1
|
Lewis KD, Peris K, Sekulic A, Stratigos AJ, Dunn L, Eroglu Z, Chang ALS, Migden MR, Yoo SY, Mohan K, Coates E, Okoye E, Bowler T, Baurain JF, Bechter O, Hauschild A, Butler MO, Hernandez-Aya L, Licitra L, Neves RI, Ruiz ES, Seebach F, Lowy I, Goncalves P, Fury MG. Final analysis of phase II results with cemiplimab in metastatic basal cell carcinoma after hedgehog pathway inhibitors. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:221-228. [PMID: 38072158 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) is a rare condition with no effective second-line treatment options. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the binding of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) to its ligands, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2). Here, we present the final analysis of cemiplimab in patients with mBCC after first-line hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) treatment (NCT03132636). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, single-arm, phase II study, adults with mBCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, post-HHI treatment, received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤93 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Duration of response (DOR) was a key secondary endpoint. Other secondary endpoints were ORR per investigator assessment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response rate, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 70% were male and the median age of patients was 64 [interquartile range (IQR) 57.0-73.0] years. The median duration of follow-up was 8 months (IQR 4-21 months). The ORR per ICR was 22% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 36%], with 2 complete responses and 10 partial responses. Among responders, the median time to response per ICR was 3 months (IQR 2-7 months). The estimated median DOR per ICR was not reached [95% CI 10 months-not evaluable (NE)]. The disease control rate was 63% (95% CI 49% to 76%) per ICR and 70% (95% CI 56% to 82%) per investigator assessment. The median PFS per ICR was 10 months (95% CI 4-16 months); the median OS was 50 months (95% CI 28 months-NE). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue [23 (43%)] and diarrhoea [20 (37%)]. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Cemiplimab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity, including durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with mBCC who had disease progression on or intolerance to HHI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Lewis
- Department of Medicine-Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
| | - K Peris
- Department of Medicine and Translational Surgery, Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Dermatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Sekulic
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA
| | - A J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - L Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Z Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa
| | - A L S Chang
- Dermatology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City
| | - M R Migden
- Department of Dermatology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - S-Y Yoo
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - K Mohan
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - E Coates
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - E Okoye
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - T Bowler
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - J-F Baurain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels
| | - O Bechter
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - M O Butler
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - L Hernandez-Aya
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA
| | - L Licitra
- Department of Medical Oncology Head and Neck Cancer, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R I Neves
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey
| | - E S Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - F Seebach
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - I Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - P Goncalves
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| | - M G Fury
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Newman JG, Ibrahim S, Ruiz ES, Prasai A, Siegel J, Fitzgerald A, Goldberg M, Koyfman SA. Risk-Stratification using the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test Identifies Patients with Node Negative Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) at Higher Risk of Metastasis Who May Benefit from Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (ART). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S153. [PMID: 37784387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) ART is a standard treatment used to reduce the risk of metastasis and recurrence in moderate‒to‒high-risk cSCC patients. Indications for ART have been largely based on pathologic risk factors and informed by staging systems, and while radiation oncologists generally designate a >10% risk threshold for usage of ART, there is no consensus on which groups of tumors may benefit from ART. The 40-GEP test has been independently validated to predict a cSCC patient's risk for regional/distant metastasis in patients with one or more high-risk clinicopathologic factors and reports three biologic risk groups: Class 1 (low, ∼7%), Class 2A (moderate, 20-25%), and Class 2B (high risk, >50%) for metastasis. This study aims to evaluate whether a biomarker informed risk stratification approach using a 40-GEP result could refine the ability to select patients with node negative cSCC at higher risk of metastasis who are most likely to benefit from ART. MATERIALS/METHODS In this retrospective study, all patients had primary cSCC tissue with verified clinicopathologic information of tumors with one or more high-risk factors, met clinical testing criteria, were comprehensively staged, and had outcomes data (n = 954). Patients with node positive disease, or those with nodal failure within 3 months of diagnosis were excluded (n = 19). From the n = 935, an intermediate risk population wherein ART is often considered was defined as Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) ≥T2a (n = 489). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to assess metastasis free survival (MFS). Univariate Cox regression compared metastasis rates between 40-GEP results. RESULTS The 3-year MFS rate for this eligible for ART cohort was 82.4% The 40-GEP demonstrated statistically significant risk stratification with MFS rates of 92.4%, 76.1% and 59.4% for Class 1, Class 2A and Class 2B, respectively (p<0.0001). Cox regression was significant for Class 2A and 2B compared to Class 1, with a 3.2-fold and 6.4-fold increase in metastasis, respectively (p<0.0001). 64% (59/92) of all metastases received a Class 2A result, and 44% (14/32) of Class 2B patients metastasized. 46% (223/489) of the cohort received a Class 1 result. Of patients staged BWH T1 (n = 446), those with a Class 2A and 2B had an 88.7% and 66.7% MFS rate, respectively. CONCLUSION Within this eligible for ART population, patients with Class 2A or 2B 40-GEP results have inferior rates of MFS, while Class 1 patients have <10% risk of metastasis. Nearly half of this population received a 40-GEP Class 1 result and could be considered for treatment de-intensification trials. Conversely, patients with low-risk BWH T1 stage, who are traditionally not considered for ART, that received a Class 2A or 2B (>10% risk of metastasis) could be considered for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Newman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - S Ibrahim
- Rochester Dermatologic Surgery, Victor, NY
| | - E S Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - A Prasai
- Castle Biosciences Inc., Friendswood, TX
| | - J Siegel
- Castle Biosciences Inc., Friendswood, TX
| | | | - M Goldberg
- Castle Biosciences Inc., Friendswood, TX
| | - S A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stang A, Khil L, Kajüter H, Pandeya N, Schmults CD, Ruiz ES, Karia PS, Green AC. Incidence and mortality for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: comparison across three continents. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 33 Suppl 8:6-10. [PMID: 31833607 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based incidence and mortality studies of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have been few owing to the commonness of the disease, and rare deaths making accurate mortality statistics difficult. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to summarize SCC incidence and mortality in populations across three continents, exemplified by Australia, the United States (US) and Germany. METHODS We estimated age-specific and age-standardized (Australian Standard 2001 Population) incidence and mortality rates per 100 000 person-years. RESULTS Squamous cell carcinoma incidence is plateauing or falling in Australia, stable in the United States (2013-2015) and rising in Germany (2007-2015). Current incidence estimates in men and women are 341 and 209, 497 and 296, and 54 and 26, respectively, for the three countries. Incidence increases strongly with age in all countries. Mortality of non-melanoma skin cancer appears to be increasing in Germany and stable in Australia (unavailable for the US population). CONCLUSIONS Squamous cell carcinoma is an important health issue, particularly among older men, with incidence exceeding most other cancers. More precise and uniform population-based studies of incidence and mortality are needed to better quantify the impact of SCC on healthcare systems worldwide and to gauge the effect of new treatments such as anti-PD1 therapy on mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Stang
- Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L Khil
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - H Kajüter
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - N Pandeya
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - C D Schmults
- Population Health Department, Mohs and Dermatologic Surgery Center, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E S Ruiz
- Population Health Department, Mohs and Dermatologic Surgery Center, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P S Karia
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A C Green
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.,CRUK Manchester Institute and Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|