The Global Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Connection with Sleep Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The duration and quality of sleep are believed to significantly influence the onset of metabolic syndrome (MetS), but existing data lack consistency. The meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prevalence of the MetS in association with sleep duration. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Research Gate databases was performed to identify cohort and cross-sectional studies published in English between 2013 and 2023. We included studies that examined the association between sleep duration/quality and MetS, and two independent reviewers assessed study quality and bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The systematic review included 11 studies with a total of 343,669 participants, including 4 cohort studies and 7 cross-sectional studies. Sample sizes varied widely, ranging from 293 to 162,121 individuals. The studies had different follow-up periods, participant ages ranging from 10 to 80 years, and predominantly male populations. The prevalence of MetS was higher in average sleepers [52%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 40%-64%] compared with short sleepers (13%, 95% CI: 8%-18%) and long sleepers (15%, 95% CI: 9%-24%). Globally, North American countries exhibit the highest prevalence of MetS across short- (25.3%, 95% CI: 4.2%-72.4%) and long-sleeper (22.4%, 95% CI: 2.8%-74.1%) categories, whereas Asian countries experience the highest prevalence among the average sleeper category (58.7%, 95% CI: 44.1%-71.9%). Our meta-analysis indicates an elevated prevalence of MetS in average sleepers. Future research endeavors address delve into the underlying mechanisms and incorporate objective measures to understand the multifaceted connection between sleep patterns and MetS, guiding more effective preventive and management strategies.

Non-pharmacological integrative therapies for chronic cancer pain

Objective

Chronic pain is one of the most detrimental symptoms exhibited by cancer patients, being an indication for opioid therapy in up to half of the patients’ receiving chemotherapy and in 90% of advanced cases. Various successful non-pharmacological integrative therapy options have been explored and implemented to improve the quality of life in these patients. This review aims to highlight the mechanisms implicated; assessment tools used for cancer pain and summarize current evidence on non-pharmacological approaches in the treatment of chronic cancer pain.

Data sources

A review of the literature was conducted using a combination of MeSH keywords including “Chronic cancer pain,” “Assessment,” “Non-pharmacological management,” and “Integrative therapy.”

Data summary

Data on the approach and assessment of chronic cancer pain as well as non-pharmacological integrative options have been displayed with the help of figures and tables. Of note, non-pharmacological integrative management was divided into three subcategories; physical therapy (involving exercise, acupuncture, massage, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation), psychosocial therapy (e.g. mindful practices, supportive therapy), and herbal supplementation.

Conclusions

The use of non-pharmacological integrative therapy in the management of chronic cancer pain has been grossly underestimated and must be considered before or as an adjuvant of other treatment regimens to ensure appropriate care.