Characteristics of Femoral Shaft Fractures That Predict Ipsilateral Femoral Neck Fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to characterize radiographic features and fracture characteristics in femoral shaft fractures with associated femoral neck fractures, with the goal of establishing predictive indicators for the presence of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures (IFNFs).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was collected from the electronic medical record of three level I trauma centers over a 5-year period (2017 to 2022) by current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Current CPT codes for combined femoral shaft and IFNFs were identified to generate our study group. CPT codes for isolated femur fractures were identified to generate a control group.

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients comprised our IFNF cohort, and 280 comprised the control cohort. On univariate, there were significant differences in mechanism of injury (P < 0.001), Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA)/Arbeitsgemeinshaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification (P = 0.002), and fracture location (P < 0.001) between cohorts. On multivariate, motor vehicle crashes were more commonly associated with IFNFs compared with other mechanism of injuries. OTA/AO 32A fractures were more commonly associated with IFNFs when compared with OTA/AO 32B fractures (adjusted odds ratio = 0.36, P < 0.001). Fractures through the isthmus were significantly more commonly associated with IFNFs than fractures more proximal (adjusted odds ratio = 2.52, P = 0.011).

DISCUSSION

Detecting IFNFs in femoral shaft fractures is challenging. Motor vehicle crashes and motorcycle collisions, OTA/AO type 32A fractures, and isthmus fractures are predictive of IFNFs.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with orthopaedic fracture surgery in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of COVID-19-positive patients undergoing orthopaedic fracture surgery using data from a national database of U.S. adults with a COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a national database to compare orthopaedic fracture surgery outcomes between COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients in the United States. Participants aged 18-99 with orthopaedic fracture surgery between March and December 2020 were included. The main exposure was COVID-19 status. Outcomes included perioperative complications, 30-day all-cause mortality, and overall all-cause mortality. Multivariable adjusted models were fitted to determine the association of COVID-positivity with all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The total population of 6.5 million patient records was queried, identifying 76,697 participants with a fracture. There were 7,628 participants in the National COVID Cohort who had a fracture and operative management. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the COVID-19-positive group (n = 476, 6.2 %) than the COVID-19-negative group (n = 7,152, 93.8 %) (2.2 vs 1.4, p<0.001). The COVID-19-positive group had higher mortality (13.2 % vs 5.2 %, p<0.001) than the COVID-19-negative group with higher odds of death in the fully adjusted model (Odds Ratio=1.59; 95 % Confidence Interval: 1.16-2.18).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19-positive participants with a fracture requiring surgery had higher mortality and perioperative complications than COVID-19-negative patients in this national cohort of U.S. adults tested for COVID-19. The risks associated with COVID-19 can guide potential treatment options and counseling of patients and their families. Future studies can be conducted as data accumulates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

How do surgeons decide when to treat proximal humerus fractures with operative versus nonoperative management?

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the underlying factors that drive the decision for surgeons to pursue operative versus nonoperative management for proximal humerus fractures (PHF) and if fellowship training had an impact on these decisions.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Society to assess differences in patient selection for operative versus nonoperative management of PHF. Descriptive statistics were reported for all respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 250 fellowship trained Orthopaedic Surgeons responded to the online survey. A greater proportion of trauma surgeons preferred nonoperative management for displaced PHF fractures in patients over the age of 70. Operative management was preferred for older patients with fracture dislocations (98%), limited humeral head bone subchondral bone (78%), and intraarticular head split (79%). Similar proportions of trauma surgeons and shoulder surgeons cited that acquiring a CT was crucial to distinguish between operative and nonoperative management.

CONCLUSION

We found that surgeons base their decisions on when to operate primarily on patient's comorbidities, age, and the amount of fracture displacement when treating younger patients. Further, we found a greater proportion of trauma surgeons elected to proceed with nonoperative management in patients older than the age of 70 years old as compared to shoulder surgeons.

Achilles tendon disorders: An overview of diagnosis and conservative treatment

ABSTRACT

Achilles tendon-related pain affects up to 6% of the US population during their lifetime and is commonly encountered by primary care providers. An accurate diagnosis and early conservative management can improve patient quality of life and reduce unnecessary surgical consultations, saving healthcare dollars. Achilles tendon pathologies can be categorized into acute (pain lasting less than 6 weeks), chronic (pain lasting more than 6 weeks), and acute on chronic (worsening of pain with preexisting chronic Achilles tendon pathology). This article describes the diagnosis, conservative management, indications for imaging, and indications for surgical referral for acute and chronic Achilles tendon rupture, Achilles tendinitis, gastrocnemius strain, plantaris rupture, insertional Achilles tendinopathy, Haglund deformity, and noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay After Femoral Neck Fracture

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between pre-operative anemia and prolonged hospital stay among geriatric patients with operative femoral neck fractures. This retrospective cohort study was performed at a level I trauma center and included geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures (OTA/AO 31) and operative treatment with Current Procedural Terminology code 27236. Exclusion criteria were admission to the intensive care unit, evacuation of subdural hematoma, and conditions requiring exploratory laparotomy. A total of 207 individuals, with data collected between January 2015 and August 2019 and age 65 years and older, were included in the analysis. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between anemia and length of stay adjusting for potential confounders. Anemia was defined using preoperative hematocrit. The primary outcome was prolonged length of stay, defined as 5 or more days. The group was 65% women. The mean age was 80.2 years (range, 64-98 years). The majority (61%) of patients had anemia. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was associated with preoperative anemia (P=.02). Patients with anemia had a 16% higher risk of prolonged length of stay compared with patients without anemia (81% vs 65%, P=.009). In the linear regression model, preoperative hematocrit was associated with length of stay (P=.032) when adjusted for sex, age, preoperative tranexamic acid, preoperative hemoglobin, postoperative hemoglobin, and postoperative hematocrit. Length of stay was approximately 1 week in this study, with anemia being a statistically significant risk factor for prolonged length of stay. Health care providers and administrators can consider anemia on admission when predicting length of stay. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):211-217.].

Comparison of Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis for Ankle Arthropathy in Patients With Bleeding Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited literature comparing the publications on ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the setting of hemophilic arthropathy. Our objective is to systematically review the existing literature and to assess ankle arthroplasty as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis in this patient population.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted and presented according to the PRISMA statement standards. A search was conducted on March 7-10, 2023, using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies. This search was restricted to full-text human studies published in English, and articles were screened by 2 masked reviewers. Systematic reviews, case reports with less than 3 subjects, letters to the editor, and conference abstracts were excluded. Two independent reviewers rated study quality using the MINORS tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 1226 studies were included in this review. Thirteen articles reviewed the outcomes associated with AA in hemophilic arthropathy whereas 10 reviewed the outcomes associated with TAA. Two of our studies were comparative and reviewed the outcomes of both AA and TAA. Additionally, 3 included studies were prospective. Studies showed that the degree of improvement in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot-ankle score, visual analog scale pain scores, and the mental and physical component summary scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were similar for both surgeries. Complication rates were also similar between the 2 surgeries. Additionally, studies showed a significant improvement in ROM after TAA.

CONCLUSION

Although the level of evidence in this review varies and results should be interpreted with caution, the current literature suggests similar clinical outcomes and complication rates between TAA and AA in this patient population.

Management of open pelvic ring injuries

Open pelvic ring injuries are rare clinical entities that require multidisciplinary care. Due to the scarcity of this injury, there is no well-defined treatment algorithm. As a result, conflicting evidence surrounding various aspects of care including wound management and fecal diversion remain. Previous studies have shown mortality reaching 50% in open pelvic ring injuries, nearly five times higher than closed pelvic ring injuries. Early mortality is due to exsanguinating hemorrhage, while late mortality is due to wound sepsis and multiorgan system failure. With advancements in trauma care and ATLS protocols, there has been an improved survival rate reported in published case series. Major considerations when treating these injuries include aggressive resuscitation with hemorrhage control, diagnosis of associated injuries, prevention of wound sepsis with early surgical management, and definitive skeletal fixation. Classification systems for categorization and management of bony and soft tissue injury related to pelvic ring injuries have been established. Fecal diversion has been proposed to decrease rates of sepsis and late mortality. While clear indications are lacking due to limited studies, previous studies have reported benefits. Further large-scale studies are necessary for adequate evaluation of treatment protocols of open pelvic ring injuries. Understanding the role of fecal diversion, avoidance of primary closure in open pelvic ring injuries, and importance of well-coordinated care amongst surgical teams can optimize patient outcomes.

Anatomic Structures at Risk When Utilizing Percutaneous Intramedullary Fibular Screw Fixation for Lateral Malleolus Fractures: A Cadaveric Study

Category:

Ankle

Introduction/Purpose:

Isolated lateral malleolus fractures are a common ankle fracture that a foot and ankle surgeon will encounter. Retrograde intramedullary fixation for unstable lateral malleolus fractures has become a viable option for patients at higher risk for potentially devastating wound complications. The aim of this cadaveric study was to assess the relative risk of injuring adjacent anatomic structures with percutaneous implantation of an intramedullary fibular screw for lateral malleolus fractures to minimize iatrogenic injury.

Methods:

Seven fresh-frozen below-the-knee cadaver specimens were used for this study. Prior to investigations, specimens were inspected with fluoroscopic radiographs for preexisting pathology or prior surgical intervention. Lateral dissection of the lateral malleolus was performed after screw placement to determine the proximity of the peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and sural nerve (SN) to the inserted hardware. The mean, standard deviation, and range for distances were calculated for all structures. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine statistical significance.

Results:

Percutaneous intramedullary fibular screw placement was performed in seven specimens, six females and one male, with an average age of 79.3 +- 8.1 years. Amongst the seven specimens, only one resulted in an injury to a structure of interest (sural nerve). The peroneus longus and peroneus brevis were not injured in any of the specimens. Table 1 shows the average distance between the guidewire and each structure of interest.

Conclusion:

This study shows the potential risks to lateral structures when placing an intramedullary fibular screw for unstable lateral malleolus fractures. We suggest that orthopedic surgeons exercise caution when performing critical steps of the procedure to minimize avoidable injury to structures of importance that may increase the morbidity of the patient.

What are the Major Risk Factors for Nonunion in Pilon Fractures?

Category:

Trauma; Ankle

Introduction/Purpose:

Pilon fractures are difficult injuries to manage as they are typically associated with extensive soft tissue damage. Although staged management of external fixation followed by open reduction and internal fixation is often used to prevent additional soft tissue damage and its associated complications, rates of nonunion remain high in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and identify factors associated with increased rates of nonunion following operative fixation of pilon fractures.

Methods:

A retrospective review of all operatively managed pilon fractures at a single level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Minimum six-month follow-up was required for inclusion. Patients with skeletal immaturity or amputation prior to definitive fixation were excluded. Patients were grouped based on presence or absence of nonunion, which was defined as lack of bridging bone in at least 3 of 4 cortices and the presence of pain with ambulation at six-month follow-up. Demographics, injury and operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results:

Among the 279 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 48 developed nonunion at 6-month follow-up (17.2%). Average follow-up was 3.2 years. Patients with nonunion had significantly higher rates of open fractures (50.0% vs. 22.1%, p<0.001) and more required skin grafts (14.6% vs. 5.6%, p=0.029), muscle flap coverage (12.5% vs. 2.6%, p=0.002), and bone grafting (25.0% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001) compared to controls. Those who developed nonunion had significantly lower rates of medial column fixation (43.8% vs. 67.5%, p=0.002) and higher rates of surgical site infection (45.8% vs. 7.8%, p<0.001). Rates of AO/OTA 43C fractures (70.8% vs. 52.4%) and fractures treated with plates overlapping the site of external fixation (39.5% vs. 26.6%) were higher in the nonunion group, but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.064 and p=0.098). There were no significant differences in demographics, mechanism of injury, Gustilo-Anderson classification, associated ipsilateral lower extremity injuries, surgical approach, or type of fixation between the two groups.

Conclusion:

In the present study, pilon fractures were found to have a nonunion rate of 17.2% at six-month follow-up. Nonunion was associated with the presence of open fracture, need for soft tissue coverage or bone grafting, and surgical site infection. Medial column fixation was associated with a lower rate of nonunion in these fractures.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Operative Management of Pilon Fractures

Category:

Trauma; Ankle

Introduction/Purpose:

Pilon fractures are complex injuries that most commonly result from high-energy trauma. The extensive soft tissue damage and high rates of associated infection seen in these injuries remains a challenging concern for surgeons. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) following operative management of pilon fractures.

Methods:

A retrospective review of all operatively managed pilon fractures at a single level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Minimum six-month follow-up and skeletal maturity was required for inclusion. Patients with amputation prior to definitive fixation were excluded. SSI consisted of superficial (defined as infection resolving with oral antibiotics) and/or deep infections (defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures). Patients were grouped based on presence or absence of SSI. Demographics, injury and operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results:

A total of 279 patients met inclusion criteria for the study, with 40 patients developing SSI (14.3%). Average follow-up was 3.2 years. Patients that developed SSI had a significantly higher proportion of open fractures (47.5% vs 23.4%, p=0.003); however, there were no significant differences in Gustilo-Anderson classification or open wound location compared to controls. The SSI group required significantly higher rates of skin grafts (25.0% vs 4.2%, p<0.001) and muscle flap coverage (20.0% vs 1.7%, p<0.001). Average operative time was significantly longer in the SSI group (283.1 vs. 222.3 minutes, p=0.002). Patients with SSI displayed significantly higher rates of nonunion at six-month follow-up compared to those without SSI (55.0% vs 10.9%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in mechanism of injury, AO/OTA fracture classification, associated ipsilateral lower extremity injuries, bone grafting, surgical approach, or presence of medial column fixation between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The present study showed that SSI after pilon fractures can lead to significant morbidity, with 55% of patients having nonunion at six months. Risk factors for SSI in these patients included open fracture, need for soft tissue coverage, and longer operative times. Future multicenter studies are needed to further investigate risk factors for SSI after operative management of pilon fractures.

Rates of Complications and Readmissions: In-Patient vs Outpatient ORIF of Calcaneus Fractures

Category:

Hindfoot; Trauma

Introduction/Purpose:

Calcaneus fractures are common injuries to the hindfoot. The safety of in-patient versus outpatient treatment in patients with calcaneus fractures remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in wound complications and readmissions in operative calcaneus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in an in- patient versus outpatient setting.

Methods:

Patients undergoing ORIF for calcaneus fractures from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18 years and an operative calcaneus fracture treated with the sinus tarsi approach (STA). Exclusion criteria consisted of a minimum of three months follow-up, open calcaneal fractures or fracture dislocations, inpatients with polytrauma, and patients without a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. A total of 113 patients met inclusion criteria with 24 (21%) managed inpatient and 89 (79%) managed as outpatient. The primary outcomes were deep infection defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included implant related pain and unplanned return to the operating room.

Results:

Inpatients had a higher percentage of ASA classification 3&4 patients (58.3% vs 29.2%, p=0.008). Outpatients had a longer delay in days between injury and definitive fixation (mean 8 (8.9 SD, 0-31 range) vs. 14 (12.4 SD, 0-91 range) days, p=0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of deep infections (8.3% vs. 4.5%, p=.606), implant related pain (8.3% vs. 15.7%, p=.516), return to the operating room (16.7% vs. 15.7%, p=1.0) or readmissions (4.2% vs. 3.4%, p=1.0) between inpatient and outpatient groups including in binary logistic regression models (p>.3 for all). In our retrospective study of patients undergoing operative repair of isolated calcaneus fractures with STA, there was no increased risk of wound complications or readmissions when calcaneus fractures were treated in an outpatient setting.

Conclusion:

In our retrospective study of patients undergoing operative repair of isolated calcaneus fractures with STA, there was no increased risk of wound complications or readmissions when calcaneus fractures were treated in an outpatient setting.

Intermetatarsal Screw Fixation Reduced Intermetatarsal Angle Following Modified Lapidus Procedures

Category:

Midfoot/Forefoot

Introduction/Purpose:

The Modified Lapidus arthrodesis is a historically established surgical technique for treatment of hallux valgus, providing quality patient outcomes and reproducible results. Addition of a transverse first to second intermetatarsal screw spanning the base of the metatarsals in this procedure can increase stability. However, no study evaluates the radiographical parameters following application of this intermetatarsal screw fixation to procedures without first to second intermetatarsal screw fixation. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of radiographic parameters between individuals receiving a first to second intertarsal screw fixation to those that did not receive intermetatarsal screw fixation following a non-saw cut Modified Lapidus procedure.

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed on 74 patients that underwent a Modified Lapidus arthrodesis between 2016- 2020 at a single institution. Preoperative indications for the procedure included first ray instability, first ray hypermobility, hallux abductovalgus, and metatarsal primus elevatus. Inclusion criteria consisted of skeletally mature patients undergoing non sawcut Modified Lapidus procedure. Patients that received the procedure due to a traumatic event or patients with concomitant second metatarsal arthrodesis were excluded. Review of patient's charts was performed. Basic demographics data, implant type, and radiographic parameters including intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and first metatarsal length were obtained from preoperative as well as postoperative films.

Results:

A total of 74 patients who underwent a Modified Lapidus arthrodesis were included in the study. A group of 43 patients received the Modified Lapidus arthrodesis with the addition of a first to second intermetatarsal screw fixation compared to a group of 31 patients who only received the Modified Lapidus arthrodesis procedure. The average IMA in all patients prior to surgery was 13°. The patients who received intermetatarsal screw fixation had significantly higher IMA reductions between preoperative and postoperative films than those who did not receive the intermetatarsal screw (-8.41° vs. -5.78°, p=.005). The difference in first metatarsal length on preoperative and postoperative films was less in patients who received the screw fixation but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

The Modified Lapidus procedure is a commonly used procedure to treat hallux valgus. The results of this study found that the addition of a first to second intermetatarsal significantly reduced the IMA when compared to individuals who did not receive the screw construct. These findings will help surgeons further delineate if an intermetatarsal screw is required and how it will contribute to the radiographic parameters of interest.

Tarsometatarsal Joint Preparation using a Modified Dorsal Approach vs Standard Approach: A Cadaver Study

Category:

Midfoot/Forefoot

Introduction/Purpose:

Lisfranc injuries are a relatively common midfoot injury involving the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint. Surgical fixation typically involves open reduction with internal fixation or primary arthrodesis of the joint(s). The standard surgical approach to the TMT joint involves two dorsal incisions however, a recent study has suggested the use of a modified single dorsal incision approach. The goal of this paper is to compare the total surface area of the joint that can be prepared for primary arthrodesis of the TMT using the standard vs modified single dorsal approach.

Methods:

Ten fresh frozen below-the-knee cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to receive either the standard or modified dorsal single incision operative approach to the TMT joint. Prior to initiating the study, specimens were inspected with fluoroscopic radiographs for preexisting pathology or prior surgical intervention. The joint surface was visualized and then underwent articular preparation as for a joint fusion. After adequate joint preparation, the TMT joint was disarticulated and the surface was photographed for image analysis. Using ImageJ, articular joint surface preparation areas were measured by two blinded reviewers. to assess the joint surface preparation and this was compared by surgical approach.

Results:

After ImageJ and Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis, there was no significant difference in the amount of joint prepared when comparing the standard versus modified dorsal approach for the first three TMT joints (p= 0.548, p=0.310, p= 0.548). The percentage of joint preparation utilizing the standard dorsal approach versus the modified dorsal approach for TMT joints one through three are as follows (percentages utilized are listed as the median value with its correlating range): First TMT- 67.6% (range 26%) by the standard approach versus 71.7% (range 9%) by the modified dorsal approach, second TMT- 67.9% (range 24%) versus 65.7% (range 12%), and third TMT- 65.9% (range 42%) versus 59.6% (range 24%). Table 1 summarizes our results between each operative approach.

Conclusion:

With our findings, we demonstrate that a modified single dorsal approach to the Lisfranc joint provided comparable joint preparation for primary arthrodesis as the standard dual incision approach. However, the modified dorsal approach may be beneficial in that it avoids creating a skin bridge which has potential for necrosis with the standard two incision approach. The authors believe the comparable joint preparation combined with its potential to alleviate soft tissue complications make the modified dorsal approach a viable surgical approach for a TMT arthrodesis.

Which surgical approach is optimal for joint preparation in talonavicular fusion - A cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Fusion of the talonavicular joint has proven challenging in literature. The optimal surgical approach for talonavicular arthrodesis is still uncertain. This study compares the amount of physical joint preparation between dorsal and medial approaches to the talonavicular joint.

METHODS

Twenty fresh frozen cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to receive either a dorsal or medial operative approach to the talonavicular joint. The joint surface was prepared, and the joint was disarticulated. Image analysis, using ImageJ, was performed by two blinded reviewers to assess the joint surface preparation and this was compared by surgical approach.

RESULTS

The dorsal approach had a higher median percentage of talar and total talonavicular joint surface area prepared (75% vs. 59% (p = .007) and 82% vs. 70% (p = .005)). Irrespective of approach, the talus was significantly more difficult to prepare than the navicular (62% vs 88% (p = .001)).

CONCLUSION

The dorsal approach provides superior talonavicular joint preparation. The lateral ¼th of the talar head was the most difficult surface to prepare, and surgeons performing double or triple arthrodesis may prepare the lateral talar head from the lateral approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Civilian Ballistic Femoral Shaft Fractures Compared With Blunt Femur Shaft Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To assess ballistic femoral shaft fracture outcomes in comparison with closed and open femoral shaft fractures sustained by blunt mechanisms. We hypothesized that ballistic femoral shaft fractures would have similar outcomes to blunt open fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level I trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 16 years and older presenting with ballistic (140), blunt closed (317), or blunt open (71) femoral shaft fractures.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Unplanned return to operating room, fracture-related infection, soft tissue reconstruction, nonunion, implant failure, length of stay, Injury Severity Scores, hospital charges, and compartment syndrome.

RESULTS

A total of 528 femoral shaft fractures were identified. A group of 140 ballistic fractures and comparison groups of all femoral shaft fractures sustained by blunt mechanisms and treated with intramedullary nailing were included in the analysis. Among the 2 subgroups of nonballistic injuries, 317 were blunt closed fractures and 71 were blunt open fractures. The ballistic group was associated with a 3-fold increase in overall complications (30%) compared with the blunt closed group (10%, P < 0.001), had a higher occurrence of thigh compartment syndrome (P < 0.001), and required more soft tissue reconstruction (P < 0.001) than either of the blunt fracture groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ballistic femoral shaft fractures do not perfectly fit with blunt closed or open femoral fractures. A high index of suspicion for the development of thigh compartment syndrome should be maintained in ballistic femoral shaft fractures. The overall rates of nonunion and infection were comparable between all groups, but the all-cause complication rate was significantly higher in the ballistic group compared with the blunt closed group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ?

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or nonoperatively. Given the mixed results in the literature, the optimal treatment is unclear to surgeons. The purpose of this study was to survey orthopedic shoulder and trauma surgeons to identify the patient- and fracture-related characteristics that influence surgical decision-making.

METHODS

We distributed a 23-question closed-response email survey to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Questions posed to respondents included demographics, surgical planning, indications for ORIF and arthroplasty, and the use of surgical augmentation with ORIF. Numerical and multiple-choice responses were compared between shoulder and trauma surgeons using unpaired t-tests and χ² tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Respondents included 172 shoulder and 78 trauma surgeons. When surgery is indicated, most shoulder and trauma surgeons treat 2-part (69%) and 3-part (53%) PHFs with ORIF. Indications for managing PHFs with arthroplasty instead of ORIF include an intra-articular fracture (82%), bone quality (76%), age (72%), and previous rotator cuff dysfunction (70%). In patients older than 50 years, 90% of respondents cited a head-split fracture as an indication for arthroplasty. Both shoulder and trauma surgeons preferred RSA for treating PHFs presenting with a head-split fracture in an elderly patient (94%), pre-existing rotator cuff tear (84%), and pre-existing glenohumeral arthritis with an intact cuff (75%). Similarly, both groups preferred ORIF for PHFs in young patients with a fracture dislocation (94%). In contrast, although most trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in low functioning patients with a significantly displaced fracture or nonreconstructable injury nonoperatively (84% and 86%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either RSA (44% and 46%, respectively) or nonoperative treatment (54% and 49%, respectively) (P < .001). Similarly, although trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in young patients with a head-split fracture or limited humeral head subchondral bone with ORIF (98% and 87%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either ORIF (54% and 62%, respectively) or HA (43% and 34%, respectively) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ORIF and HA are preferred for treating simple PHFs in young patients with good bone quality or fracture dislocations, whereas RSA and nonoperative management are preferred for complex fractures in elderly patients with poor bone quality, rotator cuff dysfunction, or osteoarthritis. The preferred management differed between shoulder and trauma surgeons for half of the common PHF presentations, highlighting the need for future research.

Understanding postoperative rehabilitation preferences in operatively managed proximal humerus fractures: do trauma and shoulder surgeons differ?

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common, and their incidence is increasing as the population ages. Despite this, postoperative rehabilitation remains unstandardized and little is known about surgeon preferences. The aim of this study was to assess differences in postoperative rehabilitation preferences and patient education between orthopedic trauma and shoulder surgeons.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons to assess differences in postoperative rehabilitation preferences and patient counseling. Descriptive statistics were reported for all respondents, trauma surgeons, and shoulder surgeons. Chi-square and unpaired 2-sample t tests were used to compare responses. Multinomial regression was used to further elucidate the influence of fellowship training independent of confounding characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 293 surgeons completed the survey, including 172 shoulder and 78 trauma surgeons. A greater proportion of trauma surgeons preferred an immediate weightbearing status after arthroplasty compared to shoulder surgeons (45% vs. 19%, P = .003), but not after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (62% vs. 75%, P = .412). A greater proportion of shoulder surgeons preferred home exercise therapy taught by the physician or using a handout following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (21% vs. 2%, P = .009). A greater proportion of trauma surgeons began passive range of motion (ROM) <2 weeks after 2-part fractures (70% vs. 41%, P < .001). Conversely, a greater proportion of shoulder surgeons began passive ROM between 2 and 6 weeks for 2-part (57% vs. 24%, P < .001) and 4-part fractures (65% vs. 43%, P = .020). On multinomial regression analysis, fellowship training in shoulder surgery was associated with preference for a nonweightbearing duration of >12 weeks vs. 6-12 weeks after ORIF. Similarly, fellowship training in shoulder surgery was associated with increased odds of preferring a nonweightbearing duration of <6 weeks vs. no restrictions and >12 weeks vs. 6-12 weeks after arthroplasty. Training in shoulder surgery was associated with greater odds of preferring a nonweightbearing duration prior to beginning passive ROM of 2-6 weeks vs. <2 weeks or >6 weeks for 2-part fractures, but not 4-part fractures.

CONCLUSION

Trauma surgeons have a more aggressive approach to rehabilitation following operative PHF repair compared to shoulder surgeons regarding time to weightbearing status and passive ROM. Given the increasing incidence of PHFs and substantial variations in reported treatment outcomes, differences in rehabilitation after PHF treatment should be further evaluated to determine the role it may play in the outcomes of treatment studies.

What Are the Risk Factors for Infection After Operative Treatment of Peritalar Fracture Dislocations?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk factors associated with deep infection after operative treatment of peritalar fracture dislocations.

DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed to identify patients who had operative treatment of a peritalar fracture dislocation over an 11-year period (2008-2019).

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were identified by review of all surgical billing that included open reduction of peritalar dislocation. Minimum follow-up for inclusion was 3 months or the outcome of interest. A total of 178 patients were identified, and 154 patients met inclusion criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcome was deep infection, defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures.

RESULTS

A total of 19 (12.3%) patients developed a postoperative deep infection. The most common associated fractures were talus (47%), calcaneus (33%), and fibula (9%) fractures. The infected group was significantly older (47.2 vs. 39.5 years, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing operative management for peritalar fracture dislocations with current smoking were found to have significantly higher odds of postoperative deep infection (74 vs. 34%, adjusted odds ratio = 7.4, 95% confidence interval, 2.3-24.1, P = 0.001). There was a significantly higher risk of infection in patients with a Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture (32 vs. 12%, adjusted odds ratio = 5.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-20.3, P = 0.007). The infected group had high rates of below knee amputation when compared with the group without infection (47 vs. 1%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective study, risk factors for infection after peritalar fracture dislocation included older age, smoking, and Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pediatric hallux valgus: An overview of history, examination, conservative, and surgical management

Pediatric hallux valgus (PHV), while relatively rare, is still often encountered by general pediatricians. Herein, we concisely summarize the existing literature regarding the pathogenesis, associated conditions, clinical diagnosis, radiographic characteristics, conservative management, and surgical management of PVH. Though PHV is generally considered benign, the progression of hallux valgus can result in complications. The presence of an open physis in the pediatric age group delineates first line treatment choices, whenever possible, as nonoperative. The general exception to this recommendation is for children with neuromuscular and connective tissues disease who may benefit from earlier surgical management. If conservative approaches fail prior to skeletal maturity, the risk of recurrence and need for revision surgery should be discussed with patients and their families before surgical referral is made. The current review was conducted to aid primary care providers in better understanding the pathogenesis, associated conditions, and intervention options available to manage PHV.

Union Rates of Talar Neck Fractures With Substantial Bone Defects Treated With Autograft

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the union rate of talar neck fractures with substantial bone defects treated acutely with autologous tibial bone graft during primary osteosynthesis.

METHODS

A case series at a level 1 trauma center was performed to identify consecutive patients who underwent operative fixation of talar neck fracture with autograft (Current Procedural Terminology codes 28445 and 20902) between 2015 and 2018. "Substantial bone defect" was defined as a gap greater than 5 mm in the sagittal plane and greater than one-third of width of the talar neck in the coronal plane. Postoperative foot computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained for all patients. Primary outcome was union, and secondary outcomes were malunion, avascular necrosis (AVN), post-traumatic arthritis (PTA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

Twelve patients with 12 fractures were included in the series, with an average length of follow-up of 26 months (range: 7-55) The average age was 34 years (17-59), and the most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash. The Hawkins classification of the fractures was 4 type II (2 type IIA and 2 type IIB) (33%) and 8 type III (67%). Four fractures (33%) were open fractures. Union was achieved in 11 patients (92%). There was 1 malunion (8%). AVN was identified on postoperative CT scans in 11 patients (92%). Three of these 11 eventually showed collapse. Ten patients (83%) had radiographic evidence of some degree of ankle PTA, and 12 patients (100%) had radiographic evidence of some degree of subtalar PTA. Average Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Short Form score was 37 (32-45) and average Foot and Ankle Ability Measure activities of daily living and sports subscale scores were, respectively, 61 (31-87) and 31 (0-71), respectively. Average visual analog scale score was 5 (0-10), and average Foot Function Index was 49 (7-89). SF-36 scores showed fair to poor outcomes in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSION

In this relatively small series, tibial autograft in primary osteosynthesis of comminuted talar neck fractures with substantial bone defects is associated with excellent union rates and low malunion rates. Despite high union rates, secondary outcomes of AVN with or without collapse, ankle and subtalar PTA, and relatively low PROs were common.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Ankle Fracture and Length of Stay in US Adult Population Using Data From the National COVID Cohort Collaborative

Background:

The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is an innovative approach to integrate real-world clinical observations into a harmonized database during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic when clinical research on ankle fracture surgery is otherwise mostly limited to expert opinion and research letters. The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce the largest cohort of US ankle fracture surgery patients to date with a comparison between lab-confirmed COVID-19–positive and COVID-19–negative.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort of adults with ankle fracture surgery using data from the N3C database with patients undergoing surgery between March 2020 and June 2021. The database is an NIH-funded platform through which the harmonized clinical data from 46 sites is stored. Patient characteristics included body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, overall mortality, surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, time to surgery, and length of stay. COVID-19–positive patients were compared to COVID-19–negative controls to investigate perioperative outcomes during the pandemic.

Results:

A total population of 8.4 million patient records was queried, identifying 4735 adults with ankle fracture surgery. The COVID-19–positive group (n=158, 3.3%) had significantly longer times to surgery (6.5 ± 6.6 vs 5.1 ± 5.5 days, P = .001) and longer lengths of stay (8.3 ± 23.5 vs 4.3 ± 7.4 days, P < .001), compared to the COVID-19–negative group. The COVID-19–positive group also had a higher rate of 30-day mortality.

Conclusion:

Patients with ankle fracture surgery had longer time to surgery and prolonged hospitalizations in COVID-19–positive patients compared to those who tested negative (average delay was about 1 day and increased length of hospitalization was about 4 days). Few perioperative events were observed in either group. Overall, the risks associated with COVID-19 were measurable but not substantial.

Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Barriers and Resources to Optimize Bone Health in Orthopaedic Education: Own the Bone (OTB): Bone Health Education in Residency

Osteoporosis is a critical public health issue with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Resident education on osteoporosis is not standardized. Little is known about the barriers to osteoporosis treatment and the usefulness of educational programming from the perspective of orthopaedic residency program directors (PDs).

The role of bladder catheterization in total knee arthroplasty

The use of a urinary bladder catheter in the perioperative period for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty is controversial. In the current study, two bladder management protocols were studied. One group of patients had an indwelling catheter inserted into the bladder before total knee arthroplasty. The other group of patients was observed and treated for urinary retention as necessary. From 1993 to 1998, 652 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized by surgeon into two groups: one group underwent preoperative insertion of an indwelling bladder catheter (306 patients), and one group (346 patients) had a catheter inserted postoperatively as necessary. Sixty-six percent (229 of 346) of these patients required catheterization (203 had indwelling catheters and 26 had intermittent straight catheters). A urinary tract infection developed in five patients (1.6%) in whom a catheter was inserted preoperatively. A urinary tract infection developed in six patients (1.7%) in whom a catheter was inserted if necessary. Five of these urinary tract infections developed in patients with delayed indwelling bladder catheters. A urinary tract infection did not develop in any patient in whom a straight catheter was inserted. There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the hospital between the two groups. The group in whom a catheter always was inserted generated $491 greater cost for total knee arthroplasty than patients in whom a catheter was inserted if necessary.

Single Price/Case Price Purchasing in orthopaedic surgery: experience at the Lahey Clinic

BACKGROUND

Hospital revenues for orthopaedic operations are not keeping pace with inflation or with rising hospital expenses. In an attempt to reduce the hospital cost of orthopaedic operations by reducing the cost of operating-room supplies, we developed a Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program for implants used in total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty as well as for arthroscopic shavers and burrs, interference screws, and bone-suture anchors.

METHODS

The Lahey Clinic asked orthopaedic vendors to supply all instruments, implants, and disposable items related to these selected products for one single price per unit or case. For example, a single price for total hip arthroplasty implants included instruments, acetabular cups, acetabular liners, acetabular screws, femoral stems, femoral heads, and stem centralizers, if required. The hospital implemented the Single Price/ Case Price Purchasing Program with a competitive-bid request for proposal. Surgeons evaluated the responses to the bidding process, and they made final decisions on product selection.

RESULTS

The Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program at the Lahey Clinic was successful in reducing the cost of orthopaedic implants and supplies. In the present article, we could not disclose the specific prices that we agreed to pay our vendors. The specific cost reductions were 32 percent for hip implants with a change of vendor, 23 percent for knee implants without a change of vendor, 25 percent for shoulder implants with a change of vendor, 45 percent for arthroscopic shavers and burrs without a change of vendor, 45 percent for interference screws without a change of vendor, and 23 percent for bone-suture anchors without a change of vendor.

CONCLUSIONS

The Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program at the Lahey Clinic allowed the hospital to reduce its cost of orthopaedic operations by lowering the cost of operating-room supplies. This cost reduction is important in a health-care economy in which hospital revenues per unit of service or care are decreasing.

Impact of a clinical pathway and implant standardization on total hip arthroplasty: a clinical and economic study of short-term patient outcome

This study evaluates the impact of a clinical pathway (CP) and a hip implant standardization program (HISP) on the quality and cost of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two hundred six unilateral THA operations for osteoarthritis were evaluated: 89 operations were performed in 1991 without a CP or HISP (4-year follow-up period); 117 operations were performed in 1993 with a CP and HISP (2-year follow-up period). All patients had good clinical results and excellent outcomes with short-term follow-up evaluation. No differences were seen between groups in terms of patient ratings of outcome and satisfaction or in terms of complication rates in the hospital. Implementation of a CP and HISP did not adversely affect the short-term outcome of THA but did reduce hospital length of stay and hospital cost for THA.

Knee implant standardization: an implant selection and cost reduction program

The largest single unit cost in the hospital cost for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the cost of knee implants. We developed a knee implant standardization program to provide guidelines for knee implant selection and to reduce the cost of knee implants for hospitals. Patients are assigned to demand categories based on five criteria: age, weight, expected activity, general health, and bone stock. Implants are assigned to demand categories based on an implant's projected capacity to handle the patient's projected demand. The program was applied retrospectively to 127 knee replacement operations performed on 93 patients during 1992. If this program had been in place, 8.4% of what was actually spent on knee implants for these 127 patients would have been saved. If the most expensive implants allowed in each demand category had actually been used, the program would have saved our hospital 12.8% of the cost of knee implants for these patients. Potential savings were noted in higher demand categories I and II by reducing the use of expensive cementless, porous-coated implants. The greatest potential savings were noted in lower demand categories III and IV: 11% savings could have been realized in demand category III, and 27% savings could have been achieved in the cost of knee implants in demand category IV. Potential savings would have been realized in these lower demand categories because of the recommended use of an all-polyethylene tibial component in 38 of 92 patients. This knee implant standardization program has the potential to assist surgeons in selecting knee implants and reduce the cost of knee implants without compromising outcome following TKA.

Implant standardization for total hip arthroplasty. An implant selection and a cost reduction program

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been targeted by the United States federal government for cost control because of its high cost and rising incidence in the aging population. The hospital cost for THA during the 1980s was controlled by utilization review and a reduction in the volume of services delivered for each THA. The single largest increase in the cost of THA during the 1980s was the cost of hip implants. The Lahey Clinic Hip Implant Standardization Program was developed to provide objective guidelines for hip implant selection. These guidelines are based on the demands a patients is expected to place on his or her hip prosthesis. Because not every patient requires an expensive high-demand hip prosthesis, the standardization program also has the potential to reduce the hospital cost for hip implants without compromising patient care. Patients are assigned to four demand categories based on five objective criteria: age, weight, expected activity, general health, and bone stock. Selection of the prosthesis in each of the four demand categories is intended to match the implant's capacity with expected patient demand. The standardization program was retrospectively applied to 103 THAs performed during 1991. Analysis of variance demonstrated that patient variables and demand categories were statistically significant groupings. The cost of hip implants would have been reduced by 25.7% with the Lahey Clinic Hip Implant Standardization Program. A prospective outcome study is required to determine the long-term validity of this standardization program.