1
|
Duru Birgi S, Özkaya Akagündüz Ö, Dagdelen M, Yazici G, Canyilmaz E, Ceylaner Biçakçi B, Çetinayak HO, Baltalarli PB, Demiröz Abakay C, Kaydihan N, Delikgöz Soykut E, Erdiş E, Akyürek S, Esassolak M, Uzel ÖE, Bakirarar B, Cengiz M. Radiotherapy Results in Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Study Group 01-005. Am J Clin Oncol 2024:00000421-990000000-00176. [PMID: 38390915 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine the treatment outcomes and related factors in locally advanced sinonasal cancer across Turkiye. METHODS Twelve centers participants of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Study Group attended the study. One hundred and ninety-four patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late toxicity were recorded per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0. RESULTS The median age was 58 years and 70% were male. The majority of tumors were located in maxillary sinus (59%). Most of the patients (%83) had T3 and T4A disease. Fifty-three percent of patients were in stage 4A. Radiotherapy was administered to 80% of the patients in the adjuvant settings. Median 66 Gy dose was administered in median 31 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with radiotherapy in 45% of the patients mostly with weekly cisplatin. No grade ≥4 acute and late toxicity was observed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS); locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS); distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61% and 47%; 69% and 61%; 72%, and 69%, and 56% and 49%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, several factors demonstrated significant influence on OS, such as performance status, surgery, and lymph node involvement. Moreover, surgery was the key prognostic factor for LRFS. For DMFS, lymph node involvement and surgical margin were found to be influential factors. In addition, performance status and lymph node involvement were identified as significantly affecting PFS. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the authors obtained promising results with IMRT. Performance status, lymph node involvement, and surgery emerged as the primary factors significantly influencing OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meltem Dagdelen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Gözde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon
| | | | - Hasan O Çetinayak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir
| | - Papatya B Baltalarli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli
| | | | - Nuri Kaydihan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Bahçelievler Hospital, İstanbul
| | - Ela Delikgöz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun
| | - Eda Erdiş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey
| | | | | | - Ömer E Uzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa University Faculty of Medicine
| | | | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yıldırım HC, Dinçbaş FÖ, Demircan V, Beyzadeoğlu M, Tekçe E, Yazıcı G, Turna M, Çetinayak O, Ensarioğlu Baktır K, Akın M, Canyılmaz E, Altınok A, Delikgöz Soykut E, Akmansu M, Tuğrul F, Ünverdi S, Benli Yavuz B, Kamer S, Düzova M, Duru Birgi S, Özkan EE, Yalçın B, Şahin M, Etiz D, Arslantaş HS, Meydan D, İğdem Ş, Sağınç H, Parvizi M, Altınok P, Anacak Y. Radiotherapy for benign diseases in Turkey: a patterns of care survey of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology (TROD 05-002). Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:143-150. [PMID: 37796342 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02154-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the patterns of radiotherapy (RT) care in cases of benign diseases in Turkey. METHODS A questionnaire survey was sent to all radiation oncology (RO) departments in Turkey. The number of patients treated for benign disease between 2015 and 2020 was requested. A list of benign conditions was given, and information on the number of patients per disease, single and total doses prescribed, weekly fractions, radiation type, energy, and device was requested. RESULTS Of the 138 RO departments, 29 (21%) responded. The data received concerned 15 (52%) university, 10 (34%) public, and four (14%) private hospitals. A total of 130,846 patients were treated with RT in these departments. Of these patients, 6346 (4.85%) were treated for benign conditions. The most common benign diseases treated with RT were meningioma (35%), plantar fasciitis (19%), schwannoma (16%), arteriovenous malformation (11%), and pituitary adenoma (7%). Most centers performed RT for paraganglioma, heterotopic ossification, vertebral hemangioma, and Graves' ophthalmopathy, but none treated arthrosis. Wide variations were observed across the departments. Radiosurgery for intracranial pathologies was performed intensively in four centers. By contrast, RT for plantar fasciitis was predominantly treated in five centers, one of which had more than 1000 patients. CONCLUSION The ratio of patients who underwent RT for benign diseases in Turkey among all patients who underwent RT was 4.85%. The common pattern of RT in 72% of patients was radiosurgery for intracranial benign diseases, followed by low-dose RT for plantar fasciitis in 19%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halil Cumhur Yıldırım
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Kocamustafapasa Street No:53, Cerrahpasa, 34098, Fatih/Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Fazilet Öner Dinçbaş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Demircan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Beyzadeoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ertuğrul Tekçe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gözde Yazıcı
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Menekşe Turna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Oğuz Çetinayak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Mustafa Akın
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Balikesir Ataturk City Hospital, Balikesir, Turkey
| | - Emine Canyılmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Ayse Altınok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Park Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ela Delikgöz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Müge Akmansu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fuzuli Tuğrul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eskisehir City Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Seda Ünverdi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Berrin Benli Yavuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Serra Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mürsel Düzova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Sumerya Duru Birgi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Emine Elif Özkan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Berrin Yalçın
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Merve Şahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erzurum Bolge Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Durmuş Etiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Hasan Suat Arslantaş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Deniz Meydan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Şefik İğdem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Halil Sağınç
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Murtaza Parvizi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Pelin Altınok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Anacak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|