Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Lobular and Rare Subtypes of Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictive factors for the pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with non-ductal invasive breast cancer (ND-BC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Departments of Medical Oncology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Sirnak State Hospital, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Marmara University, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Hospital, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura Hospital, Sakarya University, Balıkesir Ataturk Hospital, Turkiye, from April 2016 to December 2022.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 222 non-metastatic breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective multicentric study. The clinicopathologic data were obtained from the hospitals' electronic-record-system. The logistic regression models were used to identify predictive factors for pCR.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six patients (56.8%) had invasive lobular carcinoma and 28 patients (12.6%) had signet ring cell/mucinous carcinoma. A total of 45 patients (20.3%) achieved pCR. The pCR rate was 14.3% for lobular carcinoma and 17.9% for signet ring cell/mucinous carcinoma. The univariate analysis showed that estrogen receptor-negative tumours (p = 0.017), high Ki-67 (p = 0.008), high histologic grade (p<0.001), HER2+ expression (p<0.001), and non-lobular histologic type (p = 0.012) were predictive factors for pCR. The multivariate model revealed that HER2 expression (p<0.001) and Ki-67 (p = 0.005) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated effectiveness in ND-BC patients, leading to favourable pCR rates and enabling breast-conserving surgery. Predictive markers for pCR varied depending on histologic types, with HER2 expression, ER status, Ki-67, and histologic grade showing significance in non-ductal subtypes, while HER2 status alone was predictive in lobular carcinoma.

KEY WORDS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Non-ductal breast cancer, Lobular carcinoma.

Is the serum level of survivin, an antiapoptotic protein, a potential predictive and prognostic biomarker in metastatic pancreatic cancer?

In the present study, we aimed to assess the association between the serum survivin level and overall survival and treatment response rates in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). Serum samples were prospectively collected from 41 patients with newly diagnosed MPC patients and 41 healthy individuals (control group) to assess the survivin levels. The median survivin level was 136.2 ng/mL in patients with MPC and 52 ng/mL in healthy individuals (P = .028). Patients were divided into low- and high-survivin groups according to the baseline median survivin level. Patients with a high serum survivin level compared with a low serum survivin level had shorter median progression-free survival (2.39 vs 7.06 months; P = .008, respectively) and overall survival (3.74 vs 9.52 months; P = .026, respectively). Patients with higher serum survivin levels had significantly worse response rates (P = .007). The baseline high level of serum survivin in patients with MPC may be associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis. A confirmation will be needed for these results in future large multicenter prospective studies.

Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: which one is the culprit of urinary incontinence in premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy?

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to compare tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors (AI) in terms of urinary incontinence (UI) in premenopausal female patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy for breast cancer. A secondary aim was to investigate the prevalence and the affecting factors of UI.

METHODS

This study was designed as a multicenter, cross-sectional that included consecutive premenopausal breast cancer patients ≤50 years of age receiving tamoxifen (with/without LHRHa) or AI (with LHRHa) for at least 6 months, between June 2021 and September 2022. Patients with urinary incontinence before hormone treatments and metastatic patients were excluded from the study. Turkish validation of The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ UI-SF) was used to determine the UI. Using logistic regression methods, we analyzed potential predictive factors for UI.

RESULTS

A total of 206 breast cancer patients were included in this study. A total of 120 (58.2%) patients were receiving tamoxifen plus LHRHa, 40 (19.4%) patients were receiving aromatase inhibitor plus LHRHa, and 46 (22.3%) patients were receiving tamoxifen only. In this study, the prevalence of urinary incontinence was found to be 35.9% (n:74). 41% of the patients receiving tamoxifen and 15.0% of those receiving aromatase inhibitors had complaints of urinary incontinence. There was a statistically significant difference between patients receiving tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor in terms of urinary incontinence (p=0.001). In the univariate analysis established to predict UI, parity (≥2 vs <2) (OR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.62-6.46, p= 0.001), tamoxifen (vs AI) (OR = 3.97, 95% CI: 1.58-9.98, p= 0.003), age ( ≥40 vs. <40) (OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.37-5.71, p= 0.005), vaginal deliveries (≥2 vs. <2) (OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.44-7.46, p= 0.005), hypertension (OR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.43-9.02, p= 0.007), diuretic use (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.09-5.95, p= 0.031) ), and body mass index (≥25 vs <25) (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.05-3.63), p= 0.034) was found to be predictive. Tamoxifen (OR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.77-12.56, p= 0.002), hypertension (OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.27-9.52, p= 0.015), and age (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.10-5.02, p= 0.027) remained independent predictors for incontinence in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

We found that tamoxifen had increased the risk of urinary incontinence compared to aromatase inhibitors in patients receiving hormone therapy for breast cancer. In addition, we showed that age and hypertension were also independent predictors for UI. In the context of quality of life, we recommend close follow-up of these patients, as drug adherence may be affected in the event of urinary incontinence.

A New Mortality Prediction Model in Advanced Stage Cancer Patients Requiring Hospitalisation while Receiving Active Systemic Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To predict short and long-term mortality in patients who were admitted to the emergency department and then hospitalised unplanned in medical oncology-ward.

STUDY DESIGN

 An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Medical Oncology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University Hospital, Tekirdag, Turkiye, from May 2021 to May 2022.

METHODOLOGY

Consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department with unplanned hospitalisation in the oncology ward, were included. Patients receiving treatment with the curative intent, patients hospitalised for febrile neutropenia, and terminally ill patients requiring intensive care unit follow-up at admission  were  excluded  from  the study.  Univariate  and  multivariate  logistic  regression  analyses were used to identify predictive factors for short and long-term mortality-dependent variables.

RESULTS

This study included 253 advanced cancer patients. The number of patients who died in the ward within 10 days (short-term mortality) was 28 (11.1%). Ninety patients (35.6%) died afterwards anytime in the ward during the study (long-term mortality). In the multivariate analysis established for short-term mortality, higher ALT (OR = 6.75, 95% CI: 2.09 - 21.85, p=0.001), rapid deterioration in performance status (OR = 5.49, 95% CI: 1.81-16.67, p=0.003), higher CRP (OR = 5.86, 95% CI: 1.20-28.53, p=0.029), higher procalcitonin (OR = 7.94, 95% CI: 0.99 - 63.82, p=0.051), and higher lactate (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 0.94-6.51, p=0.067) showed significant predictive features.

CONCLUSION

The decision of whether to continue treatment or not is challenging in cancer patients who require unplanned hospitalisation while receiving palliative systemic therapy. New mortality estimation models can be used in making the transition from life-long to palliative treatments.

KEY WORD

Mortality prediction, Hospitalisation, Estimation of survival, Chemotherapy.

Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients undergoing treatment for breast and lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) specific IgG positivity against two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine in breast and lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy, to determine the factors affecting seropositivity, and to observe long-term results up to a secondary booster vaccine.

RESULTS

The analysis included 201 cancer patients (99 breasts, 102 lungs; median age: 59 years (range: 28-92), 42.3 % men) and 97 controls (median age: 62 years (range: 24-87), 38.1 % men). The seropositivity rate for RBD IgG after 2 doses of vaccine in the cancer group was 81.6 % (n=164) and 93.8 % (n=91) in the control group (p=0.005). The median IgG titer of cancer patients was significantly lower than in the control group (338 (IQR, 95-933) AU/mL vs 676 (IQR, 389-1270) AU/mL; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of all the patients determined that having cancer (OR: 0.303, 95%CI: 0.123-0.750, p=0.010) and being over 60 years of age (OR: 0.447, 95%CI: 0.218-0.917, p=0.028) was associated with a reduced vaccine response. A subgroup analysis of cancer patients revealed that seroconversion was lower in men than in women (75.3 % vs 86.2 %, p=0.049) and lower in ≥60 patients than in <60 patients (75.9 % vs 89.4 %, p=0.014).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Cancer patients receiving an active systemic therapy with two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine had a lower antibody response than the non-cancer population, and deaths due to COVID-19 may occur in these patients despite the vaccine. Therefore, extensive protective measures should be taken to protect against COVID-19 in cancer patients aged 60 years and older, who have received two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine (Tab. 4, Fig. 4, Ref. 27).

Next generation sequencing analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies novel variations in breast cancer

Mutations in two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified to be the most important predisposing factors for the development of breast cancer. Thus, BRCA1/2 testing is a well-established method of choice for the assessment of developing breast cancer. Accordingly, here we aimed to report novel BRCA1/2 variations and distribution of previously known mutations and their association with the clinical course of breast cancer disease. A total of 287 breast cancer patients were enrolled from January 2017 through December 2019. Of these patients, 50 of them were identified to be positive for BRCA1/2. Next Generation Sequencing analysis was performed for the screening of exonic and intronic variations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Notably, novel variations of 4448 G > A (Ser1843Asn) in BRCA1, and 982dupA (Thr328AspfsTer) and 7588C > T (Gln2530Ter) in BRCA2 gene were identified. The most common variations in BRCA1 gene were 5152 + 66G > A, 442-34C > T and 5266dupC. In BRCA2 gene, the most common variations were 9097dupA, 67 + 1G > A and 1114A > C. Novel variations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were identified in breast cancer and might be useful predisposing factors in breast cancer diagnosis.

Protective effects of onion (Allium cepa) extract against doxorubicin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats

Background/aim:

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used and potent chemotherapeutic agent. However, serious dose-limiting toxicity through generation of free oxygen radicals is a commonly encountered clinical problem. The aim of the current study was to assess the protective role of onion ( Allium cepa) extract (ACE) against DOX-induced hepatotoxicity in rats.

Method:

A total of 24 rats were randomly divided into 3 equal experimental groups: (1) DOX; (2) ACE + DOX; and (3) control groups. ACE was given orally as 1 mL of fresh ACE juice for 14 consecutive days followed by DOX injection. DOX was injected intraperitoneally in a single dose of 30 mg/kg body weight to induce hepatotoxicity, and the rats were killed after 48 h from injection. Control group was given saline only.

Results:

In the ACE pretreated group (ACE + DOX), serum aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and tissue malondialdehyde and glutathione levels were significantly lower, while superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase were higher compared with the DOX group. The histopathological examination of liver specimens revealed parenchymal necrosis, proliferation of biliary duct in DOX group; while ACE pretreatment provided marked reduction in these changes.

Conclusion:

Our study indicates that pretreatment with ACE protects against DOX-induced hepatotoxicity due to the antioxidant properties of ACE. Further studies on efficacy of antioxidant treatment by ACE in DOX-mediated toxicity and underlying mechanisms would provide a better explanation.