1
|
Bruder O, Schneider S, Pilz G, van Rossum AC, Schwitter J, Nothnagel D, Lombardi M, Buss S, Wagner A, Petersen S, Greulich S, Jensen C, Nagel E, Sechtem U, Mahrholdt H. 2015 Update on Acute Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium based Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular MR. Large Multi-National and Multi-Ethnical Population Experience With 37788 Patients From the EuroCMR Registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17:58. [PMID: 26170152 PMCID: PMC4501068 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-015-0168-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Specifically we aim to demonstrate that the results of our earlier safety data hold true in this much larger multi-national and multi-ethnical population. BACKGROUND We sought to re-evaluate the frequency, manifestations, and severity of acute adverse reactions associated with administration of several gadolinium- based contrast agents during routine CMR on a European level. METHODS Multi-centre, multi-national, and multi-ethnical registry with consecutive enrolment of patients in 57 European centres. RESULTS During the current observation 37,788 doses of Gadolinium based contrast agent were administered to 37,788 patients. The mean dose was 24.7 ml (range 5-80 ml), which is equivalent to 0.123 mmol/kg (range 0.01 - 0.3 mmol/kg). Forty-five acute adverse reactions due to contrast administration occurred (0.12%). Most reactions were classified as mild (43 of 45) according to the American College of Radiology definition. The most frequent complaints following contrast administration were rashes and hives (15 of 45), followed by nausea (10 of 45) and flushes (10 of 45). The event rate ranged from 0.05% (linear non-ionic agent gadodiamide) to 0.42% (linear ionic agent gadobenate dimeglumine). Interestingly, we also found different event rates between the three main indications for CMR ranging from 0.05% (risk stratification in suspected CAD) to 0.22% (viability in known CAD). CONCLUSIONS The current data indicate that the results of the earlier safety data hold true in this much larger multi-national and multi-ethnical population. Thus, the "off-label" use of Gadolinium based contrast in cardiovascular MR should be regarded as safe concerning the frequency, manifestation and severity of acute events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Bruder
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Elisabeth Hospital, Essen, Germany.
| | - S Schneider
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Department of Biometrics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| | - G Pilz
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Agatharied, Hausham, Germany.
| | - A C van Rossum
- Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J Schwitter
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois - CHUV University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - D Nothnagel
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
| | - M Lombardi
- Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, Italy.
| | - S Buss
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - A Wagner
- Cardiology Associates of Fairfield, Stamford, CT, USA.
| | - S Petersen
- Barts and The London NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, London Chest Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | - S Greulich
- Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Centre, Stuttgart, 70376, Germany.
| | - C Jensen
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Elisabeth Hospital, Essen, Germany.
| | - E Nagel
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, J.W. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Center of Cardiovascular Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - U Sechtem
- Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Centre, Stuttgart, 70376, Germany.
| | - H Mahrholdt
- Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Centre, Stuttgart, 70376, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moschetti K, Muzzarelli S, Pinget C, Wagner A, Pilz G, Wasserfallen JB, Schulz-Menger J, Nothnagel D, Dill T, Frank H, Lombardi M, Bruder O, Mahrholdt H, Schwitter J. Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14:35. [PMID: 22697303 PMCID: PMC3461475 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-14-35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2012] [Accepted: 06/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has favorable characteristics for diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD. CMR utilization in CAD detection is growing fast. However, data on its cost-effectiveness are scarce. The goal of this study is to compare the costs of two strategies for detection of significant coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD): 1) Performing CMR first to assess myocardial ischemia and/or infarct scar before referring positive patients (defined as presence of ischemia and/or infarct scar to coronary angiography (CXA) versus 2) a hypothetical CXA performed in all patients as a single test to detect CAD. METHODS A subgroup of the European CMR pilot registry was used including 2,717 consecutive patients who underwent stress-CMR. From these patients, 21% were positive for CAD (ischemia and/or infarct scar), 73% negative, and 6% uncertain and underwent additional testing. The diagnostic costs were evaluated using invoicing costs of each test performed. Costs analysis was performed from a health care payer perspective in German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care settings. RESULTS In the public sectors of the German, United Kingdom, and Swiss health care systems, cost savings from the CMR-driven strategy were 50%, 25% and 23%, respectively, versus outpatient CXA. If CXA was carried out as an inpatient procedure, cost savings were 46%, 50% and 48%, respectively. In the United States context, cost savings were 51% when compared with inpatient CXA, but higher for CMR by 8% versus outpatient CXA. CONCLUSION This analysis suggests that from an economic perspective, the use of CMR should be encouraged as a management option for patients with suspected CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Moschetti
- Institute of Health Economics and Management (IEMS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Technology Assessment Unit (UET), University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Muzzarelli
- Division of Cardiology and Head of Cardiac MR Centre, University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Pinget
- Institute of Health Economics and Management (IEMS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Technology Assessment Unit (UET), University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Cardiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Günther Pilz
- Department of Cardiology, Clinic Agatharied, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen
- Institute of Health Economics and Management (IEMS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Technology Assessment Unit (UET), University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- WG CARDIAC MRI, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité and HELIOS-Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Detle Nothnagel
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Dill
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Herbert Frank
- Landeskrankenhaus Tulln Interne Abteilung, Donauklinikum Alter Zietelweg, Tulln, Austria
| | | | - Oliver Bruder
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heiko Mahrholdt
- Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jürg Schwitter
- Division of Cardiology and Head of Cardiac MR Centre, University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geyer H, Nothnagel D. [Fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products and pregnancy-specific beta 1-glycoprotein (SP 1) in normal and pathological pregnancies]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1984; 44:787-91. [PMID: 6335446 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1036520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products and SP 1 were measured in about 150 women with normal pregnancies. The mean levels of both parameters rose up to term. In 13 normal pregnancies the SP 1 course never decreased. Elevated levels of SP 1 were measured in 4 out of 10 cases of mild gestosis. In 11 cases of severe gestosis, however, 7 had increased values. A decrease of elevated levels correlated to a clinical deterioration. SP 1 was normal in the most cases of severe gestosis, but a fall of SP 1 indicated an impaired placental function resulting in small-for-date baby or imminent foetal asphyxia. The measurements of fibrinogen degradation products and of the course of SP 1 are helpful in the diagnosis of gestosis.
Collapse
|