Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and fluorescence angiography in arterial insufficiency secondary to injection of crushed hydromorphone

INTRODUCTION

Foreign body emboli can lead to acute arterial insufficiency. We present a case report of upper extremity arterial insufficiency in an intravenous (IV) drug user secondary to intra-arterial injection of crushed tablet particles successfully treated with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy.

CASE

A 37-year-old right-hand-dominant male developed pain and swelling of the left hand after attempting to inject crushed hydromorphone tablets into his venous circulation. Angiography revealed incomplete distal filling of the proper digital arteries, princeps pollicis, and radialis indicis branches of the left hand. The patient was treated with HBO2 for acute arterial insufficiency, secondary to these findings. Fluorescence angiography was performed prior to, during and after completion of HBO2, which showed improved perfusion of the hand upon completion of serial imaging. The patient underwent subsequent partial amputation of the left second digit and removal of the thenar and third finger pads.

DISCUSSION

Much of the literature on treatment of arterial insufficiency with HBO2 are in relation to chronic problem wounds. However, there is limited data on adjunctive treatment with HBO2 for foreign body embolism. Fluorescence angiography and clinical exam were used to track tissue perfusion and progression throughout course of therapy with HBO2.

CONCLUSION

Acute arterial insufficiency induced by foreign body embolism was successfully treated with HBO2 and provided increased tissue salvage of the patient's hand. The use of fluorescence angiography as a secondary measure of perfusion can provide additional insight regarding qualitative tissue oxygenation and may be a viable tool to track patient progress during HBO2 treatment.

Reliability of the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor During Hyperbaric Oxygen Exposure

Background: People with diabetes-related ulcers may benefit from hyperbaric oxygen (HBO₂) therapy and from continuous glucose monitors (CGM). Although blood glucose (BG) meters based on glucose oxidase (GO) report erroneously low values at high pO₂, BG meters based on glucose dehydrogenase (GD) do not. We therefore examined the performance of a GO-based CGM system in comparison to GO-based and GD-based BG systems in normobaric air (NBAir), hyperbaric air (HBAir), and HBO₂ environments. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six volunteers without diabetes mellitus (DM) wore Dexcom G6 CGM systems and provided periodic blood samples before, during, and after a standard HBO₂ treatment consisting of three 30-min intervals of HBO₂ separated by two 5-min intervals of HBAir. Accuracy of the CGM and GO-based BG meter were assessed by comparisons with the GD-based values. Results: The mean absolute relative difference for the CGM system was 15.96% and for the GO-based meter was 8.52%. Compared to NBAir, HBO₂ exposure resulted in significantly higher CGM values (+3.76 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and significantly lower GO-based meter values (-10.38 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Pre-HBO₂ and post-HBO₂ values obtained in NBAir were also significantly different when measured by CGM (+4.13 mg/dL, P = 0.015) or the GO-based meter (-9.04 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Conclusions: In volunteers without DM, HBO₂ exposure results in statistically significant differences in glucose measurements obtained with GO-based devices, but not a GD-based device. Standard HBO₂ treatment results in statistically significant effects on glucose concentrations. These differences are of unlikely clinical significance.

Safety of a continuous glucose monitoring device during hyperbaric exposure

BACKGROUND

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has been demonstrated to lower blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) allows glucose monitoring in real time. Battery-operated CGM transmitters have yet to be formally tested and given safety approval for use in a hyperbaric environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated and tested commercially available Dexcom® G6 CGM transmitters under hyperbaric conditions. Each transmitter contains a 3V, 130-mAh (0.39 Wh) lithium manganese dioxide battery (IEC CR1632) and circuit board that are fully encapsulated in epoxy. Each transmitter is pressurized to 90 pounds per square inch (psi) in an autoclave at 40°C for up to 72 hours during manufacturing to ensure that all enclosed air spaces are eliminated from the epoxy. We compared the CGM components against section 14.2.9.3.17.5 of the 2018 National Fire Protection Association 99 (NFPA 99) Health Care Facilities Code requirements. Six CGM transmitters attached to estimated glucose value generators (EGVGs) underwent 11 pressurization cycles to 45 feet of seawater (fsw). All transmitters were returned to the manufacturer to assess post-exposure structural integrity. G6 sensors, which contain no electrical components or compressible air spaces, do not pose a risk in the hyperbaric environment.

RESULTS

There was no observed change in preset EGVG readings during hyperbaric exposures. Post-exposure testing revealed no structural compromise after repeated hyperbaric exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

The CGM transmitter meets section 14.2.9.3.17.5 of the 2018 NFPA 99 requirements for battery-operated devices allowed for use in a hyperbaric environment. This analysis revealed no significant safety concerns with subjecting Dexcom G6 CGM transmitters to hyperbaric environments.