Responses to gastric distension in functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that an altered visceral perception threshold plays a role in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms in dyspeptic patients. However, it is not clear whether the compliance and adaptive relaxation of the proximal stomach contribute to the symptoms.

AIMS

To investigate whether abnormal relaxation or adaptation of the proximal stomach during the interdigestive state and the postprandial phase could explain the symptoms of functional dyspepsia.

SUBJECTS

Twelve volunteers and 12 patients with dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia were included in the study.

METHODS

An electronic barostat was used to investigate adaptation to distension of the proximal stomach and accommodation in response to a liquid meal. Dyspeptic symptoms during distension and accommodation were assessed.

RESULTS

When the subjects were in the fasting state, the pressure-volume curve showed slightly higher compliance in the dyspeptic patients (p < 0.05). Patients not only had a higher score for nausea, bloating, and pain but also the increase in nausea and pain scores with intragastric pressure was higher than in volunteers (p < 0.05). The increase in intragastric bag volume in response to a meal was significantly lower in patients (p < 0.05). Both bloating and pain significantly increased in the patients (p < 0.05), but not in the healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with functional dyspepsia show slightly higher compliance to mechanical distension. Their visceral perception of mechanical stress is enhanced. In contrast with the balloon distension, relaxation after a meal was less. Therefore the postprandial symptoms cannot be explained fully by greater global tension in the stomach wall, as assessed by the barostat technique. Visceral hypersensitivity plays a major role in the pathogenesis of the symptoms.

Function of the proximal stomach after Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

After Nissen fundoplication patients frequently report upper abdominal (dyspeptic) symptoms. Theoretically, these symptoms may be the result of changes in function of the proximal stomach as induced by fundoplication.

METHODS

In this case-control study the response of the proximal stomach to both distension by an air-filled bag and a liquid meal were evaluated with the use of a barostat. In 12 patients after fundoplication and 12 healthy volunteers (age- and sex-matched) perception of symptoms was evaluated during both bag distension and liquid meal stimulus.

RESULTS

The minimal distending pressure required to overcome the intra-abdominal pressure was significantly different between patients and controls (mean(s.e.m.) 9.34(0.26) versus 6.73(0.43) mmHg; P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups in either the fasted state, volume-pressure curve (compliance) or total symptom score. After ingestion of the liquid meal the adaptive relaxation in the fundoplication group was significantly less than that in controls (mean(s.e.m.) 150(29.2) versus 244(34.8) ml; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that after Nissen fundoplication compliance of the proximal stomach is no different from that in healthy volunteers. Postprandial relaxation of the proximal stomach is decreased and this abnormality may be involved in the pathogenesis of reported dyspeptic symptoms.

Compliance of the proximal stomach and dyspeptic symptoms in patients with type I diabetes mellitus

In the present study the function of the proximal stomach and its role in eliciting dyspeptic symptoms were evaluated in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eight type I diabetics with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and dyspeptic symptoms, and 10 healthy volunteers were studied using an electronic barostat device connected to a intragastric bag. The intragastric bag was inflated and deflated by stepwise pressure increments, creating pressure-volume curves. During the experiment the blood glucose concentrations were maintained within the euglycemic range in the diabetics. The volume-pressure curves showed a larger volume during the pressure increase in the diabetics than in the controls (P < 0.01). This resulted in a significant difference in compliance (dV/dP), 57.2 +/- 4.2 ml/mm Hg in diabetics and 43.7 +/- 3.5 ml/MM Hg in controls (P < 0.014). The volume-pressure curves during deflation of the intragastric balloon were different from the curves during inflation, creating a hysteresis loop. The area between the inflation and deflation curves was 827 ml/mm Hg in diabetics and 627 ml/mm Hg in the controls (P = 0.21). Gastric distension induced more upper gastrointestinal sensations in the patients than in the volunteers: nausea (P < 0.002), bloating (P < 0.003), upper abdominal pain (P < 0.001).

IN CONCLUSION

this study showed that the compliance of the proximal stomach is increased in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal symptoms. This abnormality, probably due to autonomic neuropathy, is associated with increased symptom generation during gastric distension.