1
|
García-Ovejero E, Pisano-González M, Salcedo-Diego I, Serrano-Gallardo P. Impact of Chronic Disease Self-Management Program on the Self-Perceived Health of People in Areas of Social Vulnerability in Asturias, Spain. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:811. [PMID: 38667573 PMCID: PMC11049834 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12080811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) focuses on a health promotion perspective with a salutogenic approach, reinforcing the pillars of self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the CDSMP on Self-perceived Health (SPH) in disadvantaged areas of Asturias, España. The study included vulnerable adults with experience of chronic diseases for over six months, along with their caregivers. The intervention consisted of a six-session workshop led by two trained peers. SPH was evaluated by administering the initial item of the SF-12 questionnaire at both baseline and six months post-intervention. To evaluate the variable "Change in SPH" [improvement; remained well; worsening/no improvement (reference category)], global and disaggregated by sex multivariate multinomial logistic regression models were applied. There were 332 participants (mean = 60.5 years; 33.6% were at risk of social vulnerability; 66.8% had low incomes). Among the participants, 22.9% reported an improvement in their SPH, without statistically significant sex-based differences, while 38.9% remained in good health. The global model showed age was linked to decreased "improvement" probability (RRRa = 0.96), and the "remaining well" likelihood drops with social risk (RRRa = 0.42). In men, the probability of "remaining well" decreased by having secondary/higher education (RRRa = 0.25) and increased by cohabitation (RRRa = 5.11). Women at social risk were less likely to report "remaining well" (RRRa = 0.36). In conclusion, six months after the intervention, 22.9% of the participants had improved SPH. Age consistently decreased the improvement in the different models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester García-Ovejero
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- National Centre for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Pisano-González
- General Directorate of Social and Health Care and Coordination, Ministry of Health of the Principality of Asturias, 33005 Asturias, Spain
- Research Group “Person-Centered Care” of the Research Institute of Asturias (ISPA), 33005 Asturias, Spain
| | - Isabel Salcedo-Diego
- Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
- Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute (IDIPHISA), 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Pilar Serrano-Gallardo
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute (IDIPHISA), 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
- Interuniversity Institute “Advanced Research on Evaluation of Science and the University” (INAECU), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colling R, Indave I, Del Aguila J, Jimenez RC, Campbell F, Chechlińska M, Kowalewska M, Holdenrieder S, Trulson I, Worf K, Pollán M, Plans-Beriso E, Pérez-Gómez B, Craciun O, García-Ovejero E, Michałek IM, Maslova K, Rymkiewicz G, Didkowska J, Tan PH, Md Nasir ND, Myles N, Goldman-Lévy G, Lokuhetty D, Cree IA. A New Hierarchy of Research Evidence for Tumor Pathology: A Delphi Study to Define Levels of Evidence in Tumor Pathology. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100357. [PMID: 37866639 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
The hierarchy of evidence is a fundamental concept in evidence-based medicine, but existing models can be challenging to apply in laboratory-based health care disciplines, such as pathology, where the types of evidence and contexts are significantly different from interventional medicine. This project aimed to define a comprehensive and complementary framework of new levels of evidence for evaluating research in tumor pathology-introducing a novel Hierarchy of Research Evidence for Tumor Pathology collaboratively designed by pathologists with help from epidemiologists, public health professionals, oncologists, and scientists, specifically tailored for use by pathologists-and to aid in the production of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors (WCT) evidence gap maps. To achieve this, we adopted a modified Delphi approach, encompassing iterative online surveys, expert oversight, and external peer review, to establish the criteria for evidence in tumor pathology, determine the optimal structure for the new hierarchy, and ascertain the levels of confidence for each type of evidence. Over a span of 4 months and 3 survey rounds, we collected 1104 survey responses, culminating in a 3-day hybrid meeting in 2023, where a new hierarchy was unanimously agreed upon. The hierarchy is organized into 5 research theme groupings closely aligned with the subheadings of the WCT, and it consists of 5 levels of evidence-level P1 representing evidence types that merit the greatest level of confidence and level P5 reflecting the greatest risk of bias. For the first time, an international collaboration of pathology experts, supported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, has successfully united to establish a standardized approach for evaluating evidence in tumor pathology. We intend to implement this novel Hierarchy of Research Evidence for Tumor Pathology to map the available evidence, thereby enriching and informing the WCT effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Colling
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - Iciar Indave
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Javier Del Aguila
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ramon Cierco Jimenez
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Magdalena Chechlińska
- Department of Cancer Biology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Kowalewska
- Department of Molecular and Translational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Stefan Holdenrieder
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich (DHM), Munich, Germany
| | - Inga Trulson
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich (DHM), Munich, Germany
| | - Karolina Worf
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich (DHM), Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Pollán
- National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISC III), Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Plans-Beriso
- National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISC III), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
- National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISC III), Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Oana Craciun
- National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISC III), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ester García-Ovejero
- National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISC III), Madrid, Spain
| | - Irmina Maria Michałek
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kateryna Maslova
- Department of Cancer Biology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Rymkiewicz
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Didkowska
- Polish National Cancer Registry, Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCI), Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Nickolas Myles
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Gabrielle Goldman-Lévy
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Dilani Lokuhetty
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beunza JJ, Puertas E, García-Ovejero E, Villalba G, Condes E, Koleva G, Hurtado C, Landecho MF. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for clinical event prediction (risk of coronary heart disease). J Biomed Inform 2019; 97:103257. [PMID: 31374261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to compare the utility of several supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting clinical events in terms of their internal validity and accuracy. The results, which were obtained using two statistical software platforms, were also compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS The data used in this research come from the open database of the Framingham Heart Study, which originated in 1948 in Framingham, Massachusetts as a prospective study of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Through data mining processes, three data models were elaborated and a comparative methodological study between the different ML algorithms - decision tree, random forest, support vector machines, neural networks, and logistic regression - was carried out. The global selection criterium for choosing the right set of hyperparameters and the type of data manipulation was the area under a curve (AUC). The software tools used to analyze the data were R-Studio® and RapidMiner®. RESULTS The Framingham study open database contains 4240 observations. The algorithm that yielded the greatest AUC when analyzing the data in R-Studio was neural network applied to a model that excluded all observations in which there was at least one missing value (AUC = 0.71); when analyzing the data in RapidMiner and applying the same model, the best algorithm was support vector machines (AUC = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS ML algorithms can reinforce the diagnostic and prognostic capacity of traditional regression techniques. Differences between the applicability of those algorithms and the results obtained with them were a function of the software platforms used in the data analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan-Jose Beunza
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Enrique Puertas
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Computer Science and Technology, School of Architecture, Engineering and Design, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ester García-Ovejero
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Nursing and Psychology, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gema Villalba
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Indra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilia Condes
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gergana Koleva
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristian Hurtado
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel F Landecho
- Machine Learning Health Working Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Departament of Internal Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|