Efficacy and safety of topical finasteride spray solution for male androgenetic alopecia: a phase III, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Background

Oral finasteride is a well‐established treatment for men with androgenetic alopecia (AGA), but long‐term therapy is not always acceptable to patients. A topical finasteride formulation has been developed to minimize systemic exposure by acting specifically on hair follicles.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride compared with placebo, and to analyse systemic exposure and overall benefit compared with oral finasteride.

Methods

This randomized, double‐blind, double dummy, parallel‐group, 24‐week study was conducted in adult male outpatients with AGA at 45 sites in Europe. Efficacy and safety were evaluated. Finasteride, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentrations were measured.

Results

Of 458 randomized patients, 323 completed the study and 446 were evaluated for safety. Change from baseline in target area hair count (TAHC) at week 24 (primary efficacy endpoint) was significantly greater with topical finasteride than placebo (adjusted mean change 20.2 vs. 6.7 hairs; P < 0.001), and numerically similar between topical and oral finasteride. Statistically significant differences favouring topical finasteride over placebo were observed for change from baseline in TAHC at week 12 and investigator‐assessed change from baseline in patient hair growth/loss at week 24. Incidence and type of adverse events, and cause of discontinuation, did not differ meaningfully between topical finasteride and placebo. No serious adverse events were treatment related. As maximum plasma finasteride concentrations were >100 times lower, and reduction from baseline in mean serum DHT concentration was lower (34.5 vs. 55.6%), with topical vs. oral finasteride, there is less likelihood of systemic adverse reactions of a sexual nature related to a decrease in DHT with topical finasteride.

Conclusion

Topical finasteride significantly improves hair count compared to placebo and is well tolerated. Its effect is similar to that of oral finasteride, but with markedly lower systemic exposure and less impact on serum DHT concentrations.

Abediterol (LAS100977), a novel long-acting β2-agonist: efficacy, safety and tolerability in persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Abediterol (LAS100977) is a novel, long-acting β2-agonist, in development for the once-daily treatment of asthma in combination with mometasone. Here we report the results of a Phase IIa trial of single doses of abediterol added to ongoing maintenance therapy (inhaled corticosteroids) in patients with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, five-way crossover study. Male patients (18-70 years) with a clinical diagnosis of persistent asthma received abediterol (5, 10 and 25 μg), salmeterol and placebo, on top of ongoing maintenance therapy. Lung function was determined using spirometry and whole body plethysmography. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after a single dose.

RESULTS

All three abediterol doses induced statistically significant increases in trough FEV1 vs placebo and salmeterol. Improvements in other lung function parameters were also statistically significantly greater with all abediterol doses vs both placebo (p < 0.0001) and salmeterol (p < 0.05) than the first assessment at 5 min post-dose. These improvements were sustained to 36 h post-dose. The profile of treatment-emergent adverse events judged as related to abediterol was consistent with that seen after adrenergic stimulation and occurred exclusively in patients who received abediterol 10 μg or 25 μg.

CONCLUSIONS

This first-in-patient study revealed the potent, rapid and long-acting bronchodilatory effect of abediterol in patients with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma together with an overall good safety and tolerability profile. Further studies are now underway to establish the optimal efficacy-safety-tolerability profile for this compound.

No sex-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of captopril

Captopril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) used in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure and has demonstrated its cardiovascular effects in experimental animal models, healthy volunteers and patients. The aim of this study was to find out whether or not differences in the pharmacokinetic profile and the haemodynamic response of a 100-mg single oral dose of captopril appeared between subjects of both sexes. Twenty-four young healthy volunteers (12 males and 12 females) took part in the trial. Blood samples to assess captopril plasma concentrations, determined by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as well as haemodynamic variables, were obtained before and at different times following drug intake. Pharmacokinetic parameters did not show significant sex differences. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure exhibited a statistically significant decrease between 0.5 and 8 h in both sexes. No significant sex-related differences were found. The drug exhibited a good tolerability.