Building a Bridge between Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Investigating the Effect of Chemotherapy on Immune Checkpoint Expression

In light of the promising results of immune checkpoint blockade (ICPB) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), we investigated the effect of different chemotherapeutic agents on the expression of immune checkpoints (ICPs) in order to rationally design a good treatment schedule for their combination with ICP blocking antibodies. Cisplatin, oxaliplatin and pemetrexed are interesting chemotherapeutic agents to combine with immunotherapy given their immunomodulatory capacities. We looked into cisplatin and pemetrexed because their combination is used as first-line treatment of MPM. Additionally, the effect of the immunogenic chemotherapeutic agent, oxaliplatin, was also studied. Three different MPM cell lines were used for representation of both epithelioid and sarcomatoid subtypes. The desired inhibitory concentrations of the chemotherapeutic agents were determined with the SRB-assay. Allogeneic co-cultures of MPM cells with healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were set up to assess the effect of these chemotherapeutic agents on the expression of ICPs (PD-1, LAG-3, TIM-3) and their ligands (PD-L1, PD-L2, galectin-9). Cisplatin might be a promising treatment to combine with ICP blocking antibodies since our MPM cell lines were most susceptible to this stand-alone treatment. We found that the expression of ICPs and their ligands on both MPM cells and PBMC was mostly downregulated or unaltered when treated with chemotherapeutic agents, though no clear trend could be determined.

Poly(I:C) primes primary human glioblastoma cells for an immune response invigorated by PD-L1 blockade

Prognosis of glioblastoma remains dismal, underscoring the need for novel therapies. Immunotherapy is generating promising results, but requires combination strategies to unlock its full potential. We investigated the immunomodulatory capacities of poly(I:C) on primary human glioblastoma cells and its combinatorial potential with programmed death ligand (PD-L) blockade. In our experiments, poly(I:C) stimulated expression of both PD-L1 and PD-L2 on glioblastoma cells, and a pro-inflammatory secretome, including type I interferons (IFN) and chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL4 and CCL5. IFN-β was partially responsible for the elevated PD-1 ligand expression on these cells. Moreover, real-time PCR and chloroquine-mediated blocking experiments indicated that poly(I:C) triggered Toll-like receptor 3 to elicit its effect. Cocultures of poly(I:C)-treated glioblastoma cells with peripheral blood mononuclear cells enhanced lymphocytic activation (CD69, IFN-γ) and cytotoxic capacity (CD107a, granzyme B). Additional PD-L1 blockade further propagated immune activation. Besides activating immunity, poly(I:C)-treated glioblastoma cells also doubled the attraction of CD8⁺ T cells, and to a lesser extent CD4⁺ T cells, via a mechanism which included CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands. Our results indicate that by triggering glioblastoma cells, poly(I:C) primes the tumor microenvironment for an immune response. Secreted cytokines allow for immune activation while chemokines attract CD8⁺ T cells to the front, which are postulated as a prerequisite for effective PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Accordingly, additional blockade of the concurrently elevated tumoral PD-L1 further reinforces the immune activation. In conclusion, our data proposes poly(I:C) treatment combined with PD-L1 blockade to invigorate the immune checkpoint inhibition response in glioblastoma.

Medical costs of treatment and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Belgium

The advent of new cell-based immunotherapies for leukemia offers treatment possibilities for certain leukemia subgroups. The wider acceptability of these new technologies in clinical practice will depend on its impact on survival and costs. Due to the small patient groups who have received it, these aspects have remained understudied. This non-randomized single-center study evaluated medical costs and survival for acute myeloid leukemia between 2005 and 2010 in 50 patients: patients treated with induction and consolidation chemotherapy (ICT) alone; patients treated with ICT plus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), which is the current preferred post-remission therapy in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk AML with few co-morbidities, and patients treated with ICT plus immunotherapy using autologous dendritic cells (DC) engineered to express the Wilms' tumor protein (WT1). Total costs including post- consolidation costs on medical care at the hematology ward and outpatient clinic, pharmaceutical prescriptions, intensive care ward, laboratory tests and medical imaging were analyzed. Survival was markedly better in HCT and DC. HCT and DC were more costly than ICT. The median total costs for HCT and DC were similar. These results need to be confirmed to enable more thorough cost-effectiveness analyses, based on observations from multicenter, randomized clinical trials and preferably using quality-adjusted life-years as an outcome measure.