Exploring celiac trunk parameters in median arcuate ligament syndrome: A CT study

PURPOSE

To assess anatomical variations in the celiac trunk (Ct) in patients with Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) using computed tomography (CT). The primary objectives were to investigate the celiac trunk angle (CtA), origin level, length (CtL), and their relationships with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in MALS patients. Additionally, the study intended to evaluate gender differences in these parameters and explore correlations between variables.

METHODS

Retrospectively, reports of abdominal CT scans taken between January 2018, and Sepmtember 2021, in the hospital image archive were screened vey two observers independently for MALS diagnosis. Parameters such as CtA, CtL, Ct-SMA distance, SMA angle (SMAA), and median arcuate ligament thickness (MALT) were measured. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Among the 81 patients (25 females, 56 males), significant differences were observed in MALT between genders (p = 0.001). CtA showed a negative correlation with CtL and Ct-SMA (p < 0.001), and a positive correlation was found between CtL and Ct-SMA (p = 0.002). CtL was measured as 25 mm for the all group. Origin levels of Ct and SMA were evaluated in comparison to vertebral levels. Ct-SMA distance was relatively shorter (9.19 mm) compared to the literature. SMAA findings were consistent with normal population values.

CONCLUSION

This study provided valuable insights into the anatomical parameters of the Ct ans SMA in MALS patients. Despite some differences compared to normal population parameters, no evidence supported the hypothesis of a superiorly placed Ct contributing to MALS.

Can 3D radiological calculations predict operational difficulties for rectal cancer?: A single center retrospective analysis

Low anterior resection, performing total mesorectal excision with appropriate pelvic dissection to prevent local recurrence, is probably the most challenging type of surgery in colorectal surgery, especially in a narrow pelvis. In this study, we aimed to predict the operation difficulty of rectal cancer by comparing the operation time with 2D and 3D pelvimetry. Sixty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy due to primary rectal cancer located in the middle and lower rectum (10 cm from the anus) were included in the study. Surgery notes were reviewed and data on demographic factors, tumor stage, duration of surgery, and types of surgery were collected, as well as pelvimetric parameters. All protocols had 2D T2-weighted sequences in 3 planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal). Pelvimetric measurements were made by measuring 8 pelvic lengths and 2 angles. Pelvis and tumor volume were measured by manual margin monitoring. In each slice, both pelvis and tumor boundaries were manually drawn individually in the sagittal plane. Pelvis and tumor volumes were calculated from the set of adjacent images by summing slice thickness and products of area measurements within the pelvis and tumor boundaries. In our results, no correlation was observed with operation time, including pelvic volume. Exception for this were interacetabular distance and tumor volume. In the regression test, the only parameter that correlated with the operation time was tumor volume. In conclusion, we believe that tumor volumetric calculations may be useful in predicting difficult distal rectal carcinoma surgeries.