1
|
Ospina AV, Bolufer Nadal S, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL, González Larriba JL, Macía Vidueira I, Massutí Sureda B, Nadal E, Trancho FH, Álvarez Kindelán A, Del Barco Morillo E, Bernabé Caro R, Bosch Barrera J, Calvo de Juan V, Casal Rubio J, de Castro J, Cilleruelo Ramos Á, Cobo Dols M, Dómine Gómez M, Figueroa Almánzar S, Garcia Campelo R, Insa Mollá A, Jarabo Sarceda JR, Jiménez Maestre U, López Castro R, Majem M, Martinez-Marti A, Martínez Téllez E, Sánchez Lorente D, Provencio M. Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03382-y. [PMID: 38530556 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03382-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team. OBJECTIVE Development of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP. METHODS Between March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes. RESULTS New and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Consensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylen Vanessa Ospina
- Head of the Oncology Department at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Full Professor of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Manuel de Falla, 1 Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mariano Provencio
- Head of the Oncology Department at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Full Professor of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Manuel de Falla, 1 Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain.
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Romero Román A, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL, Macía I, Escobar Campuzano I, Figueroa Almánzar S, Delgado Roel M, Gálvez Muñoz C, García Fontán EM, Muguruza Trueba I, Romero Vielva L, Cano Garcia JR, Martínez Téllez E, Partida González C, Jiménez López MF, Jiménez Maestre U, Mongil Poce R, Sánchez Lorente D, Álvarez Kindelán A, Provencio Pulla M. Outcomes of surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60:81-88. [PMID: 33661301 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This analysis aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes of surgical resection following neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy plus nivolumab in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS Eligible patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel + carboplatin) plus nivolumab for 3 cycles. Reassessment of the tumour was carried out after treatment and patients with at least stable disease as best response underwent pulmonary resection. After surgery, patients received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 1 year. Surgical data were collected from the NADIM database and patient charts were reviewed for additional surgical details. RESULTS Among 46 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, 41 (89.1%) underwent surgery. Two patients rejected surgery and 3 did not fulfil resectability criteria. There were 35 lobectomies (85.3%), 3 of which were sleeve lobectomies (9.4%), 3 bilobectomies (7.3%) and 3 pneumonectomies (7.3%). Video-assisted thoracoscopy was the initial approach in 51.2% of cases, with a conversion rate of 19% (n = 4). There was no operative mortality at either 30 or 90 days. The most common complications were prolonged air leak (n = 8), pneumonia (n = 5) and arrhythmia (n = 4). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in all patients who underwent surgery, downstaging was observed in 37 patients (90.2%) and major pathological response in 34 patients (82.9%). CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection following induction therapy with chemotherapy plus nivolumab appears to be safe and offers appropriate oncological outcomes. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in our study were no higher than previously reported in this setting. A minimally invasive approach is, therefore, feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Romero Román
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Iván Macía
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Escobar Campuzano
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) and Unit of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge;, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) and Department of Clinical Sciences, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - María Delgado Roel
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Carlos Gálvez Muñoz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Muguruza Trueba
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José Ramón Cano Garcia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Unai Jiménez Maestre
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Roberto Mongil Poce
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - David Sánchez Lorente
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mariano Provencio Pulla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Despite the numerous differences among the distinct diseases of the chest wall, the surgery of this area shows certain common features. Treatment has progressively changed in the last few years due to advances in diagnostic techniques, minimally invasive procedures and reconstruction materials, and especially due to the multidisciplinary management of many diseases. Nuss' minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum has gained devotees, although open approaches are performed with increasingly small incisions, almost comparable to the lateral incisions in Nuss' technique. Surgeons supporting the open approach also cite the evident disadvantages of the need for a steel implant for 2 or 3 years and for a second intervention to remove this implant. En-bloc resections with reconstruction using materials, which are increasingly better and covered by myocutaneous grafts in collaboration with plastic surgery departments, constitute a major advance in the treatment of chest wall tumors. Trimodal therapy for Pancoast tumors, consisting of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy and subsequent surgical treatment of the tumor, currently provides the best results in terms of resectability and survival.
Collapse
|