Assessing biomechanics and associated factors in individuals with patellofemoral pain in a clinical setting: A qualitative study based on interviews with expert clinicians

OBJECTIVES

To explore the perspectives of ten clinicians from different medical disciplines with experience in managing PFP on how to conduct biomechanical assessments in individuals with PFP in a clinical setting.

METHODS

An explorative qualitative design was used to explore the perspectives of ten clinicians with at least five years of experience managing patients with patellofemoral pain. A series of semi-structured interviews were done over Zoom video chat. The participants were from six different medical disciplines (physiotherapy, biokinetics, podiatry, sport science, sports medicine, orthopaedic surgery). Data was analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged from the data. These were: 1) biomechanical contributing factors that clinicians routinely screen for in patients with PFP; 2) relevant functional activities for biomechanical screening in patients with PFP; 3) conducting gait analysis assessments in a clinical setting; and 4) challenges of biomechanical assessment in patients with PFP. The clinicians expressed conflicting opinions on the usefulness of clinical gait analysis. The clinicians questioned the clinical applicability of some of the biomechanical factors identified as important in the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for clinicians to include the biomechanical assessment of functional activities linked to pain when managing patients with PFP. However, some of the biomechanical factors identified in the evidence are too difficult to observe without 3D movement analysis equipment and should not be considered clinically relevant. Expert clinical opinion is important to provide contextual information when addressing biomechanics in individuals with PFP.

Hop Performance After Return to Sport in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Gaelic Football and Hurling Athletes

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most severe injuries in the Gaelic Athletic Association. Hop tests measure functional performance after ACL reconstruction as they replicate the key requirements for a match situation. However, research examining functional recovery of ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes is lacking. The objective of this study is to determine if athletes restore normal hop symmetry after ACL reconstruction and to examine if bilateral deficiencies persist in hop performance following return to sport.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate hop performance of 30 ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes who had returned to competition and 30 uninjured controls in a battery of hop tests including a single, 6-m, triple, and triple-crossover hop test.

RESULTS

In each test, the mean symmetry score of the ACL reconstruction group was above the cutoff for normal performance of 90% adopted by this study (98%, 99%, 97%, and 99% for the single, 6-m, triple, and triple-crossover hop, respectively). No significant differences in absolute hop scores emerged between involved and control limbs, with the exception of the single-hop test where healthy dominant limbs hopped significantly further than ACL-reconstructed dominant limbs (P = .02). No significant deficits were identified on the noninvolved side.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes demonstrate normal levels of hop symmetry after returning to competition. Suboptimal hop performance can persist on the involved side compared with control limbs. Targeted rehabilitation may be warranted after returning to competition to restore performance to levels of healthy uninjured athletes.

Estimating the costs and benefits of stroke rehabilitation in South Africa

OBJECTIVE

This paper explores the economic value of rehabilitation to South Africa, using a costed example of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (stroke) rehabilitation.

DESIGN

We report an economic modelling approach using a worked cost-effectiveness to validate the argument for the cost-saving benefits of stroke rehabilitation.

SETTING

South African health care, employing analysis of available secondary data from South African research and government reports.

PARTICIPANTS

In line with international trends in stroke epidemiology, we focused on people who were employed prior to having their stroke, with return-to-work as the desired rehabilitation outcome.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We used information on stroke rehabilitation and secondary data derived from grey and published literature, to determine if early stroke rehabilitation represents value for money from the government perspective. For our worked example, we used return-to-work rates, intervention costs, and the cost of rehabilitation services to estimate cost-savings as a result of an individualized workplace intervention.

RESULTS

The cost of delivering the individualized intervention was estimated at R5633/patient. Combining survivor rates, return-to-work rate, and costs of the programme, a work intervention programme could result in a net saving of R133.1 million over 5 years (or about R26.6 per year (discount 3%).

CONCLUSION

The value of rehabilitation should not be considered in terms of cost-effectiveness alone, but also as an investment for the country. A staged, prioritized approach should be considered in future South African national health budget.

The effect of an individualised functional retraining intervention on pain, function and biomechanics in participants with patellofemoral pain: a series of n of 1 trial

[Purpose] To determine the effect of an individualised functional retraining intervention on pain, function, kinematics and self-reported recovery in participants with PFP. [Participants and Methods] Thirty-one participants with unilateral PFP between the ages of 14–40 were included. Data collection and treatment sessions were conducted at the Tygerberg 3D Motion Analysis Laboratory and Physiotherapy Clinic at the University of Stellenbosch Medical School in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants underwent motion analysis testing pre- and post-intervention and attended physiotherapy weekly for a 6-week individualised intervention. [Results] Thirty of the thirty-one participants (96.8%) demonstrated improved pain levels (NPRS) post intervention. Participants demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in function (AKPS) immediately post intervention and continued to improve with greater functional scores at 6-month follow up. Fifteen participants (48.4%) rated themselves as fully recovered on a 7-point Likert scale at 6-month follow up. Nineteen of the 31 participants (61.3%) demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in their priority kinematic outcome post intervention. [Conclusion] Individualised functional retraining may improve pain, function, kinematics and long-term recovery in participants with PFP presenting with kinematic contributing factors. Clinicians need to be educated on common biomechanical contributing factors and how to tailor treatment accordingly.