1
|
Muñoz Campaña A, Farre-Alins P, Gracia-Roman R, Campos-Serra A, Llaquet-Bayo H, Vitiello G, Lucas-Guerrero V, Marrano E, Gonzalez-Castillo AM, Vila-Tura M, García-Borobia FJ, Mora Lopez L. INDURG TRIAL PROTOCOL: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL USING INDOCYANINE GREEN DURING CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS. Dig Surg 2024:000538371. [PMID: 38657579 DOI: 10.1159/000538371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common gastrointestinal surgeries, and bile duct injury is one of its main complications. The use of real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography allows the identification of extrahepatic biliary structures, facilitating the procedure and reducing the risk of bile duct lesions. A better visualization of the bile duct may help to reduce the need for conversion to open surgery, and may also shorten operating time. The main objective of this study is to determine whether the use of indocyanine green is associated with a reduction in operating time in emergency cholecystectomies. Secondary outcomes are the postoperative hospital stay, the correct intraoperative visualization of the Calot's Triangle structures with the administration of indocyanine green, and the intraoperative complications, postoperative complications and morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. METHODS This is a randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter trial with patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis requiring emergency cholecystectomy. The control group will comprise 220 patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy applying the standard technique. The intervention group will comprise 220 patients also undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with prior administration of indocyanine green. CONCLUSION Due to the lack of published studies on ICG in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy, this study may help to establish procedures for its use in the emergency setting.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bunino FM, Marrano E, Carbone F, Mauri G, Ceolin M, Penazzi R, Zucchini N, Biloslavo A, Kurihara H. Clinical Frailty Score is a good predictor of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing open abdomen surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:147-154. [PMID: 38252400 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.23.09981-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open Abdomen (OA) is gaining popularity in damage control surgery (DCS) but there is not an absolute prognostic score to identify patients that may benefit from it. Our study investigates the correlation between the clinical frailty scale score (CFSS) and postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing OA. METHODS Patients ≥65 yo undergoing OA in two referral centres between 2015 and 2020 were included and stratified according to CFSS in non-frail (NF), frail (F) and highly-frail (HF). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidity and 1- year survival. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-six patients were included: 35 NF (25.7%), 56 F (41.2%), 45 HF (33.1%). Average age 76.8. The 73.5% of cases were non-traumatic diseases with no difference in preoperative characteristics. 95 (71.4%) had one complication, 26 NF (74.3%), 34 F (63.2%), 35 HF (77.8%) (P=0.301) and 59.4% had a complication with a CD≥3, 57.1% NF, 56.6% F and 64.4 HF. The 30-day mortality was 32.4%, higher in HF (46.7%) and F (30.4%) compared to NF (17.1%, P=0.018). The Overall 1-year survival was 41% (SE ±4) with statistically significant difference between HF vs. NF and HF vs. F (P=0.009 and P=0.029, respectively). In the univariate analysis, the only significant prognostic factor impacting mortality was CFSS, with HF having an HR of 1.948 (95% CI 1.097-3.460, P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS When OA is a surgical option, frail patients should not be precluded, while HF should be carefully evaluated. The CFSS might be a good prognostic score for patients that may safely benefit from OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca M Bunino
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Marrano
- Department of General Surgery, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Carbone
- Department of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Mauri
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Ceolin
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Penazzi
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASU GI), Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicolas Zucchini
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASU GI), Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alan Biloslavo
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASU GI), Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herbolzheimer M, Marrano E, Bellio G, Kluijfhout W, Cioffi S, Wijdicks FJ, Hättich A. The Establishment of Young - ESTES: from Colleagues to Friends. Z Orthop Unfall 2023; 161:486-487. [PMID: 37769685 DOI: 10.1055/a-2142-2424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
|
4
|
Kurihara H, Bunino FM, Fugazza A, Marrano E, Mauri G, Ceolin M, Lanza E, Colombo M, Facciorusso A, Repici A, Anderloni A. Endosonography-Guided Versus Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage Versus Cholecystectomy in Fragile Patients with Acute Cholecystitis-A High-Volume Center Study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58:medicina58111647. [PMID: 36422184 PMCID: PMC9699066 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Acute cholecystitis is a frequent cause of admission to the emergency department, especially in old and frail patients. Percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD) and endosonographic guided drainage (EUS-GBD) could be an alternative option for relieving symptoms or act as a definitive treatment instead of a laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy (LC, OC). The aim of the present study was to compare different treatment groups. Materials and Methods: This is a five-year monocentric retrospective study including patients ≥65 years old who underwent an urgent operative procedure. A descriptive analysis was conducted comparing all treatment groups. A propensity score was estimated based on the ACS score, incorporated into a predictive model, and tested by recursive partitioning analysis. Results: 163 patients were included: 106 underwent a cholecystectomy (81 laparoscopic (LC) and 25 Open (OC)), 33 a PT-GBD and 21 EUS-GBD. The sample was categorized into three prognostic groups according to the adverse event occurrence rate. All patients treated with EUS-GBD or LC resulted in the low risk group, and the adverse event rate (AE) was 10/96 (10.4%). The AE was 4/28 (14.2%) and 21/36 (58.3%) in the middle- and high-risk groups respectively (p < 0.001). These groups included all the patients who underwent an OC or a PT-GBD. The PT-GBD group had a lower clinical success rate (55.5%) and higher RR (16,6%) when compared with other groups. Conclusions: Surgery still represents the gold standard for AC treatment. Nevertheless, EUS-GBD is a good alternative to PT-GBD in terms of clinical success, RR and AEs in all kinds of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca M. Bunino
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Enrico Marrano
- General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain
| | - Giulia Mauri
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Martina Ceolin
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ezio Lanza
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marrano E, Bunino F, Del Zotto G, Ceolin M, Mei S, Brocchi A, Kurihara H. Open abdomen: is a dedicated emergency surgery team needed? A single center retrospective study on 141 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2213-2217. [PMID: 35906883 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open Abdomen (OA) is widely used when facing a catastrophic abdomen. Still, no indication is validated by a strong and high quality of evidence. The study reports the 5 year experience of a dedicated emergency general surgery (EGS) team. METHODS Retrospective observational cohort study. Patients undergoing OA management from 2/01/2015 to 19/07/2020 for trauma, non-traumatic emergencies or rescue surgery. RESULTS One hundred and forty-one patients. Age 66.9 ± 15.1. Male 58.2%.9.3% OA for trauma, 64.5% for non-traumatic emergencies and 26.2% for rescue surgery. 40.4% performed by the EGS team 52.4% indication for surgery was a severe intra-abdominal infection. TAC device: commercial negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) (83%), Sandwich VAC (12%), commercial NPWT with polypropylene mesh (5%) for pregressive fascial traction. Enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) in 3 patients. OA duration 5.3 days (1-25). A 1.8 revision surgeries (0-12) required for definitive closure; ICU stay 9.9 days (0-78). 30-day mortality 23.5%. Overall and 1-year mortality were 47.5% and 43.3%. Overall survival 9.9 months. An increased one-year mortality rate was found in the >65 group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS We reported a wide use of OA in septic abdomen (90% of cases). We had a low rate of EAF, short ICU stay and OA duration. These results are related to the fact that patients were treated by a dedicated EGS team, suggesting that OA management should be cared for as much as possible by trained and experienced surgeons. Prospective studies with more accurate patient selection are needed to prove our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Marrano
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Bunino
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Del Zotto
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Ceolin
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Mei
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Brocchi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS-Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Celentano V, Giglio MC, Pellino G, Rottoli M, Sampietro G, Spinelli A, Selvaggi F, Pellino G, Rottoli M, Poggioli G, Sica G, Giglio MC, Campanelli M, Coco C, Rizzo G, Sionne F, Colombo F, Sampietro G, Lamperti G, Foschi D, Ficari F, Vacca L, Cricchio M, Giudici F, Selvaggi L, Sciaudone G, Peltrini R, Manfreda A, Bucci L, Galleano R, Ghazouani O, Zorcolo L, Deidda S, Restivo A, Braini A, Di Candido F, Sacchi M, Carvello M, Martorana S, Bordignon G, Angriman I, Variola A, Di Ruscio M, Barugola G, Geccherle A, Tropeano FP, Luglio G, Tanzanu M, Sasia D, Migliore M, Giuffrida MC, Marrano E, Moretto G, Impellizzeri H, Gallo G, Vescio G, Sammarco G, Terrosu G, Calini G, Bondurri A, Maffioli MD A, Zaffaroni G, Resegotti A, Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Botti F, Prati M, Boni L, Perotti S, Mineccia M, Giuliani A, Romano L, Graziano GMP, Pugliese L, Pietrabissa A, Delaini GG, Spinelli A, Selvaggi F. High complication rate in Crohn's disease surgery following percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscess: a multicentre study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1421-1428. [PMID: 35599268 PMCID: PMC9167187 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04183-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) present an additional challenge as their presence can contraindicate immunosuppressive treatment whilst emergency surgery is associated with high stoma rate and complications. Treatment options include a conservative approach, percutaneous drainage, and surgical intervention. The current multicentre study audited the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent preoperative radiological drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses up to 6 weeks prior to surgery for ileocolonic CD. METHODS This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing ileocolic resection for primary or recurrent CD from June 2018 to May 2019. The outcomes of patients who underwent radiological guided drainage prior to ileocolonic resection were compared to the patients who did not require preoperative drainage. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Amongst a group of 575 included patients who had an ileocolic resection for CD, there were 36 patients (6.2%) who underwent abscess drainage prior to surgery. Postoperative morbidity (44.4%) and anastomotic leak (11.1%) were significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent preoperative drainage. CONCLUSIONS Patients with Crohn's disease who require preoperative radiological guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses are at increased risk of postoperative morbidity and septic complications following ileocaecal or re-do ileocolic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Celentano
- grid.428062.a0000 0004 0497 2835Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK ,grid.4701.20000 0001 0728 6636University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK ,grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medical and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- grid.9841.40000 0001 2200 8888Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita’ Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Rottoli
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy ,grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Alma Mater, Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Sampietro
- Division of General and HPB Surgery, ASST Rhodense, Rho Memorial Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy ,grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- grid.9841.40000 0001 2200 8888Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita’ Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurihara H, Marrano E, Ceolin M, Chiara O, Faccincani R, Bisagni P, Fattori L, Zago M. Impact of lockdown on emergency general surgery during first 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 47:677-682. [PMID: 33944976 PMCID: PMC8093909 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01691-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and analyze the impact of lockdown strategy due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on emergency general surgery (EGS) in the Milan area at the beginning of pandemic outbreak. Methods A survey was distributed to 14 different hospitals of the Milan area to analyze the variation of EGS procedures. Each hospital reported the number of EGS procedures in the same time frame comparing 2019 and 2020. The survey revealed that the number of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in 2020 was reduced by 19% when compared with 2019. The decrease was statistically significant only for abdominal wall surgery. Interestingly, in 2020, there was an increase of three procedures: surgical intervention for acute mesenteric ischemia (p = 0.002), drainage of perianal abscesses (p = 0.000285), and cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis (p = 0.08). Conclusions During the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in the metropolitan area of Milan, the number of patients operated for emergency diseases decreased by around 19%. We believe that this decrease is related either to the fear of the population to ask for emergency department (ED) consultation and to a shift towards a more non-operative management in the surgeons ‘decision making’ process. The increase of acute mesenteric ischaemia and perianal abscess might be related to the modification of dietary habits and reduction of physical activity related to the lockdown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Enrico Marrano
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Martina Ceolin
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- Universita' di Milano, Chirurgia Generale-Trauma Team ASST Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Faccincani
- Pronto Soccorso e Chirurgia Generale e Delle Urgenze, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Luca Fattori
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia-Chirurgia d'Urgenza, Ospedale San Gerardo ed Universita' Degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- General and Emergency Surgery Division, Robotic and Emergency Surgery Department, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Celentano V, Pellino G, Rottoli M, Poggioli G, Sica G, Giglio MC, Campanelli M, Coco C, Rizzo G, Sionne F, Colombo F, Sampietro G, Lamperti G, Foschi D, Ficari F, Vacca L, Cricchio M, Giudici F, Selvaggi L, Sciaudone G, Peltrini R, Manfreda A, Bucci L, Galleano R, Ghazouani O, Zorcolo L, Deidda S, Restivo A, Braini A, Di Candido F, Sacchi M, Carvello M, Martorana S, Bordignon G, Angriman I, Variola A, Barugola G, Di Ruscio M, Tanzanu M, Geccherle A, Tropeano FP, Luglio G, Sasia D, Migliore M, Giuffrida MC, Marrano E, Moretto G, Impellizzeri H, Gallo G, Vescio G, Sammarco G, Terrosu G, Calini G, Bondurri A, Maffioli A, Zaffaroni G, Resegotti A, Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Botti F, Prati M, Boni L, Perotti S, Mineccia M, Giuliani A, Romano L, Graziano GMP, Pugliese L, Pietrabissa A, Delaini G, Spinelli A, Selvaggi F. Correction to: Surgical treatment of colonic Crohn's disease: a national snapshot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:3921-3924. [PMID: 33651161 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02119-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. .,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive & Gastro-Intestinal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Michela Campanelli
- Minimally Invasive & Gastro-Intestinal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Coco
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale 2 - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rizzo
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale 2 - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Sionne
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale 2 - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Colombo
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Sampietro
- Division of General and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST Rhodense - Rho Memorial Hospital, 20017, Rho, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Lamperti
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Foschi
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucio Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Guido Sciaudone
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Luigi Bucci
- University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Luigi Zorcolo
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Simona Deidda
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Angelo Restivo
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Di Candido
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Sacchi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Michele Carvello
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefania Martorana
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Bordignon
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences University of Padova, Surgical Unit, Padova, Italy
| | - Imerio Angriman
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences University of Padova, Surgical Unit, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marta Tanzanu
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Gaetano Luglio
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Diego Sasia
- Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Marco Migliore
- Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Marrano
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Moretto
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Vescio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sammarco
- Department of Health sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giovanni Terrosu
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Giacomo Calini
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Andrea Bondurri
- Unit 1, General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maffioli
- Unit 1, General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Zaffaroni
- Unit 1, General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Resegotti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mistrangelo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Ettore Allaix
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Fiorenzo Botti
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Prati
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Serena Perotti
- Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- San Salvatore Hospital. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lucia Romano
- San Salvatore Hospital. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Pugliese
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - GianGaetano Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Celentano V, Pellino G, Spinelli A, Selvaggi F, Celentano V, Pellino G, Rottoli M, Poggioli G, Sica G, Giglio MC, Campanelli M, Coco C, Rizzo G, Sionne F, Colombo F, Sampietro G, Lamperti G, Foschi D, Ficari F, Vacca L, Cricchio M, Giudici F, Selvaggi L, Sciaudone G, Peltrini R, Manfreda A, Bucci L, Galleano R, Ghazouani O, Zorcolo L, Deidda S, Restivo A, Braini A, Di Candido F, Sacchi M, Carvello M, Martorana S, Bordignon G, Angriman I, Variola A, Di Ruscio M, Barugola G, Geccherle A, Tropeano FP, Luglio G, Tanzanu M, Sasia D, Migliore M, Giuffrida MC, Marrano E, Moretto G, Impellizzeri H, Gallo G, Vescio G, Sammarco G, Terrosu G, Calini G, Bondurri A, Maffioli A, Zaffaroni G, Resegotti A, Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Botti F, Prati M, Boni L, Perotti S, Mineccia M, Giuliani A, Romano L, Graziano GMP, Pugliese L, Pietrabissa A, Delaini G, Spinelli A, Selvaggi F. Anastomosis configuration and technique following ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multicentre study. Updates Surg 2021; 73:149-156. [PMID: 33409848 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00918-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. .,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, Universita' degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paiella S, De Pastena M, Pollini T, Zancan G, Ciprani D, De Marchi G, Landoni L, Esposito A, Casetti L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Tuveri M, Marrano E, Maggino L, Secchettin E, Bonamini D, Bassi C, Salvia R. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients ≥ 75 years of age: Are there any differences with other age ranges in oncological and surgical outcomes? Results from a tertiary referral center. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:3077-3083. [PMID: 28533664 PMCID: PMC5423044 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare surgical and oncological outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients ≥ 75 years of age with two younger cohorts of patients.
METHODS The prospectively maintained Institutional database of pancreatic resection was queried for patients aged ≥ 75 years (late elderly, LE) submitted to PD for any disease from January 2010 to June 2015. We compared clinical, demographic and pathological features and survival outcomes of LE patients with 2 exact matched cohorts of younger patients [≥ 40 to 64 years of age (adults, A) and ≥ 65 to 74 years of age (young elderly, YE)] submitted to PD, according to selected variables.
RESULTS The final LE population, as well as the control groups, were made of 96 subjects. Up to 71% of patients was operated on for a periampullary malignancy and pancreatic cancer (PDAC) accounted for 79% of them. Intraoperative data (estimated blood loss and duration of surgery) did not differ among the groups. The overall complication rate was 65.6%, 61.5% and 58.3% for LE, YE and A patients, respectively, P = NS). Reoperation and cardiovascular complications were significantly more frequent in LE than in YE and A groups (P = 0.003 and P = 0.019, respectively). When considering either all malignancies and PDAC only, the three groups did not differ in survival. Considering all benign diseases, the estimated mean survival was 58 and 78 mo for ≥ and < 75 years of age (YE + A groups), respectively (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION Age is not a contraindication for PD. A careful selection of LE patients allows to obtain good surgical and oncological results.
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Onofrio M, Ciaravino V, Cardobi N, De Robertis R, Tinazzi Martini P, Girelli R, Barbi E, Paiella S, Marrano E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Pederzoli P, Bassi C. The borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma staging with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6:S79-S82. [PMID: 29387697 PMCID: PMC5774080 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_67_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Ciaravino
- Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicolò Cardobi
- Department of Radiology, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Robertis
- Department of Radiology, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Tinazzi Martini
- Department of Radiology, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Girelli
- Department of Surgery, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Emilio Barbi
- Department of Radiology, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Marrano
- Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Department of Surgery, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Pederzoli
- Department of Surgery, Dott. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|