Enoxaparin for symptomatic COVID-19 managed in the ambulatory setting: An individual patient level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC trials

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic treatment may improve the disease course in non-critically ill, symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.

METHODS

We performed an individual patient-level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC randomized controlled trials, which compared enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for either 14 (OVID) or 21 days (ETHIC) vs. no thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one additional risk factor. The primary efficacy outcome included all-cause hospitalization and all-cause death within 30 days from randomization. Both studies were prematurely stopped for futility. Secondary efficacy outcomes were major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, arterial cardiovascular events, or their composite occurring within 30 days from randomization. The same outcomes were assessed over a 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding (ISTH criteria).

RESULTS

A total of 691 patients were randomized: 339 to receive enoxaparin and 352 to the control group. Over 30-day follow-up, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.0 % of patients in the enoxaparin group vs. 5.8 % of controls for a risk ratio (RR) of 1.05 (95%CI 0.57-1.92). The incidence of major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events and arterial cardiovascular events was 0.9 % vs. 1.8 %, respectively (RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.13-2.06). Most cardiovascular thromboembolic events were represented by symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, occurring in 0.6 % vs. 1.5 % of patients, respectively. A similar distribution of outcomes between the treatment groups was observed over 90 days. No major bleeding occurred in the enoxaparin group vs. one (0.3 %) in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for the clinical benefit of early administration of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. These results should be interpreted taking into consideration the relatively low occurrence of events.

Percutaneous large-bore aspiration embolectomy with veno-arterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation support or standby in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism and contraindications to thrombolysis: a preliminary single center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Large-bore catheter aspiration embolectomy reduces thrombus burden and right ventricle strain, and improves hemodynamics after pulmonary embolism (PE). Sparse data is available for patients with high-risk PE and contraindications to thrombolysis or thrombolysis failure, particulary if veno-arterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is required.

METHODS

All patients with acute high-risk PE and contraindications to thrombolysis undergoing FlowTriever® percutaneuous embolectomy and VA-ECMO circulatory support (or standby) at the University Hospital Zurich between April 2021 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the combination of recurrent PE, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death at 30 days.

RESULTS

The analysis included 15 patients: mean age was 63.1 years and 14 (93%) were men. Overall, 4 (27%) patients presented with cardiac arrest, 8 (53%) with ongoing obstructive shock, and 3 (20%) with persistent arterial hypotension. VA-ECMO was implanted prior to aspiration embolectomy in 8 (53%) patients. Three of 7 patients without initial VA-ECMO support experienced periprocedural cardiac arrest, of whom 2 received ECMO support before completion of embolectomy. VA-ECMO weaning was successful in all patients after a mean of 5.4 days. There was one periprocedural death in a patient who did not receive VA-ECMO support following a periprocedural cardiac arrest. The primary outcome at 30 days occurred in 5 (33.3%; 95%CI 13.0-61.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of percutaneous large-bore aspiration embolectomy in combination with VA-ECMO support (or standby) in patients with high-risk PE and contraindications to thrombolysis.

Transient perivascular inflammation of the carotid artery (TIPIC) syndrome

Background: The Transient Perivascular Inflammation of the Carotid artery (TIPIC) syndrome is presumably a very rare disease characterized by a local transient inflammation of the tissue around the carotid artery. Its pathophysiology remains unknown. We performed an updated study of TIPIC syndrome cases in the setting of a multinational collaborative study. Methods: This study was conducted as an observational multinational retrospective individual patient level cohort study. Information from all known cases diagnosed with TIPIC syndrome in the literature (2005-2020) was collected after a semi-structured literature search of PubMed and Web of Science. We also collected unpublished information of patients from French, Swiss, and Italian vascular medicine or radiology departments. Results: A total of 72 patients were included and served for data analysis: 42 (58.3%) were women; the mean age was 47.9 (SD=11.4) years. Symptoms were unilateral in 92% of patients and 81.4% required pain killers. At baseline, irrespective of the imaging method used, the median thickness of the carotid lesions was 5 (Q1-Q3: 4-7; range: 2-11) mm and the median length of the lesion was 20 (Q1-Q3: 10-30; range: 3-50) mm. We found a positive linear correlation between thickness and length. At follow-up, the thickness of the carotid lesions decreased to a median of 2 (Q1-Q3: 1-3; range: 0-6) mm; the length decreased to a median 10 (Q1-Q3: 5-15; range: 0-41) mm. A linear correlation between baseline and follow-up values was observed for both thickness and length measurements. Symptoms disappeared after a median of 14 (Q1-Q3: 10-15) days. Thirteen patients experienced a recurrence after a median follow-up of 6 (Q1-Q3: 2-12) months. Conclusions: The present analysis elucidates clinical and sonographic characteristics of TIPIC syndrome, indicating the benign nature of this condition. A future international registry will study the long-term course of the disease.

An update on the global use of risk assessment models and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with medical illnesses from the World Thrombosis Day steering committee: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The majority of VTE events are hospital-associated. In 2008, the Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) multinational cross-sectional study reported that only approximately 40% of medical patients at risk of VTE received adequate thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at providing updated figures concerning the use of thromboprophylaxis globally. We focused on: (a) the frequency of patients with an indication to thromboprophylaxis according with individual models; (b) the use of adequate thromboprophylaxis; and (c) reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis. Observational nonrandomized studies or surveys focusing on medically ill patients were considered eligible.

RESULTS

After screening, we included 27 studies from 20 countries for a total of 137 288 patients. Overall, 50.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.9-59.1, I2 99%) of patients had an indication to thromboprophylaxis: of these, 54.5% (95% CI: 46.2-62.6, I2 99%) received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The use of adequate thromboprophylaxis was 66.8% in Europe (95% CI: 50.7-81.1, I2 98%), 44.9% in Africa (95% CI: 31.8-58.4, I2 96%), 37.6% in Asia (95% CI: 25.7-50.3, I2 97%), 58.3% in South America (95% CI: 31.1-83.1, I2 99%), and 68.6% in North America (95% CI: 64.9-72.6, I2 96%). No major differences in adequate thromboprophylaxis use were found across risk assessment models. Bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and renal/hepatic failure were the most frequently reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anticoagulants for VTE prevention has been proven effective and safe, but thromboprophylaxis prescriptions are still unsatisfactory among hospitalized medically ill patients around the globe with marked geographical differences.

Thrombosis and Dissection of the Abdominal Arteries Associated with Infarcts of Solid Organs in a Patient with COVID-19: A Novel Clinical Entity

The clinical spectrum of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic cases to severe pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome. COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, notably pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Arterial cardiovascular complications and myocarditis have also been described in association with COVID-19, but appear to be less prevalent. In this report of a 57-year-old man with multiple splanchnic infarctions, arterial dissections and COVID-19 as the sole potential trigger, we describe a novel type of complications and put it in the context of a growing literature on this topic.

Oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve and intracranial haemorrhage

Optimal timing for restarting anticoagulant therapy after intracranial bleeding is a critical issue. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize published studies on the management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial bleeding secondary to the use of vitamin K antagonists in patients with a mechanical heart valve. A computer-assisted search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases till January 2008 was performed. Two investigators independently performed study selection and completed a predefined quality assessment and data extraction form. Main inclusion criterion was the enrolment of patients with a mechanical heart valve and intracranial haemorrhage during oral anticoagulant treatment. Any randomised controlled trial, observational cohort study, case series and reports was included. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Six observational cohort studies were included in the final analysis. All studies were of low quality. A total of 120 patients were enrolled. Anticoagulation was restarted within a broad time range (2 days to 3 months). Four ischaemic strokes and two recurrent cerebral haemorrhages occurred after anticoagulation was restarted after a mean follow-up of 7.9 months. Eighteen patients were described in the selected case reports. Anticoagulant therapy was restarted within four days to eight weeks. Two patients had a recurrent haemorrhagic event, and no ischaemic events were reported. In conclusion, restarting oral anticoagulant therapy few days and, indirectly, stopping anticoagulant therapy for a few days (even for 7–14 days) after the occurrence of cerebral haemorrhage are both safe. However, well-designed studies are strongly recommended to provide better evidence.

Oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve and intracranial haemorrhage. A systematic review

Optimal timing for restarting anticoagulant therapy after intracranial bleeding is a critical issue. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize published studies on the management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial bleeding secondary to the use of vitamin K antagonists in patients with a mechanical heart valve. A computer-assisted search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases till January 2008 was performed. Two investigators independently performed study selection and completed a predefined quality assessment and data extraction form. Main inclusion criterion was the enrolment of patients with a mechanical heart valve and intracranial haemorrhage during oral anticoagulant treatment. Any randomised controlled trial, observational cohort study, case series and reports was included. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Six observational cohort studies were included in the final analysis. All studies were of low quality. A total of 120 patients were enrolled. Anticoagulation was restarted within a broad time range (2 days to 3 months). Four ischaemic strokes and two recurrent cerebral haemorrhages occurred after anticoagulation was restarted after a mean follow-up of 7.9 months. Eighteen patients were described in the selected case reports. Anticoagulant therapy was restarted within four days to eight weeks. Two patients had a recurrent haemorrhagic event, and no ischaemic events were reported. In conclusion, restarting oral anticoagulant therapy few days and, indirectly, stopping anticoagulant therapy for a few days (even for 7-14 days) after the occurrence of cerebral haemorrhage are both safe. However, well-designed studies are strongly recommended to provide better evidence.

Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with HIV infection

Thromboembolic complications in HIV-infected patients have been reported. To our knowledge, no case-control studies have compared the prevalence of thromboembolic events between HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals. One hundred and sixty-nine HIV-infected patients and 180 randomly selected blood donors were enrolled. Selected patients completed a specific questionnaire and were subsequently interviewed. Information was collected on family and personal history of cardiovascular disorders and the presence of personal risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis. All reported events were adjudicated only if adequate documentation of objective tests was available. Mean age and sex were similar in the two groups. A vascular event was documented in six HIV-infected patients (3.55%) and in none of the controls (P=0.0108). Family history of cardiovascular disorders, cigarette smoking and hypertriglyceridemia were more prevalent in HIV patients than in controls. In multivariate analysis, neither family traditional cardiovascular risk factors nor HIV infection were independently associated with the presence of thromboembolic events. The results confirm the hypothesis that HIV-positive patients have an increased risk of thromboembolic disorders. Whether this increased risk has been provoked by HIV infection itself or by other associated risk factors for cardiovascular events, such as cigarette smoking and hypertriglyceridemia, remain to be clarified.