Ankle fracture following hip arthroscopy

This article describes a case of an ankle fracture following hip arthroscopy. A 58-year-old woman underwent hip arthroscopy for a labral tear. She was placed in a lateral decubitus position with her foot in a padded boot. Traction was maintained for approximately 30 minutes. She was instructed to bear weight as tolerated with crutches postoperatively. At 2-week follow-up, she reported ipsilateral ankle pain. Radiographs revealed a minimally displaced medial malleolus fracture. She was treated with a cast followed by a cam walker boot and successfully went on to complete union and resolution of her symptoms. The following risk factors exist for ankle fracture after hip arthroscopy: history of ankle sprains, ligamentous laxity (more common in women), and small feet with large calves (more likely to become plantarflexed during traction). Distraction performed with the ankle rotated is also likely to place added stress on the medial or lateral ligamentous structures. It is important to counsel patients preoperatively about the risk of ankle pain after hip arthroscopy, to be aware of the possibility of ankle pathology postoperatively, and to have a low threshold for ordering radiographs. Radiographs are warranted if patients continue to have ankle pain after 72 hours postoperatively.

Incomplete seating of a metal-backed alumina liner in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Metal-backed modular ceramic bearing systems using a recessed alumina liner in a titanium sleeve were developed to decrease ceramic chipping or fracture due to femoral neck impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, malseating of the metal-backed ceramic liner has recently been described. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence, etiology, and clinical relevance of this event. Between 2005 and 2008, 51 consecutive patients (61 hips) underwent THA with a metal-backed alumina liner housed in a titanium shell. The metal-backed ceramic liner was aligned, seated, and impacted into the shell, and satisfaction in terms of liner stability and seating was confirmed intraoperatively. Postoperative assessment of seating was assessed with standard radiographs. Liner seating was classified as well seated, suspicious, or malseated. Seven liners (11.5%) were found to be malseated and 4 (6.5%) were considered suspicious. Radiographically, there was a gap between the liner and the shell located inferomedially in 4 patients and superolaterally in 3 patients. Two liners subsequently seated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. No dislodgement, failures, or adverse events were identified. There were no revision surgeries. The significant percentage of malseated liners were potentially attributed to poor exposure, bony/soft tissue interposition, and surgeon learning curve.