Castleman disease: Experience from a single institution

Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of rare heterogeneous lymphoproliferative disorders characterized by enlarged hyperplastic lymph nodes. It is classified into unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD). The present retrospective study examined the data of 11 patients with CD diagnosed and treated at a tertiary cancer center from 2017 to 2022. The median age of the study group was 41 years (range, 24 to 68 years). There were 8 males and 3 females. In total, 7 patients were diagnosed with UCD and 4 patients with MCD. The hyaline-vascular variant was the most common histology in both UCD and MCD. Among the 7 patients with UCD, 5 patients underwent excision, 1 patient underwent debulking followed by radiotherapy and 1 patient received single agent rituximab. Of the patients with UCD, 6 had a complete response (CR) and 1 patient had a partial response (PR). All 4 patients with MCD received systemic treatment, which included single agent rituximab (2 patients), rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (RCHOP) (1 patient) and CHOP (1 patient). Among the patients with MCD, 1 patient attained a CR, 2 patients had a PR and 1 patient succumbed. The 3-year survival rate for the study population was 91%. In summary, CD is a rare disease occurring in immunodeficient patients. UCD is more common and is associated with better outcomes. Surgery is the mainstay of management in UCD whereas MCD requires combination chemotherapy.

Lymphoma and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Case Series

Occurrences of lymphoma and differentiated thyroid cancer are rare. Usually, involvement of the thyroid gland is seen as a part of extranodal involvement or as a part of radiation-induced malignant transformation in previously treated lymphoma patients. The incidence of synchronous hematological malignancy with differentiated thyroid cancer is 7%. The synchronous occurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer and lymphoma poses a significant diagnostic and treatment dilemma. Here we report a case series of four patients with lymphoma and differentiated thyroid cancer. All four patients had lymphoma treated first followed by definitive management of thyroid malignancy.

“A.B.C.” of Immunotherapy in Hematological Malignancies…Promise and Perils

The treatment landscape of hematological malignancies has been evolving at an extremely fast pace. Hematological malignancies are diverse and distinct from solid tumors. These constitute challenges, which are also unique opportunities for immunotherapy. The five categories of immunotherapies that have found success in the management of hematological malignancies are allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, monoclonal antibodies and innovative designs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and B cell targeting small immunomodulatory molecules. Allogeneic stem cell transplant rightly called our bluntest weapon is the oldest form of successful immunotherapy. Alternate donor transplants and improvement in supportive care have improved the scope of this immunotherapy option. Among monoclonal antibodies, rituximab forms the prototype on which over a dozen other antibodies have been developed. The bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab engages cytotoxic CD3 T cells with CD19 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, which is an effective treatment method for relapsed refractory ALL. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have established their role in hematological malignancies with high PD-L1 expression, including relapsed refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (BCL). Small immunomodulatory drugs targeting the B cell receptor downstream signaling through BTK inhibitors, SYK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib), and BCL-2 inhibitors (venetoclax), and immunomodulatory imide drugs (lenalidomide) have also emerged as exciting therapeutic avenues in immunotherapy. CAR T cells are one of the most exciting and promising forms of adoptive immunotherapy. CAR T cells are rightly called living drugs or serial killers to keep patients alive. CAR T cells are genetically engineered, autologous T cells that combine the cytotoxicity of T cells with the antigen-binding specificity of CARs. CARs are antigen-specific but major histocompatibility complex/human leukocyte antigen-independent. There are five approved CAR T cell products for the management of relapsed refractory leukemias, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. The past and present of immunotherapy have been really exciting and the future looks incredibly promising. The challenges include widening the availability and affordability beyond specialized centers, identification of potentially predictive biomarkers of response, and experience in the management of complications of these novel agents. The combinational approach of multiple immunotherapies might be the way forward to complement the treatment strategies to harness the immune system and to improve survival with good quality of life.

Histiocytic Sarcoma: Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients Treated at a Tertiary Cancer Care Center

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare histiocytic disorder of unknown etiology. It is not a true sarcoma and is named so, due to the pathological resemblance to mature histiocytes. The clinical presentation of HS is diverse and is related to the involved organs. Due to its aggressive nature, with poor prognosis and lack of a standard treatment regimen of choice, its diagnosis and management pose a challenge to the clinician. Limited literature is available on the management of this entity. Here, we report four patients with HS, diagnosed over 15 years in a tertiary cancer center, with varied clinical presentation, management, and outcomes. The first patient presented with a localized unresectable esophageal mass. He was treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) combination chemotherapy and attained complete remission. The second patient had a painless mass of the hand, treated with wide excision and adjuvant Radiotherapy. She is disease-free for the past 12 years. The third patient had presented with an anterior mediastinal mass. He had progressive disease on chemotherapy. The fourth patient had multifocal disease with generalized lymphadenopathy. She was treated with CHOP chemotherapy and is now disease-free at 13 months. To summarize, the patients with the localized resectable disease did well, with surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy, while patients with the multifocal disease did well on CHOP chemotherapy. The take-home message from this case series is - CHOP off whenever you can and if not give CHOP to chop off the disease.

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 mutation in lung cancer: types, incidence, clinical features and impact on treatment

BACKGROUND

There are limited data available on the treatment and outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20-mutated lung cancer patients. Hence, we planned an analysis of the demographic details, clinical profile and survival of lung cancer patients with exon 20 mutations. We compared our results to patients with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitizing activating and EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative mutations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients who were treated at our center between January 2010 and August 2014. We reviewed the results of EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. We also reviewed the data relating to baseline demographics, clinical profile, patient treatment and outcome measures in terms of response and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 580 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. In all, 227 (39.1%) patients had EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations, 20 (3.4%) patients had exon 20 insertion mutations and 333 patients were EGFR/ALK mutation negative (57.5%). The median OS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-9.8 months) in exon 20 insertion mutations, 16.1 months (95% CI 12.8-19.5 months) in EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations and 10 months (95% CI 7.9-12.1 months) in EGFR/ALK mutation-negative patients. The median OS was significantly better for the EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutation group (P=0.000, log-rank test) and for the EGFR/ALK-negative group (P=0.037, log-rank test) compared to the exon 20-mutated group.

CONCLUSION

Exon 20 mutation results in a poorer OS prognosis compared to EGFR- and ALK-negative patients and patients harboring EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations. The incidence of de novo exon 20 insertions was 3.4%. Different types of exon mutations seem to have different outcomes.