Economic burden of comorbid insomnia in 5 common medical disease subgroups

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Approximately 85% of insomnia co-occurs with other disorders. Whereas insomnia was once considered "secondary" to these disorders, it is now widely recognized as an independent condition warranting treatment. While it is clear that insomnia can affect the course of other medical conditions, there is scant literature on the economic impact of comorbid insomnia among patients with common medical conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden of comorbid insomnia in 5 medical diseases commonly associated with insomnia: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cancer undergoing treatment, menopause undergoing hormone replacement therapy, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2019. Insomnia and comorbid disease groups were defined using physician-assigned International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes. Insomnia medication treatment was defined based on ≥1 prescription fills for the most commonly prescribed insomnia medications (zolpidem, low-dose trazodone, and benzodiazepines [as a class]). For each comorbid disease subgroup, 4 cohorts were created: (1) patients with either treated or untreated insomnia, (2) non-sleep-disordered controls, (3) patients with untreated insomnia, and (4) patients with treated insomnia.

RESULTS

Sample sizes for individuals with comorbid insomnia ranged from 23,168 (T2DM) to 3,015 (ADRDs). Within each disease subgroup and relative to non-sleep-disordered controls, patients with comorbid insomnia demonstrated greater adjusted health care resource utilization and costs across most points of service. Likewise, relative to individuals with untreated insomnia, those with treated insomnia generally demonstrated greater adjusted health care resource utilization and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, both untreated comorbid insomnia and comorbid insomnia treated with commonly prescribed insomnia medications were associated with increased health care resource utilization and costs across most points of service.

CITATION

Wickwire EM, Juday TR, Kelkar M, Heo J, Margiotta C, Frech FH. Economic burden of comorbid insomnia in 5 common medical disease subgroups. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(7):1293-1302.

Benzodiazepine Usage, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Among Older Adults Treated with Common Insomnia Medications: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed for insomnia management but are often associated with negative safety outcomes such as falls and abuse, particularly among older adults.

Objective

The purpose of this real-world study was to compare the impact of benzodiazepines, low-dose trazodone, and zolpidem immediate release (IR) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among older adults (age ≥ 65 years) with insomnia in the US.

Methods

Using the IBM MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Database, older adults with >1 physician-assigned diagnosis of insomnia and treated with benzodiazepines were matched 1:1 on age, sex, and index-date to individuals treated with trazodone, and separately matched 1:1 on age and sex, to individuals treated with zolpidem immediate release (IR). Between-groups differences were analyzed using general linear models (GLMs) that controlled for multiple confounders.

Results

Significant between-groups differences in HCRU and costs were observed such that relative to zolpidem IR and separately relative to low-dose trazodone, benzodiazepines were consistently associated with worsened outcomes.

Conclusion

These findings build upon and extend prior knowledge on the negative impact of benzodiazepines and suggest directions for future research.

Cardiac events and economic burden among patients with hypertension and treated insomnia in the USA

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) event risk, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs have not been elucidated among hypertension patients with treated insomnia (H + TI). Materials & methods: Adult patients with H + TI were identified in IBM MarketScan databases. H + TI patients were matched 1:1 on age and sex to controls with hypertension but without sleep disorders. Multivariable models were used to estimate associations between treated insomnia and CV event risk, HCRU and costs. Results: In total, 81,502 H + TI patients (mean age = 62 years, 53% female) were matched. Relative to controls, H + TI patients were 2.4 times as likely to have CV events. H + TI patients incurred higher costs per patient per month (US$2343 vs US$1013). Conclusion: Treated insomnia was associated with higher costs and HRCU in hypertension patients.

Falls, healthcare resources and costs in older adults with insomnia treated with zolpidem, trazodone, or benzodiazepines

Background

Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death among older Americans. While some research has found that insomnia heightens falls, health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, the impact of insomnia treatments on fall risk, mortality, HCRU and costs in the elderly population, which could be of substantial interest to payers, has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the risk of falls and related consequences among adults ≥ 65 years of age treated with common prescription medications for insomnia compared with non-sleep disordered controls.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified Medicare claims from January 2011 through December 2017. Medicare beneficiaries treated for insomnia receiving zolpidem extended-release, zolpidem immediate-release, trazodone, or benzodiazepines were matched with non-sleep disordered controls. The main outcomes were falls, mortality, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and medical costs during the 12 months following the earliest fill date for the insomnia medication of interest. Generalized linear models controlled for several key covariates, including age, race, sex, geographic region and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.

Results

The study included 1,699,913 Medicare beneficiaries (59.9% female, mean age 75 years). Relative to controls, adjusted analyses showed that beneficiaries receiving insomnia medication experienced over twice as many falls (odds ratio [OR] = 2.34, 95% CI: 2.31–2.36). In adjusted analyses, patients receiving benzodiazepines or trazodone had the greatest risk. Crude all-cause mortality rates were 15-times as high for the insomnia-treated as controls. Compared with controls, beneficiaries receiving insomnia treatment demonstrated higher estimated adjusted mean number of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits and longer length of inpatient stay. All-cause total adjusted mean costs were higher among insomnia treated patients ($967 vs $454).

Conclusions

Individuals receiving insomnia treatment had an increased risk of falls and mortality and higher HCRU and costs compared with matched beneficiaries without sleep disorders. Trazodone and benzodiazepines were associated with the greatest risk of falls. This analysis suggests that significant risks are associated with common, older generation insomnia medication treatments in the elderly. Nonetheless, these results should be interpreted with caution as the use of these medications may be indicative of underlying morbidity with potential for residual confounding.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03165-6.

Burden of insomnia among cancer patients undergoing treatment: A retrospective claims database analysis

e18816

Background: Almost half of all cancer patients have trouble sleeping, usually insomnia or other sleep-wake disorders. Cancer treatment can exacerbate sleep problems. This study evaluated all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in cancer patients undergoing treatment who also have insomnia relative to a matched cohort of cancer patients undergoing treatment who do not have insomnia. Methods: This retrospective study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (Jan 2014-Dec 2019) to identify patients: (1) age ≥18 years; (2) with ≥1 ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for insomnia OR with ≥2 prescriptions for zolpidem immediate release (IR) OR trazodone ≤150mg OR benzodiazepine; (3) with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment pre-/post-index date (earliest diagnosis or medication fill date); (4) with ≥2 ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for any cancer; and (5) ≥1 claim for oncology treatment. Patients with sleep disorders other than insomnia were excluded. The resulting patients (“insomnia cohort”) were 1:1 matched on age, sex and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) score to patients with cancer undergoing treatment without insomnia or other sleep disorders (“control cohort”). HCRU and costs were reported per patient per month (PPPM). Generalized linear models were used to compare adjusted outcomes between cohorts. Results: For each cohort, 7,132 patients (mean age 60.8 years, 69.5% female, 13.6 ECI score) were identified. In adjusted analyses, significantly more patients in the insomnia cohort had at least one inpatient visit per month, inpatient stays were significantly longer, and mean outpatient visits were significantly higher (all p < 0.001) relative to the control cohort. The insomnia cohort had higher mean number of emergency department (ED) visits (p < 0.05); however, mean number of inpatient visits was not significantly different between cohorts. Adjusted analyses also showed significantly higher mean total PPPM costs for the insomnia cohort than the control cohort ($4,864 and $3,302, respectively; mean ratio = 1.47; p < 0.0001). Mean PPPM costs for inpatient visits, ED visits, and outpatient costs were also higher for the insomnia cohort (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Cancer patients undergoing treatment who have insomnia had more intensive HCRU and higher costs relative to those without insomnia. These results suggest that better managing insomnia in this population may have a beneficial impact on both patients and payers.

Fall Risk, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs Among Adult Patients in the United States Treated for Insomnia with Zolpidem, Trazodone, or Benzodiazepines: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Falls are a common cause for morbidity and mortality among patients taking prescription insomnia medication. The objective of this study is to compare the risk of falls, all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among patients treated with commonly used, older generation insomnia medications and non-sleep-disordered controls.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases to identify patients aged at least 18 years treated with commonly prescribed medications for insomnia (zolpidem, trazodone, benzodiazepines) between 1 January 2012 and 30 September 2017. The insomnia-treated cohort were age- and sex-matched (1:1) to non-sleep-disordered controls. Odds ratios (ORs) compared risk of falls in each cohort, adjusting for covariates. Costs were adjusted to 2018 dollars, the most recent year for the study data.

RESULTS

Relative to matched controls (n = 313,086), the insomnia-treated cohort had a higher rate of falls (3.34% vs. 1.33%), and higher risk of falls [OR = 2.36 (95% confidence interval 2.27-2.44)]. Relative to other index treatments, patients treated with trazodone had the greatest risk of falls. Compared with matched controls, the estimated mean number of inpatient visits, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and mean length of inpatient stay were all significantly higher among patients treated for insomnia. Such patients incurred greater total costs per patient per month than matched controls ($2100 versus $888; estimated mean ratio, 2.36; 95% CI 2.35-2.38; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to matched controls, the insomnia-treated cohort showed higher risk of falls with greater HCRU and costs. Each outcome measured was highest among patients treated with trazodone, relative to other index treatments. Findings suggest the need for new treatment options to optimize quality of care for patients with insomnia.

Use of valsartan for the treatment of heart-failure patients not receiving ACE inhibitors: A budget impact analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a widespread and costly malady. It represents the leading single diagnosis for hospitalized patients. For many heart failure patients, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are either not tolerated or contraindicated, but angiotensin receptor blockers such as valsartan may be a therapeutic option for them.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to prepare a budget impact analysis to assist health plans in evaluating the financial impact of adding valsartan therapy to usual care for heart failure patients not receiving ACE inhibitors.

METHODS

A budget impact analysis was developed for a hypothetical US health plan. Model inputs included demographic data, estimates of the prevalence of heart failure and proportion of heart-failure patients not on ACE inhibitors, prevalence of heart failure-related hospitalization, cost data, and resultant health care utilization from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Costs and cost savings were reported as year-2001 US dollars.

RESULTS

An estimated 1207 of hypothetical 250,000 enrollees were projected to have heart-failure diagnoses, with 603 (50.0%) not receiving ACE inhibitors, and 160 (26.5%) of such patients being hospitalized each year. For valsartan-treated patients, savings due to reduced hospitalizations and shorter length of hospital stay were 1,083,938 US dollars and 221,364 US dollars, respectively. Subtracting the cost of valsartan treatment (629,472 US dollars) from savings yielded projected net savings of 675,830 US dollars per year. Varying patient, treatment, and payer-mix characteristics resulted in projected net savings of $409,598 to 1,350,617 US dollars per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of valsartan therapy to usual care in this model analysis resulted in net cost savings among hypothetical heart-failure patients not receiving ACE inhibitors. Substantial cost savings were realized, regardless of variation in model parameters.

Markov modeling analysis of health and economic outcomes of therapy with valsartan versus amlodipine in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria

OBJECTIVE

To estimate 8-year health and economic outcomes of the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine in therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria based on clinical endpoints from a 6-month randomized controlled clinical trial, the MicroAlbuminuria Reduction With VALsartan (MARVAL) study.

METHODS

We developed a Markov model that utilized urinary albumin excretion rate data to project patient distributions to 7 possible health states over 8 years. For each health state, we identified quality-adjustment weights (health utilities) and medical care costs from public sources. The model then calculated mean quality-adjusted survival, medical care costs, and cost-effectiveness ratios for each treatment arm. Treatment arms were compared with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

Patients treated with valsartan gained 7 months (mean) per patient of quality-adjusted survival relative to patients treated with amlodipine (77 versus 70 months; P<0.01); valsartan patients also incurred 32,412 dollars (mean) per patient lower medical costs than amlodipine patients (92,058 dollars versus 124,470 dollars; P<0.01). Model results were consistent for each year of analysis and robust to changes in key model parameters.

CONCLUSION

This research (1) extends 6-month clinical trial outcomes to an 8-year period, (2) translates health outcomes from technical clinical endpoints to quality-adjusted survival, and (3) estimates economic consequences of therapeutic outcomes. The results quantify the favorable long-term health (i.e., quality-adjusted survival) and economic benefits (i.e., lower total medical costs) of therapy with valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, versus amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria based on an extension of the results of a short-term clinical (MARVAL) trial. These research findings are important to the extent patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria do not receive the recommended antihypertensive agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers).