1
|
Brown SA, Beavers C, Bauer B, Cheng RK, Berman G, Marshall CH, Guha A, Jain P, Steward A, DeCara JM, Olaye IM, Hansen K, Logan J, Bergom C, Glide-Hurst C, Loh I, Gambril JA, MacLeod J, Maddula R, McGranaghan PJ, Batra A, Campbell C, Hamid A, Gunturkun F, Davis R, Jefferies J, Fradley M, Albert K, Blaes A, Choudhuri I, Ghosh AK, Ryan TD, Ezeoke O, Leedy DJ, Williams W, Roman S, Lehmann L, Sarkar A, Sadler D, Polter E, Ruddy KJ, Bansal N, Yang E, Patel B, Cho D, Bailey A, Addison D, Rao V, Levenson JE, Itchhaporia D, Watson K, Gulati M, Williams K, Lloyd-Jones D, Michos E, Gralow J, Martinez H. Advancing the care of individuals with cancer through innovation & technology: Proceedings from the cardiology oncology innovation summit 2020 and 2021. Am Heart J Plus 2024; 38:100354. [PMID: 38510746 PMCID: PMC10945974 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
As cancer therapies increase in effectiveness and patients' life expectancies improve, balancing oncologic efficacy while reducing acute and long-term cardiovascular toxicities has become of paramount importance. To address this pressing need, the Cardiology Oncology Innovation Network (COIN) was formed to bring together domain experts with the overarching goal of collaboratively investigating, applying, and educating widely on various forms of innovation to improve the quality of life and cardiovascular healthcare of patients undergoing and surviving cancer therapies. The COIN mission pillars of innovation, collaboration, and education have been implemented with cross-collaboration among academic institutions, private and public establishments, and industry and technology companies. In this report, we summarize proceedings from the first two annual COIN summits (inaugural in 2020 and subsequent in 2021) including educational sessions on technological innovations for establishing best practices and aligning resources. Herein, we highlight emerging areas for innovation and defining unmet needs to further improve the outcome for cancer patients and survivors of all ages. Additionally, we provide actionable suggestions for advancing innovation, collaboration, and education in cardio-oncology in the digital era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry-Ann Brown
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Craig Beavers
- University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Brenton Bauer
- COR Healthcare Associates, Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Richard K. Cheng
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Catherine H. Marshall
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Avirup Guha
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Prantesh Jain
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Jeanne M. DeCara
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Iredia M. Olaye
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jim Logan
- University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Cardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Carri Glide-Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Irving Loh
- Ventura Heart Institute, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Alan Gambril
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Peter J. McGranaghan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, German Heart Center, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Akshee Batra
- Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Courtney Campbell
- Cardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Fatma Gunturkun
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Robert Davis
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - John Jefferies
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- The Heart Institute at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health and Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Michael Fradley
- Cardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Albert
- Helen and Arthur E. Johnson Beth-El College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Anne Blaes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Indrajit Choudhuri
- Department of Electrophysiology, Froedtert South Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Arjun K. Ghosh
- Cardio-Oncology Service, Barts Heart Centre and University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thomas D. Ryan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ogochukwu Ezeoke
- Department of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Douglas J. Leedy
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Sebastian Roman
- Department of Internal Medicine III: Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lorenz Lehmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III: Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Abdullah Sarkar
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Diego Sadler
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Polter
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Neha Bansal
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Eric Yang
- Cardio-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brijesh Patel
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - David Cho
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alison Bailey
- Center for Heart, Lung, and Vascular Health at Parkridge, HCA Healthcare, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Daniel Addison
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vijay Rao
- Indiana Heart Physicians, Franciscan Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joshua E. Levenson
- Division of Cardiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dipti Itchhaporia
- Cardiology, University of California Irvine, Hoag Hospital Newport Beach, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Karol Watson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martha Gulati
- Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kim Williams
- Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Donald Lloyd-Jones
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Erin Michos
- Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Julie Gralow
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Hugo Martinez
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- The Heart Institute at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health and Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyce TG, Christianson B, Hanson KE, Dunn D, Polter E, VanWormer JJ, Williams CL, Belongia EA, McLean HQ. Factors associated with human papillomavirus and meningococcal vaccination among adolescents living in rural and urban areas. Vaccine X 2022; 11:100180. [PMID: 35755142 PMCID: PMC9218554 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies have shown that adolescent vaccination rates with human papillomavirus (HPV) and quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccines are lower in rural areas of the U.S. than in urban areas. We sought to determine factors associated with vaccine acceptance in these two settings. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 536 parents or guardians of teens age 13 through 15 years in select rural and urban counties of Minnesota and Wisconsin. We collected information on demographic variables, receipt of adolescent vaccines, and attitudes toward HPV vaccine in particular. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between covariates and outcomes of interest (HPV vaccine receipt and MenACWY receipt). Results Of the 536 respondents, 267 (50%) resided in a rural county. Most respondents were female (78%) and non-Hispanic White (88%). About half (52%) of teens of the surveyed parents received the three vaccines recommended specifically for adolescents: 90% received tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), 84% received MenACWY, and 60% received one or more doses of HPV vaccine. Rural and urban parents surveyed differed on several covariates relating to teen's health services, parent's demographics, and household characteristics. Parent's perception of the importance that their healthcare providers placed on vaccination with HPV and MenACWY were independently associated with receipt of each of those vaccines (odds ratio [OR] 6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.90-13.96 and OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.07-4.31, respectively). Parents of vaccinated teens were less likely to report concerns about potential harm from the HPV vaccine or having heard stories about health problems caused by the HPV vaccine. Conclusion Teen receipt of HPV vaccine and MenACWY appears to be influenced by parents' perception of vaccine importance, provider recommendations, and concerns regarding potential harm from the HPV vaccine. Continued education of providers and parents of the importance of adolescent vaccinations is warranted.
Collapse
Key Words
- Adolescent
- CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- CHIAS, Carolina HPV Immunization Attitudes and Beliefs Scale
- HPV, human papillomavirus
- Human papillomavirus
- IIS, immunization information system
- IRB, Institutional Review Board
- MCRI, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute
- MDH, Minnesota Department of Health
- MIIC, Minnesota Immunization Information Connection
- MenACWY, quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine
- Rural population
- Tdap, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine
- UIC, Urban Influence Codes
- Vaccinations
- WIR, Wisconsin Immunization Registry
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G Boyce
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | | | - Kayla E Hanson
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Denise Dunn
- Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Charnetta L Williams
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Huong Q McLean
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wheldon CW, Polter E, Rosser BRS, Bates AJ, Haggart R, Wright M, Mitteldorf D, Ross MW, Konety BR, Kohli N, Talley KMC, West W, Tatum AK. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Gay and Bisexual Prostate Cancer Survivors: Results From the Restore-2 Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832508. [PMID: 35600390 PMCID: PMC9117614 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Equitable cancer survivorship care for gay and bisexual male (GBM) prostate cancer survivors should be responsive to their sexual health needs. Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are higher among GBM compared to heterosexual men across the lifespan. In addition, evidence suggests that GBM will use a variety of strategies to cope with sexual dysfunction that may increase risk for STIs. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of STIs following prostate cancer treatment among GBM and identify risk factors. Methods In 2019, 401 GBM previously treated for prostate cancer were recruited into the Restore-2 Study. They completed a baseline online questionnaire with items assessing STIs diagnosed since being treated for prostate cancer. Any STI diagnoses was regressed on demographic, clinical, and relationship related variables using binary logistic regression. Results Forty-five participants (11.4%) were diagnosed with an STI during or following their prostate cancer treatment. The mostly commonly diagnosed STI was syphilis (4.3%), followed by gonorrhoea (2.8%), and chlamydia (2.5%). Four participants were infected with HIV following their prostate cancer treatment. Independent risk factors for STI diagnosis included time since prostate cancer diagnosis (aOR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10-1.26), nonmonogamous sexual relationship (aOR = 11.23; 95% CI: 2.11-59.73), better sexual function (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), penile injection treatment (aOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 1.48-7.29), and multiple sex partners (aOR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.64-18.96). Conclusions GBM prostate cancer survivors are at risk for STIs. Culturally responsive STI prevention should be incorporated into cancer survivorship plans, particularly as men are treated for and regain sexual function over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W. Wheldon
- Cancer Health Equity, Education and Research Lab, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Christopher W. Wheldon,
| | - Elizabeth Polter
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - B. R. Simon Rosser
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Alex J. Bates
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Ryan Haggart
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Morgan Wright
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Michael W. Ross
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Nidhi Kohli
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kristine M. C. Talley
- Adult and Geriatric Health, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - William West
- Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Alexander K. Tatum
- Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and Counseling, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haggart R, Polter E, Ross M, Kohli N, Konety BR, Mitteldorf D, West W, Rosser BRS. Comorbidity Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life in Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment. Sex Med 2021; 9:100439. [PMID: 34634579 PMCID: PMC8766256 DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Studies have demonstrated worse health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in gay and bisexual men (GBM) following prostate cancer treatment compared to heterosexual men potentially due to differences in comorbidity burden. Aim To establish the prevalence of comorbidities and their association with HRQOL metrics in GBM following prostate cancer treatment. Methods We evaluated HRQOL and prevalence of comorbidities in 193 GBM from the United States and Canada in a cross-sectional, online survey: the Masked for Review. HRQOL was measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Main Outcome Measures Our outcomes included comorbidity prevalence, mean differences for HRQOL scores by comorbidity status, and mean differences for HRQOL by comorbidity count. Results GBM were found to have a higher prevalence of blood vessel disease and mental health disorders but lower prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes when compared to published data in general prostate cancer populations. Statistically significant reductions in HRQOL metrics were associated with mental health diagnoses, diabetes, and obesity. Increased number of comorbidities was also associated with reductions in HRQOL metrics in nearly all categories. Conclusion These results suggest that the worse QOL outcomes in GBM following prostate cancer treatment may be due to differences in comorbidity burden. This study is the first to evaluate the relationship between comorbidities and HRQOL outcomes in GBM. Limitations of this study include a small sample size and cross-sectional study design. If confirmed in larger, longitudinal, clinically confirmed studies, these findings indicate a need to intervene on and consider comorbidities in GBM diagnosed with prostate cancer. Haggart R, Polter E, Ross M, et al. Comorbidity Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life in Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment. Sex Med 2021;9:100439.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Haggart
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Polter
- Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Michael Ross
- Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nidhi Kohli
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | - William West
- Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - B R Simon Rosser
- Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Onyeaghala GC, Polter E, Lutsey PL, Folsom AR, Joshu CE, Platz EA, Prizment AE. Abstract 5309: Dietary magnesium is inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-5309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Magnesium is a key nutritional mineral required for the regulation of numerous biochemical reactions throughout the body. Main food sources of magnesium include whole grains, nuts, and green vegetables, but more than 50% of Americans do not currently meet their daily recommended magnesium intake. Prior research has shown that those deficient in magnesium have increased susceptibility to oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, leading to endothelial dysfunction and potentially stimulating cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness. Previous epidemiological studies suggested a link between a diet high in magnesium and reduced CRC, especially among women. The American Cancer Society underscores the importance of clarifying the role of dietary magnesium in CRC development overall and by gender. Thus, we prospectively examined the associations between dietary magnesium intake and CRC risk in the ARIC study, overall, and separately in men and women.
Methods: The ARIC study followed 15,792 men and women (45-64 years old at baseline) for cancer occurrence from 1987-2006. Participants received medical examinations and completed questionnaires at 4 visits; food frequency data were collected at Visit I (1987-89) and magnesium intake estimated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CI for CRC associated with dietary magnesium intake in quartiles using two models: Model 1 adjusted for baseline age, race, center, sex, energy intake, BMI, and physical activity. Model 2 included Model 1 covariates as well as intake of alcohol, dietary calcium, dietary fiber, aspirin, CRP levels, and cigarette smoking.
Results: The analytic cohort (n=14,160, 54.5% women, 27.3% black and 72.7% white, 45-64 years at baseline) was followed for a median of 15.4 years; 315 CRC cases were identified. Since only the highest quartile of dietary magnesium intake met US recommendations (>300 mg/day), we examined the highest quartile versus the 3 lowest quartiles combined (reference category). In Model 1, the highest quartile of dietary magnesium was associated with lower CRC risk: HR (95%CI) =0.68 (0.47-0.99). The inverse association between magnesium and CRC persisted in Model 2 (HR=0.70; 95% CI 0.48, 1.02). The association followed a similar trend after stratification by colon and rectal cancer cases (HR(95% CI) =0.72 (0.48-1.08) and HR(95% CI)=0.49 (0.23-1.06), respectively) and by men and women (HR(95% CI)=0.75 (0.42-1.21) and HR(95% CI)=0.63 (0.36-1.12) respectively). There was no interaction of dietary magnesium intake with dietary calcium intake, alcohol consumption use or dietary fiber.
Conclusion: Our findings corroborate an inverse association between higher dietary magnesium intake and CRC risk, with similar associations observed in men and women. Support: NHLBI, NCI, NPCR
Citation Format: Guillaume C. Onyeaghala, Elizabeth Polter, Pamela L. Lutsey, Aaron R. Folsom, Corrine E. Joshu, Elizabeth A. Platz, Anna E. Prizment. Dietary magnesium is inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5309. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5309
Collapse
|