1
|
Berger JM, Alany A, Berchtold L, Puhr R, Friedrich A, Scheiner B, Prager GW, Preusser M, Berghoff AS, Bergen ES. Prognosticators of survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and ascites. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102048. [PMID: 37977000 PMCID: PMC10774951 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of factors associated with survival after ascites diagnosis in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients may guide treatment decisions and help to maintain quality of life in this highly symptomatic patient collective. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients treated for mPC at the Medical University of Vienna between 2010 and 2019 developing ascites throughout their course of disease were identified by retrospective chart review. General risk factors, metastatic sites, systemic inflammation and liver function parameters, as well as type of treatment after ascites diagnosis were investigated for associations with survival. RESULTS One hundred and seventeen mPC patients with ascites were included in this study. Median time from mPC to ascites diagnosis was 8.9 months (range 0-99 months) and median overall survival (OS) after ascites diagnosis was 27.4 days (range 21.3-42.6 days). Identified prognostic factors at ascites diagnosis independently associated with an impaired OS were presence of liver metastases [hazard ratio (HR): 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-3.79, P = 0.018), peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR: 1.74, 95% CI 1.11-2.71, P = 0.015), and portal vein obstruction (HR: 2.52, 95% CI 1.29-4.90, P = 0.007). Compared with best supportive care, continuation of systemic therapy after ascites diagnosis was independently associated with survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.61, P < 0.001) with a median OS of 62 days (95% CI 51-129 days, P < 0.001) versus 16 days (95% CI 11-24 days), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Liver and peritoneal metastases as well as portal vein obstruction were found to be prognostic factors after ascites diagnosis in mPC patients. Continuation of systemic therapy after ascites diagnosis was associated with a longer OS, which needs to be evaluated in larger clinical trials including quality-of-life assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Berger
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Personalized Immunotherapy, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - A Alany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - L Berchtold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - R Puhr
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - A Friedrich
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - B Scheiner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G W Prager
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Personalized Immunotherapy, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - A S Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Personalized Immunotherapy, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - E S Bergen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berghoff AS, Bartsch R, Furtner J, Marhold M, Bergen ES, Roider-Schur S, Starzer AM, Forstner H, Rottenmanner B, Dieckmann K, Bago-Horvath Z, Widhalm G, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Minichsdorfer C, Fuereder T, Singer CF, Weltermann A, Haslacher H, Szekeres T, Puhr R, Preusser M. OS01.5.A Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 serum levels in patients with active brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd): A biomarker analysis from the TUXEDO-1 trial. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
T-DXd is a novel antibody-drug conjugate with high activity in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The prospective, single-arm, single-centre phase II TUXEDO-1 trial showed clinically relevant activity of T-DXd in HER2-positive BC pts with active BM with an intracranial response rate of 73.3%. This biomarker sub-study of TUXEDO-1 aimed to investigate changes in the extent of metastases-induced brain damage in patients with and without response to therapy by measuring the serum levels of two proteins constitutively expressed in the human brain and measurable upon brain damage in the blood serum: NSE and S100.
Material and Methods
We assessed serum NSE (sNSE) and serum S100 (sS100) levels in a total of 37 blood samples drawn at cycles 1, 4 and end of treatment (EOT) in all patients of the intent-to-treat population of the TUXEDO-1 trial using commercially available ELISA assays. Intracranial radiological response was centrally assessed by a board-certified neuro-radiologist using RANO criteria. sNSE and sS100 levels were compared between responders and non-responders using the Mann Whitney U test and a significance level of 0.05.
Results
At baseline, we detected no significant difference of sNSE or sS100 levels between T-DXd responders and non-responders, respectively. Baseline median sNSE level was 10.6 ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 8.6-12.2) in T-DXd responders as compared with median 12.5 ng/ml (IQR 12.2-12.9) in the non-responder group (n.s.). At cycle 4, corresponding numbers were 8.1 ng/ml in responding patients (IQR 7-11.2) and 12.7 ng/ml (IQR 12.2-12.9) in non-responders, respectively (p=0.009). No differences in sS100 levels were observed between the groups at any time point.
Conclusion
In patients showing intracranial objective response to T-Dxd, sNSE levels were significantly lower at cycle 4 as compared with non-responders, suggesting a reduction in metastases-induced brain damage as a direct treatment effect. sNSE may be a clinically useful biomarker for longitudinal assessment of brain metastasis burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Berghoff
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - R Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - J Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - M Marhold
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - E S Bergen
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - S Roider-Schur
- Department of Medicine I, Oncology, St. Josef Krankenhaus , Vienna , Austria
| | - A M Starzer
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - H Forstner
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - B Rottenmanner
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - K Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Z Bago-Horvath
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - G Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - A Ilhan-Mutlu
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - C Minichsdorfer
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - T Fuereder
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - C F Singer
- Departments of Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - A Weltermann
- Department of Medicine 1, Academic Teaching Hospital Elisabethinen Linz , Vienna , Austria
| | - H Haslacher
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - T Szekeres
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - R Puhr
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - M Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bergen ES, Scherleitner P, Ferreira P, Kiesel B, Müller C, Widhalm G, Dieckmann K, Prager G, Preusser M, Berghoff AS. Primary tumor side is associated with prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with brain metastases. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100168. [PMID: 34098230 PMCID: PMC8190486 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BM) are a rare complication in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and associated with an unfavorable survival prognosis. Primary tumor side (PTS) was shown to act as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in several trials including metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. Here, we aim to investigate whether PTS is also associated with the outcome of CRC patients with BM. Methods Patients treated for CRC BM between 1988 and 2017 at an academic care center were included. Right-sided CRC was defined as located in the appendix, cecum and ascending colon and left-sided CRC was defined as located in the descending colon, sigma and rectum. Results Two hundred and eighty-one CRC BM patients were available for this analysis with 239/281 patients (85.1%) presenting with a left-sided and 42/281 patients (14.9%) with a right-sided primary CRC. BM-free survival (BMFS) was significantly longer in left-sided compared with right-sided CRC patients (33 versus 20 months, P = 0.009). Overall survival from CRC diagnosis as well as from diagnosis of BM was significantly longer in patients with a left-sided primary (42 versus 25 months, P = 0.002 and 5 versus 4 months, P = 0.005, respectively). In a multivariate analysis including graded prognostic assessment, PTS remained significantly associated with prognosis after BM (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.92 months, P = 0.0016). Conclusions PTS was associated with survival times after the rare event of BM development in CRC patients. Therefore, its prognostic value remains significant even thereafter. Primary tumor side is a relevant and independent prognostic factor in mCRC. Left-sided CRC was associated with a significantly longer BMFS compared with right-sided CRC. OS from initial diagnosis of CRC as well as from BM was significantly longer in patients with left-sided primaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Bergen
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Scherleitner
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Ferreira
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Kiesel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Müller
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Dieckmann
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Prager
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A S Berghoff
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bergen ES, Tichy C, Berghoff AS, Rudas M, Dubsky P, Bago-Horvath Z, Mader RM, Exner R, Gnant M, Zielinski CC, Steger GG, Preusser M, Bartsch R. Prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes in elderly patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157:91-9. [PMID: 27107570 PMCID: PMC4866984 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3787-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to analyse the impact of breast cancer (BC) subtypes on the clinical course of disease with special emphasis on the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) and outcome in an elderly BC population. A total number of 706 patients ≥65 years receiving treatment for BC from 2007 to 2011 were identified from a BC database. 62 patients diagnosed with DCIS and 73 patients with incomplete datasets were excluded, leaving 571 patients for this analysis. Patient characteristics, biological tumour subtypes, and clinical outcome including overall survival (OS) were obtained by retrospective chart review. 380/571 (66, 5 %) patients aged 65–74 years were grouped among the young-old, 182/571 (31.9 %) patients aged 75–84 years among the old–old, and 29/571 (5.1 %) patients aged ≥85 years among the oldest-old. 392/571 (68.8 %) patients presented with luminal BC, 119/571 (20.8 %) with HER2-positive, and 59/571 (10.3 %) with triple-negative BC (TNBC). At 38 months median follow-up, 115/571 (20.1 %) patients presented with distant recurrence. A higher recurrence rate was observed in the HER2-positive subtype (43/119 (36.1 %)), as compared to TNBC (15/59 (25.4 %)) and luminal BC (57/392 (14.5 %); p < 0.001). BM were detected at a significantly higher rate in HER2-positive BC patients (9/119 (7.6 %)), as compared to TNBC (2/59 (3.4 %)) and luminal BC patients (6/392 (1.5 %); p = 0.003). Diagnosis of metastatic disease (HR 7.7; 95 % CI 5.2–11.4; p < 0.001) as well as development of BM (HR 3.5; 95 % CI 1.9–6.4; p < 0.001) had a significantly negative impact on OS in a time-dependent covariate cox regression model. In contrast to younger BC patients, outcome in this large cohort of elderly patients suggests that HER2-positive disease—not TNBC—featured the most aggressive clinical course with the highest rates of metastatic spread and BM. In-depth analysis regarding a potentially distinct biology of TNBC in elderly is therefore warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Bergen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria. .,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - C Tichy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A S Berghoff
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Rudas
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Dubsky
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Z Bago-Horvath
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R M Mader
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Exner
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C C Zielinski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G G Steger
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Preusser
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Bartsch
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria. .,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bergen ES, Tichy C, Berghoff AS, Rudas M, Dubsky P, Bago-Horvath Z, Mader RM, Gnant M, Dieckmann K, Zielinski CC, Steger GG, Preusser M, Bartsch R. Abstract P2-08-17: Prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes in elderly patients. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p2-08-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to analyze the impact of BC subtypes on the clinical course with special emphasis on the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) and outcome in an elderly breast cancer population.
Patients and Methods
571 patients ≥65 years receiving treatment for BC from 2007-2011 were identified from a BC database. BC subtypes and clinical characteristics including overall survival (OS) were obtained by chart review. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi Square test, the log rank test and time depended covariate cox regression model as appropriate.
Results
Three-hundred-eighty/571 (63%) were grouped among the young-old (65-74 years), 182/571 (31.9%) among the old-old (75-84 years), and 29/571 (5,1%) among the oldest-old (≥85 years). 392/571 (68.8%) patients presented with luminal BC, 119/571 (20.8%) with HER2 positive and 59/571 (10.3%) with triple negative BC. After a median follow up of 38 months (range 0-204), 115/571 (20.1%) patients presented with metastatic recurrence. Highest recurrence rate was observed in HER2 positive BC patients (43/119 (36.1%)), followed by triple negative (15/59 (25.4%) and luminal BC (57/392 (14.5%); p<0.001; Chi Square test). BM occurred significantly more frequently in HER2 positive BC patients (9/119 (7.6%) compared to triple negative (2/59 (3.4%) and luminal BC patients (6/392 (1.5%); p=0.003; Chi Square test). Occurrence of metastases (HR 7.7; 95% CI 5.2-11.4; p<0.001) as well as development of BM (HR 3.5; 95% CI 1.9-6.4; p<0.001) had a significant impact on OS prognosis as entered in a time depended covariate cox regression model.
Conclusions
In contrast to younger BC patients, HER2 positive BC subtype and not triple negative BC subtype was linked to the most aggressive clinical course including the development of metastatic disease and BM in our elderly cohort.
Citation Format: Bergen ES, Tichy C, Berghoff AS, Rudas M, Dubsky P, Bago-Horvath Z, Mader RM, Gnant M, Dieckmann K, Zielinski CC, Steger GG, Preusser M, Bartsch R. Prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes in elderly patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ES Bergen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - C Tichy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - AS Berghoff
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - M Rudas
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - P Dubsky
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Z Bago-Horvath
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - RM Mader
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - K Dieckmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - CC Zielinski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - GG Steger
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - M Preusser
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - R Bartsch
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|