1
|
Lindberg S, Grozman V, Karlsson K, Onjukka E, Lindbäck E, Jirf KA, Lax I, Wersäll P, Persson GF, Josipovic M, Khalil AA, Møller DS, Hoffmann L, Knap MM, Nyman J, Drugge N, Bergström P, Olofsson J, Rogg LV, Hagen RK, Frøland AS, Ramberg C, Kristiansen C, Jeppesen SS, Nielsen TB, Lödén B, Rosenbrand HO, Engelholm S, Haraldsson A, Billiet C, Lewensohn R, Lindberg K. Expanded HILUS Trial: A Pooled Analysis of Risk Factors for Toxicity From Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Central and Ultracentral Lung Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1222-1231. [PMID: 37423292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors near the central airways implies high-grade toxic effects, as concluded from the HILUS trial. However, the small sample size and relatively few events limited the statistical power of the study. We therefore pooled data from the prospective HILUS trial with retrospective data from patients in the Nordic countries treated outside the prospective study to evaluate toxicity and risk factors for high-grade toxic effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS All patients were treated with 56 Gy in 8 fractions. Tumors within 2 cm of the trachea, the mainstem bronchi, the intermediate bronchus, or the lobar bronchi were included. The primary endpoint was toxicity, and the secondary endpoints were local control and overall survival. Clinical and dosimetric risk factors were analyzed for treatment-related fatal toxicity in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 230 patients evaluated, grade 5 toxicity developed in 30 patients (13%), of whom 20 patients had fatal bronchopulmonary bleeding. The multivariable analysis revealed tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus as significant risk factors for grade 5 bleeding and grade 5 toxicity. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 84% (95% CI, 80%-90%) and 40% (95% CI, 34%-47%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and high maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus increase the risk of fatal toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy in 8 fractions for central lung tumors. Similar dose constraints should be applied to the intermediate bronchus as to the mainstem bronchi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Section of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristin Karlsson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elias Lindbäck
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karam Al Jirf
- Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wersäll
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gitte Fredberg Persson
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Azza Ahmed Khalil
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marianne Marquard Knap
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jan Nyman
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ninni Drugge
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Bergström
- Department of Oncology, Northern Sweden University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Olofsson
- Department of Oncology, Northern Sweden University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Christina Ramberg
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Charlotte Kristiansen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Stefan Starup Jeppesen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tine Bjørn Nielsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Britta Lödén
- Oncology Department, Central Hospital in Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden
| | | | - Silke Engelholm
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - André Haraldsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Billiet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Rolf Lewensohn
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Theme Cancer, Department of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumors, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karlsson K, Lax I, Lindbäck E, Grozman V, Lindberg K, Wersäll P, Poludniowski G. Estimation of delivered dose to lung tumours considering setup uncertainties and breathing motion in a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2021; 88:53-64. [PMID: 34175747 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dose-response relationships for local control of lung tumours treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have proved ambiguous, however, these have been based on the prescribed or planned dose. Delivered dose to the target may be a better predictor for local control. In this study, the probability of the delivered minimum dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) in relation to the prescribed dose was estimated for a cohort of patients, considering geometrical uncertainties. MATERIALS AND METHODS Delivered doses were retrospectively simulated for 50 patients treated with SBRT for lung tumours, comparing two image-guidance techniques: pre-treatment verification computed tomography (IG1) and online cone-beam computed tomography (IG2). The prescribed dose was typically to the 67% isodose line of the treatment plan. Simulations used in-house software that shifted the static planned dose according to a breathing motion and sampled setup/matching errors. Each treatment was repeatedly simulated, generating a multiplicity of dose-volume histograms (DVH). From these, tumour-specific and population-averaged statistics were derived. RESULTS For IG1, the probability that the minimum CTV dose (D98%) exceeded 100% of the prescribed dose was 90%. With IG2, this probability increased to 99%. CONCLUSIONS Doses below the prescribed dose were delivered to a considerably larger part of the population prior to the introduction of online soft-tissue image-guidance. However, there is no clear evidence that this impacts local control, when compared to previous published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Karlsson
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elias Lindbäck
- Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Section of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Karin Lindberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Head, Neck, Lung and Skin Tumours, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Peter Wersäll
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Gavin Poludniowski
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karlsson K, Lax I, Lindbäck E, Poludniowski G. Accuracy of the dose-shift approximation in estimating the delivered dose in SBRT of lung tumors considering setup errors and breathing motions. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1189-1196. [PMID: 28388257 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1310395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Geometrical uncertainties can result in a delivered dose to the tumor different from that estimated in the static treatment plan. The purpose of this project was to investigate the accuracy of the dose calculated to the clinical target volume (CTV) with the dose-shift approximation, in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung tumors considering setup errors and breathing motion. The dose-shift method was compared with a beam-shift method with dose recalculation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Included were 10 patients (10 tumors) selected to represent a variety of SBRT-treated lung tumors in terms of tumor location, CTV volume, and tumor density. An in-house developed toolkit within a treatment planning system allowed the shift of either the dose matrix or a shift of the beam isocenter with dose recalculation, to simulate setup errors and breathing motion. Setup shifts of different magnitudes (up to 10 mm) and directions as well as breathing with different peak-to-peak amplitudes (up to 10:5:5 mm) were modeled. The resulting dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were recorded and dose statistics were extracted. RESULTS Generally, both the dose-shift and beam-shift methods resulted in calculated doses lower than the static planned dose, although the minimum (D98%) dose exceeded the prescribed dose in all cases, for setup shifts up to 5 mm. The dose-shift method also generally underestimated the dose compared with the beam-shift method. For clinically realistic systematic displacements of less than 5 mm, the results demonstrated that in the minimum dose region within the CTV, the dose-shift method was accurate to 2% (root-mean-square error). Breathing motion only marginally degraded the dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS Averaged over the patients and shift directions, the dose-shift approximation was determined to be accurate to approximately 2% (RMS) within the CTV, for clinically relevant geometrical uncertainties for SBRT of lung tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Karlsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elias Lindbäck
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gavin Poludniowski
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|