[Evaluation of the Methods Used for the Detection of Entamoeba histolytica in Stool Samples of Patients with Diarrhea]

Amoebic dysentery (amebiasis) is a parasitic infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica. The diagnosis of invasive amebiasis has traditionally been based on direct and stained microscopic examination of stool samples. Stool microscopy exhibits low sensitivity and it is difficult to distinguish E.histolytica cysts and trophozoites from cells such as leukocytes, macrophages and non-pathogenic Entamoeba species in the stool by microscopy. Therefore more sensitive and specific diagnostic methods such as enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests which investigate the presence of E.histolytica-specific antigen in stool, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are being widely used. In this study it was aimed to study stool samples of the patients who applied with the clinical signs of amebiasis by using direct and permanent stained microscopy, E.histolytica adhesin antigen ELISA test and real-time PCR-based BD Max Enteric Parasite Panel (BD Max EPP) test and to evaluate the diagnostic values of these tests. A total of 546 faecal samples with blood and/or mucus were analyzed in the study. In these samples, the presence of E.histolytica was investigated by direct and permanent stained microscopy, E.histolytica adhesin antigen ELISA and BD Max EPP PCR. Of the samples 36.3% were suspected to contain E.histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii cyst and/or trophozoite by direct microscopic examination. Trichrome staining was performed on these samples and 49 samples were found suspicious for the presence of E.histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii cysts and/or trophozoites. The presence of E.histolytica and other Entamoeba species was not confirmed in 75.2% of the samples. BD Max EPP PCR and E.histolytica adhesin antigen ELISA tests were studied in 49 faecal samples that were suspected by trichrome staining. None of these samples were positive by ELISA. Forty-four samples were negative by PCR and invalid test results were obtained in five samples. In this study, E.histolytica was not detected in the patient population. The results of this study showed that microscopic examination alone is not sufficient for the detection of E.histolytica. It is concluded that it is necessary to use a more sensitive and specific also rapid diagnostic test such as E.histolytica-specific antigen detection test or PCR in the diagnosis of amebiasis to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment of patients.

[Evaluation of Microscopic Examination, Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction Tests in the Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis Infection]

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are important as a public health problem all over the world. There are some difficulties in prevention and control programs of STIs due to clinical and laboratory diagnostic problems.The most common STIs are Chlamydia trachomatis infections, trichomoniasis and gonorrhea. The study aimed to investigate the direct microscopic examination, culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection; to determine other microbiological agents that may cause vaginal discharge and to evaluate the various social variables in women with vaginal discharge admitted to the outpatient clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Akdeniz University Hospital. Two hundred and fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The socio-demographic features of the patients were recorded. Vaginal/endocervical swab specimens taken from patients were evaluated by microscopic examination. Swab specimens were inoculated into blood agar, MacConkey agar and chocolate agar for bacterial culture. Modified Trichosel broth with 5% horse blood (Becton Dickinson, USA) was used for Trichomonas spp. culture. The presence of C.trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and T.vaginalis in swab samples were investigated by multiplex PCR assay (BD Max CT/GC/TV, Becton Dickinson, USA). At least one pathogen was detected among 65 (30.3%) samples. T.vaginalis was detected by microscopic examination and PCR in four of 215 (1.9%) patients. Existence of yeast morphology was observed in 21 (9.8%) specimens by microscopic examination. Twenty four (11.2%) patients were diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis microscopically according to Nugent score system. Candida species grew in 32 (14.9%) and Streptococcus agalactiae grew in 2 (0.9%) of the specimens. C.trachomatis was detected in 2 (0.9%) samples and N.gonorrhoeae in 1 (0.5%) sample by PCR. In this study, 95.3% of the patients were married and 96.7% had only one sexual partner in the mean time. The rate of detection of pathogens were statistically higher in women who have had two or more pregnancies (p<0.05). In our study, T.vaginalis together with N.gonorrhoeae and C.trachomatis were investigated by PCR method in women with vaginal discharge. The use of multiplex PCR test allowed simultaneous investigation of multiple pathogens in the patient samples.