Comparison of STONE Score, Guy's Stone Score, CROES Nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score in Prognosticating Outcomes of Multiple-Tract Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study

Objective  The objective of this study was to compare the STONE score (Size of the stone, Topography or location, degree of Obstruction of the urinary system, Number of stones, and Evaluation of Hounsfield units), Guy's stone score (GSS), Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score (RSCS) in prognosticating multiple tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) outcome. Methodology This descriptive retrospective analysis was carried out at the Urology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. Male and female patients in the age range of 18-70 years who underwent multiple tract mPCNL for renal stones from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023, were included in the analysis. Results  A total of 110 patients were registered. Stone-free status (SFS) was achieved in 78.2% (n=86), and complications were observed in 13.6% (n=15) patients. The odds ratio for STONE score, GSS, CROES scoring system, and RSCS for predicting the SFS was 7.093 (95%CI 2.40-20.89), 9.333 (95%CI 2.92-29.81), 11.70 (95%CI 2.56-53.38) and 3.450 (95%CI 1.25-9.53), respectively. Conclusion  Multiple tract mPCNL is a safe and effective technique for the management of renal stones, producing a high stone-free rate. This study demonstrated adequate efficacy and dependability of the four scoring systems in predicting SFS.

Proximal Type - Epithelioid Sarcoma- A Rare And Aggressive Soft Tissue Neoplasm

Introduction/Objective

Epithelioid Sarcoma is a rare malignant soft tissue neoplasm that is well known for local recurrence, regional lymph node involvement, and metastasis. It accounts for less than one percent of all sarcomas. Two subtypes of epithelioid sarcoma are described: the conventional or classic subtype and the proximal subtype, with the classic type being more common than the proximal type. We present a case of proximal epithelioid sarcoma involving the inguinal region, in which the patient presented with the history of weight loss for one year and a slow- growing inguinal mass for the last few months. The biopsy was done in an outside hospital and showed carcinoma of unknown origin. Imaging also failed to reveal any clear source of this mass.

Methods

The mass was resected and sent to pathology, where H&E staining and immunohistochemistry was done for diagnosis.

Results

The H&E sections of the left inguinal mass showed proliferation of large epithelioid cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm, vesicular nuclear chromatin and prominent nucleoli. Mitosis was also seen. Necrosis was not identified. Immunohistochemical staining was done and revealed that the tumor cells were immunoreactive for epithelial marker cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and showed loss of INI-1. Tumor cells were also negative for Myogenin, ERG, HMB-45, MART-1, Myo-D1, S100, and SMA. Considering the cytomorphology and immunophenotypic findings the diagnosis of epithelioid sarcoma, proximal type was made.

Conclusion

Epithelioid sarcoma is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm with epithelioid cytomorphology and phenotype. Among the two types of epithelioid sarcoma, the proximal type is reported about 50% less than the classic type and is associated with aggressive behavior and worse prognosis. The classic cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry findings helped us in making the diagnosis in this case.