheumatic diseases (RD) and 612 healthy controls (HC). Study participants were vaccinated either with CoronaVac (BS:109, FMF: 90, RD: 343, and HC: 334) or BioNTech (BS: 147, FMF:157, RD: 258 and HC: 278). BioNTech ensured a significantly better efficacy than CoronaVac against COVID-19 in all patient groups (BS: 1.4% vs 10.1%; FMF: 3.2% vs 12.2%, RD:2.7% vs 6.4%). Those with at least one adverse event (AE) were significantly more frequent among those vaccinated with BioNTech than those with CoronaVac (BS: 86.4% vs 45%; FMF: 83.4% vs 53.3%; RD: 83.3% vs 45.5% and HC: 86.3% vs 52.1%). The majority of AEs were mild to moderate and transient and this was true for either vaccine. There were also AEs that required medical attention in all study groups following CoronaVac (BS:5.5%, FMF:3.3%, RD:2.9% and HC:3.3%) or BioNTech (BS:5.4%, FMF:1.9%, RD:4.7% and HC:4.7%). The main causes for medical assistance were disease flare, and cardiovascular events. Disease flares after vaccination were significantly more frequent among BS (41/256; 16.0%) and FMF (43/247; 17.4%) patients compared to patients with RD (36/601; 6.0%). This was true for both CoronaVac (BS: 11.0%, FMF: 24.4% and RD: 5.2%, p<0.001) and BioNTech (BS: 19.7%, FMF: 13.4% and RD: 7.0%, p=0.001)(Table 1).

Table 1.

Flares among patients with Behçet’s syndrome, familial Mediterranean fever, rheumatic diseases after vaccination with CoronaVac and BioNTech

CoronaVacBehçet’s syndrome,n=109Familial Mediterranean Fever,n=90Rheumatic diseases, n=343Flares, n (%)Flares, n (%)Flares, n (%)12 (11.0)22 (24.4)18 (5.2)BioNTechBehçet’s syndrome, n=147Familial Mediterranean Fever, n=157Rheumatic diseases, n=258Flares, n (%)Flares, n (%)Flares, n (%)29 (19.7)21 (13.4)18 (7.0)

RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis; BS, Behçet’s syndrome; FMF, Familial Mediterranean Fever

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that BS and FMF patients vaccinated with either CoronaVac or BioNTech demonstrated almost similar AE profile and frequency compared to RD patients and HC. AEs that required physician consultation or hospitalization occurred in all study groups after either CoronaVac or BioNTech. Caution should be required when monitoring these patients after vaccination. Increased frequency of flares in BS and FMF compared to that seen in RD might reflect defects in innate immunity and deserves further investigation.

References

[1]https://covid19.who.int Accessed date 22.01.2022

[2]Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha M, Agha R. The so-cio- economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int J Surg. 2020 Jun; 78:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. PMID: 32305533; PMCID: PMC7162753.

Disclosure of Interests

Ayse Ozdede: None declared, Sabriye Güner: None declared, Guzin Ozcifci: None declared, Berna Yurttas: None declared, Zeynep Toker Dincer: None declared, Zeynep Atli: None declared, Ugur Uygunoglu: None declared, Eser Durmaz: None declared, Didar Ucar: None declared, Serdal Ugurlu Speakers bureau: Novartis,Pfizer,Celltrion and Lilly, Sebahattin Saip: None declared, Ömer Fehmi Tabak Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, MSD and GSK, Consultant of: Abbvie, Gilead, MSD and GSK, Vedat Hamuryudan: None declared, Emire Seyahi Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis and Gilead,

POS0819 EMERGENCE OF DE NOVO MANIFESTATIONS DURING INFLIXIMAB TREATMENT IN BEHÇET SYNDROME

Background:

Infliximab (IFX) is increasingly used in the management of severe, relapsing or refractory manifestations of Behçet Syndrome (BS). Emergence of de novo manifestations have been reported during IFX treatment, despite efficacy for the initial manifestation that required IFX use1.

Objectives:

We aimed to survey a sizeable cohort of BS patients treated with IFX for the development of de novo manifestations during treatment.

Methods:

A chart review was conducted to identify all BS patients who were given IFX in our Behçet Disease Research Center between 2004 and 2020. Demographic data, indications for IFX initiation, concomitant drugs, prior treatments, and outcomes were recorded. De novo manifestations were defined as new BS manifestations that had not occurred before IFX treatment.

Results:

A total of 252 patients used IFX with the main indications being uveitis in 122, vascular involvement in 82, parenchymal central nervous system involvement in 32, gastrointestinal involvement in 11, arthritis in 10, mucocutaneous involvement in 4, and secondary amyloidosis in 1. Of these patients, 17 (6%) had developed a total of 21 de-novo manifestations during a mean follow-up of 38.4 ± 92 (SD) months (Table 1). Vascular involvement was the main indication for IFX in the majority (n=12; 71%) of these 17 patients followed by eye involvement (n=3; 18%), central nervous system involvement (n=1), and joint involvement (n=1). Concomitant medications were prednisolone in 14 patients, azathioprine in 6 patients, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine-A and methotrexate in 1 patient each. Thirteen patients (76%) were in remission for the main indication when de-novo manifestations emerged. In 10 patients IFX treatment was intensified either by increasing the dose to 10 mg/kg (2 patients) or by shortening the infusion intervals to 4 weeks (2 patients) along with the addition of corticosteroids or immunosuppressives. In the remaining 7 patients IFX was switched to another agent (cyclophosphamide in 5, adalimumab in 1 and anakinra in 1). At the time of this survey 8/17 patients were still on IFX for a mean follow-up of 32.5 ± 24.6 (SD) months, with concomitant low dose prednisolone in 5, azathioprine in 3 and mycophenolate mofetil in 3. In addition to the 7 patients who discontinued IFX at the time of de-novo manifestations, 2 more patients had discontinued IFX due to allergic reactions.

Conclusion:

De novo manifestations developed during IFX treatment in 6% of BS patients, despite efficacy for the initial manifestation. Appearance of de novo manifestations mostly in patients with vascular involvement is noteworthy. Intensification of IFX treatment was efficacious in managing de novo manifestations in more than half of these patients.

References:

[1]Hamuryudan V et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45(3):369-73.

Table 1.

Distribution of de novo manifestations that have emerged in 17 patients

De-novo manifestations21Pulmonary artery aneurysm1Pulmonary artery thrombosis2Coronary artery involvement3Superficial thrombophlebitis5Arthritis5Erythema nodosum3Gastrointestinal involvement1Central nervous system involvement1

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0814 DRUG RETENTION RATE, REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION AND OUTCOME OF INFLIXIMAB USE IN BEHÇET SYNDROME

Background:

Infliximab (IFX) plays a key role in the management of severe and refractory manifestations of Behçet syndrome (BS). However we had previously shown that its sustained use may be limited due to adverse events and lack of patient compliance (1).

Objectives:

To assess the retention rate of IFX, adverse events, causes of discontinuation and outcome after cessation of IFX in a larger group of BS patients who were followed in a tertiary center.

Methods:

The charts of BS patients who were prescribed IFX between 2004 and 2020 were reviewed to determine demographic features, reasons for IFX use, previous and concomitant drugs, IFX duration, reasons for cessation of IFX and time to flare following cessation of IFX. Follow-up was censored on March 2020.

Results:

A total of 252 patients (195 men, mean age 40±10 years) received IFX for uveitis (n=122), vascular involvement (n=82), parenchymal neurologic involvement (n=32), gastrointestinal involvement (n=11), arthritis (n=10), mucocutaneous involvement (n=4), and secondary amyloidosis (n=1). Ten patients had more than 1 involvement requiring IFX.

During a median follow-up of 52 (IQR: 30-88) months, 122 (48%) patients were still receiving IFX for a median period of 33 (IQR: 15-56) months while 130 (52%) patients had discontinued IFX after a median follow-up of 17 (IQR: 7-31) months. Reasons for discontinuation were remission in 25 (19%) patients, adverse events in 39 (30%), lack of efficacy in 23 (18%) (4 primary and 19 secondary), lack of patient compliance in 36 (28%), pregnancy in 4, and preparation for surgery in 3 patients.

Adverse events (n=39) that required the cessation of IFX were infusion reaction (n=17), infection (n=7), hepatotoxicity (n=4), malignancy (n=4), palmoplantar psoriasis (n=3), lichen planus (n=1), drug induced lupus (n=1), splenic infarction (n=1), and a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (n=1).

Among the 25 patients who discontinued IFX due to remission, 5 (20%) had a relapse after 4, 21, 26, 29, 38 and 46 months. The remaining patients did not experience a relapse during a median follow-up of 35 (IQR: 24-68) months.

At the end of the follow-up, 2 patients had died due to lung adenocarcinoma during IFX treatment and 3 patients had died 1 year, 3 and 8 years after IFX discontinuation. The causes of death were with right heart failure due to pulmonary hypertension in 1, and severe nervous system involvement in 2 of the patients.

Conclusion:

Despite its successful use for the management of potentially organ and life-threatening manifestations in more than half of our patients with BS, long term maintenance was not possible in 42%, mainly due to adverse events, lack of patient compliance and inefficacy.

Reference:

[1]Esatoglu SN, Tukek B, Taflan SS, et al. SAT0258 Drug Retention Rate and Prognosis After Discontinuation of Infliximab in Patients with Behçet Syndrome. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2020;79: 1071-1072.

Reasons for infliximab treatmentNo of patientsNo (%) of patients who were still receiving infliximabNumber (%) of patients who discontinued infliximabReasons for discontinuationDuration of infliximab use(median (IQR) months)Eye involvement12259 (48)63 (52)Remission (n=17)Inefficacy (n=10)Lack of patient compliance (n=19)Adverse event (n=12)Others (n)=5)28 (12.5-52)Vascular involvement8240 (49)42 (51)Remission (n=10)Inefficacy (n=7)Lack of patient compliance (n=12)Adverse event (n=12)Others (n=4)18.5 (9-33.5)Parenchymal neurologic involvement3221 (66)11 (34)Adverse event (n=8)Inefficacy (n=2)Lack of patient compliance (n=1)25 (14.5-50)Gastrointestinal involvement114 (36)7 (64)Remission (n=1)Inefficacy (n=1)Adverse event (n=2)Lack of patient compliance (n=4)7 (2-17)Joint involvement102 (20)8 (80)Inefficacy (n=1)Adverse event (n=5)Lack of patient compliance (n=2)20 (4-35)Mucocutaneous involvement431Inefficacy (n=1)6, 10, 12, 104 monthsAA amyloidosis101Inefficacy (n=1)6 years

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0258 DRUG RETENTION RATE AND PROGNOSIS AFTER DISCONTINUATION OF INFLIXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH BEHÇET SYNDROME

Background:

Infliximab (IFX) has become an important treatment option for all manifestations of Behçet syndrome (BS). Adverse events, loss of efficacy, lack of patient compliance and cost may limit its sustained use in patients with BS.

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate the drug retention rates, causes of discontinuation and outcome after cessation of IFX.

Methods:

We reviewed the charts of 850 patients with BS who were registered in our clinic between 2009 and 2013 and identified those who had used IFX. The charts of these patients were surveyed for demographic features, the reasons for IFX use, previous and concomitant drugs, IFX duration, reasons for discontinuation and time to flare after discontinuation of IFX. We defined flare as disease activity in the organ involvement that necessitated IFX use. New major organ involvement that developed during or after discontinuation of IFX were also be noted.

Results:

A total of 50/850 patients were treated with IFX (40 men, mean age 40±9.5 years), for uveitis (n=29), vascular involvement (n=11), parenchymal neurologic involvement (n=8), arthritis (n=1) and venous ulcer (n=1). Of these 50 patients, 22 (43%) are still receiving IFX for a median duration of 40 (IQR: 25-83) months. The remaining 28 (47%) patients had discontinued IFX after a median follow-up of 12 (IQR: 7-30) months. Reasons for discontinuation were remission in 7 patients, adverse events in 10, primary lack of efficacy in 2, and lack of patient compliance in 9 patients. Among the 7 patients who discontinued IFX due to remission, only 1 patient with uveitis had a flare, 11 months after discontinuation, while on azathioprine. The remaining 6 did not experience any flares during a median follow-up of 29.5 (IQR: 4-24) months. Five of these patients used azathioprine and 1 used mycophenolate mofetil for maintenance. Among the 10 patients who discontinued due to adverse events, IFX was switched to adalimumab in 3 patients and none experienced flares under adalimumab. The remaining 7 patients continued to receive azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil without a biologic. Among these, 1 patient with uveitis 1 with arthritis experienced flares 6 months after discontinuing IFX. Among the 9 patients who discontinued IFX due to lack of patient compliance, 3 patients (2 with uveitis and 1 with arthritis) had flares after 5 months, 1 year and 1.5 years. IFX was re-initiated in all. The remaining 6 patients did not experience any flares after a mean follow up of 5±1.5 years. Two with uveitis and 2 with venous thrombosis used azathioprine for maintenance, while 2 patients did not receive further treatment. New major organ involvement was not observed. New BS manifestations developed in 2 patients under IFX, arthritis in one patient and both epididymitis and erythema nodosum in the other.

Conclusion:

Almost half of our patients with BS remained on IFX during a median follow-up of 5.4 years (IQR:2.4-7). Main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events, remission and lack of patient compliance. Our observations further support the efficiency of IFX in managing patients with BS.

Disclosure of Interests:

Sinem Nihal Esatoglu: None declared, Beyza Tukek: None declared, Sitki Safa Taflan: None declared, Yilmaz Ozyazgan: None declared, Didar Ucar: None declared, Emire Seyahi: None declared, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Vedat Hamuryudan Speakers bureau: Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, MSD, Novartis, UCB, Ugur Uygunoglu: None declared, Aksel Siva: None declared, Izzet Fresko: None declared, Sebahattin Yurdakul: None declared, Hasan Yazici: None declared, Gulen Hatemi Grant/research support from: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Silk Road Therapeutics – grant/research support, Consultant of: Bayer, Eli Lilly – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Mustafa Nevzat, Novartis, UCB – speaker

Abstract P6-22-01: Repurposing sulindac sulfide as a notch inhibitor to target cancer stem-like cells in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive breast cancers. TNBC patients have a high risk of recurrence and metastasis, and current treatment options remain limited. There is strong evidence supporting the involvement of Notch signaling in TNBC progression. Expression of Notch1 and its ligand Jagged1 correlate with poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) that escape chemo or radiation therapy in TNBC are often Notch-dependent. At the same time, there is evidence that active tumor immunity predicts good response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. Notch inhibitors, including Gamma Secretase Inhibitors (GSIs) are quite effective in preclinical models of TNBC, where they eliminate CSCs resistant to chemotherapy. However, the success of GSIs in clinical trials is limited by their intestinal toxicity and adverse immunological effects. CD4 and CD8 T-cells, necessary to adaptive tumor immunity, require Notch1 for activation. Our overarching goal is to replace GSIs with agents that lack their systemic toxicity and adverse immunological effects. We identified Sulindac Sulfide (SS), the active metabolite of FDA-approved NSAID Sulindac, as a potential candidate to replace GSI. SS has Gamma Secretase Modifier (GSM) activity. We confirmed that SS inhibits Notch1 cleavage in TNBC cells. SS significantly inhibited mammosphere growth in all human and murine TNBC models we tested: 1) human MDA-MB-231 cells; 2) murine TNBC model C0321, from targeted conditional knockout of Lunatic Fringe (LFng-/-); and 3) Two TNBC patient-derived xenograft models, 2K1 and 4IC. In contrast, SS did not inhibit Notch expression or cleavage in murine T cells. In C0321 tumors, which recapitulate human mesenchymal TNBC, we found that SS had remarkable single-agent anti-tumor activity and virtually eliminated Notch1 expression in tumors. SS caused an increase in intra-tumoral CD11c+ dendritic cells, but decreased CD4 cells, which in this model are largely PD-1 positive (exhausted). CD8 cells were modestly increased. SS did not affect the number of tumor infiltrating macrophages or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). However, SS blocked the immunosuppressive function of bone marrow-derived MDSC. We are currently investigating the mechanisms of this anti-tumor activity. Our data support further investigation of SS for the treatment of TNBC, with standard of care or with immunotherapy agents. Repurposing an FDA-approved, safe agent for the treatment of TNBC would be significantly easier and more cost-effective than developing unproven investigational agents.

Citation Format: Hossain F, Ucar D, Majumder S, Xu K, Ran Y, Minter L, Xi Y, Burow M, Golde T, Osborne B, Miele L. Repurposing sulindac sulfide as a notch inhibitor to target cancer stem-like cells in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-22-01.

Human genome meeting 2016 : Houston, TX, USA. 28 February - 2 March 2016

O1 The metabolomics approach to autism: identification of biomarkers for early detection of autism spectrum disorder A. K. Srivastava, Y. Wang, R. Huang, C. Skinner, T. Thompson, L. Pollard, T. Wood, F. Luo, R. Stevenson O2 Phenome-wide association study for smoking- and drinking-associated genes in 26,394 American women with African, Asian, European, and Hispanic descents R. Polimanti, J. Gelernter O3 Effects of prenatal environment, genotype and DNA methylation on birth weight and subsequent postnatal outcomes: findings from GUSTO, an Asian birth cohort X. Lin, I. Y. Lim, Y. Wu, A. L. Teh, L. Chen, I. M. Aris, S. E. Soh, M. T. Tint, J. L. MacIsaac, F. Yap, K. Kwek, S. M. Saw, M. S. Kobor, M. J. Meaney, K. M. Godfrey, Y. S. Chong, J. D. Holbrook, Y. S. Lee, P. D. Gluckman, N. Karnani, GUSTO study group O4 High-throughput identification of specific qt interval modulating enhancers at the SCN5A locus A. Kapoor, D. Lee, A. Chakravarti O5 Identification of extracellular matrix components inducing cancer cell migration in the supernatant of cultivated mesenchymal stem cells C. Maercker, F. Graf, M. Boutros O6 Single cell allele specific expression (ASE) IN T21 and common trisomies: a novel approach to understand DOWN syndrome and other aneuploidies G. Stamoulis, F. Santoni, P. Makrythanasis, A. Letourneau, M. Guipponi, N. Panousis, M. Garieri, P. Ribaux, E. Falconnet, C. Borel, S. E. Antonarakis O7 Role of microRNA in LCL to IPSC reprogramming S. Kumar, J. Curran, J. Blangero O8 Multiple enhancer variants disrupt gene regulatory network in Hirschsprung disease S. Chatterjee, A. Kapoor, J. Akiyama, D. Auer, C. Berrios, L. Pennacchio, A. Chakravarti O9 Metabolomic profiling for the diagnosis of neurometabolic disorders T. R. Donti, G. Cappuccio, M. Miller, P. Atwal, A. Kennedy, A. Cardon, C. Bacino, L. Emrick, J. Hertecant, F. Baumer, B. Porter, M. Bainbridge, P. Bonnen, B. Graham, R. Sutton, Q. Sun, S. Elsea O10 A novel causal methylation network approach to Alzheimer’s disease Z. Hu, P. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Zhao, M. Xiong, David A Bennett O11 A microRNA signature identifies subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer and reveals MIR-342-3P as regulator of a lactate metabolic pathway A. Hidalgo-Miranda, S. Romero-Cordoba, S. Rodriguez-Cuevas, R. Rebollar-Vega, E. Tagliabue, M. Iorio, E. D’Ippolito, S. Baroni O12 Transcriptome analysis identifies genes, enhancer RNAs and repetitive elements that are recurrently deregulated across multiple cancer types B. Kaczkowski, Y. Tanaka, H. Kawaji, A. Sandelin, R. Andersson, M. Itoh, T. Lassmann, the FANTOM5 consortium, Y. Hayashizaki, P. Carninci, A. R. R. Forrest O13 Elevated mutation and widespread loss of constraint at regulatory and architectural binding sites across 11 tumour types C. A. Semple O14 Exome sequencing provides evidence of pathogenicity for genes implicated in colorectal cancer E. A. Rosenthal, B. Shirts, L. Amendola, C. Gallego, M. Horike-Pyne, A. Burt, P. Robertson, P. Beyers, C. Nefcy, D. Veenstra, F. Hisama, R. Bennett, M. Dorschner, D. Nickerson, J. Smith, K. Patterson, D. Crosslin, R. Nassir, N. Zubair, T. Harrison, U. Peters, G. Jarvik, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project O15 The tandem duplicator phenotype as a distinct genomic configuration in cancer F. Menghi, K. Inaki, X. Woo, P. Kumar, K. Grzeda, A. Malhotra, H. Kim, D. Ucar, P. Shreckengast, K. Karuturi, J. Keck, J. Chuang, E. T. Liu O16 Modeling genetic interactions associated with molecular subtypes of breast cancer B. Ji, A. Tyler, G. Ananda, G. Carter O17 Recurrent somatic mutation in the MYC associated factor X in brain tumors H. Nikbakht, M. Montagne, M. Zeinieh, A. Harutyunyan, M. Mcconechy, N. Jabado, P. Lavigne, J. Majewski O18 Predictive biomarkers to metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment J. B. Goldstein, M. Overman, G. Varadhachary, R. Shroff, R. Wolff, M. Javle, A. Futreal, D. Fogelman O19 DDIT4 gene expression as a prognostic marker in several malignant tumors L. Bravo, W. Fajardo, H. Gomez, C. Castaneda, C. Rolfo, J. A. Pinto O20 Spatial organization of the genome and genomic alterations in human cancers K. C. Akdemir, L. Chin, A. Futreal, ICGC PCAWG Structural Alterations Group O21 Landscape of targeted therapies in solid tumors S. Patterson, C. Statz, S. Mockus O22 Genomic analysis reveals novel drivers and progression pathways in skin basal cell carcinoma S. N. Nikolaev, X. I. Bonilla, L. Parmentier, B. King, F. Bezrukov, G. Kaya, V. Zoete, V. Seplyarskiy, H. Sharpe, T. McKee, A. Letourneau, P. Ribaux, K. Popadin, N. Basset-Seguin, R. Ben Chaabene, F. Santoni, M. Andrianova, M. Guipponi, M. Garieri, C. Verdan, K. Grosdemange, O. Sumara, M. Eilers, I. Aifantis, O. Michielin, F. de Sauvage, S. Antonarakis O23 Identification of differential biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma via transcriptome microarray meta-analysis S. Likhitrattanapisal O24 Clinical validity and actionability of multigene tests for hereditary cancers in a large multi-center study S. Lincoln, A. Kurian, A. Desmond, S. Yang, Y. Kobayashi, J. Ford, L. Ellisen O25 Correlation with tumor ploidy status is essential for correct determination of genome-wide copy number changes by SNP array T. L. Peters, K. R. Alvarez, E. F. Hollingsworth, D. H. Lopez-Terrada O26 Nanochannel based next-generation mapping for interrogation of clinically relevant structural variation A. Hastie, Z. Dzakula, A. W. Pang, E. T. Lam, T. Anantharaman, M. Saghbini, H. Cao, BioNano Genomics O27 Mutation spectrum in a pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) cohort and identification of associated truncating mutations in TBX4 C. Gonzaga-Jauregui, L. Ma, A. King, E. Berman Rosenzweig, U. Krishnan, J. G. Reid, J. D. Overton, F. Dewey, W. K. Chung O28 NORTH CAROLINA macular dystrophy (MCDR1): mutations found affecting PRDM13 K. Small, A. DeLuca, F. Cremers, R. A. Lewis, V. Puech, B. Bakall, R. Silva-Garcia, K. Rohrschneider, M. Leys, F. S. Shaya, E. Stone O29 PhenoDB and genematcher, solving unsolved whole exome sequencing data N. L. Sobreira, F. Schiettecatte, H. Ling, E. Pugh, D. Witmer, K. Hetrick, P. Zhang, K. Doheny, D. Valle, A. Hamosh O30 Baylor-Johns Hopkins Center for Mendelian genomics: a four year review S. N. Jhangiani, Z. Coban Akdemir, M. N. Bainbridge, W. Charng, W. Wiszniewski, T. Gambin, E. Karaca, Y. Bayram, M. K. Eldomery, J. Posey, H. Doddapaneni, J. Hu, V. R. Sutton, D. M. Muzny, E. A. Boerwinkle, D. Valle, J. R. Lupski, R. A. Gibbs O31 Using read overlap assembly to accurately identify structural genetic differences in an ashkenazi jewish trio S. Shekar, W. Salerno, A. English, A. Mangubat, J. Bruestle O32 Legal interoperability: a sine qua non for international data sharing A. Thorogood, B. M. Knoppers, Global Alliance for Genomics and Health - Regulatory and Ethics Working Group O33 High throughput screening platform of competent sineups: that can enhance translation activities of therapeutic target H. Takahashi, K. R. Nitta, A. Kozhuharova, A. M. Suzuki, H. Sharma, D. Cotella, C. Santoro, S. Zucchelli, S. Gustincich, P. Carninci O34 The undiagnosed diseases network international (UDNI): clinical and laboratory research to meet patient needs J. J. Mulvihill, G. Baynam, W. Gahl, S. C. Groft, K. Kosaki, P. Lasko, B. Melegh, D. Taruscio O36 Performance of computational algorithms in pathogenicity predictions for activating variants in oncogenes versus loss of function mutations in tumor suppressor genes R. Ghosh, S. Plon O37 Identification and electronic health record incorporation of clinically actionable pharmacogenomic variants using prospective targeted sequencing S. Scherer, X. Qin, R. Sanghvi, K. Walker, T. Chiang, D. Muzny, L. Wang, J. Black, E. Boerwinkle, R. Weinshilboum, R. Gibbs O38 Melanoma reprogramming state correlates with response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma T. Karpinets, T. Calderone, K. Wani, X. Yu, C. Creasy, C. Haymaker, M. Forget, V. Nanda, J. Roszik, J. Wargo, L. Haydu, X. Song, A. Lazar, J. Gershenwald, M. Davies, C. Bernatchez, J. Zhang, A. Futreal, S. Woodman O39 Data-driven refinement of complex disease classification from integration of heterogeneous functional genomics data in GeneWeaver E. J. Chesler, T. Reynolds, J. A. Bubier, C. Phillips, M. A. Langston, E. J. Baker O40 A general statistic framework for genome-based disease risk prediction M. Xiong, L. Ma, N. Lin, C. Amos O41 Integrative large-scale causal network analysis of imaging and genomic data and its application in schizophrenia studies N. Lin, P. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Zhao, V. Calhoun, M. Xiong O42 Big data and NGS data analysis: the cloud to the rescue O. Dobretsberger, M. Egger, F. Leimgruber O43 Cpipe: a convergent clinical exome pipeline specialised for targeted sequencing S. Sadedin, A. Oshlack, Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance O44 A Bayesian classification of biomedical images using feature extraction from deep neural networks implemented on lung cancer data V. A. A. Antonio, N. Ono, Clark Kendrick C. Go O45 MAV-SEQ: an interactive platform for the Management, Analysis, and Visualization of sequence data Z. Ahmed, M. Bolisetty, S. Zeeshan, E. Anguiano, D. Ucar O47 Allele specific enhancer in EPAS1 intronic regions may contribute to high altitude adaptation of Tibetans C. Zeng, J. Shao O48 Nanochannel based next-generation mapping for structural variation detection and comparison in trios and populations H. Cao, A. Hastie, A. W. Pang, E. T. Lam, T. Liang, K. Pham, M. Saghbini, Z. Dzakula O49 Archaic introgression in indigenous populations of Malaysia revealed by whole genome sequencing Y. Chee-Wei, L. Dongsheng, W. Lai-Ping, D. Lian, R. O. Twee Hee, Y. Yunus, F. Aghakhanian, S. S. Mokhtar, C. V. Lok-Yung, J. Bhak, M. Phipps, X. Shuhua, T. Yik-Ying, V. Kumar, H. Boon-Peng O50 Breast and ovarian cancer prevention: is it time for population-based mutation screening of high risk genes? I. Campbell, M.-A. Young, P. James, Lifepool O53 Comprehensive coverage from low DNA input using novel NGS library preparation methods for WGS and WGBS C. Schumacher, S. Sandhu, T. Harkins, V. Makarov O54 Methods for large scale construction of robust PCR-free libraries for sequencing on Illumina HiSeqX platform H. DoddapaneniR. Glenn, Z. Momin, B. Dilrukshi, H. Chao, Q. Meng, B. Gudenkauf, R. Kshitij, J. Jayaseelan, C. Nessner, S. Lee, K. Blankenberg, L. Lewis, J. Hu, Y. Han, H. Dinh, S. Jireh, K. Walker, E. Boerwinkle, D. Muzny, R. Gibbs O55 Rapid capture methods for clinical sequencing J. Hu, K. Walker, C. Buhay, X. Liu, Q. Wang, R. Sanghvi, H. Doddapaneni, Y. Ding, N. Veeraraghavan, Y. Yang, E. Boerwinkle, A. L. Beaudet, C. M. Eng, D. M. Muzny, R. A. Gibbs O56 A diploid personal human genome model for better genomes from diverse sequence data K. C. C. Worley, Y. Liu, D. S. T. Hughes, S. C. Murali, R. A. Harris, A. C. English, X. Qin, O. A. Hampton, P. Larsen, C. Beck, Y. Han, M. Wang, H. Doddapaneni, C. L. Kovar, W. J. Salerno, A. Yoder, S. Richards, J. Rogers, J. R. Lupski, D. M. Muzny, R. A. Gibbs O57 Development of PacBio long range capture for detection of pathogenic structural variants Q. Meng, M. Bainbridge, M. Wang, H. Doddapaneni, Y. Han, D. Muzny, R. Gibbs O58 Rhesus macaques exhibit more non-synonymous variation but greater impact of purifying selection than humans R. A. Harris, M. Raveenedran, C. Xue, M. Dahdouli, L. Cox, G. Fan, B. Ferguson, J. Hovarth, Z. Johnson, S. Kanthaswamy, M. Kubisch, M. Platt, D. Smith, E. Vallender, R. Wiseman, X. Liu, J. Below, D. Muzny, R. Gibbs, F. Yu, J. Rogers O59 Assessing RNA structure disruption induced by single-nucleotide variation J. Lin, Y. Zhang, Z. Ouyang P1 A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of mitochondrial dna copy number A. Moore, Z. Wang, J. Hofmann, M. Purdue, R. Stolzenberg-Solomon, S. Weinstein, D. Albanes, C.-S. Liu, W.-L. Cheng, T.-T. Lin, Q. Lan, N. Rothman, S. Berndt P2 Missense polymorphic genetic combinations underlying down syndrome susceptibility E. S. Chen P4 The evaluation of alteration of ELAM-1 expression in the endometriosis patients H. Bahrami, A. Khoshzaban, S. Heidari Keshal P5 Obesity and the incidence of apolipoprotein E polymorphisms in an assorted population from Saudi Arabia population K. K. R. Alharbi P6 Genome-associated personalized antithrombotical therapy for patients with high risk of thrombosis and bleeding M. Zhalbinova, A. Akilzhanova, S. Rakhimova, M. Bekbosynova, S. Myrzakhmetova P7 Frequency of Xmn1 polymorphism among sickle cell carrier cases in UAE population M. Matar P8 Differentiating inflammatory bowel diseases by using genomic data: dimension of the problem and network organization N. Mili, R. Molinari, Y. Ma, S. Guerrier P9 Vulnerability of genetic variants to the risk of autism among Saudi children N. Elhawary, M. Tayeb, N. Bogari, N. Qotb P10 Chromatin profiles from ex vivo purified dopaminergic neurons establish a promising model to support studies of neurological function and dysfunction S. A. McClymont, P. W. Hook, L. A. Goff, A. McCallion P11 Utilization of a sensitized chemical mutagenesis screen to identify genetic modifiers of retinal dysplasia in homozygous Nr2e3^rd7 mice Y. Kong, J. R. Charette, W. L. Hicks, J. K. Naggert, L. Zhao, P. M. Nishina P12 Ion torrent next generation sequencing of recessive polycystic kidney disease in Saudi patients B. M. Edrees, M. Athar, F. A. Al-Allaf, M. M. Taher, W. Khan, A. Bouazzaoui, N. A. Harbi, R. Safar, H. Al-Edressi, A. Anazi, N. Altayeb, M. A. Ahmed, K. Alansary, Z. Abduljaleel P13 Digital expression profiling of Purkinje neurons and dendrites in different subcellular compartments A. Kratz, P. Beguin, S. Poulain, M. Kaneko, C. Takahiko, A. Matsunaga, S. Kato, A. M. Suzuki, N. Bertin, T. Lassmann, R. Vigot, P. Carninci, C. Plessy, T. Launey P14 The evolution of imperfection and imperfection of evolution: the functional and functionless fractions of the human genome D. Graur P16 Species-independent identification of known and novel recurrent genomic entities in multiple cancer patients J. Friis-Nielsen, J. M. Izarzugaza, S. Brunak P18 Discovery of active gene modules which are densely conserved across multiple cancer types reveal their prognostic power and mutually exclusive mutation patterns B. S. Soibam P19 Whole exome sequencing of dysplastic leukoplakia tissue indicates sequential accumulation of somatic mutations from oral precancer to cancer D. Das, N. Biswas, S. Das, S. Sarkar, A. Maitra, C. Panda, P. Majumder P21 Epigenetic mechanisms of carcinogensis by hereditary breast cancer genes J. J. Gruber, N. Jaeger, M. Snyder P22 RNA direct: a novel RNA enrichment strategy applied to transcripts associated with solid tumors K. Patel, S. Bowman, T. Davis, D. Kraushaar, A. Emerman, S. Russello, N. Henig, C. Hendrickson P23 RNA sequencing identifies gene mutations for neuroblastoma K. Zhang P24 Participation of SFRP1 in the modulation of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene in prostate cancer cell lines M. Rodriguez-Dorantes, C. D. Cruz-Hernandez, C. D. P. Garcia-Tobilla, S. Solorzano-Rosales P25 Targeted Methylation Sequencing of Prostate Cancer N. Jäger, J. Chen, R. Haile, M. Hitchins, J. D. Brooks, M. Snyder P26 Mutant TPMT alleles in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from México City and Yucatán, Mexico S. Jiménez-Morales, M. Ramírez, J. Nuñez, V. Bekker, Y. Leal, E. Jiménez, A. Medina, A. Hidalgo, J. Mejía P28 Genetic modifiers of Alström syndrome J. Naggert, G. B. Collin, K. DeMauro, R. Hanusek, P. M. Nishina P31 Association of genomic variants with the occurrence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced coughing among Filipinos E. M. Cutiongco De La Paz, R. Sy, J. Nevado, P. Reganit, L. Santos, J. D. Magno, F. E. Punzalan , D. Ona , E. Llanes, R. L. Santos-Cortes , R. Tiongco, J. Aherrera, L. Abrahan, P. Pagauitan-Alan; Philippine Cardiogenomics Study Group P32 The use of “humanized” mouse models to validate disease association of a de novo GARS variant and to test a novel gene therapy strategy for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D K. H. Morelli, J. S. Domire, N. Pyne, S. Harper, R. Burgess P34 Molecular regulation of chondrogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells M. A. Gari, A. Dallol, H. Alsehli, A. Gari, M. Gari, A. Abuzenadah P35 Molecular profiling of hematologic malignancies: implementation of a variant assessment algorithm for next generation sequencing data analysis and clinical reporting M. Thomas, M. Sukhai, S. Garg, M. Misyura, T. Zhang, A. Schuh, T. Stockley, S. Kamel-Reid P36 Accessing genomic evidence for clinical variants at NCBI S. Sherry, C. Xiao, D. Slotta, K. Rodarmer, M. Feolo, M. Kimelman, G. Godynskiy, C. O’Sullivan, E. Yaschenko P37 NGS-SWIFT: a cloud-based variant analysis framework using control-accessed sequencing data from DBGAP/SRA C. Xiao, E. Yaschenko, S. Sherry P38 Computational assessment of drug induced hepatotoxicity through gene expression profiling C. Rangel-Escareño, H. Rueda-Zarate P40 Flowr: robust and efficient pipelines using a simple language-agnostic approach;ultraseq; fast modular pipeline for somatic variation calling using flowr S. Seth, S. Amin, X. Song, X. Mao, H. Sun, R. G. Verhaak, A. Futreal, J. Zhang P41 Applying “Big data” technologies to the rapid analysis of heterogenous large cohort data S. J. Whiite, T. Chiang, A. English, J. Farek, Z. Kahn, W. Salerno, N. Veeraraghavan, E. Boerwinkle, R. Gibbs P42 FANTOM5 web resource for the large-scale genome-wide transcription start site activity profiles of wide-range of mammalian cells T. Kasukawa, M. Lizio, J. Harshbarger, S. Hisashi, J. Severin, A. Imad, S. Sahin, T. C. Freeman, K. Baillie, A. Sandelin, P. Carninci, A. R. R. Forrest, H. Kawaji, The FANTOM Consortium P43 Rapid and scalable typing of structural variants for disease cohorts W. Salerno, A. English, S. N. Shekar, A. Mangubat, J. Bruestle, E. Boerwinkle, R. A. Gibbs P44 Polymorphism of glutathione S-transferases and sulphotransferases genes in an Arab population A. H. Salem, M. Ali, A. Ibrahim, M. Ibrahim P46 Genetic divergence of CYP3A5*3 pharmacogenomic marker for native and admixed Mexican populations J. C. Fernandez-Lopez, V. Bonifaz-Peña, C. Rangel-Escareño, A. Hidalgo-Miranda, A. V. Contreras P47 Whole exome sequence meta-analysis of 13 white blood cell, red blood cell, and platelet traits L. Polfus, CHARGE and NHLBI Exome Sequence Project Working Groups P48 Association of adipoq gene with type 2 diabetes and related phenotypes in african american men and women: The jackson heart study S. Davis, R. Xu, S. Gebeab, P Riestra, A Gaye, R. Khan, J. Wilson, A. Bidulescu P49 Common variants in casr gene are associated with serum calcium levels in koreans S. H. Jung, N. Vinayagamoorthy, S. H. Yim, Y. J. Chung P50 Inference of multiple-wave population admixture by modeling decay of linkage disequilibrium with multiple exponential functions Y. Zhou, S. Xu P51 A Bayesian framework for generalized linear mixed models in genome-wide association studies X. Wang, V. Philip, G. Carter P52 Targeted sequencing approach for the identification of the genetic causes of hereditary hearing impairment A. A. Abuzenadah, M. Gari, R. Turki, A. Dallol P53 Identification of enhancer sequences by ATAC-seq open chromatin profiling A. Uyar, A. Kaygun, S. Zaman, E. Marquez, J. George, D. Ucar P54 Direct enrichment for the rapid preparation of targeted NGS libraries C. L. Hendrickson, A. Emerman, D. Kraushaar, S. Bowman, N. Henig, T. Davis, S. Russello, K. Patel P56 Performance of the Agilent D5000 and High Sensitivity D5000 ScreenTape assays for the Agilent 4200 Tapestation System R. Nitsche, L. Prieto-Lafuente P57 ClinVar: a multi-source archive for variant interpretation M. Landrum, J. Lee, W. Rubinstein, D. Maglott P59 Association of functional variants and protein physical interactions of human MUTY homolog linked with familial adenomatous polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome Z. Abduljaleel, W. Khan, F. A. Al-Allaf, M. Athar , M. M. Taher, N. Shahzad P60 Modification of the microbiom constitution in the gut using chicken IgY antibodies resulted in a reduction of acute graft-versus-host disease after experimental bone marrow transplantation A. Bouazzaoui, E. Huber, A. Dan, F. A. Al-Allaf, W. Herr, G. Sprotte, J. Köstler, A. Hiergeist, A. Gessner, R. Andreesen, E. Holler P61 Compound heterozygous mutation in the LDLR gene in Saudi patients suffering severe hypercholesterolemia F. Al-Allaf, A. Alashwal, Z. Abduljaleel, M. Taher, A. Bouazzaoui, H. Abalkhail, A. Al-Allaf, R. Bamardadh, M. Athar

Chemical and biological characterization of an active substance of the human placenta

Acetic acid extracts of human term placenta have been fractionated by pH and salt precipitations and by exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex G-75 column. A partially purified fraction (F-II) possessing uterotropic activity in immature and young mice was obtained. This active fraction was submitted to the action of protein denaturating agents (heat, 8 M urea) and of specific proteolytic enzymes (trypsin, alpha-chymotrypsin and pronase). These treatments completely destroy the uterotropic activity showing that the active substance is of protein nature. The administration of F-II to spayed mice did not produce any increase in their uterine weight suggesting that the uterotropic activity would be due to stimulation of the female gonad.