Feasibility of a screening and prevention procedure for risks associated with dysphagia in older patients in geriatric units: the DYSPHAGING pilot study protocol

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia, particularly sarcopenic dysphagia, is frequent in frail older patients. Sarcopenic dysphagia is a swallowing disorder caused by sarcopenia, corresponding to a loss of muscle mass and strength. It frequently leads to inhalation and to the decrease of food intake, leading the patient to enter a vicious circle of chronic malnutrition and frailty. The awareness of the major health impacts of sarcopenic dysphagia is recent, explaining a low rate of screening in the population at risk. In this context, methods of prevention, evaluation and intervention of sarcopenic dysphagia adapted to the most at-risk population are necessary.

METHODS

The DYSPHAGING (dysphagia & aging) pilot study is a prospective, multicentre, non-comparative study aiming to estimate the feasibility of an intervention on allied health professionals using the DYSPHAGING educational sheet designed to implement a two-step procedure 'screen-prevent' to mitigate swallowing disorders related to sarcopenic dysphagia. After obtaining oral consent, patients are screened using Eating Assessment Tool-10 Score. In case of a score≥2, procedures including positional manoeuvres during mealtimes, food and texture adaptation should be implemented. The primary endpoint of the study is the feasibility of this two-step procedure (screening-prevention measures) in the first 3 days after patient's consent.The study will include 102 patients, with an expected 10% rate of non-analysable patients. Participants will be recruited from acute geriatric wards, rehabilitation centres and long-term care units, with the hypothesis to reach a feasibility rate of 50% and reject a rate lower than 35%.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved according to French legislation (CPP Ile-de-France VII) on 15 February 2023. The results of the primary and secondary objectives will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05734586.

Cultural and Ethical Barriers to Cancer Treatment in Nursing Homes and Educational Strategies: A Scoping Review

(1) Background: The aging of the population, the increase in the incidence of cancer with age, and effective chronic oncological treatments all lead to an increased prevalence of cancer in nursing homes. The aim of the present study was to map the cultural and ethical barriers associated with the treatment of cancer and educational strategies in this setting. (2) Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted until April 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. All articles assessing continuum of care, paramedical education, and continuing education in the context of older cancer patients in nursing homes were reviewed. (3) Results: A total of 666 articles were analyzed, of which 65 studies were included. Many factors interfering with the decision to investigate and treat, leading to late- or unstaged disease, palliative-oriented care instead of curative, and a higher risk of unjustified transfers to acute care settings, were identified. The educational strategies explored in this context were generally based on training programs. (4) Conclusions: These results will allow the co-construction of educational tools intended to develop knowledge and skills to improve diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, the consistency of care, and, ultimately, the quality of life of older cancer patients in nursing homes.

Risk factors associated with day-30 mortality in patients over 60 years old admitted in ICU for severe COVID-19: the Senior-COVID-Rea Multicentre Survey protocol

INTRODUCTION

With the spread of COVID-19 epidemic, health plans must be adapted continuously. There is an urgent need to define the best care courses of patients with COVID-19, especially in intensive care units (ICUs), according to their individualised benefit/risk ratio. Since older age is associated with poorer short-term and long-term outcomes, prediction models are needed, that may assist clinicians in their ICU admission decision. Senior-COVID-Rea was designed to evaluate, in patients over 60 years old admitted in ICU for severe COVID-19 disease, the impact of age and geriatric and paraclinical parameters on their mortality 30 days after ICU admission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre survey protocol to be conducted in seven hospitals of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, France. All patients over 60 years old admitted in ICU for severe COVID-19 infection (or their legally acceptable representative) will be proposed to enter the study and to fill in a questionnaire regarding their functional and nutritional parameters 1 month before COVID-19 infection. Paraclinical parameters at ICU admission will be collected: lymphocytes and neutrophils counts, high-fluorescent lymphoid cells and immature granulocytes percentages (Sysmex data), D-dimers, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinine, CT scan for lung extension rate as well as clinical resuscitation scores, and the delay between the first signs of infection and ICU admission. The primary outcome will be the overall survival at day 30 post-ICU admission. The analysis of factors predicting mortality at day 30 will be carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Multivariate logistic regression will consider up to 15 factors.The ambition of this trial, which takes into account the different approaches of geriatric vulnerability, is to define the respective abilities of different operational criteria of frailty to predict patients' outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was ethically approved. The results of the primary and secondary objectives will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04422340.

Food-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire

Objectives

Monitoring psychosocial, emotional, and hedonic aspects of food behavior is important to understand cancer patients’ distress and help to reduce risks of malnutrition. However, to date, there is no specific tool to measure the impact of diet, eating behavior, and chemotherapy side effects on patients’ food-related quality of life during cancer and its treatments. The objective was to develop and validate a questionnaire that aims to assess the food-related quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

Relevant items from the existing food-related quality of life assessment tools were selected to compose the present 46-item questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaire was conducted in 276 healthy volunteers and 173 cancer patients. Exploratory Factor Analysis

(EFA) was performed in both groups, construct and discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability were calculated.

Results

The questionnaire was perceived as clear and required less than14 minutes for completion (93% complete responses) in a pre-test (n = 156). The EFA allowed the inclusion of 9 dimensions in the food-related quality of life questionnaire. Common patterns between patients and healthy volunteers (factor loadings ≥ 0.4 in both groups) were used to calculate scores by dimension. Scores in the dimensions of adapting diet and sensorial discomfort (taste/odor) were higher in cancer patients, whilst scores in the dimension of discomfort in satiety were higher in healthy volunteers. Among patients with cancer, the total scores in sensorial discomfort, digestive discomfort, and discomfort in satiety were higher under chemotherapy than no treatment. Reproducibility after one week was in increasing order; digestive discomfort 0.6, adapting diet 0.61, products’ quality 0.67, cooking 0.75, healthy diet 0.76, eating and pleasure 0.80, discomfort in satiety 0.82, and sensorial discomfort 0.85.

Conclusions

This 46-item questionnaire can discriminate cancer patients versus healthy volunteers, and patients receiving vs those not receiving chemotherapy. A good to very good reproducibility was found for the most important factors of food-related quality of life of patients with cancer, i.e, eating and pleasure, sensorial discomfort, and discomfort in satiety.

Funding Sources

This study is funded by La Région Auvergne Rhône-Aples and La Métropôle de Lyon.

Feasibility of a prehabilitation programme dedicated to older patients with cancer before complex medical-surgical procedures: the PROADAPT pilot study protocol

BACKGROUND

Ageing is associated with an increased prevalence of comorbidities and sarcopenia as well as a decline of functional reserve of multiple organ systems, which may lead, in the context of the disease-related and/or treatment-related stress, to functional deconditioning. The multicomponent 'Prehabilitation & Rehabilitation in Oncogeriatrics: Adaptation to Deconditioning risk and Accompaniment of Patients' Trajectories (PROADAPT)' intervention was developed multiprofessionally to implement prehabilitation in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

The PROADAPT pilot study is an interventional, non-comparative, prospective, multicentre study. It will include 122 patients oriented to complex medical-surgical curative procedures (major surgery or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy). After informed consent, patients will undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment and will be offered a prehabilitation kit that includes an advice booklet with personalised objectives and respiratory rehabilitation devices. Patients will then be called weekly and monitored for physical and respiratory rehabilitation, preoperative renutrition, motivational counselling and iatrogenic prevention. Six outpatient visits will be planned: at inclusion, a few days before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of the procedure. The main outcome of the study is the feasibility of the intervention, defined as the ability to perform at least one of the components of the programme. Clinical data collected will include patient-specific and cancer-specific characteristics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ile de France 8 ethics committee on 5 June 2018. The results of the primary and secondary objectives will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03659123. Pre-results of the trial.

Progastrin, a New Blood Biomarker for Multiple Cancers Allowing a New Strategy for Screening, Early Detection and Monitoring

Background: The majority of cancers evolve for years before becoming symptomatic. But once symptomatic, it is often too late for the patients to be cured. It is thus of paramount importance to improve early cancer screening in the general population as well as in genetically predisposed individuals. Moreover, although there is an undeniable progress in treatments, in particular in the immuno-oncology field, there is a growing need for circulating biomarkers to monitor treatment efficacy to better impact patient health and social economics. Aim: Progastrin (PG) is abnormally released in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), as the gene coding for PG is a direct target of the WNT/β-catenin oncogenic pathway involved in tumorigenesis of many organs and activated from the very first steps of tumorigenesis, allowing the detection of PG in early stage cancers. The objective was to assess the diagnostic value of PG in a series of different types of cancers (early and advanced stages), as well as the role of PG as a circulating biomarker for treatment follow-up in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a metastatic disease where imaging monitoring is impossible (due to the small size of lesions). Methods: Progastrin was measured in plasma EDTA samples using the ELISA cancerREAD technology. For the evaluation of PG in cancer patients, 673 samples were collected for comparison with 119 healthy volunteers. For the follow-up monitoring, patients were enrolled during management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or surgery). The diagnostic value of PG concentrations at inclusion in 190 GI cancer patients was assessed against 80 control samples. Results: Progastrin was detected in 77% of cancer patients, all cancers combined. The diagnosis area under the ROC curve of PG was 0.9114, P < 0.0001. Sensitivity ranged from 71% (breast cancer) to 87% (skin melanoma). All the 15 different types of cancers tested were positive. Early stage detection was assessed for colorectal and breast cancers with a sensitivity of 62.5% for adenomatous polyps, and 68.2% for stage 0 and I breast cancers. Sensitivity increased up to 82% for stage II colorectal cancer and to 78% for stage II-IV breast cancers. For the follow-up of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients, median PG levels decreased whatever the GI subtype with sequential treatments from 4.4 pM at inclusion time, to 1.3 after adjuvant chemotherapy. A trend for better PFS was observed in patients with PG decline after surgery. Conclusion: Progastrin assay is a simple and inexpensive blood test exhibiting high diagnostic accuracy for multiple gastro-intestinal, gynecologic, skin cancers. It may be used for cancer screening before tumor localization. It also exhibits promising therapeutic monitoring value during treatment in advanced CRC patients. Assessment of PG value as a multitumor screening biomarker, and as a monitoring test, is ongoing.

Nuclear trafficking of EGFR by Vps34 represses Arf expression to promote lung tumor cell survival

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a cell surface receptor that has an essential role in cell proliferation and survival, and overexpression of EGFR is a common feature of human cancers. In Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), activating mutations of EGFR have also been described. We recently showed that mutant EGFR-L858R inhibits the expression of the p14ARF tumor-suppressor protein to promote cell survival. In this study, we defined the molecular bases by which EGFR controls Arf expression. Using various lung tumor models, we showed that EGF stimulation inhibits Arf transcription by a mechanism involving the nuclear transport and recruitment of EGFR to the Arf promoter. We unraveled the vesicular trafficking protein Vps34 as a mediator of EGFR nuclear trafficking and showed that its neutralization prevents the accumulation of EGFR to the Arf promoter in response to ligand activation. Finally, in lung tumor cells that carry mutant EGFR-L858R, we demonstrated that inhibition of Vps34 using small interfering RNA restrains nuclear EGFR location and restores Arf expression leading to apoptosis. These findings identify the Arf tumor suppressor as a new transcriptional target of nuclear EGFR and highlight Vps34 as an important regulator of the nuclear EGFR/Arf survival pathway. As a whole, they provide a mechanistic explanation to the inverse correlation between nuclear expression of EGFR and overall survival in NSCLC patients.

p14(ARF) inhibits the growth of lung adenocarcinoma cells harbouring an EGFR L858R mutation by activating a STAT3-dependent pro-apoptotic signalling pathway

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) stimulates proliferative and survival signals. Activating mutations of EGFR are involved in the aetiology and maintenance of the malignant phenotype of lung tumours. We previously described the frequent association of these mutations with the decreased expression of the p14(ARF) tumour suppressor, another common feature of lung cancer. Based on these data, we postulated that p14(ARF) could protect cells against untimely or excessive mitotic signals induced by mutant EGFR. In this study, we demonstrate that p14(ARF) promotes apoptosis in lung tumour cells harbouring the EGFR L858R mutation through the accumulation of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) on Tyr 705 residue, which leads to Bcl-2 downregulation. Using siRNA against PTP-RT, the phosphatase that specifically targets Tyr 705 residue, we show that accumulation of pSTAT3-Tyr705 promotes EGFR L858R mutant cell death, thereby confirming the existence of a STAT3-dependent pro-apoptotic pathway in these cells. Finally, we show that the expression of the EGFR L858R mutant represses p14(ARF) expression and inhibits STAT3/Bcl-2 signalling. These results identify a novel link between the p14(ARF) and EGFR pathways and suggest that EGFR L858R counteracts the pro-apoptotic function of p14(ARF) by downregulating its expression to promote carcinogenesis.