1
|
Iyer G, Demeure MJ, Deming DA, Federman N, McKean M, Lee EK, Spira AI, Kwiatkowski DJ, Hussein MA, Gordon EM, Crockett DG, Ganjoo KN, Schulte B, Cranmer LD, Schmid AN, Navarro WH, Itri LM. Phase 2, multicenter, open-label basket trial of nab-sirolimus for patients with malignant solid tumors harboring pathogenic inactivating alterations in TSC1 or TSC2 genes (PRECISION I). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS597 Background: Albumin-bound ( nab)-sirolimus, a novel mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) that utilizes nanoparticle technology to preferentially target tumors, is approved in the US for the treatment of adults with malignant PEComa. In an exploratory analysis of the AMPECT registrational trial of nab-sirolimus in advanced malignant PEComa (NCT02494570), 8/9 (89%) and 1/5 (20%) patients with TSC1 and TSC2 inactivating alterations, respectively, had confirmed response (Wagner, J Clin Oncol. 2021). Importantly, both TSC1 and TSC2 alterations have been observed in patients with various gastrointestinal cancers (Table). Overall, most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in AMPECT were grade 1/2 and manageable for long-term treatment; no grade ≥4 TRAEs occurred. Methods: PRECISION I (NCT05103358) is a phase 2, open-label, multi-institutional basket trial evaluating efficacy and safety of nab-sirolimus in patients with alterations in TSC1 (Arm A) and TSC2 (Arm B). Patients ≥12 years old with malignant solid tumors harboring pathogenic inactivating alterations in TSC1 or TSC2 (confirmed by central review of next-generation sequencing reports) who have progressed on standard therapies and are mTORi-naïve are eligible. nab-Sirolimus 100 mg/m2 will be administered weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint is overall response rate determined by independent review using RECIST v1.1; other endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, time to response progression-free survival by independent radiographic review, overall survival, patient-reported quality of life, and safety. Enrollment is ongoing. The most frequent tumor types expected in this tissue-agnostic trial are bladder, hepatobiliary, endometrial, soft tissue sarcoma, ovarian, and esophagogastric based on the prevalence of TSC1 or TSC2 alterations (Table). Clinical trial information: NCT05103358 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gopa Iyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian Schulte
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lee D. Cranmer
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Consortium, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deming DA, Rodon Ahnert J, Demeure MJ, Federman N, McKean M, Lee EK, Spira AI, Kwiatkowski DJ, Hussein MA, Gordon EM, Crockett DG, Ganjoo KN, Schulte B, Cranmer LD, Schmid AN, Navarro WH, Itri LM, Iyer G. Phase 2, multicenter, open-label basket trial of nab-sirolimus for patients with malignant solid tumors harboring pathogenic inactivating alterations in TSC1 or TSC2 genes (PRECISION I). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.tps818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS818 Background: Albumin-bound ( nab)-sirolimus, a novel mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) that utilizes nanoparticle technology to preferentially target tumors, is approved in the US for the treatment of adults with malignant PEComa. In an exploratory analysis of the AMPECT registrational trial of nab-sirolimus in advanced malignant PEComa (NCT02494570), 8/9 (89%) and 1/5 (20%) patients with TSC1 and TSC2 inactivating alterations, respectively, had confirmed response (Wagner, J Clin Oncol. 2021). Importantly, both TSC1 and TSC2 alterations have been observed in patients with various gastrointestinal cancers (Table). Overall, most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in AMPECT were grade 1/2 and manageable for long-term treatment; no grade ≥4 TRAEs occurred. Methods: PRECISION I (NCT05103358) is a phase 2, open-label, multi-institutional basket trial evaluating efficacy and safety of nab-sirolimus in patients with alterations in TSC1 (Arm A) and TSC2 (Arm B). Patients ≥12 years old with malignant solid tumors harboring pathogenic inactivating alterations in TSC1 or TSC2 (confirmed by central review of next generation sequencing reports) who have progressed on standard therapies and are mTORi-naïve are eligible. nab-Sirolimus 100 mg/m2 will be administered weekly as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint is overall response rate determined by independent review using RECIST v1.1; other endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, time to response, progression-free survival by independent radiographic review, overall survival, patient-reported quality of life, and safety. Enrollment is ongoing. The most frequent tumor types expected in this tissue-agnostic trial are bladder, hepatobiliary, endometrial, soft tissue sarcoma, ovarian, and esophagogastric based on the prevalence of TSC1 or TSC2 alterations (Table). Clinical trial information: NCT05103358 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael J. Demeure
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maen A. Hussein
- Florida Cancer Specialists North Division, St Petersburg, FL
| | | | | | | | - Brian Schulte
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lee D. Cranmer
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Consortium, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - Gopa Iyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Atkins MB, Lee SJ, Chmielowski B, Tarhini AA, Cohen GI, Truong TG, Moon HH, Davar D, O'Rourke M, Stephenson JJ, Curti BD, Urba WJ, Brell JM, Funchain P, Kendra KL, Ikeguchi AP, Jaslowski A, Bane CL, Taylor MA, Bajaj M, Conry RM, Ellis RJ, Logan TF, Laudi N, Sosman JA, Crockett DG, Pecora AL, Okazaki IJ, Reganti S, Chandra S, Guild S, Chen HX, Streicher HZ, Wolchok JD, Ribas A, Kirkwood JM. Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients With Advanced BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial-ECOG-ACRIN EA6134. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:186-197. [PMID: 36166727 PMCID: PMC9839305 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 133.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4-blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety. RESULTS A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank P = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A (P = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B (P < .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated. CONCLUSION Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra J. Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Helen H. Moon
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA
| | - Diwakar Davar
- Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mark O'Rourke
- Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, SC
| | | | | | | | - Joanna M. Brell
- MetroHealth Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Kari L. Kendra
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Mark A. Taylor
- Lewis Ca & Res Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler, Savannah, GA
| | | | | | | | - Theodore F. Logan
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Jeffrey A. Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | - Sunandana Chandra
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Helen X. Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Howard Z. Streicher
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jedd D. Wolchok
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Antoni Ribas
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - John M. Kirkwood
- Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Crockett DG, Loberiza FR. Persistent Disparities in Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2015; 10:192-8. [PMID: 26104908 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-015-0268-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The use of large databases has provided advancements in the understanding of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the field of adult hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). Disparities exist on individual, institutional, and systemic levels for both allogeneic and autologous HCT. We reviewed the most recent publications that utilized large databases to elucidate disparities in HCT and placed them into historical context of the other major studies in the field. Two emerging themes were identified. These themes are persistent inequalities in both allogeneic HCT and autologous HCT for myeloma and the importance of improving homogeneity of care in HCT. Minimization of inequalities can be achieved only with an understanding of the persistent barriers that exist in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Crockett
- Section of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 987680 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-7680, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dhir M, Crockett DG, Stevens TM, Silberstein PT, Hunter WJ, Foster JM. Neoadjuvant treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of pancreas with Imatinib: case report and systematic review of literature. Clin Sarcoma Res 2014; 4:8. [PMID: 25276339 PMCID: PMC4179866 DOI: 10.1186/2045-3329-4-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a rare skin tumor, characterized by frequent local recurrence but is seldom metastatic. It is histologically characterized by storiform arrangement of spindle cells. Cytogenetically, most tumors are characterized by translocation 17:22 leading to overexpression of tyrosine kinase PDGFB which can be targeted with tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Imatinib. We describe the first case of unresectable pancreatic metastases from DFSP treated with neoadjuvant Imatinib and subsequently R0 metastectomy. Additionally, a comprehensive systematic review of DFSP pancreatic metastases and the current published data on the use of Imatinib in DFSP is summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashaal Dhir
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, 986345 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6345, USA
| | - David G Crockett
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Todd M Stevens
- Department of Pathology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Peter T Silberstein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - William J Hunter
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jason M Foster
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, 986345 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6345, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with Lynch syndrome are much more likely to have generally rare upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma but not bladder urothelial carcinoma. While the risk has been quantified, to our knowledge there is no description of how this population of patients with Lynch syndrome and upper urinary tract cancer differs from the general population with upper urinary tract cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We obtained retrospective data on a cohort of patients with Lynch syndrome from the Hereditary Cancer Center in Omaha, Nebraska and compared the data to those on a control general population from western Sweden. These data were supplemented by a new survey about exposure to known risk factors. RESULTS Of the patients with Lynch syndrome 91% had mutations in MSH2 rather than in MSH1 and 79% showed upper tract urothelial carcinoma a mean of 15.85 years after prior Lynch syndrome-type cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years vs 70 in the general population (p <0.0001). Only half of our patients had a significant smoking history and the male-to-female ratio was 0.95. Of patients with Lynch syndrome 51% had urothelial carcinoma in the ureter while it occurred in the renal pelvis in 65% of the general population (p = 0.0013). Similar numbers of high grade tumors were found in the Lynch syndrome and general populations (88% and 74%, respectively, p = 0.1108). CONCLUSIONS Upper urinary tract tumors develop at a younger age and are more likely to be in the ureter with an almost equal gender ratio in patients with Lynch syndrome. It has high grade potential similar to that in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Crockett
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|