3
|
Chang KJ, Fisher W, Kenady D, Klapman J, Posner M, Reid T, Rosemurgy A, Shah R, Zervos E, Laheru D. Multicenter randomized controlled phase III clinical trial using TNFerade (TNF) with chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): Interim analysis (IA) of overall survival (OS). J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4605 Intro: Local control of LAPC with CRT has historically demonstrated survival benefit vs. RT alone. TNF is a nonreplicating adenovirus vector delivering human tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). Results from a phase II study with TNF in LAPC indicated a possible survival advantage. To confirm these findings, a randomized, open-label, controlled Pancreatic Cancer Trial with TNF (PACT) study was developed. Methods: The TNF arm received a 5 wk treatment of qw intratumoral inj of 4x1011 PU TNF, cont. iv 5-FU and 50.4Gy radiation. The standard of care (SOC) arm received CRT alone. Both groups received adjuvant gemcitabine(G) with the option of erlotinib(E). An IA of OS (primary efficacy endpoint) was planned after the first third (92) of the expected 276 total death events (from a total patient n=330). Nonparametric logrank of OS was planned; in addition, a lognormal model was used to account for an evident separation of the survival curves after the median. Results: 185 pts were available for OS analysis (117-TNF+SOC and 68-SOC). Survival in the TNF+SOC group demonstrated a HR of 0.753 (CI [0.494 - 1.15]) relative to SOC. Best fit parametric lognormal analysis indicated a median survival of 11.1 mo with TNF+SOC and 8.7 mo with SOC; nonparametric methods indicated a MS of 9.9 mo for both arms, with a pronounced “late effect” (75th percentile 19.4 mo with TNF+SOC and 11.8 mo with SOC). Prognostic information (G and E use, stage, etc) indicated equivalent distribution between groups. Conclusions: HR results of the OS IA indicate an encouraging trend in favor of the TNF treated group. Parametric medians may better reflect the true HR than nonparametric methods since the latter do not reflect the shape of the OS distribution. A second IA is planned after 2/3 total events. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. J. Chang
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - W. Fisher
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - D. Kenady
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - J. Klapman
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - M. Posner
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - T. Reid
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - A. Rosemurgy
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - R. Shah
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - E. Zervos
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - D. Laheru
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kelley ST, Bloomston M, Serafini F, Carey LC, Karl RC, Zervos E, Goldin S, Rosemurgy P, Rosemurgy AS. Cholangiocarcinoma: advocate an aggressive operative approach with adjuvant chemotherapy. Am Surg 2004; 70:743-8; discussion 748-9. [PMID: 15481288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma presents many challenges. Prognosis is thought to be determined by conventional predictors of survival; margin status, pathologic criteria, stage, and comorbid disease. Ninety-four patients, 57 males and 37 females, underwent resections for cholangiocarcinoma between 1989 and 2000. Thirty-two patients (34%) had distal tumors, 10 had midduct lesions, and 52 had proximal/intrahepatic lesions. Thirty-four patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies, 23 bile duct resections alone, and 37 bile duct and concomitant hepatic resections. Tumor location did not influence mean survival (distal, 28 months +/- 23; midduct, 28 months +/- 21; and proximal, 31 months +/- 36). Operation undertaken did not alter survival (bile duct resection, 30 months +/- 37; pancreaticoduodenectomy, 27 months +/- 23; and concomitant bile duct/hepatic resection, 32 months +/- 32). TNM stage failed to predict survival: 5 stage I (29 months +/- 22), 12 stage II (41 months +/- 33), 12 stage III (33 months +/- 19), and 64 stage IV (27 months +/- 32). Tumor size did not influence survival: T1-2 (32 months +/- 33) versus T3-4 lesions (29 months +/- 25). Mean survival with negative margin (n = 67) was 34 months +/- 33, whereas microscopically positive (n = 13, 23.9 months +/- 25) or grossly positive (n = 14, 20.4 months +/- 20) margins were predictive of significantly shorter survival (P < 0.03). Adjuvant treatment (n = 41) was associated with significantly longer survival (40.5 months +/- 36) than those who received no further therapy (n = 53; 24 months +/- 24) (P = 0.05). TNM stage, tumor size, operation undertaken, and location were not associated with duration of survival after resection. Margin status was associated with duration of survival, though extended survival is possible even with positive margins. Advanced stage should not preclude aggressive resection. Without specific contraindications, an aggressive operative approach is advocated followed by adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T Kelley
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kelley S, Bloomston M, Serafini F, Carey L, Karl R, Zervos E, Goldin S, Rosemurgy P, Rosemurgy A. Cholangiocarcinoma: Advocate an Aggressive Operative Approach with Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Am Surg 2004. [DOI: 10.1177/000313480407000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma presents many challenges. Prognosis is thought to be determined by conventional predictors of survival; margin status, pathologic criteria, stage, and comorbid disease. Ninety-four patients, 57 males and 37 females, underwent resections for cholangiocarcinoma between 1989 and 2000. Thirty-two patients (34%) had distal tumors, 10 had midduct lesions, and 52 had proximal/intrahepatic lesions. Thirty-four patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies, 23 bile duct resections alone, and 37 bile duct and concomitant hepatic resections. Tumor location did not influence mean survival (distal, 28 months ± 23; midduct, 28 months ± 21; and proximal, 31 months ± 36). Operation undertaken did not alter survival (bile duct resection, 30 months ± 37; pancreaticoduodenectomy, 27 months ± 23; and concomitant bile duct/hepatic resection, 32 months ± 32). TNM stage failed to predict survival: 5 stage I (29 months ± 22), 12 stage II (41 months ± 33), 12 stage HI (33 months ± 19), and 64 stage IV (27 months ± 32). Tumor size did not influence survival: T1–2 (32 months ± 33) versus T3–4 lesions (29 months ± 25). Mean survival with negative margin (n = 67) was 34 months ± 33, whereas microscopically positive (n = 13, 23.9 months ± 25) or grossly positive (n = 14, 20.4 months ± 20) margins were predictive of significantly shorter survival ( P < 0.03). Adjuvant treatment (n = 41) was associated with significantly longer survival (40.5 months ± 36) than those who received no further therapy (n = 53; 24 months ± 24) ( P = 0.05). TNM stage, tumor size, operation undertaken, and location were not associated with duration of survival after resection. Margin status was associated with duration of survival, though extended survival is possible even with positive margins. Advanced stage should not preclude aggressive resection. Without specific contraindications, an aggressive operative approach is advocated followed by adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S.T. Kelley
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - M. Bloomston
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - F. Serafini
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - L.C. Carey
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - R.C. Karl
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - E. Zervos
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - S. Goldin
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - P. Rosemurgy
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - A.S. Rosemurgy
- From the Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A small number of patients fail fundoplication and require reoperation. Laparoscopic techniques have been applied to reoperative fundoplications. We reviewed our experience with reoperative laparoscopic fundoplication. METHODS Reoperative laparoscopic fundoplication was undertaken in 28 patients, 19 F and 9 M, of mean age 56 years +/- 12. Previous antireflux procedures included 19 open and 12 laparoscopic antireflux operations. RESULTS Symptoms were heartburn (90%), dysphagia (35%), and atypical symptoms (30%%). The mean interval from antireflux procedure to revision was 13 months +/- 4.2. The mean DeMeester score was 78+/-32 (normal 14.7). Eighteen patients (64%) had hiatal breakdown, 17 (60%) had wrap failure, 2 (7%) had slipped Nissen, 3 (11%) had paraesophageal hernias, and 1 (3%) had an excessively tight wrap. Twenty-five revisions were completed laparoscopically, while 3 patients required conversion to the open technique. Complications occurred in 9 of 17 (53%) patients failing previous open fundoplications and in 4 of 12 patients (33%) failing previous laparoscopic fundoplications and included 15 gastrotomies and 1 esophagotomy, all repaired laparoscopically, 3 postoperative gastric leaks, and 4 pneumothoraces requiring tube thoracostomy. No deaths occurred. Median length of stay was 5 days (range 2-90 days). At a mean follow-up of 20 months +/- 17, 2 patients (7%) have failed revision of their fundoplications, with the rest of the patients being essentially asymptomatic (93%). CONCLUSIONS The results achieved with reoperative laparoscopic fundoplication are similar to those of primary laparoscopic fundoplications. Laparoscopic reoperations, particularly of primary open fundoplication, can be technically challenging and fraught with complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Serafini
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33601, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|