Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection rates in 5 European countries

OBJECTIVE

To determine the overall and procedure-specific incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) as well as risk factors for such across all surgical disciplines in Europe.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of patients with surgical procedures performed at 14 European centres in 2016, with a nested case-control analysis. S. aureus SSI were identified by a semi-automated crossmatching bacteriological and electronic health record data. Within each surgical procedure, cases and controls were matched using optimal propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 764 of 178 902 patients had S. aureus SSI (0.4%), with 86.0% of these caused by methicillin susceptible and 14% by resistant pathogens. Mean S. aureus SSI incidence was similar for all surgical specialties, while varying by procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This large procedure-independent study of S. aureus SSI proves a low overall infection rate of 0.4% in this cohort. It provides proof of principle for a semi-automated approach to utilize big data in epidemiological studies of healthcare-associated infections. Trials registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT03353532 (11/2017).

Harmonized procedure coding system for surgical procedures and analysis of surgical site infections (SSI) of five European countries

BACKGROUND

The use of routine data will be essential in future healthcare research. Therefore, harmonizing procedure codes is a first step to facilitate this approach as international research endeavour. An example for the use of routine data on a large scope is the investigation of surgical site infections (SSI). Ongoing surveillance programs evaluate the incidence of SSI on a national or regional basis in a limited number of procedures. For example, analyses by the European Centre for Disease Prevention (ECDC) nine procedures and provides a mapping table for two coding systems (ICD9, National Healthcare Safety Network [NHSN]). However, indicator procedures do not reliably depict overall SSI epidemiology. Thus, a broader analysis of all surgical procedures is desirable. The need for manual translation of country specific procedures codes, however, impedes the use of routine data for such an analysis on an international level. This project aimed to create an international surgical procedure coding systems allowing for automatic translation and categorization of procedures documented in country-specific codes.

METHODS

We included the existing surgical procedure coding systems of five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom [UK]). In an iterative process, country specific codes were grouped in ever more categories until each group represented a coherent unit based on method of surgery, interventions performed, extent and site of the surgical procedure. Next two ID specialist (arbitrated by a third in case of disagreement) independently assigned country-specific codes to the resulting categories. Finally, specialist from each surgical discipline reviewed these assignments for their respective field.

RESULTS

A total number of 153 SALT (Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infection Multinational Epidemiology in Europe) codes from 10 specialties were assigned to 15,432 surgical procedures. Almost 4000 (26%) procedure codes from the SALT coding system were classified as orthopaedic and trauma surgeries, thus this medical field represents the most diverse group within the SALT coding system, followed by abdominal surgical procedures with 2390 (15%) procedure codes.

CONCLUSION

Mapping country-specific codes procedure codes onto to a limited number of coherent, internally and externally validated codes proofed feasible. The resultant SALT procedure code gives the opportunity to harmonize big data sets containing surgical procedures from international centres, and may simplify comparability of future international trial findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT03353532 on November 27^th, 2017.

Quantifying guideline adherence in mucormycosis management using the EQUAL score

OBJECTIVES

Mucormycosis is a difficult-to-diagnose life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality. Adherence to guidelines that lead through complex management and support clinical decisions is however rarely reported. By applying the EQUAL Score, our study evaluates the management of mucormycosis at the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with mucormycosis at the University Hospital of Cologne. Data collection comprised items for quality assessment in mucormycosis management according to the EQUAL Mucormycosis Score and economics.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients identified, 27 were documented retrospectively. Eight patients of 18 with neutropenia (>10 days) or receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (44.4%) received mould active prophylaxis. Chest CT was done in 21 patients (77.8%), while BAL and direct microscopy of BAL fluid was performed in 22 patients (81.5%), culture in 22 (81.5%) and fungal PCR in 24 (88.9%). First-line treatment was liposomal amphotericin B in 19 patients (70.4%). Isavuconazole or posaconazole with therapeutic drug monitoring was used in four (14.8%) and in one patient (3.7%), respectively. In our cohort, crude mortality was 51.9% (n = 14) with a median survival time of 113 days. During the management of the 27 patients, 450 points (53.8%) of the maximum EQUAL Mucormycosis Score were achieved (median 15 points, range 6-30).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed management of mucormycosis aligning with current guidelines and hope to encourage other groups to use the EQUAL Score in routine clinical settings. Future studies will evaluate whether guideline adherence in mucormycosis management improves patient outcome.

Analyzing candidemia guideline adherence identifies opportunities for antifungal stewardship

Candidemia epidemiology varies significantly by region; thus, local data are essential for evidence-based decision-making in prophylaxis and treatment. Current management strategies are derived from large randomized controlled trials mostly executed in large high-volume tertiary care centers. Results may not be entirely transferable to smaller hospitals. This study investigates epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment standards in six hospitals in the Cologne metropolitan area (number of inhabitants approx. one million). We assessed adherence to the current guideline of the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) using the EQUAL Candida Score of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Data were documented by trained medical students as part of an integrated research and teaching concept at the University of Cologne. Between January 2014 and June 2017, 77 patients had candidemia, corresponding to an incidence of 0.2 cases/1000 admissions. While 55 patients were enrolled, 22 patients were excluded due to incompletely retrievable health records. Fluconazole monotherapy was the preferred first-line treatment in cases with Candida albicans infection (21/29). A central vascular catheter was present in 40 patients and was removed in 17 (43%) during treatment. Overall mortality at 30 days was 44%. Patients reached a mean EQUAL Candida Score of 9.9 (range 8-14), which was well below the maximum score of 22 for perfect guideline adherence. In summary, management of candidemia differed from current European recommendations. It remains unclear to what extent enhanced adherence would improve patient outcome. Larger prospective studies need to answer that question.