Risk factors including the presence of inflammation at the resection margins for colorectal anastomotic stenosis following surgery for diverticular disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for anastomotic stenosis in patients operated on for diverticular disease. Histological inflammation and diverticula at the resection margins were also considered.

METHOD

Patients' characteristics, the surgical technique and postoperative complications were collected from the medical records. Anastomotic stenoses were evaluated prospectively by rigid sigmoidoscopy during follow-up examination. Histological specimens were examined by a single pathologist who investigated inflammation and diverticula at the resection margins. Twenty patients with anastomotic colorectal stenosis from a single tertiary centre were compared with 24 consecutive patients without stenosis. They were all operated on for diverticular disease over a specified time period.

RESULTS

Histological inflammation and diverticula were found in 25% and 30% of the resection margins respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age > 71 years (P = 0.0002), female gender (P = 0.0069) and anastomoses located below 12 cm from the anal verge (P = 0.020) were risk factors for stenosis. No correlation was found between anastomotic stenosis and the presence of histological inflammation or diverticula at the resection margins. By multivariate analysis, only age > 71 years was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for stenosis (P = 0.0003, OR = 60.8, 95% CI: 6.4-575.5).

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic stenosis is a frequent, long-term complication following surgery for diverticular disease. An analysis demonstrated that age is a risk factor for colorectal stenosis and that histological inflammation and the presence of diverticula near/at the resection margins have no effect on the incidence of stenosis.

Transanal ileoproctostomy is feasible in human cadavers

AIM

An ileorectal bypass performed entirely through a transanal route has recently been described in an animal model. The present study aimed to demonstrate its technical feasibility in four human cadavers.

METHOD

A transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) device and endoscopic instruments were used. The principal steps of the procedure included insertion of the TEM device, rectostomy above the peritoneal reflection, peritoneoscopy using a standard gastroscope and delivery of the small bowel through the proctostomy to perform an anastomosis.

RESULTS

The procedure was successfully completed using transanal access in all cases. The mean procedure time was 90 min. The bypass was patent, and the anastomosis between the intraperitoneal rectum and the terminal ileum was leakproof.

CONCLUSION

Transanal ileoproctostomy is technically feasible in human cadavers. The procedure may become an alternative to stoma formation in selected patients with colonic obstruction.