Real-life use of ramucirumab in gastric cancer in Spain: the RAMIS study

Aims: To obtain real-world data on ramucirumab use and effectiveness for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ). Methods: Observational, retrospective study carried out in 20 Spanish hospitals, in patients who started ramucirumab treatment between December 2015 and December 2018. Descriptive analysis was conducted for patient characteristics, treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes. Results: Three hundred seventeen patients were included (93.7% treated with ramucirumab-paclitaxel and 6.3% with ramucirumab); age 62.5 (11.3) years; 66.9% male. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.3) and 7.4 (95% CI: 6.4-8.9) in combination regimen and 2.0 (1.1-2.8) and 4.3 (95% CI: 1.9-7.3) in monotherapy, respectively. Conclusion: The study findings were consistent with available real-world studies and randomized clinical trials.

Trial in progress: A phase I study of AMG 199, a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE) immune therapy, targeting MUC17 in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer

TPS4649

Background: Prognosis for advanced G/GEJ cancer is poor and new treatment modalities are urgently needed. MUC17 is a transmembrane protein overexpressed and differentially localized on the cell membrane of G/GEJ cancer cells; expression and localization in normal cells is much more limited. AMG 199 is an HLE BiTE immune therapy designed to engage CD3-positive T cells to MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer cells, mediate redirected tumor cell lysis, and induce T cell activation and proliferation. A clinical trial is being conducted for this novel and targeted immune therapy agent in patients with MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer. Methods: This is a first-in-human phase 1, open-label, dose escalating study (NCT04117958) evaluating AMG 199 in patients with MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer. Key eligibility criteria include metastatic or locally advanced unresectable MUC17-positive (as determined by IHC using a central laboratory assay) gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma ineligible for curative surgery and relapsed or treatment-refractory following ≥2 lines including a platinum, a fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan, and an approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antibody or tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients eligible for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) directed therapy should have received an approved HER2 targeting antibody. Primary endpoints include: dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent or -related adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), and laboratory changes. Secondary endpoints include: pharmacokinetics of AMG 199, objective response, duration of response, time to progression, 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival, and 1-year and 2-year overall survival. The dose exploration (n = 30) will estimate the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dose; this will be followed by a dose expansion (n = 40) and evaluation of the benefit/risk profile of AMG 199. The study began enrolling patients in January 2020 and is ongoing. This is the first clinical trial to investigate MUC17 as a potential anti-tumor target. For more information, please contact Amgen Medical Information: medinfo@amgen.com . Clinical trial information: NCT04117958 .

DNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations (mut) are predictors of response to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) patients (pts)

e16805

Background: Somatic DDR mut have been reported in close to 10% of PC samples. In this study we investigate their predictive value for response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Case-control study with pts deriving response to oxaliplatin-based treatment (partial or complete response at any line) [n = 30] versus no response (progression in first restaging at 1st line) [n = 18]. An in-house NGS panel test of 420 genes was performed on tumor samples. DDR mut were classified in 2 subgroups: (a) functional BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2; and (b) any functional DDR gene mut, including those in (a). Results: 48 pts were included, median ages was 54.5 years (30-74), 29 male, 26 were diagnosed with stage IV, 36 pts (75%) received FOLFIRINOX and 37 received platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st. line treatment. Prevalence of DDR mut are described in the table. Among responders, 3 tumors had BRCA2 mt, 3 BRCA1, 2 ATM, and 1 each with BRCA2 + MSH2, PALB2, PMS2, MUYTH, RECQL4 + MDC1. Among non-responders 1 tumor each had ATM, FANCD2 and BLM. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in pts with BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mut tumors was 21.7 months (95% CI 12.3-NA); among those with any DDR mt was 12.3 months (95% CI 9.13-NA); while in pts whose tumors had no DDR mut was 6.4 months (95% CI 3.07-13)(Log-rank P-value = 0.02 comparison subgroup [a] vs. others; P-value = 0.1 subgroup [b] vs. others). Conclusions: The subgroup of pts with PC whit tumors harboring DDR gene mut, particularly functional BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2, have higher response rate and longer PFS with oxaplatin-based chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

In the EXTREME trial, a combination of cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab was superior to cisplatin/carboplatin plus 5-FU for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). With the aim of improving fluoropyrimidine-related tolerance without decreasing its efficacy, the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus the oral fluoropyrimidine tegafur and cetuximab were investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC was conducted. Patients were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve: 5 mg/mL/min) on day 1, oral tegafur (250 mg/m² twice daily) for 21 consecutive days, and cetuximab (400 mg/m² as an initial 2-hour intravenous infusion, then 250 mg/m² as a 1-hour weekly infusion for 3 weeks) for ≤6 cycles. Patients who responded to the therapy then received weekly cetuximab maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated with a high level of compliance (relative dose intensity: 96%, 88%, and 81% for carboplatin, tegafur, and cetuximab, respectively). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 38% of patients (skin reactions in 17% of patients, anemia 4%, and neutropenia 3%). Grade 1-2 AEs included skin reactions (52% of patients), hypomagnesemia (20%), asthenia (19%), and anemia (13%). No venous thrombosis related to chemotherapy perfusion was observed. Over a median follow-up of 21 months, the median overall and progression-free survival were 11 and 6 months, respectively, and the overall response rate was 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin plus oral tegafur and cetuximab is a safe, well-tolerated first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

On the Effect of Triplet or Doublet Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Results From a National Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus regarding first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who are ineligible to receive trastuzumab. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of triplets versus doublets by analyzing a national gastric cancer registry.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Patients with AGC treated with polychemotherapy without associating trastuzumab were included from 2008 through 2016. The effect of triplets versus doublets was compared using 3 methods: Cox proportional hazards regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and coarsened exact matching (CEM).

RESULTS

A total of 970 patients were recruited (doublets: n=569; triplets: n=401). In the multivariate Cox model, the use of triplets was associated with better overall survival (OS), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P=.035). After PSM, the sample contained 340 pairs. A significant increase in OS, 11.14 months (95% CI, 9.60-12.68) versus 9.60 months (95% CI, 8.44-10.75), was seen in favor of triplets (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92; stratified log-rank test, P=.004). The effect appeared to be comparable for anthracycline-based (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94) or docetaxel-based triplets (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-1.009). The trend was similar after applying the CEM algorithm, with an HR of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97; P=.03). Triplet therapy was viable and relative dose intensities exceeded 85%, except for cisplatin in DCX (docetaxel, cisplatin, capecitabine). Triplets had more severe toxicity overall, especially hematologic, hepatic, and mucosal adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitations of a retrospective study that examines a heterogeneous set of chemotherapy regimens, we found that triplets are feasible in daily practice and are associated with a discreet benefit in efficacy at the expense of a moderate increase in toxicity.

Prognostic significance of performing universal HER2 testing in cases of advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab significantly improves overall survival (OS) when added to cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine as a treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancers (AGC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the gradual implementation of HER2 testing on patient prognosis in a national registry of AGC.

METHODS

This Spanish National Cancer Registry includes cases who were consecutively recruited at 28 centers from January 2008 to January 2016. The effect of missing HER2 status was assessed using stratified Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression.

RESULTS

The rate of HER2 testing increased steadily over time, from 58.3 % in 2008 to 92.9 % in 2016. HER2 was positive in 194 tumors (21.3 %). In the stratified Cox PH regression, each 1 % increase in patients who were not tested for HER2 at the institutions was associated with an approximately 0.3 % increase in the risk of death: hazard ratio, 1.0035 (CI 95 %, 1.001-1.005), P = 0.0019. Median OS was significantly lower at institutions with the highest proportions of patients who were not tested for HER2.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated at centers that took longer to implement HER2 testing exhibited worse clinical outcomes. The speed of implementation behaves as a quality-of-care indicator. Reviewed guidelines on HER2 testing should be used to achieve this goal in a timely manner.