1
|
D'Angelo SP, Lebbé C, Mortier L, Brohl AS, Fazio N, Grob JJ, Prinzi N, Hanna GJ, Hassel JC, Kiecker F, von Heydebreck A, Güzel G, Nghiem P. First-line avelumab treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: 4-year follow-up from part B of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 study. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103461. [PMID: 38744102 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 study led to the approval of avelumab [an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody] for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) in multiple countries and its inclusion in the treatment guidelines as a preferred or recommended therapy in this setting. Here, we report 4-year follow-up results from the cohort of patients with mMCC who received avelumab as first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS In part B of JAVELIN Merkel 200, a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, patients with mMCC who had not received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease received avelumab 10 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. In this analysis, long-term overall survival (OS), patient disposition, and subsequent treatment were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 116 patients received first-line avelumab. At the data cutoff (2 February 2022), the median follow-up was 54.3 months (range 48.0-69.7 months). Seven patients (6.0%) remained on treatment and an additional 21 patients remained in follow-up (18.1%); 72 patients (62.1%) had died. The median OS was 20.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.4-42.0 months], with a 4-year OS rate of 38% (95% CI 29% to 47%). In patients with PD-L1+ or PD-L1- tumors, the 4-year OS rate was 48% (95% CI 26% to 67%) and 35% (95% CI 25% to 45%), respectively. In total, 48 patients (41.4%) received poststudy anticancer drug therapy, most commonly etoposide (20.7%), carboplatin (19.0%), and avelumab (12.1%). CONCLUSIONS Avelumab first-line monotherapy in patients with mMCC resulted in meaningful long-term OS, which compared favorably with historical studies of first-line chemotherapy. These results further support the role of avelumab as a standard of care for patients with mMCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P D'Angelo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
| | - C Lebbé
- Université Paris Cité, AP-HP Dermato-Oncology and Clinical Investigation Center, Cancer Institute AP-HP. Nord Paris Cité, INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Mortier
- Dermatology Clinic, CARADERM and University of Lille, INSERM U1189, Lille Hospital-Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille Cedex, France
| | - A S Brohl
- Sarcoma Department and Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - N Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - J-J Grob
- AP-HM Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - N Prinzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - G J Hanna
- Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - J C Hassel
- Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - F Kiecker
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin
| | | | - G Güzel
- Global Clinical Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - P Nghiem
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center at South Lake Union, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Livingstone E, Gogas H, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Meier F, Eigentler TK, Ziemer M, Terheyden PAM, Gesierich AH, Herbst RA, Kähler KC, Ziogas DC, Mijuskovic Z, Garzarolli M, Garbe C, Roesch A, Ugurel S, Gutzmer R, Grob JJ, Kiecker F, Utikal J, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Eckhardt S, Zimmer L, Schadendorf D. Early switch from run-in treatment with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib to atezolizumab after 3 months leads to rapid loss of tumour control in patients with advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: The ImmunoCobiVem phase 2 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112941. [PMID: 37482012 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
AIM ImmunoCobiVem investigated whether a planned switch to atezolizumab after achieving tumour control during run-in with vemurafenib + cobimetinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to continuous targeted therapy (TT) in patients with previously untreated advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. METHODS In this multicenter phase 2 study, patients received vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. After 3months, patients without progressive disease (PD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue vemurafenib + cobimetinib (Arm A) or switch to atezolizumab (Arm B) until first documented PD (PD1). Primary outcome was PFS1 (time from start of run-in until PD1 or death). OS and safety were also assessed. RESULTS Of 185 patients enroled between November 2016 and December 2019, 135 were randomly assigned after the run-in period (Arm A, n = 69; Arm B, n = 66). Median PFS1 was significantly longer in Arm A versus Arm B (13.9 versus 5.9months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.84; PStratified=0.001). Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 1.22; 95%CI, 0.69-2.16; PStratified=0.389); 2-year OS was higher in Arm B versus Arm A (67%; 95%CI, 53-78 versus 58%; 95%CI, 45-70). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 55% of patients in Arm A and 64% in Arm B; treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of any drug in 7% and 9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma who achieve tumour control with TT, early switch at 3months to atezolizumab led to rapid loss of tumour control but provided a numerical OS benefit at 2years compared with continued TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - H Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - L Kandolf-Sekulovic
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - F Meier
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany
| | - T K Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - A H Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - K C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - D C Ziogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Z Mijuskovic
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Garzarolli
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - C Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A Roesch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - R Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - J J Grob
- Aix-Marseille University, Timone Hospital (APHM), Marseille, France
| | - F Kiecker
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - L Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berking C, Livingstone E, Weichenthal M, Leiter-Stoppke U, Remy J, Eigentler T, Mohr P, Kiecker F, Loquai C, Debus D, Gutzmer R. 828P Effectiveness and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma in the real-world setting: Final results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
4
|
Becker J, Ugurel S, Leiter-Stoppke U, Meier F, Gutzmer R, Haferkamp S, Zimmer L, Livingstone E, Eigentler T, Hauschild A, Kiecker F, Hassel J, Mohr P, Fluck M, Thomas I, Garzarolli M, Grimmelmann I, Drexler K, Eckhardt S, Schadendorf D. 787O Adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab (NIVO) versus observation in completely resected Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC): Disease-free survival (DFS) results from ADMEC-O, a randomized, open-label phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
5
|
Stege HM, Haist M, Schultheis S, Fleischer MI, Mohr P, Ugurel S, Terheyden P, Thiem A, Kiecker F, Leiter U, Becker JC, Meissner M, Kleeman J, Pföhler C, Hassel J, Grabbe S, Loquai C. Response durability after cessation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter DeCOG study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:3313-3322. [PMID: 33870464 PMCID: PMC8505278 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02925-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have led to a prolongation of progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, immune-mediated adverse events due to ICI therapy are common and often lead to treatment discontinuation. The response duration after cessation of ICI treatment is unknown. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the time to relapse after discontinuation of ICI in MCC patients. METHODS We analyzed 20 patients with metastatic MCC who have been retrospectively enrolled at eleven skin cancer centers in Germany. These patients have received ICI therapy and showed as best overall response (BOR) at least a stable disease (SD) upon ICI therapy. All patients have discontinued ICI therapy for other reasons than disease progression. Data on treatment duration, tumor response, treatment cessation, response durability, and tumor relapse were recorded. RESULTS Overall, 12 of 20 patients (60%) with MCC relapsed after discontinuation of ICI. The median response durability was 10.0 months. Complete response (CR) as BOR to ICI-treatment was observed in six patients, partial response (PR) in eleven, and SD in three patients. Disease progression was less frequent in patients with CR (2/6 patients relapsed) as compared to patients with PR (7/11) and SD (3/3), albeit the effect of initial BOR on the response durability was below statistical significance. The median duration of ICI therapy was 10.0 months. Our results did not show a correlation between treatment duration and the risk of relapse after treatment withdrawal. Major reasons for discontinuation of ICI therapy were CR (20%), adverse events (35%), fatigue (20%), or patient decision (25%). Discontinuation of ICI due to adverse events resulted in progressive disease (PD) in 71% of patients regardless of the initial response. A re-induction of ICI was initiated in 8 patients upon tumor progression. We observed a renewed tumor response in 4 of these 8 patients. Notably, all 4 patients showed an initial BOR of at least PR. CONCLUSION Our results from this contemporary cohort of patients with metastatic MCC indicate that MCC patients are at higher risk of relapse after discontinuation of ICI as compared to melanoma patients. Notably, the risk of disease progression after discontinuation of ICI treatment is lower in patients with initial CR (33%) as compared to patients with initial PR (66%) or SD (100%). Upon tumor progression, re-induction of ICI is a feasible option. Our data suggest that the BOR to initial ICI therapy might be a potential predictive clinical marker for a successful re-induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Stege
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
| | - M Haist
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Schultheis
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - M I Fleischer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - P Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbe-Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - S Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Terheyden
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - A Thiem
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - F Kiecker
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology at the Charité, University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Leiter
- Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J C Becker
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Oncology (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J Kleeman
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Homburg, Homburg, Germany
| | - J Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bharmal M, Nolte S, Lebbé C, Mortier L, Brohl A, Fazio N, Grob JJ, Prinzi N, Hanna G, Hassel J, Kiecker F, Ellers-Lenz B, Bajars M, Guezel G, Nghiem P, Hunger M, Schlichting M, Henry-Szatkowski M, D'Angelo S. 1092P Non-progression with avelumab treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) is associated with a clinically meaningful better health-related quality of life compared with progressive disease. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
7
|
Knispel S, Gassenmaier M, Menzies A, Loquai C, Johnson D, Franklin C, Gutzmer R, Hassel J, Weishaupt C, Eigentler T, Schummer P, Kiecker F, Owen C, Schmidgen M, Kähler K, Cann C, Niebel D, Mohr P, Schadendorf D, Zimmer L. Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz255.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
8
|
Krauss J, Eigentler T, Schreiber J, Weishaupt C, Terheyden P, Heinzerling L, Mohr P, Weide B, Ochsenreither S, Gutzmer R, Becker J, Kiecker F, Funkner F, Heidenreich R, Kays SK, Klinkhardt U, Gnad-Vogt U, Scheel B, Schönborn-Kellenberger O, Seibel T. A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of intratumorally administered CV8102, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz244.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
9
|
Berking C, Livingstone E, Weichenthal M, Leiter U, Wittmann K, Eigentler T, Mohr P, Kiecker F, Loquai C, Debus D, Gutzmer R. Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma in the real-world setting: Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz255.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
10
|
Schadendorf D, Hassel J, Fluck M, Eigentler T, Loquai C, Berneburg M, Gutzmer R, Meier F, Mohr P, Hauschild A, Becker J, Menzer C, Kiecker F, Dippel E, Simon JC, Conrad B, Garbe C, Körner S, Livingstone E, Zimmer L. Adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab (NIVO) alone or in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) versus placebo in stage IV melanoma patients with no evidence of disease (NED): A randomized, double-blind phase II trial (IMMUNED). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related cognitive impairment is an important complication in cancer patients, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Over the last decade, the field of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes has been dramatically changed by the discovery of new neuronal autoantibodies, some of them associated with cognitive impairment. We aimed to assess the prevalence of neuronal autoantibodies in melanoma patients and their association with neurological and cognitive dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 157 consecutive melanoma patients with a median age of 63 years were recruited at the Department of Dermatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and tested for neuronal autoantibodies. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment was carried out in a selected subgroup of 84 patients after exclusion of patients with confounding factors for a cognitive dysfunction, including brain metastases, relevant medication, and neurological disorders. RESULTS Neuronal autoantibodies were found in 22.3% of melanoma patients. The most frequent antibodies were IgA/IgM anti-NMDAR antibodies. Applying the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force criteria, 36.9% had cognitive impairment, however, with a threefold higher odds in antibody-positive compared with antibody-negative patients (57.1% versus 30.2%, OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.1 to 8.6; P = 0.037). In patients with anti-NMDAR antibodies, this impairment increased with higher antibody titers (P = 0.007). Antibody-positive patients had a significantly impaired overall cognitive performance (z-value: -0.38 ± 0.69 versus 0.00 ± 0.56; P = 0.014) as well as significant impairments in tests of memory, attention, and executive function. In a multiple linear regression analysis, autoantibodies were an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment (B = -0.282; 95% CI: -0.492 to -0.071; P = 0.009). Autoantibody seropositivity was associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment and a history of autoimmune diseases. CONCLUSIONS A large number of melanoma patients harbor neuronal autoantibodies that are associated with significant cognitive impairment affecting memory, attention, and executive function. Neuronal autoantibodies might represent a pathophysiological factor and possible biomarker in the development of cancer-related cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bartels
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
| | - T Strönisch
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
| | - K Farmer
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin
| | - K Rentzsch
- Institute of Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck
| | - F Kiecker
- Department of Dermatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Finke
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Terheyden P, Weishaupt C, Heinzerling L, Klinkhardt U, Krauss J, Mohr P, Kiecker F, Becker J, Dähling (Submitter A, Döner F, Heidenreich R, Scheel B, Schönborn-Kellenberger O, Seibel T, Gnad-Vogt U. Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of intratumoral CV8102, a RNA-based TLR- and RIG-1 agonist in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy289.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
13
|
Yan B, Garcet S, Gulati N, Mitsui H, Kiecker F, Krueger J. 1188 Immune surveillance and evasion in the progression from common melanocytic nevi to dysplastic nevi to malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
14
|
Heppt M, Schlaak M, Eigentler T, Kähler K, Kiecker F, Loquai C, Meier F, Tomsitz D, Brenner N, Niesert A, Thonke R, Hauschild A, Berking C. Checkpoint blockade for metastatic melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma in HIV-positive patients. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:3104-3106. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
15
|
Leyvraz S, Schuette M, Rieke D, Kessler T, Ochsenreither S, Amstislavskiy V, Risch T, Wierling C, Joehrens K, Peuker C, Lamping M, Burock S, Poch G, Kiecker F, Schaefer R, Lange B, Lehrach H, Joussen A, Keilholz U, Yaspo ML. Precision medicine for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: A pilot study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Schadendorf D, Flaherty K, Nathan P, Hersey P, Garbe C, Milhem M, Demidov L, Mohr P, Hassel J, Rutkowski P, Dummer R, Utikal J, Kiecker F, Larkin J, D’Amelio A, Huang Y, Mookerjee B, Robert C. Five-year efficacy and safety update from METRIC: Trametinib vs chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K–mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
17
|
Eigentler TK, Gutzmer R, Hauschild A, Heinzerling L, Schadendorf D, Nashan D, Hölzle E, Kiecker F, Becker J, Sunderkötter C, Moll I, Richtig E, Pönitzsch I, Pehamberger H, Kaufmann R, Pföhler C, Vogt T, Berking C, Praxmarer M, Garbe C. Adjuvant treatment with pegylated interferon α-2a versus low-dose interferon α-2a in patients with high-risk melanoma: a randomized phase III DeCOG trial. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1625-32. [PMID: 27287206 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant treatment with interferon (IFN)-α-2a improved disease-free survival (DFS) and showed a trend for improving overall survival (OS) in melanoma. This trial was designed to examine whether PEG-IFN is superior to IFN with regard to distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), DFS and OS. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized phase III trial, patients with resected cutaneous melanoma stage IIA(T3a)-IIIB (AJCC 2002) were randomized to receive PEG-IFN (180 μg subcutaneously 1×/week; 24 months) or IFN α-2a (3MIU subcutaneously 3×/week; 24 months). Randomization was stratified for stage, number of metastatic nodes, age and previous IFN treatment. The primary end point was DMFS; secondary end points were OS, DFS, quality of life (QoL) and tolerability. RESULTS A total of 909 patients were enrolled (451 PEG-IFN versus 458 IFN). Neither 5-year DMFS [PEG-IFN 61.0% versus IFN 67.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, P = 0.21] nor 5-year OS (PEG-IFN 73.2% versus IFN 75.2%; HR 1.05, P = 0.70) nor 5-year DFS (PEG-IFN 57.3% versus IFN 60.9%; HR 1.09, P = 0.40) showed significant differences. Subgroup analyses in patients ± ulcerated primaries and of different tumor stages did not find differences in DMFS, OS or DFS between the treatment groups. One hundred and eighteen patients (26.2%) in the PEG-IFN and 61 patients (13.3%) in the IFN population did not receive the full dosage and length of treatment due to adverse events (P < 0.001). Leukopenia and elevation of liver enzymes were more common in the PEG-IFN arm (56% versus 23.5% LCP; 19.1% versus 9.4% AST; 33.0% versus 16.5% ALT). QoL was identical for nearly all domains. CONCLUSION PEG-IFN did not improve the outcome over IFN. A higher percentage of patients under PEG-IFN discontinued treatment due to toxicity. CLINICAL TRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT00204529.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T K Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - R Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel
| | - L Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Essen-Duisburg, Essen
| | - D Nashan
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund
| | - E Hölzle
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - F Kiecker
- Department of Dermatology, Charité Berlin, Berlin
| | - J Becker
- Department of Dermatology, University Essen-Duisburg, Essen
| | - C Sunderkötter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster
| | - I Moll
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Richtig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - I Pönitzsch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - H Pehamberger
- Department of Dermatology, AKH Wien, University Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main
| | - C Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar
| | - T Vogt
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar
| | - C Berking
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - C Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
20
|
Hauschild A, Trefzer U, Garbe C, Kaehler K, Ugurel S, Kiecker F, Eigentler T, Krissel H, Schadendorf D. A phase II multicenter study on the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor MS-275, comparing two dosage schedules in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8044 Background: The acetylation of histones is a key component of gene regulation, which plays an important role in tumor initiation and progression. MS-275, an inhibitor of the benzamide series, is a synthetic orally available inhibitor of HDACs which showed anti-tumor activity in 3 phase 1 trials. Methods: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study of oral MS-275 evaluated the efficacy and toxicity in patients with non-resectable metastatic melanoma. Patients should have received at least one, but not more than two previous systemic therapies (chemo- and/or immunotherapy) for stage IV melanoma. Patients were stratified to receive either 3 mg MS-275 biweekly (days 1+15 of a 4-week cycle) or 7 mg MS-275 weekly (days 1+8+15 of a 4-week cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Study endpoints were the assessment of tumor response and toxicity. Results: A total of 28 patients have been randomized equally to the two dosing groups. Patients were classified as belonging to AJCC stage IVa (n=0), IVb (n=9; 32%), and IVc (n=19; 68%). In general, MS-275 was very well tolerated. No treatment-related SAEs have been observed. Most frequently reported side effects were nausea (CTC Grade 1+2, 32%) hypophosphatemia (CTC Grade 1–3, 29%), and diarrhea (CTC Grade 1+2, 18%). Stable diseases lasting from 8 wks to more than 48 wks have been observed in 4 pts (29%) in the 3 mg and 3 pts (21%) in the 7 mg dose group. Stabilizations occurred in these metastatic localizations: skin, peripheral and visceral lymph nodes, lung and bone, respectively. However, objective tumor responses were not observed. Conclusions: The results suggest that MS-275 is well tolerated and shows long-lasting tumor stabilizations in patients with pre-treated metastatic melanoma. The failure of objective tumor responses in the single-agent treatment with MS-275 warrants further evaluation also in combinational settings. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Hauschild
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - U. Trefzer
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Garbe
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - K. Kaehler
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - S. Ugurel
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - F. Kiecker
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - T. Eigentler
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - H. Krissel
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - D. Schadendorf
- University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany; Schering, AG, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hofmann M, Kiecker F, Baharlou S, Audring H, Sterry W, Trefzer U. Einfluss der Tumorregression und -infiltration auf Wächterlymphknotenbefall in kutanen Melanomen. Akt Dermatol 2004. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
22
|
Kiecker F, Hofmann M, Rogalla S, Braumann C, Jacobi C, Sterry W, Trefzer U. Taurolidin induziert Apoptose und Nekrose in Melanomzellen. Akt Dermatol 2004. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
23
|
Kiecker F, Hofmann M, Kunz J, Walden P, Sterry W, Trefzer U. Induktion von antigen-spezifischen T-Zellen unter adjuvanter Interferontherapie bei Melanompatienten. Akt Dermatol 2003. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-822199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
24
|
Hofmann M, Kiecker F, Siegel P, Sterry W, Trefzer U. Zytokinmonitoring unter adjuvanter Interferontherapie beim malignen Melanom. Akt Dermatol 2003. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-822200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|