1
|
Ganz PA, Bandos H, Španić T, Friedman S, Müller V, Kuemmel S, Delaloge S, Brain E, Toi M, Yamauchi H, de Dueñas EM, Armstrong A, Im SA, Song CG, Zheng H, Sarosiek T, Sharma P, Geng C, Fu P, Rhiem K, Frauchiger-Heuer H, Wimberger P, t'Kint de Roodenbeke D, Liao N, Goodwin A, Chakiba-Brugère C, Friedlander M, Lee KS, Giacchetti S, Takano T, Henao-Carrasco F, Virani S, Valdes-Albini F, Domchek SM, Bane C, McCarron EC, Mita M, Rossi G, Rastogi P, Fielding A, Gelber RD, Scheepers ED, Cameron D, Garber J, Geyer CE, Tutt ANJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in g BRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1288-1300. [PMID: 38301187 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment. METHODS Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive. RESULTS One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status. CONCLUSION Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Ganz
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology SDMC, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tanja Španić
- Europa Donna-The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Depatment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Masakazu Toi
- Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Eduardo-M de Dueñas
- Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anne Armstrong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chuan-Gui Song
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | - Cuizhi Geng
- The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shiijazhuang, China
| | - Peifen Fu
- Breast Surgery Department, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Ning Liao
- Guangdong People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW and Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Keun Seok Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sylvie Giacchetti
- Breast Disease Unit (Sénopole), AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Toshimi Takano
- Breast Medical Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Edward C McCarron
- MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center-Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Monica Mita
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, SOCCI, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Priya Rastogi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Richard D Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Charles E Geyer
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- The Institute of Cancer Research London, London, United Kingdom
- Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|