Platelet inhibition beyond conventional antiplatelet agents: expanding role of angiotensin receptor blockers, statins and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Aspirin, dipyridamole, cilostazol, thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors represent the classical examples of the established antiplatelet agents commonly used for the secondary prevention in patients after vascular events. Obviously, the era of expanding antiplatelet regimens and indications may require new agents as the substitutes, or additions to the available strategies. However, recent results of the majority of antiplatelet trials strongly suggest boarder line advantages in clinical outcomes, and higher associated bleeding risks with the novel antiplatelet agents or/and regimens. Moreover, unexpected failures, such as lack of efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin combination for ischaemic stroke prevention (MATCH), or use of the same antiplatelet regimen for the primary vascular prevention (CHARISMA) raise legitimate concerns that the concept 'the more the better' may not be valid. Broad use of statins, angiotensin receptor blockers and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be in part responsible for the lack of impressive results with the antiplatelet therapy because each of these drug classes per se inhibits platelets. In this review, we discuss the available evidence and potential clinical significance of these findings.

Rewards in practice from chrono-meta-analyses 'recycling' heart rate, ectopy, ischemia and blood pressure information

Previously published average curves of heart rate and duration of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease, studied while on placebo or on treatment with either atenolol or diltiazem, are re-analysed for the assessment of about-daily (circadian) and about-weekly (circaseptan) changes in these variables and of any treatment effect on rhythm characteristics. In addition to circadians, a circaseptan pattern characterizes the duration of ischemia in all three aforementioned study stages. Both drugs decrease the duration of ischemia, atenolol, but not diltiazem, also affects the circadian amplitude and acrophase of this variable. A circaseptan pattern is also found for heart rate on placebo and on treatment with atenolol, but not with diltiazem. Both drugs lower heart rate and the circadian amplitude and 24-h standard deviation of heart rate, atenolol much more markedly than diltiazem. Circadian and circaseptan rhythm characteristics and their alterations with treatment serve to optimize treatment by timing its administration. Chronobiologic surveillance of variables that are being readily monitored as-one-goes by modern implantable devices can also serve for the validation of the effectiveness of drug and electrical therapy. Rhythm alterations, in turn, can provide the earliest warnings of an elevated disease risk and lead to an improved diagnosis.