1
|
Boukerb AM, Noël C, Quenot E, Cadiou B, Chevé J, Quintric L, Cormier A, Dantan L, Gourmelon M. Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking Approach. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:697553. [PMID: 34335529 PMCID: PMC8317174 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.697553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Fecal pollution in coastal areas is of a high concern since it affects bathing and shellfish harvesting activities. Wild waterbirds are non-negligible in the overall signal of the detectable pollution. Yet, studies on wild waterbirds’ gut microbiota focus on migratory trajectories and feeding impact on their shape, rare studies address their comparison to other sources and develop quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based Microbial Source Tracking (MST) markers to detect such pollution. Thus, by using 16S rRNA amplicon high-throughput sequencing, the aims of this study were (i) to explore and compare fecal bacterial communities from wild waterbirds (i.e., six families and 15 species, n = 275 samples) to that of poultry, cattle, pigs, and influent/effluent of wastewater treatment plants (n = 150 samples) and (ii) to develop new MST markers for waterbirds. Significant differences were observed between wild waterbirds and the four other groups. We identified 7,349 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) from the hypervariable V3–V4 region. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and, in a lesser extent, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were ubiquitous while Fusobacteria and Epsilonbacteraeota were mainly present in wild waterbirds. The clustering of samples in non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination indicated a by-group clustering shape, with a high diversity within wild waterbirds. In addition, the structure of the bacterial communities was distinct according to bird and/or animal species and families (Adonis R2 = 0.13, p = 10–4, Adonis R2 = 0.11, p = 10–4, respectively). The Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) showed that the wild waterbird group differed from the others by the significant presence of sequences from Fusobacteriaceae (W = 566) and Enterococcaceae (W = 565) families, corresponding to the Cetobacterium (W = 1427) and Catellicoccus (W = 1427) genera, respectively. Altogether, our results suggest that some waterbird members present distinct fecal microbiomes allowing the design of qPCR MST markers. For instance, a swan- and an oystercatcher-associated markers (named Swan_2 and Oyscab, respectively) have been developed. Moreover, bacterial genera harboring potential human pathogens associated to bird droppings were detected in our dataset, including enteric pathogens, i.e., Arcobacter, Clostridium, Helicobacter, and Campylobacter, and environmental pathogens, i.e., Burkholderia and Pseudomonas. Future studies involving other wildlife hosts may improve gut microbiome studies and MST marker development, helping mitigation of yet unknown fecal pollution sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amine M Boukerb
- IFREMER, RBE-SGMM-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, Plouzané, France
| | - Cyril Noël
- IFREMER - PDG-IRSI-SEBIMER, Plouzané, France
| | - Emmanuelle Quenot
- IFREMER, RBE-SGMM-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, Plouzané, France
| | | | - Julien Chevé
- IFREMER, ODE-UL-LERBN, Laboratoire Environnement Ressource Bretagne Nord, Dinard, France
| | | | | | - Luc Dantan
- IFREMER, RBE-SGMM-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, Plouzané, France
| | - Michèle Gourmelon
- IFREMER, RBE-SGMM-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, Plouzané, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vincent-Hubert F, Wacrenier C, Morga B, Lozach S, Quenot E, Mège M, Lecadet C, Gourmelon M, Hervio-Heath D, Le Guyader FS. Passive Samplers, a Powerful Tool to Detect Viruses and Bacteria in Marine Coastal Areas. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:631174. [PMID: 33708186 PMCID: PMC7940377 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.631174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of viruses and bacteria which can pose a threat either to shellfish health or shellfish consumers remains difficult. The current detection methods rely on point sampling of water, a method that gives a snapshot of the microorganisms present at the time of sampling. In order to obtain better representativeness of the presence of these microorganisms over time, we have developed passive sampling using the adsorption capacities of polymer membranes. Our objectives here were to assess the feasibility of this methodology for field detection. Different types of membrane were deployed in coastal waters over 2 years and the microorganisms tested using qPCR were: human norovirus (NoV) genogroups (G)I and II, sapovirus, Vibrio spp. and the species Vibrio alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus, OsHV-1 virus, and bacterial markers of fecal contamination. NoV GII, Vibrio spp., and the AllBac general Bacteroidales marker were quantified on the three types of membrane. NoV GII and OsHV-1 viruses followed a seasonal distribution. All membranes were favorable for NoV GII detection, while Zetapor was more adapted for OsHV-1 detection. Nylon was more adapted for detection of Vibrio spp. and the AllBac marker. The quantities of NoV GII, AllBac, and Vibrio spp. recovered on membranes increased with the duration of exposure. This first application of passive sampling in seawater is particularly promising in terms of an early warning system for the prevention of contamination in oyster farming areas and to improve our knowledge on the timing and frequency of disease occurence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benjamin Morga
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | - Solen Lozach
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, LSEM/SG2M, Nantes, France
| | | | - Mickaël Mège
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | - Cyrielle Lecadet
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vincent-Hubert F, Wacrenier C, Morga B, Lozach S, Quenot E, Mège M, Lecadet C, Gourmelon M, Hervio-Heath D, Le Guyader FS. Passive Samplers, a Powerful Tool to Detect Viruses and Bacteria in Marine Coastal Areas. Front Microbiol 2021. [PMID: 33708186 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.631174/bibtex] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The detection of viruses and bacteria which can pose a threat either to shellfish health or shellfish consumers remains difficult. The current detection methods rely on point sampling of water, a method that gives a snapshot of the microorganisms present at the time of sampling. In order to obtain better representativeness of the presence of these microorganisms over time, we have developed passive sampling using the adsorption capacities of polymer membranes. Our objectives here were to assess the feasibility of this methodology for field detection. Different types of membrane were deployed in coastal waters over 2 years and the microorganisms tested using qPCR were: human norovirus (NoV) genogroups (G)I and II, sapovirus, Vibrio spp. and the species Vibrio alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus, OsHV-1 virus, and bacterial markers of fecal contamination. NoV GII, Vibrio spp., and the AllBac general Bacteroidales marker were quantified on the three types of membrane. NoV GII and OsHV-1 viruses followed a seasonal distribution. All membranes were favorable for NoV GII detection, while Zetapor was more adapted for OsHV-1 detection. Nylon was more adapted for detection of Vibrio spp. and the AllBac marker. The quantities of NoV GII, AllBac, and Vibrio spp. recovered on membranes increased with the duration of exposure. This first application of passive sampling in seawater is particularly promising in terms of an early warning system for the prevention of contamination in oyster farming areas and to improve our knowledge on the timing and frequency of disease occurence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benjamin Morga
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | - Solen Lozach
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, LSEM/SG2M, Nantes, France
| | | | - Mickaël Mège
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | - Cyrielle Lecadet
- Ifremer, Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques, LGPMM/SG2M, La Tremblade, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jardé E, Jeanneau L, Harrault L, Quenot E, Solecki O, Petitjean P, Lozach S, Chevé J, Gourmelon M. Application of a microbial source tracking based on bacterial and chemical markers in headwater and coastal catchments. Sci Total Environ 2018; 610-611:55-63. [PMID: 28802110 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
This study identified sources of fecal contamination in three different French headwater and coastal catchments (the Justiçou, Pen an Traon, and La Fresnaye) using a combination of microbial source tracking tools. The tools included bacterial markers (three host-associated Bacteroidales) and chemical markers (six fecal stanols), which were monitored monthly over one or two years in addition to fecal indicator bacteria. 168 of the 240 freshwater and marine water samples had Escherichia coli (E. coli) or enterococci concentrations higher than "excellent" European water quality threshold. In the three catchments, the results suggested that the fecal contamination appeared to be primarily from an animal origin and particularly from a bovine origin in 52% (Rum2Bac) and 46% (Bstanol) of the samples and to a lesser extent from a porcine origin in 19% (Pig2Bac) and 21% (Pstanol) of the samples. Our results suggested a human fecal contamination in 56% (HF183) and 32% (Hstanol) of the samples. Rainfall also impacted the source identification of microbial contamination. In general, these findings could inform effective implementation of microbial source tracking strategies, specifically that the location of sampling points must include variability at the landscape scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Jardé
- Geosciences Rennes CNRS UMR6118, Campus de Beaulieu, Bat. 15, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France.
| | - Laurent Jeanneau
- Geosciences Rennes CNRS UMR6118, Campus de Beaulieu, Bat. 15, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Loïc Harrault
- Geosciences Rennes CNRS UMR6118, Campus de Beaulieu, Bat. 15, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Quenot
- Ifremer, RBE-SG2M-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France
| | - Olivia Solecki
- IRSTEA, UR OPAALE, 17 avenue de Cucillé, CS 64427, 35044 Rennes, France
| | - Patrice Petitjean
- Geosciences Rennes CNRS UMR6118, Campus de Beaulieu, Bat. 15, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Solen Lozach
- Ifremer, RBE-SG2M-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France
| | - Julien Chevé
- Ifremer, Laboratoire Environnement Ressources de Bretagne Nord, 38 rue du Port Blanc, BP 70134, 35801 Dinard, France
| | - Michèle Gourmelon
- Ifremer, RBE-SG2M-LSEM, Laboratoire Santé Environnement Microbiologie, ZI de la Pointe du Diable, CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France
| |
Collapse
|