Association between common cardiovascular risk factors and clinical phenotype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy/Myocarditis registry

AIMS

The interaction between common cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is poorly studied. We sought to explore the relation between CVRF and the clinical characteristics of patients with HCM enrolled in the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

1739 patients with HCM were studied. The relation between hypertension (HT), diabetes (DM), body mass index (BMI), and clinical traits was analysed. Analyses were stratified according to the presence or absence of a pathogenic variant in a sarcomere gene. The prevalence of HT, DM, and obesity (Ob) was 37, 10, and 21%, respectively. HT, DM, and Ob were associated with older age (P<0.001), less family history of HCM (HT and DM P<0.001), higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P<0.001), atrial fibrillation (HT and DM P<0.001; Ob p = 0.03) and LV (left ventricular) diastolic dysfunction (HT and Ob P<0.001; DM P = 0.003). Stroke was more frequent in HT (P<0.001) and mutation-positive patients with DM (P = 0.02). HT and Ob were associated with higher provocable LV outflow tract gradients (HT P<0.001, Ob P = 0.036). LV hypertrophy was more severe in Ob (P = 0.018). HT and Ob were independently associated with NYHA class (OR 1.419, P = 0.017 and OR 1.584, P = 0.004, respectively). Other associations, including a higher proportion of females in HT and of systolic dysfunction in HT and Ob, were observed only in mutation-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Common CVRF are associated with a more severe HCM phenotype, suggesting a proactive management of CVRF should be promoted. An interaction between genotype and CVRF was observed for some traits.

P1778Changes in size of ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves

Introduction

It is well known that bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with premature valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dilation. However, limited data still exists regarding the rate of growth of the ascending aorta and the risk factors associated with it in these patients.

Methods

We analyzed prospectively baseline characteristics and echocardiographic data from 192 adult patients with BAV followed in an Adult Congenital Heart Disease Unit from 2007 until 2018.

The exclusion criteria were: patient's without at least 2 echocardiographic examinations >6 months apart, and patients with aortic valve and/or ascending aorta surgery at baseline o at follow up (except aortic coarctation).

Following the ASE guidelines two cardiologists experts in echocardiography made all the studies at baseline and follow-up where they measured the aortic root and ascending aortic diameters, as well as typified the aortic valve and analyzed the degree of stenosis (AS) and regurgitation (AR).

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 13.1, and a p value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

97 patients were finally included (70 male, mean age 37.56±18.9 years). 66 patients had type A BAV (68.04%), 21 type B (21.7%), 2 type C (2.06%) and 7 unicuspid (7.22%). 19 patients had hypertension (19.59%) and 9 had a corrected aortic coarctation. In baseline echocardiogram, 20 had aortic stenosis ≥ moderate (20.6%) and 38 regurgitation ≥ grade II (39.18%). Mean diameter of ascending aorta was 35.78mm ± 6.73.

With a mean follow-up time of 50.53±27.05 months, mean rate of diameter progression was 0.76 mm/year at the proximal ascending aorta (95% CI 0.6 to 1.2). Progression was significantly higher in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (0.65 vs. 1.17 mm/year, p=0.021). Age, sex, hypertension, AR and high baseline diameters (≥40mm or ≥45mm) were not associated with progression. In a direct comparison between the two more frequent forms of BAV, Type A and Type B, rate of diameter progression was significantly higher in Type B (0.61 vs. 1.05 mm/year, p=0.044).

In a multivariate analysis, none of the variables statistically associated to major progression were found to be predictors of growth of the ascending aorta.

Conclussions

In our population of BAV patients, mean rate of diameter progression at the proximal ascending aorta was 0.76 mm/year. Moderate-severe AS, and having type B BAV were associated, but not predictors, of higher growth rates.