Adiyaman SC, Altay C, Kamisli BY, Avci ER, Basara I, Simsir IY, Atik T, Secil M, Oral EA, Akinci B. Pelvis magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose familial partial lipodystrophy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023:7049389. [PMID:
36808247 DOI:
10.1210/clinem/dgad063]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT
The diagnosis of familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) is currently made based on clinical judgement.
OBJECTIVE
There is a need for objective diagnostic tools that can diagnose FPLD accurately.
METHODS
We have developed a new method that used measurements from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the pubis level. We evaluated measurements from a lipodystrophy cohort (n = 59; median age [25-75 percentiles]: 32 [24-44]; 48 females and 11 males) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 29). Another dataset included MRIs from 289 consecutive patients.
RESULTS
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a potential cut-point of ≤ 13 mm gluteal fat thickness for the diagnosis of FPLD. A combination of gluteal fat thickness ≤ 13 mm and pubic/gluteal fat ratio ≥ 2.5 (based on a ROC) provided 96.67% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity and 91.38% (95% CI: 81.02-97.14%) specificity in the overall cohort and 100.00% (95% CI: 87.23-100.00%) sensitivity and 90.00% (95% CI: 76.34-97.21%) specificity in females for the diagnosis of FPLD. When this approach was tested in a larger dataset of random patients, FPLD was differentiated from subjects without lipodystrophy with 96.67% (95% CI: 82.78-99.92%) sensitivity and 100.00% (95% CI: 98.73-100.00%) specificity. When only women were analyzed, the sensitivity and the specificity was 100.00% (95%CI: 87.23-100.00% and 97.95-100.00%, respectively). The performance of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat thickness ratio was comparable to readouts performed by radiologists with expertise in lipodystrophy.
CONCLUSION
The combined use of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat ratio from pelvic MRI is a promising method to diagnose FPLD that can reliably identify FPLD in women. Our findings need to be tested in larger populations and prospectively.
Collapse